Controlled III–V semiconductor cluster nucleation and epitaxial growth via electron‐beam lithography

1995 ◽  
Vol 66 (11) ◽  
pp. 1343-1345 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. W. Sleight ◽  
R. E. Welser ◽  
L. J. Guido ◽  
M. Amman ◽  
M. A. Reed
1996 ◽  
Vol 427 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Y. Yew ◽  
L. J. Chen ◽  
K. Nakamura

AbstractEpitaxial growth of NiSi2 on (111)Si inside 0.1-0.6 4m in size oxide openings prepared by electron beam lithography has been studied by field emission scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy and thin film stress measurement. Striking effects of size and shape of deep submicron oxide openings on the growth of NiSi2 epitaxy were observed. Epitaxial growth of NiSi2 of single orientation on (111)Si was found to occur at a temperature as low as 400 °C inside both contact holes and linear openings of 0.3. μm or smaller in size. Contact holes were found to be more effective in inducing the epitaxial growth of NiSi2 of single orientation than that of linear openings of the same size. The effects of size and shape of lateral confinement on the epitaxial growth of NiSi2 on (111)Si are correlated with the stress level inside oxide openings.


Author(s):  
L. D. Jackel

Most production electron beam lithography systems can pattern minimum features a few tenths of a micron across. Linewidth in these systems is usually limited by the quality of the exposing beam and by electron scattering in the resist and substrate. By using a smaller spot along with exposure techniques that minimize scattering and its effects, laboratory e-beam lithography systems can now make features hundredths of a micron wide on standard substrate material. This talk will outline sane of these high- resolution e-beam lithography techniques.We first consider parameters of the exposure process that limit resolution in organic resists. For concreteness suppose that we have a “positive” resist in which exposing electrons break bonds in the resist molecules thus increasing the exposed resist's solubility in a developer. Ihe attainable resolution is obviously limited by the overall width of the exposing beam, but the spatial distribution of the beam intensity, the beam “profile” , also contributes to the resolution. Depending on the local electron dose, more or less resist bonds are broken resulting in slower or faster dissolution in the developer.


2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (12) ◽  
pp. 126502
Author(s):  
Moataz Eissa ◽  
Takuya Mitarai ◽  
Tomohiro Amemiya ◽  
Yasuyuki Miyamoto ◽  
Nobuhiko Nishiyama

1999 ◽  
Vol 35 (15) ◽  
pp. 1283 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Michel ◽  
E. Lavallée ◽  
J. Beauvais ◽  
J. Mouine

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Goncharsky ◽  
Anton Goncharsky ◽  
Dmitry Melnik ◽  
Svyatoslav Durlevich

AbstractThis paper focuses on the development of flat diffractive optical elements (DOEs) for protecting banknotes, documents, plastic cards, and securities against counterfeiting. A DOE is a flat diffractive element whose microrelief, when illuminated by white light, forms a visual image consisting of several symbols (digits or letters), which move across the optical element when tilted. The images formed by these elements are asymmetric with respect to the zero order. To form these images, the microrelief of a DOE must itself be asymmetric. The microrelief has a depth of ~ 0.3 microns and is shaped with an accuracy of ~ 10–15 nm using electron-beam lithography. The DOEs developed in this work are securely protected against counterfeiting and can be replicated hundreds of millions of times using standard equipment meant for the mass production of relief holograms.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document