The Roman Baths at Wallsend

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-2
Author(s):  
Peter Davenport
Keyword(s):  
2017 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. 37-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faith S. Williams ◽  
Theo Arnold-Foster ◽  
Hui-Yuan Yeh ◽  
Marissa L. Ledger ◽  
Jan Baeten ◽  
...  

1977 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. 63-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Mitchell

Even a hurried glance at the walls of the Byzantine citadel, or a rapid inspection of the material collected by the Ankara Archaeological Museum at the depot in the Roman baths is enough to show that Ankara contains a richer collection of Greek and Latin inscriptions than almost any other city of the Anatolian plateau. A long sequence of epigraphic publications stretches back to 1555 when the companions of Augier Ghiselin de Busbecq, ambassador to the court of Suleiman the Magnificent, made the first copy of the Res Gestae, inscribed on the walls of the temple of Rome and Augustus. Since then a succession of travellers and epigraphists has added to the total of known inscriptions, and even if none of their discoveries can rank beside the record which the first emperor published of his life and actions, many of them are of considerable importance both for the history of Ancyra itself and in the wider context of the Roman Empire and the Byzantine world.However, any general study of these inscriptions and their historical implications has been hampered by the fact that they are scattered in a wide range of publications, many of them difficult to obtain. This situation has been partially remedied by Professor E. Bosch's Quellen zur Geschichte der Stadt Ankara im Altertum, completed in its essentials by 1945, but only published after the author's death by the TTK press in Ankara in 1967. This contains a large proportion of the source material relevant to the city's history from its earliest appearance in the classical sources to the age of Constantine, accompanied by a commentary in German. However, despite its usefulness, the book has not fulfilled the need for a full corpus of the city's inscriptions.


Britannia ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 50 ◽  
pp. 13-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giacomo Savani

ABSTRACTIn this paper, I investigate how eighteenth-century antiquarians engaged with the remains of Roman bath buildings in Britain and discuss their multifaceted attitude towards the ancient practice of bathing, with a focus on the city of Bath. I also examine the interests and priorities of Georgian scholars in studying Roman baths and their structure, highlighting their sometimes uncritical use of Classical sources and tracking the origins of their misconceptions regarding the components and function of these facilities. Finally, I briefly address the elusive socio-cultural legacy of Roman baths and bathing in eighteenth-century Britain, stressing influences and differences in practice and architecture.


2020 ◽  
Vol 33 ◽  
pp. 147-168
Author(s):  
Sadi Maréchal

Roman-style bathhouses are often used as markers to study processes of ‘Romanisation’, or, more generally, the spread of a Roman way of life throughout newly conquered regions. The building type, with its characteristic hypocaust system and pools, was a foreign element in regions unacquainted with communal bathing. However, to assume that these buildings were introduced and spread as a ‘package’, with the standard sequence of rooms and accompanying technology, would be oversimplifying a complex phenomenon of acceptance, rejection and adaptation. Since Roman baths are too often perceived as a mainly urban phenomenon, regions on the fringes of the empire with low levels of urbanisation, including the northern provinces, have been excluded from most seminal works.1 The present paper aims to examine a corpus of baths in NW Gaul from between the 1st and early 4th c. (i.e., the period between the first villa constructions and their abandonment following Germanic invasions) in order to challenge idées fixes2 that their plans were rigid and standardised and that most were in urban settings.


Archaeologia ◽  
1926 ◽  
Vol 75 ◽  
pp. 1-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. H. Knowles

The town or settlement of ancient Aquae Sulis comprised an area of less than thirty acres. It was encircled on three sides by the river Avon, and almost surrounded by the lofty outliers of Cotswold and Mendip. The situation was an attractive one, and singularly appropriate for the important structures contained within the walled area. The baths occupied a central position in the town, and were in length at least one-third of its width from east to west.


Author(s):  
Antónimo González Blanco ◽  
Manuel Amante Sánchez ◽  
Ph. Rahtz ◽  
L. Watts

Se expone el estado de la cuestión en el estudio del termalismo de la Región de IVIurcia con particular atención a la época romana. Se centra el tema en la investigación del balneario de Fortuna y en las nuevas perspectivas que para el tema lia ofrecido el descubrimiento de una parte interesante del yacimiento romano del lugar cuyas excavaciones se describen: se trata de un edificio de considerable entidad cuya estructura todavía apenas queda especificada, pero que se espera aclarar con el avance de las investigaciones arqueológicas. Se plantean los nuevos horizontes que este descubrimiento crea para la interpretación del conjunto epigráfico de la Cueva Negra, cuyos tituli picti adquieren consistencia y se sitúan en una nueva dimensión intelectual al ponerlos en relación con la vida del balneario.The situation of the research on thermalism in the Región of Murcia, with particular attention paid to the Román period, are set forth in this article. The exposition centers on the research carried out in the baths of Fortuna and on the new perspectivas oponed by the discovery, in the Román part of the site, of a large building which structure only dates partly determined. The authors explain the new horizon which this discovery offers towards the interpretation of the epigraphical collection found in the Cueva Negra, whose tituli picti acquire consistency and they are situated in a new intelectual dimensión when they are related to the livelihood of the Román Baths.


2001 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 121
Author(s):  
Kathleen Coleman ◽  
Garrett G. Fagan ◽  
Stephan Busch
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document