Trends and Epidemiology of Knee Extensor Mechanism Injuries Presenting to United States Emergency Departments from 2001 to 2020

Author(s):  
Joseph G. Lyons ◽  
Humza M. Mian ◽  
Garrhett G. Via ◽  
David A. Brueggeman ◽  
Anil B. Krishnamurthy
Author(s):  
Tishya L. Wren ◽  
Veronica Beltran ◽  
Mia J. Katzel ◽  
Adriana S. Conrad-Forrest ◽  
Curtis D. VandenBerg

Iliotibial band autograft is an increasingly popular option for pediatric anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The purpose of this study was to compare recovery of knee extensor mechanism function among pediatric patients who underwent ACLR using iliotibial band (IT), hamstring tendon (HT), quadriceps tendon (QT), and patellar tendon (PT) autografts. One hundred forty-five pediatric athletes (76 female; age 15.0, range 7–21 years) with recent (3–18 months) unilateral ACLR performed drop-jump landing and 45° cutting with 3D motion capture. Knee extensor mechanism function (maximum knee flexion angle, maximum internal knee extensor moment, energy absorption at knee) during the loading phase (foot contact to peak knee flexion) was compared among graft types (20 IT, 29 HT, 39 QT, 57 PT) and sides (ACLR or contralateral) using linear mixed models with sex, age, and time since surgery as covariates. Overall, knee flexion was significantly lower on the operated vs. contralateral side for HT, QT, and PT during both tasks (p < 0.03). All graft types exhibited lower knee extensor moments and energy absorption on the operated side during both movements (p ≤ 0.001). Kinetic asymmetry was significantly lower for IT compared with QT and PT during both movements (p ≤ 0.005), and similar patterns were observed for HT vs. QT and PT (p ≤ 0.07). Asymmetry was similar between IT and HT and between QT and PT. This study found that knee extensor mechanism function recovers fastest in pediatric ACLR patients with IT autografts, followed by HT, in comparison to QT and PT, suggesting that IT is a viable option for returning young athletes to play after ACLR.


Injury ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (12) ◽  
pp. 2793-2799 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Serino ◽  
Amin Mohamadi ◽  
Sebastian Orman ◽  
Brian McCormick ◽  
Philip Hanna ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Erhan Okay ◽  
Mehmet Cenk Turgut ◽  
Abbas Tokyay

Quadriceps ruptures are one of the pathological conditions of the knee extensor mechanism, accounting for 3% of all tendon injuries. These injuries cause substantial disability of the extensor mechanism. Primary repair is the treatment of choice in acute presentation. In the setting of chronic conditions, the treatment becomes more challenging. Available surgical options include lengthening procedures, and reconstruction with auto graft or allografts. The traditional Scuderi and Codivilla techniques are challenging to perform in degenerative or traumatic retracted ruptures. There is no standard effective treatment in these patients, which yields the best clinical and biomechanical outcomes. An 18 - year-old male patient with quadriceps re-rupture after a primary repair was managed with allograft reconstruction using suture anchors. At six years of follow-up, the patient gained a full range of motion with excellent clinical outcomes. He returned to his previous work. In conclusion, quadriceps reconstruction using suture anchor and Achilles allograft combination is a feasible technique in neglected cases who present with quadriceps tendon re-rupture after primary surgical repair.


2015 ◽  
Vol 68 (5) ◽  
pp. 729-735 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian Fischer ◽  
Silke Soimaru ◽  
Tobias Hirsch ◽  
Maximilian Kueckelhaus ◽  
Christoph Seitz ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
pp. 659-661
Author(s):  
Rodrigo Pires Albuquerque ◽  
Vincenzo Giordano ◽  
Maria Isabel Pires Albuquerque ◽  
Antonio Carlos Pires Carvalho ◽  
Ney Pecegueiro do Amaral ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 215 (2) ◽  
pp. 198-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas D. O’Brien ◽  
Neil D. Reeves ◽  
Vasilios Baltzopoulos ◽  
David A. Jones ◽  
Constantinos N. Maganaris

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document