Radioembolization in the Setting of Systemic Therapies

2021 ◽  
Vol 38 (04) ◽  
pp. 472-478
Author(s):  
Tarub S. Mabud ◽  
Ryan Hickey

Abstract 90Yttrium (Y90) radioembolization has been shown to improve outcomes for primary and metastatic liver cancers, but there is limited understanding of the optimal timing and safety of combining systemic therapies with Y90 treatment. Both therapeutic effects and toxicities could be synergistic depending on the timing and dosing of different coadministration paradigms. In particular, patients with liver-only or liver-dominant metastatic disease progression are often on systemic therapy when referred to interventional radiology for consideration of Y90 treatment. Interventional radiologists are frequently asked to offer insight into whether or not to hold systemic therapy, and for how long, prior to and following transarterial therapy. This study reviews the current evidence regarding the timing and safety of systemic therapy with Y90 treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma, metastatic colorectal carcinoma, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, metastatic neuroendocrine tumors, and other hepatic metastases. A particular focus is placed on the timing, dosing, and toxicities of combined therapy.

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (15) ◽  
pp. 3682
Author(s):  
Raees Tonse ◽  
Martin C. Tom ◽  
Minesh P. Mehta ◽  
Manmeet S. Ahluwalia ◽  
Rupesh Kotecha

Brain metastasis (BM) represents a common complication of cancer, and in the modern era requires multi-modal management approaches and multi-disciplinary care. Traditionally, due to the limited efficacy of cytotoxic chemotherapy, treatment strategies are focused on local treatments alone, such as whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), and resection. However, the increased availability of molecular-based therapies with central nervous system (CNS) penetration now permits the individualized selection of tailored systemic therapies to be used alongside local treatments. Moreover, the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), with demonstrated CNS activity has further revolutionized the management of BM patients. The rapid introduction of these cancer therapeutics into clinical practice, however, has led to a significant dearth in the published literature about the optimal timing, sequencing, and combination of these systemic therapies along with SRS. This manuscript reviews the impact of tumor biology and molecular profiles on the management paradigm for BM patients and critically analyzes the current landscape of SRS, with a specific focus on integration with systemic therapy. We also discuss emerging treatment strategies combining SRS and ICIs, the impact of timing and the sequencing of these therapies around SRS, the effect of corticosteroids, and review post-treatment imaging findings, including pseudo-progression and radiation necrosis.


FEBS Journal ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eshak I. Bahbah ◽  
Christa Noehammer ◽  
Walter Pulverer ◽  
Martin Jung ◽  
Andreas Weinhäusel

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 3059
Author(s):  
Corrado Pelaia ◽  
Cecilia Calabrese ◽  
Eugenio Garofalo ◽  
Andrea Bruni ◽  
Alessandro Vatrella ◽  
...  

Among patients suffering from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) syndrome, one of the worst possible scenarios is represented by the critical lung damage caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2)-induced cytokine storm, responsible for a potentially very dangerous hyperinflammatory condition. Within such a context, interleukin-6 (IL-6) plays a key pathogenic role, thus being a suitable therapeutic target. Indeed, the IL-6-receptor antagonist tocilizumab, already approved for treatment of refractory rheumatoid arthritis, is often used to treat patients with severe COVID-19 symptoms and lung involvement. Therefore, the aim of this review article is to focus on the rationale of tocilizumab utilization in the SARS-CoV-2-triggered cytokine storm, as well as to discuss current evidence and future perspectives, especially with regard to ongoing trials referring to the evaluation of tocilizumab’s therapeutic effects in patients with life-threatening SARS-CoV-2 infection.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Won Jin Ho ◽  
Rossin Erbe ◽  
Ludmila Danilova ◽  
Zaw Phyo ◽  
Emma Bigelow ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The majority of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC) are diagnosed at the metastatic stage, and standard therapies have limited activity with a dismal 5-year survival rate of only 8%. The liver and lung are the most common sites of PDAC metastasis, and each have been differentially associated with prognoses and responses to systemic therapies. A deeper understanding of the molecular and cellular landscape within the tumor microenvironment (TME) metastasis at these different sites is critical to informing future therapeutic strategies against metastatic PDAC. Results By leveraging combined mass cytometry, immunohistochemistry, and RNA sequencing, we identify key regulatory pathways that distinguish the liver and lung TMEs in a preclinical mouse model of metastatic PDAC. We demonstrate that the lung TME generally exhibits higher levels of immune infiltration, immune activation, and pro-immune signaling pathways, whereas multiple immune-suppressive pathways are emphasized in the liver TME. We then perform further validation of these preclinical findings in paired human lung and liver metastatic samples using immunohistochemistry from PDAC rapid autopsy specimens. Finally, in silico validation with transfer learning between our mouse model and TCGA datasets further demonstrates that many of the site-associated features are detectable even in the context of different primary tumors. Conclusions Determining the distinctive immune-suppressive features in multiple liver and lung TME datasets provides further insight into the tissue specificity of molecular and cellular pathways, suggesting a potential mechanism underlying the discordant clinical responses that are often observed in metastatic diseases.


