Deep seismic reflections near the SG4 borehole, central Urals

1993 ◽  
Vol 115 (4) ◽  
pp. 315-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Juhlin ◽  
D. G. Gee ◽  
S. Kashubin ◽  
A. Rybalka ◽  
T. Hismatulin
Geophysics ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 66 (6) ◽  
pp. 1838-1842 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. M. Schmeissner ◽  
K. T. Spikes ◽  
D. W. Steeples

Ultrashallow seismic reflection surveys require dense spatial sampling during data acquisition, which increases their cost. In previous efforts to find ways to reduce these costs, we connected geophones rigidly to pieces of channel iron attached to a farm implement. This method allowed us to plant the geophones in the ground quickly and automatically. The rigidly interconnected geophones used in these earlier studies detected first‐arrival energy along with minor interfering seismic modes, but they did not detect seismic reflections. To examine further the feasibility of developing rigid geophone emplacement systems to detect seismic reflections, we experimented with four pieces of channel iron, each 2.7 m long and 10 cm wide. Each segment was equipped with 18 geophones rigidly attached to the channel iron at 15‐cm intervals, and the spikes attached to all 18 geophones were pushed into the ground simultaneously. The geophones detected both refracted and reflected energy; however, no significant signal distortion or interference attributable to the rigid coupling of the geophones to the channel iron was observed in the data. The interfering seismic modes mentioned from the previous experiments were not detected, nor was any P‐wave propagation noted within the channel iron. These results show promise for automating and reducing the cost of ultrashallow seismic reflection and refraction surveys.


2014 ◽  
Vol 456 (1) ◽  
pp. 563-566 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. A. Sherendo ◽  
V. Ya. Mitrofanov ◽  
P. S. Martyshko ◽  
V. A. Vazhenin ◽  
L. A. Pamyatnykh ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 216 (4) ◽  
pp. 693-702 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Thybo ◽  
A.R Ross ◽  
A.V Egorkin

Geophysics ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 53 (7) ◽  
pp. 894-902 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruhi Saatçilar ◽  
Nezihi Canitez

Amplitude‐ and frequency‐modulated wave motion constitute the ground‐roll noise in seismic reflection prospecting. Hence, it is possible to eliminate ground roll by applying one‐dimensional, linear frequency‐modulated matched filters. These filters effectively attenuate the ground‐roll energy without damaging the signal wavelet inside or outside the ground roll’s frequency interval. When the frequency bands of seismic reflections and ground roll overlap, the new filters eliminate the ground roll more effectively than conventional frequency and multichannel filters without affecting the vertical resolution of the seismic data.


2006 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 527-531 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gennady Goloshubin ◽  
Connie Van Schuyver ◽  
Valeri Korneev ◽  
Dmitry Silin ◽  
Vjacheslav Vingalov

1995 ◽  
Vol 100 (B7) ◽  
pp. 12895-12906 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Casey Moore ◽  
Gregory F. Moore ◽  
Guy R. Cochrane ◽  
Harold J. Tobin

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document