Integrated Analysis of mRNA–miRNA–lncRNA ceRNA Network in Human HR+/Her-2− Breast Cancer and Triple Negative Breast Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (7) ◽  
pp. 1055-1066
Author(s):  
Xiaochen Jia ◽  
Yehui Shi ◽  
Yuehong Zhu ◽  
Wenjing Meng ◽  
Lihong He ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Integrated Analysis ◽  
Cerna Network ◽  
Her 2

scholarly journals Clinical Identification of Dysregulated Circulating microRNAs and Their Implication in Drug Response in Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) by Target Gene Network and Meta-Analysis

Genes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 549
Author(s):  
Amal Qattan ◽  
Taher Al-Tweigeri ◽  
Wafa Alkhayal ◽  
Kausar Suleman ◽  
Asma Tulbah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Drug Resistance ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Drug Response ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Integrated Analysis ◽  
Circulating Mirnas ◽  
Persistent Problem ◽  
Network Analyses

Resistance to therapy is a persistent problem that leads to mortality in breast cancer, particularly triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). MiRNAs have become a focus of investigation as tissue-specific regulators of gene networks related to drug resistance. Circulating miRNAs are readily accessible non-invasive potential biomarkers for TNBC diagnosis, prognosis, and drug-response. Our aim was to use systems biology, meta-analysis, and network approaches to delineate the drug resistance pathways and clinical outcomes associated with circulating miRNAs in TNBC patients. MiRNA expression analysis was used to investigate differentially regulated circulating miRNAs in TNBC patients, and integrated pathway regulation, gene ontology, and pharmacogenomic network analyses were used to identify target genes, miRNAs, and drug interaction networks. Herein, we identified significant differentially expressed circulating miRNAs in TNBC patients (miR-19a/b-3p, miR-25-3p, miR-22-3p, miR-210-3p, miR-93-5p, and miR-199a-3p) that regulate several molecular pathways (PAM (PI3K/Akt/mTOR), HIF-1, TNF, FoxO, Wnt, and JAK/STAT, PD-1/PD-L1 pathways and EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance (TKIs)) involved in drug resistance. Through meta-analysis, we demonstrated an association of upregulated miR-93, miR-210, miR-19a, and miR-19b with poor overall survival outcomes in TNBC patients. These results identify miRNA-regulated mechanisms of drug resistance and potential targets for combination with chemotherapy to overcome drug resistance in TNBC. We demonstrate that integrated analysis of multi-dimensional data can unravel mechanisms of drug-resistance related to circulating miRNAs, particularly in TNBC. These circulating miRNAs may be useful as markers of drug response and resistance in the guidance of personalized medicine for TNBC.

scholarly journals Reproductive and hormonal risk factors for postmenopausal luminal, HER-2-overexpressing, and triple-negative breast cancer

Cancer ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 113 (7) ◽  
pp. 1521-1526 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda I. Phipps ◽  
Kathleen E. Malone ◽  
Peggy L. Porter ◽  
Janet R. Daling ◽  
Christopher I. Li
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Her 2

scholarly journals Prognostic Biomarkers on a Competitive Endogenous RNA Network Reveals Overall Survival in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenxing Qin ◽  
Feng Qi ◽  
Jia Li ◽  
Ping Li ◽  
Yuan-Sheng Zang
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Model ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Differentially Expressed ◽  
Cerna Network ◽  
Competitive Endogenous Rna