FACE ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 273250162110138
Author(s):  
Rebecca Knackstedt ◽  
Peter Taub ◽  
Gary Rogers ◽  
Brian Gastman

The mainstay of curative therapy for head and neck skin cancers relies upon surgery and/or radiation therapy. However, for some aggressive, non-resectable or recurrent tumors, systemic therapy is necessary. Recent emerging classes of drugs have shown to improve survival for high-risk, recurrent, and unresectable variants of these tumors. The goal of this paper is to review options for systemic therapies for head and neck skin cancers including melanoma, non-melanoma skin cancers and other rare and non-malignant tumors.


2021 ◽  
Vol 02 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inshia Begum ◽  
Fathima Murthuza ◽  
Juwairiya Syed Iqbaluddin ◽  
Hafsah Fatima Arsal

Background: The pandemic caused by Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), also known as Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Related Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), is believed to be one of the greatest threats to global health in the 21st century. Recent collective evidence has warranted Ruxolitinib as a potential agent in recovery. Ruxolitinib is a potent and selective inhibitor of Jack kinase (JAK) 1 and 2 with modest to marked selectivity against tyrosine kinase two and JAK3. Objective: The review aims to outline the current evidence regarding the repurposed treatment for COVID- 19 and give insight into the clinical trials. There has been considerable interest in introducing existing therapeutic agents against COVID-19 to reduce the severity of illness and ease the burden on public healthcare systems. Method: A literature search was conducted using keywords like ‘Ruxolitinib trial’ and ‘COVID-19 Ruxolitinib’ on PubMed, Google Scholar, Science Direct, and Cochrane databases to select research papers and articles on the topic published from January to October 2020. Inclusion criteria were restricted to articles on Ruxolitinib and COVID. In contrast, the exclusion criteria stipulated that any study done on COVID-19 involving a mixed treatment regimen with Ruxolitinib and other drug/s or any studies not pertinent to the purpose of the study would be omitted. Conclusion: Based on the successful outcomes of various researches conducted and clinical trials performed, the use of Ruxolitinib has shown significant improvement and faster clinical recovery among COVID-19 patients of varying severity of infection, advanced age, and multiple comorbidities. This review provides an overview of various such studies with their promising outcomes.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16161-e16161
Author(s):  
Sara Gottlieb ◽  
Ariel Gliksberg ◽  
Erik Schadde ◽  
Paul Kent

