scholarly journals Models of mental health problems: a quasi-systematic review of theoretical approaches

2022 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Dirk Richter ◽  
Jeremy Dixon
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dirk Richter ◽  
Jeremy Dixon

Background Mental health and mental illness have been contested concepts for decades, with a wide variety of models of mental health problems being proposed. To date, there has been no exhaustive review which provides an overview of existing models.Methods We conducted a systematic review of theoretical models of mental health problems. We searched academic databases, reference lists and an electronic bookshop for literature that proposed, endorsed, reviewed or critiqued such models. Papers, book chapters and books were included with material by researchers, clinicians, non-medical professions and service users writing between 2000 to June 2020 being considered. A quality appraisal could not be provided due to the theoretical content of publications. The study was registered with the Open Science Framework (No. osf.io/r3tjx). FindingsOn the basis of 110 publications we identified 34 different models which were grouped into five broader categories. Many models aimed to bridge two or more categories. Biological and psychological approaches had the largest number of models while social, consumer and cultural models were less diversified. InterpretationIn addition to established theories, we found a large number of new theoretical approaches, most stemming from academic fields. From an epistemological perspective, we could not find criteria that advance scientific models over non-scientific approaches, identifying the need for approaches by non-medical professionals and service users to be considered. Due to the non-empirical nature of the publications, several limitations in terms of search and quality appraisal apply.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela Monroy-Fraustro ◽  
Isaac Maldonado-Castellanos ◽  
Mónica Aboites-Molina ◽  
Susana Rodríguez ◽  
Perla Sueiras ◽  
...  

Background: A non-pharmaceutical treatment offered as psychological support is bibliotherapy, which can be described as the process of reading, reflecting, and discussing literature to further a cognitive shift. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic demands a response to prevent a peak in the prevalence of mental health problems and to avoid the collapse of mental health services, which are scarce and inaccessible due to the pandemic. Thus, this study aimed to review articles on the effectiveness of bibliotherapy on different mental health problems.Methods: A systematic review was conducted to examine relevant studies that assess the effectiveness of bibliotherapy in different clinical settings as a treatment capable of enhancing a sense of purpose and its surrounding values. To achieve this, a systematic review, including a bioethical meta-analysis, was performed. A variant of the PICO (Participants, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome) model was used for the search strategy, and the systematic review was conducted in three databases: PubMed, Bireme, and OVID. Inclusion criteria were relevant studies that included the keywords, excluding documents with irrelevant topics, studies on subjects 15 years or younger, and in languages besides Spanish or English. Starting with 707 studies, after three rounds of different quality criteria, 13 articles were selected for analysis, including a hermeneutic analysis, which was followed by a fourth and final recovery round assessing bibliotherapy articles concerning healthcare workers.Results: Our findings showed that through bibliotherapy, patients developed several capacities, including the re-signification of their own activities through a new outlook of their moral horizon. There are no research road maps serving as guides to conduct research on the use of bibliotherapy to enhance mental health. Additionally, values such as autonomy and justice were closely linked with positive results in bibliotherapy. This implies that bibliotherapy has the potential to have a positive impact in different settings.Conclusions: Our contribution is to offer a road map that presents state-of-the-art bibliotherapy research, which will assist institutions and healthcare professionals to plan clinical and specific interventions with positive outcomes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document