scholarly journals Screening of waterflooding, hot waterflooding and steam injection for extra heavy crude oil production from Tatarstan oilfield

2021 ◽  
Vol 931 (1) ◽  
pp. 012002
Author(s):  
A Pituganova ◽  
I Minkhanov ◽  
A Bolotov ◽  
M Varfolomeev

Abstract Thermal enhanced oil recovery techniques, especially steam injection, are the most successful techniques for extra heavy crude oil reservoirs. Steam injection and its variations are based on the decrease in oil viscosity with increasing temperature. The main objective of this study is the development of advanced methods for the production of extra heavy crude oil in the oilfield of the Republic of Tatarstan. The filtration experiment was carried out on a bulk model of non-extracted core under reservoir conditions. The experiment involves the injection of slugs of fresh water, hot water and steam. At the stage of water injection, no oil production was observed while during steam injection recovery factor (RF) achieved 13.4 % indicating that fraction of immobile oil and non-vaporizing residual components is high and needed to be recovered by steam assisted EORs.

Processes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 1009
Author(s):  
Luisana Cardona ◽  
Oscar E. Medina ◽  
Santiago Céspedes ◽  
Sergio H. Lopera ◽  
Farid B. Cortés ◽  
...  

This work focuses on evaluating the effect of the steam quality on the upgrading and recovering extra-heavy crude oil in the presence and absence of two nanofluids. The nanofluids AlNi1 and AlNi1Pd1 consist of 500 mg·L−1 of alumina doped with 1.0% in mass fraction of Ni (AlNi1) and alumina doped with 1.0% in mass fraction of Ni and Pd (AlNi1Pd1), respectively, and 1000 mg·L−1 of tween 80 surfactant. Displacement tests are done in different stages, including (i) basic characterization, (ii) waterflooding, (iii) steam injection at 0.5 quality, (iv) steam injection at 1.0 quality, (v) batch injection of nanofluids, and (vi) steam injection after nanofluid injection at 0.5 and 1.0 qualities. The steam injection is realized at 210 °C, the reservoir temperature is fixed at 80 °C, and pore and overburden pressure at 1.03 MPa (150 psi) and 5.51 MPa (800 psi), respectively. After the steam injection at 0.5 and 1.0 quality, oil recovery is increased 3.0% and 7.0%, respectively, regarding the waterflooding stage, and no significant upgrade in crude oil is observed. Then, during the steam injection with nanoparticles, the AlNi1 and AlNi1Pd1 increase the oil recovery by 20.0% and 13.0% at 0.5 steam quality. Meanwhile, when steam is injected at 1.0 quality for both nanoparticles evaluated, no incremental oil is produced. The crude oil is highly upgraded for the AlNi1Pd1 system, reducing oil viscosity 99%, increasing the American Petroleum Institute (API)° from 6.9° to 13.3°, and reducing asphaltene content 50% at 0.5 quality. It is expected that this work will eventually help understand the appropriate conditions in which nanoparticles should be injected in a steam injection process to improve its efficiency in terms of oil recovery and crude oil quality.


2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 141-146
Author(s):  
Redaksi Tim Jurnal

rom EEOR, Electro Enhanced Oil Recovery, and a developing technology application which has been established earlier. The difference is ESOR relatively does not improve recovery factor of producing well. Ideally any crude oil producing well will be experiencing pressure decline which may affect crude oil production decrement, naturally. Regarding some similar researches around the world, the use of direct current electrical exposure was proven to increase number of heavy crude oil production. At least salinity, hydrocarbon chemical compounds and crude oil flow in the reservoir (electro-osmosis) involves during chemical processes in the reservoir while ESOR application. Number of electrons conducted from direct current electrical power supply will be a supporting media during chemical process of these parameters. Unfortunately after completing ESOR application in Lapangan X, the result was contradictive with this research hypothesis. Exposure of direct current electrical supply did not increased heavy crude oil production. On a contrary, parameter of salinity and API gravity as produced heavy crude oil quality, were improving significantly.