e16161 Background: Fibrolamellar carcinoma (FLC) is an exceedingly rare liver cancer affecting children and young adults without underlying liver disease. Complete surgical resection is the primary treatment option, but recurrence is common. There are currently no established systemic therapies. We have treated patients in both the neoadjuvant and adjuvant setting with three novel combination therapies: 5-fluorouracil/interferon/nivolumab (“Triple Therapy” or TT), gemcitabine/oxaliplatin/lenvatinib (GOL), and nivolumab/lenvatinib/quercetin (NLQ). The purpose of this study was to evaluate objective responses and tolerability of three multi-agent systemic therapies in the treatment of FLC. Methods: Data from all patients with FLC who received TT, GOL, or NLQ between May 2018 and February 2021 were reviewed. Patients who received a minimum of six cycles of systemic therapy with follow up scans at least two months after initiation were assessed based on objective response, survival, and toxicity. Results: Twenty-nine patients with FLC who were treated with novel multi-agent systemic therapy were evaluable based on the above criteria. Median age at start of treatment was 20 (7-52; 16F, 12M, 1 non-disclosed). Twenty-three patients received one combination therapy (13 TT, 8 GOL, 2 NLQ), five received two different lines (3 TT/NLQ, 2 TT/GOL), and one patient received all three novel combinations. Between our 29 patients, they had relapsed 36 total times, and 11 had already tried 2+ systemic therapies. Best RECIST 1.1 objective response (clinical remission + partial response) and tumor control rate (clinical remission + partial response + stable disease) were 58%/95%, 55%/100%, and 33%/83% for TT, GOL, and NLQ respectively. The median longest Progression Free Survival (PFS) on any novel multi-agent regimen was 9 months (2-29; 9.5 for TT, 7 for GOL, 6.5 for NLQ), with 18 patients still receiving the therapy extending their PFS. Of those with previous relapses, 56% have a PFS longer than their previous longest remission and 69% have a PFS longer than their previous shortest time to relapse. Half of patients with previous relapses are still receiving the treatment responsible for their longest PFS. Fever, chills, and nausea were the most common adverse effects experienced throughout all three regimens. Seven patients experienced 1+ grade 3 adverse event. There were no toxic deaths or organ failure. Two patients died as a result of disease; their longest PFS (1 on GOL, 1 on TT) were nine and 10 months. Conclusions: FLC is a devastating cancer with patients often relapsing even after successful surgical remission. There is a strong need for effective and tolerable systemic therapies for those with unresectable, relapsed, progressive, or metastatic disease. We have had promising results in treating FLC and prolonging survival with minimal toxicities using novel multi-agent regimens.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9032-9032
Author(s):  
Alexander E. Drilon ◽  
Oliver Gautschi ◽  
Benjamin Besse ◽  
Vivek Subbiah ◽  
Daniel Shao-Weng Tan ◽  
...  

9032 Background: Selpercatinib, a first-in-class highly selective, potent, CNS-active RET kinase inhibitor, is approved in multiple countries for treatment of RET fusion+ lung or thyroid cancers. Selpercatinib demonstrated durable antitumor activity in previously treated pts with RET fusion+ NSCLC in an ongoing Phase 1/2 trial, LIBRETTO-001 (Besse et al., ASCO 2021). Methods: Pts with RET fusion+ NSCLC enrolled in the global, multicenter, LIBRETTO-001 trial (NCT03157128; 16 countries, 89 sites). Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, duration of response, and safety. This post-hoc intrapatient analysis was based on a 30 March 2020 data cutoff date. Historical physician-reported best overall response (BOR) from last systemic therapy received prior to enrollment was compared with selpercatinib BOR by independent review committee per RECIST v1.1, with each patient serving as his/her own control. Results: In efficacy-evaluable pts (N = 218) who previously received platinum-based chemotherapy (chemo), median pt age was 61 years, the majority with ECOG of 0/1 (37%/61%), with a median of 2 (range: 1-15) prior systemic therapies. Overall, 57% of patients responded to selpercatinib while 16% responded to the immediate prior therapy. ORR improvements with selpercatinib were observed regardless of prior therapy: chemotherapy + immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) (57% vs 14%), single-agent ICI (48% vs 3%), or chemotherapy (58% vs 15%). A total of 108 patients (49%) did not respond to immediate prior therapy but responded to selpercatinib. Fewer patients had progressive disease as their BOR with selpercatinib (2%) compared to the immediate prior therapy (28%). The median duration of therapy for selpercatinib was notably extended compared with that of the immediate prior therapy (11.8 vs. 3.4 months, respectively). Conclusions: In pts with RET fusion+ NSCLC treated on LIBRETTO-001, systemic therapies administered prior to enrollment achieved less meaningful clinical benefit than selpercatinib. Selpercatinib demonstrated consistent efficacy regardless of the type of prior therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT03157128.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chun-Hung Lee ◽  
Guan-Hsiung Liaw ◽  
Wu-Chuan Yang ◽  
Yu-Hsin Liu

