Adverse reactions related to proton pump inhibitors in pediatric population: an analysis of spontaneous reporting data

Author(s):  
Valeria Dipasquale ◽  
Giuseppe Cicala ◽  
Francesca Laganà ◽  
Paola Cutroneo ◽  
Patrizia Felicetti ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. CGast.S9588 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheryl Durand ◽  
Kristine C. Willett ◽  
Alicia R. Desilets

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are among the most common classes of medications prescribed. Though they were previously thought of as safe, recent literature has shown risks associated with their use including increased risk for Clostridium difficile infection, pneumonia, and fractures. Due to these risks, it is important to determine if PPIs are being used appropriately. This review evaluates seven studies in hospitalized patients. Additionally, this review evaluates literature pertaining to recently discovered adverse reactions; all studies found PPIs are being overutilized. Findings highlight the importance of evaluating appropriate therapy with these agents and recommending discontinuation if a proper indication does not exist.


2020 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. S147-S148
Author(s):  
A.U. Mishuk ◽  
L. Chen ◽  
P. Gaillard ◽  
S.C. Westrick ◽  
R.A. Hansen ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
P CUTRONEO ◽  
G POLIMENI ◽  
R CURCURUTO ◽  
G CALAPAI ◽  
A CAPUTI

2021 ◽  
pp. 106002802110392
Author(s):  
Xuejiao Xun ◽  
Qifan Yin ◽  
Yuhao Fu ◽  
Xueru He ◽  
Zhanjun Dong

Background: Some studies suggested an increased risk of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) among proton pump inhibitors (PPI) users. However, the published evidence is inadequate to define the association between PPI use and the risk of CAP. Objective: The aims of our meta-analysis were to systematically assess the association between the risk of CAP and PPI use in adults to reduce the adverse effects of PPI and ensure the safety of medication for patients. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted, published between January 1, 2004, and February 1, 2021. The primary outcome was the incidence of CAP. This meta-analysis was performed using odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs as effective measures; 13 studies including 2 098 804 patients were enrolled in our meta-analysis. Results: Our study revealed that the incidence of CAP was higher in PPI users than non -PPI users [OR = 1.37 (95% CI = 1.22–1.53)], especially for PPI duration < 30 days [OR = 1.49 (95% CI = 1.34–1.66)]. Compared with non-PPI use, PPI use increased the incidence of CAP in the stroke disease population [OR = 1.52 (95% CI = 1.33–1.75)], but not in the liver disease population [OR = 1.13 (95% CI = 0.98–1.30)]. Conclusions and Relevance: Using PPI could increase the risk of CAP when compared to not using PPI. PPI use increased the incidence of CAP in patients with stroke. Clinicians and clinical pharmacists should weigh the benefits before medication and strictly control the indication of the prescription, so as to reduce adverse reactions.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-27
Author(s):  
Dyêggo Carvalho Amorim ◽  
Matheus Pontes Parente Travassos ◽  
Igor Torres Dias ◽  
Hermano Queiroz Gurgel ◽  
Carlos Agusto Oliveira Meneses ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. A655-A656
Author(s):  
H NAKAMURA ◽  
H YOSHIYAMA ◽  
H YANAI ◽  
M SHIRAL ◽  
T NAKAZAWA ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. 139
Author(s):  
Muhammad Mahmood ◽  
Andrew Kinch ◽  
Woodall Brittany ◽  
Ayman Elkadry

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. 157-158
Author(s):  
Franco Vallejo Garcia ◽  
Melissa Sum

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document