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. M. Shuwa ◽  
R. S. Al-Hajri ◽  
A. Mohsenzadeh ◽  
Y. M. Al-Waheibi ◽  
B. Y. Jibril

Fuel ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 89 (5) ◽  
pp. 1095-1100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shadi W. Hasan ◽  
Mamdouh T. Ghannam ◽  
Nabil Esmail

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. L. Delgadillo-Aya ◽  
M.L.. L. Trujillo-Portillo ◽  
J.M.. M. Palma-Bustamante ◽  
E.. Niz-Velasquez ◽  
C. L. Rodríguez ◽  
...  

Abstract Software tools are becoming an important ally in making decisions on the development or implementation of an enhanced oil recovery processes from the technical, financial or risk point of view. This work, can be manually developed in some cases, but becomes more efficient and precise with the help of these tools. In Ecopetrol was developed a tool to make technical and economic evaluation of enhanced oil recovery processes such as air injection, both cyclic and continuous steam injection, and steam assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) and hot water injection. This evaluation is performed using different types of analysis as binary screening, analogies, benchmarking, and prediction using analytical models and financial and risk analysis. All these evaluations are supported by a comprehensive review that has allowed initially find favorable conditions for different recovery methods evaluated, and get a probability of success based on this review. Subsequently, according to the method can be used different prediction methods, given an idea of the process behavior for a given period. Based on the prediction results, it is possible to feed the software to generate a financial assessment process, in line with cash flow previously developed that incorporates all the elements to be considered during the implementation of a project. This allows for greater support to the choice or not the application of a method. Finally the tool to evaluate the levels of risks that outlines the development of the project based on the existing internal methodology in the company, identifying the main and level of criticality and define actions for prevention, mitigation and risk elimination.


1983 ◽  
Vol 23 (06) ◽  
pp. 937-945 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ching H. Wu ◽  
Robert B. Elder

Abstract Steam distillation can occur in reservoirs during steam injection and in-situ combustion processes. To estimate the amount of vaporized oil caused by steam distillation, we established correlations of steam distillation yields with the basic crude oil properties. These correlations were based on steam distillation tests performed on 16 crude oils from various pans of the U.S. The gravity of oils varied from 12 to 40 deg. API [0.99 to 0.83 g/cm3]. The viscosity of oil ranged from 5 to 4,085 cSt [5 to 4085 mm /s] at 100 deg. F [38 deg. C]. The steam distillations were performed at a saturated steam pressure of 220 psia [1.5 MPa]. One oil sample was used in experiments to investigate the effect of steam pressure (220 to 500 psia [1.5 to 3.4 MPa]) on the steam distillation yield. The experiments were carried out to a steam distillation factor (Vw/Voi) of 20, with the factor defined as the cumulative volume of condensed steam used in distillation, Vw, divided by the initial volume of oil, Voi. At a steam distillation factor of 20, the distillation yields ranged from 13 to 57% of the initial oil volume. Several basic crude oil properties can be used to predict steam distillation yields reasonably well. A correlation using oil viscosity in centistokes at 100 deg. F [38 deg. C] can be used to predict the steam distillation yield within a standard error of 4.3 %. The API gravity can be used to estimate wields within 5.6%. A gas chromatographic analysis was made for each crude oil to obtain the component boiling points (simulated distillation temperatures). A correlation parameter was selected from the simulated distillation results that can be used to estimate the steam distillation yields within 4.5%. Introduction Steamflooding has been used commercially to recover heavy oils for several decades. Although it is considered a heavy-oil recovery process, it has been demonstrated to be an effective and commercially feasible process for recovering light oils. To enhance the effectiveness of the oil recovery process, it is important to fully understand and utilize the basic steamflooding mechanisms. Willman et al. investigated the mechanisms of steamflooding. They concluded that oil viscosity reduction, oil volume expansion, and steam distillation are the major mechanisms for oil recovery. Since then, more research has been done on all phases of steam injection. However, steam distillation and its ramifications on recovery have not been quantified fully because of lack of experimental data. Steam distillation can lower the boiling point of a water/oil mixture below the boiling point of the individual components. SPEJ P. 937^


2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cesar Ovalles ◽  
Carlos Vallejos ◽  
Tito Vasquez ◽  
Jorge Martinis ◽  
Alfredo Perez-Perez ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document