BACKGROUND Methamphetamine (MA) use disorder can cause various physical and psychological harms. Despite current evidence demonstrating the therapeutic effects of psychosocial interventions, finding an approach to increase patient adherence to treatment remains a real-world challenge. The rapid development of new technologies, such as mobile health (mHealth) systems, suggests the potential to provide real-time personalized care at any time and from any location, minimize barriers to treatment, maximize use, and promote the dissemination of accessible therapeutic tools in at-risk populations. OBJECTIVE Objectives of our study investigated the feasibility and effectiveness of implementing mHealth technology in the treatment of MA use disorder. METHODS The inclusion criteria were (a) a diagnosis of MA abuse or dependence as defined by the DSM-IV-TR (b) age between 18 and 65 years, (c) no initial diagnosis of severe physical or mental illness, such as schizophrenia or bipolar I disorder, at baseline of the survey, and (d) willingness to participate in standard outpatient treatment for 1 year. Participants were randomly allocated to either a mobile messaging–assisted treatment (MMAT) group which delivered relapse prevention and recovery skills or a control group following simple randomization procedures (computerized random numbers) without blinding. All participants were followed for 6 months. Treatment retention and results of monthly urine tests were analysed as outcome measures. Feasibility and participant satisfaction were also assessed based on patients’ experiences with MMAT. RESULTS 50 participants were allocated to MMAT group and 49 to control. The average retention was 142.42 ± 60.54 days for the MMAT group and 118.12 ± 73.41 days for the control group, with no significant differences between the two treatment groups (df = 1, p = .099). Compared with the control group, the MMAT group had fewer MA-positive urine samples (19.5% vs 29.6%, F = 9.116, p = .003). Moreover, the proportion of MA-positive urine samples was positively correlated with the frequency of MA use (r = .323, p = .001), severity of MA use disorder (r = 0.364, p < .001), and polysubstance use (r = .212, p = .035) and negatively correlated with readiness to change (r = -.330, p = .001). At 6-month follow-up, 55 participants who completed the study reported high satisfaction with receiving MMAT. There was no significant adverse effects reported. CONCLUSIONS Participants in this study diagnosed as having MA use had high adherence to MMAT, generally positive treatment outcomes, and favorable acceptance, which indicates that this type of intervention is feasible for individuals with MA use disorder. Therefore, this study supports the efficacy and feasibility of using mobile phones for treating people who use MA. Future studies should investigate MMAT’s ability to (a) engage patients in the assessment of their own symptoms and daily functioning, (b) increase patients’ self-awareness and self-management of symptoms, (c) improve patients’ ability to identify triggers and track their own disease progression, and (d) increase patients’ willingness to seek care when necessary. CLINICALTRIAL Study Registry: ISRCTN16586487 (https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN16586487)


Antioxidants ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 898
Author(s):  
Hanna Kletkiewicz ◽  
Maciej Klimiuk ◽  
Alina Woźniak ◽  
Celestyna Mila-Kierzenkowska ◽  
Karol Dokladny ◽  
...  

Oxygen free radicals have been implicated in brain damage after neonatal asphyxia. In the early phase of asphyxia/reoxygenation, changes in antioxidant enzyme activity play a pivotal role in switching on and off the cascade of events that can kill the neurons. Hypoxia/ischemia (H/I) forces the brain to activate endogenous mechanisms (e.g., antioxidant enzymes) to compensate for the lost or broken neural circuits. It is important to evaluate therapies to enhance the self-protective capacity of the brain. In animal models, decreased body temperature during neonatal asphyxia has been shown to increase cerebral antioxidant capacity. However, in preterm or severely asphyxiated newborns this therapy, rather than beneficial seems to be harmful. Thus, seeking new therapeutic approaches to prevent anoxia-induced complications is crucial. Pharmacotherapy with deferoxamine (DFO) is commonly recognized as a beneficial regimen for H/I insult. DFO, via iron chelation, reduces oxidative stress. It also assures an optimal antioxidant protection minimizing depletion of the antioxidant enzymes as well as low molecular antioxidants. In the present review, some aspects of recently acquired insight into the therapeutic effects of hypothermia and DFO in promoting neuronal survival after H/I are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document