A retrospective investigation of the added clinical value of SCT symptoms on neuropsychological assessments in youth with ADHD

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Marc Barakat ◽  
Rasha Mashmoushi ◽  
George Oghgassian ◽  
Wael Shamseddeen
2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 336-336
Author(s):  
Ludwig Rinnab ◽  
Norbert M. Blumstein ◽  
Felix M. Mottaghy ◽  
Sven N. Reske ◽  
Richard E. Hautmann ◽  
...  

VASA ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 429-438 ◽  
Author(s):  
Berent ◽  
Sinzinger

Based upon various platelet function tests and the fact that patients experience vascular events despite taking acetylsalicylic acid (ASA or aspirin), it has been suggested that patients may become resistant to the action of this pharmacological compound. However, the term “aspirin resistance” was created almost two decades ago but is still not defined. Platelet function tests are not standardized, providing conflicting information and cut-off values are arbitrarily set. Intertest comparison reveals low agreement. Even point of care tests have been introduced before appropriate validation. Inflammation may activate platelets, co-medication(s) may interfere significantly with aspirin action on platelets. Platelet function and Cox-inhibition are only some of the effects of aspirin on haemostatic regulation. One single test is not reliable to identify an altered response. Therefore, it may be more appropriate to speak about “treatment failure” to aspirin therapy than using the term “aspirin resistance”. There is no evidence based justification from either the laboratory or the clinical point of view for platelet function testing in patients taking aspirin as well as from an economic standpoint. Until evidence based data from controlled studies will be available the term “aspirin resistance” should not be further used. A more robust monitoring of factors resulting in cardiovascular events such as inflammation is recommended.


1986 ◽  
Vol 25 (06) ◽  
pp. 235-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Lander ◽  
M. Bahlo ◽  
R. Montz ◽  
R. Klapdor

The effects of radioimmunotherapy were tested in xenografts of 2 different human pancreatic carcinomas comparing the intravenous and intratumoral application. On principle, intravenous injections of high doses of 131l-anti- Ca 19-9 or -BW 494/32 may inhibit tumor growth. In view of the low direct radiation dose (360-2100 rad), however, other factors than direct toxic effects have to be discussed, e. g. systemic effects due to the high whole-body irradiation. Intratumoral application, however, may induce tumor regression or growth inhibition due to the high local irradiation dose. Consequently, this treatment modality might be of clinical value at least in some patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document