The emotion word fluency test as an embedded performance validity indicator – Alone and in a multivariate validity composite

Author(s):  
Christopher A. Abeare ◽  
Kelly An ◽  
Brad Tyson ◽  
Matthew Holcomb ◽  
Laura Cutler ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 39 (8) ◽  
pp. 738-752 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher A. Abeare ◽  
Sabrina Freund ◽  
Kristen Kaploun ◽  
Tara McAuley ◽  
Claudiu Dumitrescu

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher A. Abeare ◽  
Sabrina Freund ◽  
Kristen Kaploun ◽  
Tara McAuley ◽  
Claudiu Dumitrescu

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-49
Author(s):  
Heni Gerda Pesau ◽  
Gilles Van Luijtelaar

Changes from traditional face-to-face to internet-delivered psychological assessment are urgently needed giventhe long-lasting pandemic, the general need for fast and efficient tests and test procedures, and easier availabilityand access for test-takers in remote settings. We used a quasi-experimental non-randomized group design for thecomparison of two word fluency test procedures: one traditional that is face-to-face (n = 30) and one supervisedvia internet (n = 30). Participants were 17-31 years, education level high school and Bachelor. The letters S, K, Twere used for the phonemic fluency test, for the emotion word fluency test subjects had to generate words relatedto subjective emotional feelings or the expression of emotions. The results showed that traditional administeredand internet-delivered testing are equivalent (our hypothesis) as seen from the absence of significant differencesbetween the two groups in the performances of all four word fluency tests (p > .05) and small effect sizes (Cohen’sd range < .5). Significant correlations were found between the fluency tasks, irrespective of the way of testadministration (p < .05). It can be concluded that the word fluency tasks can be assessed by supervised internet-delivered testing, but this is limited to a sample of young adults.


1992 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 223-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hisaaki Saito ◽  
Motoichiro Kato ◽  
Haruo Kashima ◽  
Masahiro Asai ◽  
Hideo Hosaki

2006 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 327-333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aiko Osawa ◽  
Shinichiro Maeshima ◽  
Jun Tanemura ◽  
Eri Sekiguchi ◽  
Toru Itakura

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document