The objective of this study was to construct a competitive endogenous RNA (ceRNA) regulatory network using differentially expressed long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs), microRNAs (miRNAs), and mRNAs in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and to construct a prognostic model for predicting overall survival (OS) in patients with TNBC. Differentially expressed lncRNAs, miRNAs, and mRNAs in TNBC patients from the TCGA and Metabric databases were examined. A prognostic model based on prognostic scores (PSs) was established for predicting OS in TNBC patients, and the performance of the model was assessed by a recipient that operated on a distinctive curve. A total of 874 differentially expressed RNAs (DERs) were screened, among which 6 lncRNAs, 295 miRNAs and 573 mRNAs were utilized to construct targeted and coexpression ceRNA regulatory networks. Eight differentially expressed genes (DEGs) associated with survival prognosis, DBX2, MYH7, TARDBP, POU4F1, ABCB11, LHFPL5, TRHDE and TIMP4, were identified by multivariate Cox regression and then used to establish a prognostic model. Our study shows that the ceRNA network has a critical role in maintaining the aggressiveness of TNBC and provides comprehensive molecular-level insight for predicting individual mortality hazards for TNBC patients. Our data suggest that these prognostic mRNAs from the ceRNA network are promising therapeutic targets for clinical intervention.

scholarly journals How shall we treat locally advanced triple negative breast cancer?

F1000Research ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 1649
Author(s):  
Paulo Luz ◽  
David Dias ◽  
Ana Fortuna ◽  
Luis Bretes ◽  
Beatriz Gosalbez
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Surrogate Marker ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Her 2 ◽  
Near Future

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) has been shown to respond to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). It has been established that achieving pathological complete response (pCR) for certain aggressive subtypes of breast cancer, including HER-2 (over-expressed) and TNBC, provides an important surrogate marker for predicting long-term clinical response and survival outcomes. How to increase the number of patients that achieve pCR remains challenging. Platinum-based NACT seems to be part of the solution and capecitabine, an active drug in metastatic breast cancer, but not a standard one in earlier stages may have found its place in the adjuvant setting. In the near future immunotherapy can play a role in early TNBC

scholarly journals Antiangiogenic therapy for breast cancer with triple negative phenotype

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-92
Author(s):  
Inna P. Ganshina ◽  
Kristina A. Ivanova ◽  
Olga O. Gordeeva ◽  
Aleksandr V. Arkhipov ◽  
Liudmila G. Zhukova
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Malignant Tumors ◽  
Antiangiogenic Therapy ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Her 2 ◽  
Triple Negative Phenotype ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Negative Phenotype

Triple-negative breast cancer is 1024% of all cases of breast cancer and is characterized by the absence of estrogen, progesterone, and HER-2 receptors in the tumor. The therapy of this illness is a difficult clinical case. In contrast to hormone-positive and HER-2-positive phenotypes, in which we successfully use targeted drugs (antiestrogens and anti-HER-2 drugs), for triple-negative breast cancer we have not had such targets for a long time. Thus, despite the impressive results of immunotherapy of triple-negative breast cancer, there remains a fairly large group of patients with negative PD-L1 status, for whom it is necessary to develop other treatment strategies. One of the approaches in the treatment of malignant tumors includes not the impact on tumor cells, but the process of angiogenesis. Antiangiogenic drugs have positively proven themselves in the treatment of a large number of malignant tumors but are underestimated for breast cancer (including triple-negative phenotype). The use of bevacizumab in combinations with cytostatic drugs in breast cancer therapy (including triple-negative breast cancer) has been studied in a large number of clinical trials but was undeservedly forgotten in some countries due to the revoked FDA registration. This review presents the role of bevacizumab in the treatment of patients with triple-negative breast cancer and suggests the conditions when the administration of this drug is justified and leads to better results.

The role of systemic treatment after whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) in breast cancer patients with brain metastases: Differences depending on biological subtype

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1027-1027
Author(s):  
A. Niwinska ◽  
M. Murawska ◽  
I. Lemanska ◽  
J. Milewska
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Systemic Treatment ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Poor Performance Status ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Her 2

