The clinical utility of next-generation sequencing for bone and soft tissue sarcoma

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Charles A. Gusho ◽  
Mia C. Weiss ◽  
Linus Lee ◽  
Steven Gitelis ◽  
Alan T. Blank ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. 153303382110689
Author(s):  
Gu Jin ◽  
Chunyang Wang ◽  
Dongdong Jia ◽  
Wenkang Qian ◽  
Chunming Yin ◽  
...  

Background: Next generation sequencing (NGS) has systematically investigated the genomic landscape of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) in Western patients, but few reports have described the utility of NGS in identifying pathogenic and targetable mutations in Asian patients. Methods: We review our single center experience of identifying the genomic profile and feasible genetic mutations in 65 Chinese patients with STS by NGS. Results: On average, 3.35 mutations were identified per patient (range, 0-28), and at least one mutation could be detected in 95.4% (62/65) of patients. TP53, MDM2, CDK4, KDR, and NF1 were the most frequent mutation genes in Chinese STS patients. Actionable mutations were discovered in 36.9% (24/65) of patients, and clinical benefit was achieved in 4 patients treated with corresponding molecular targeted therapies. Conclusions: Our study describes the mutation profile of Chinese STS patients by a single center experience. Some patients have achieved improved clinical outcomes by adopting treatment based on the results of genetic testing. NGS may affect clinical decision-making as a routine clinical test for patients with STS.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e22005-e22005
Author(s):  
Suying Lu ◽  
Feifei Sun ◽  
Xiuli Yuan ◽  
Junting Huang ◽  
Juan Wang ◽  
...  

e22005 Background: To uncover the genomic characteristics as well as to, within the scope of pediatric soft tissue sarcoma (psts), assess the clinical value of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS), we present the first report of genomic profiles in Chinese psts. Methods: Tumor tissue, as well as peripheral blood from 41 psts patients, were collected in Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Shenzhen Children's Hospital and Nanfang Hospital. Samples were sequenced in a CLIA/CAP-accredited laboratory with a targeted NGS panel (Onco PanScan plus; GenetronHealth.inc) consisted of all exons of 831 cancer-related genes and mRNA of 395 genes. Bioinformatics analysis was conducted using a build-in computational pipeline. Results: A total of 41 samples consisted of five major histology types including rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) (n = 11), fibrosarcoma (n = 4), Ewing's sarcoma (n = 4), INI1-deficient mesenchymal tumor (n = 4), and other mesenchymal tumors (n = 18). All patients were with doubtful diagnosis,advanced, relapsed, or refractory sarcoma, of which 85% samples were from initial diagnoses. In totally, we identified 116 somatic aberrations and 4 pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline mutations, with a median tumor mutational burden of 0.47/Mb (0–6.57). Genomic analysis revealed frequent alterations in TP53 (10%), NTRK fusion (10%), PAX3/7 fusion (8%), and ARID1A (7%). ARID1A (18% vs. 0%) and TP53 (18% vs. 3%) mutations were found with higher frequency compared with pediatric RMS data in a previous study (Jack et al 2014). ARID1A mutation was only reported in a RMS case report (Cramer et al 2017). Furthermore, the mutation of ARID1A potentially match PARP inhibitors, which may provide more therapeutic options. In addition, NGS aided pathologic diagnosis in 63% (26/41) patients. The proportion of confirmed diagnosis, differential diagnosis, and the excluded diagnosis was 41.5%, 12.2%, and 9.7%, respectively. Druggable alterations were detected in 39% patients (Table). Four patients received the treatment recommended by genetic testing, three of them with NTRK fusion were recruited in a matched clinical trial could be evaluated and showed partial remission upon Larotrectinib. Conclusions: We discovered ARID1A mutations, which potentially sensitive to PARP-inhibition, were at a higher incidence in Chinese RMS. This study demonstrated the value of NGS test in guiding the clinical practice of psts in Chinese population. [Table: see text]


2020 ◽  
Vol 61 (11) ◽  
pp. 2568-2583 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincent Pillonel ◽  
Darius Juskevicius ◽  
Michel Bihl ◽  
Frank Stenner ◽  
Jörg P. Halter ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junmei Fan ◽  
Li Wang ◽  
Hui Wang ◽  
Minyue Ma ◽  
Shufang Wang ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e22127-e22127
Author(s):  
Urvashi Bahadur ◽  
Aarthi Ravichandran ◽  
Shataparna Banerjee ◽  
Shreya Paliwal ◽  
Roopa Rayanur Sripathi ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e24199-e24199
Author(s):  
Navid Sadri ◽  
Tyler E Miller ◽  
Michael Yang ◽  
Afshin Dowlati ◽  
Judah D. Friedman ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. E. Bunnell ◽  
C. A. Garby ◽  
E. J. Pearson ◽  
S. A. Walker ◽  
L. E. Panos ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document