1027 Background: The aim of the study was to analyze the efficacy of systemic treatment (chemotherapy [chth], endocrine therapy, targeted therapy) performed after WBRT in patients (pts) with breast cancer and brain metastases. Methods: The group of 222 consecutive breast cancer pts with brain metastases treated in one institution in the years 2003–2006 was divided into four biological subgroups based on ER, PR, and HER-2 receptors’ expression: HER-2(+++)ER/PR(-); HER-2(+++)ER/PR(+); ER(-)PR(-)HER-2(-); and ER/PR(+)HER-2(-). WBRT was performed in 219 (99%) pts. Systemic therapy after WBRT was continued in 160 (72%) pts. Clinically, patients with triple-negative breast cancer were more often in poor performance status (KPS<60%) than the others (51% vs. 28%, respectively). Survivals from brain metastases without and with systemic treatment were compared in four mentioned biological subgroups. Results: Median survival from brain metastases in the entire group was 7.5 months. In the group of ER/PR(+)HER-2(-) median survival without and with systemic therapy was 3 and 14 months, respectively (p = 0.007). In the group of HER-2(+++)ER/PR(+) median survival without further treatment, after chth and after chth with trastuzumab was 2, 8, and 13 months, respectively (p = 0.000) and in the group of HER-2(+++)ER/PR(-) median survival without further treatment, after chth and after chth with trastuzumab was 4, 8, and 10 months, respectively (p = 0.004). In triple-negative breast cancer patients median survival without and with chemotherapy was 3 and 4 months, respectively (p = 0.75). Conclusions: Systemic treatment (chth, endocrine therapy, targeted therapy) continued after WBRT in breast cancer pts with brain metastases prolongs survival in three of four biological subgroups. In the group of HER-2-positive breast cancer pts, trastuzumab added to chth had independent positive impact on survival. No benefit was observed in the subgroup of triple-negative breast cancer pts; it would be the result of refractory disease and the fact, that more pts were in poor performance status. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals The Target Differences of Anti-Tumorigenesis Potential of Curcumin and its Analogues Against HER-2 Positive and Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 188-196
Author(s):  
Edy Meiyanto ◽  
Ulfatul Husnaa ◽  
Ria Fajarwati Kastian ◽  
Herwandhani Putri ◽  
Yonika Arum Larasati ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Cells ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Breast Cancer Cells ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Her 2

scholarly journals Mixed Effects and Mechanisms of Cannabinoids for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Treatment

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khanh Tran
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Treatment ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Progesterone Receptors ◽  
Antitumor Effects ◽  
Current Therapies ◽  
Cancer Types ◽  
Her 2 ◽  
Tumour Activity

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a subtype of breast cancer characterized by the lack of estrogen receptors (ER), progesterone receptors, and HER-2 receptors. Thus, TNBC tumours do not benefit from the current therapies targeting ER or HER-2. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop novel treatment for this subtype of breast cancer. Marijuana is a common name given to Cannabis plants, a group of plants in the Cannabis genus of the Cannabaceae family. Cannabis plants are among the oldest cultivated crops, traced back at least 12,000 years and are well known for their multi-purpose usage, including medicinal purposes. The main active compounds extracted from Cannabis plants are 21-carbon-containing terpenophenolics, which are referred to as phytocannabinoids. Of these, the tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) group contains highly potent cannabinoids, including delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (∆9-THC) and delta-8-tetrahydrocannabinol (∆8-THC), which are the most abundant THCs and are largely responsible for psychological and physiological effects of marijuana. The use of Cannabis plants for medicinal purposes was first recorded in 2337 BC in China, where Cannabis plants were used to treat pains, rheumatism, and gout. Recently, several cannabinoids have been approved for a number of treatments, one of which is the treatment of nausea and vomiting caused by chemotherapy in cancer patients. Furthermore, increasing evidence shows that cannabinoids not only attenuate side effects due to cancer treatment, but might also potentially possess direct antitumor effects in several cancer types, including breast cancer. However, anti-tumour activity of marijuana has been variable in different studies and even promoted tumour growth in some cases. In addition, the mechanisms of cannabinoid action in cancer remain unclear. This review summarizes evidence about the mixed actions of cannabinoids in cancer in general and triple-negative breast cancer in particular.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document