scholarly journals 869 Colorectal Cancer Referral Pathways: Impact of First Months of COVID-19

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
L E Spyropoulou ◽  
M Li ◽  
D Curley ◽  
E Martin ◽  
G Wynn ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Whilst daily living has adapted to the “new normal” during Covid-19, colorectal cancer pathways are yet to be revised to reflect this transformation. Government advice to stay at home, hospital avoidance and reduced healthcare access, may be masking a significant proportion of population at risk. We aim to identify changes in colorectal cancer target pathways. Method All cancer referrals during the initial Covid-19 period were retrospectively analysed, recording type and date of first clinic and investigation, MDT discussion and decision to treat dates. A comparison was made with referral and treatment data from the same referral period in 2019. Results 338 referrals were received during March-April 2020, compared to 542 in 2019, indicating a 37.6% decrease. A high proportion of patients were reviewed by telephone clinic (63.4%) rather than face-to-face (23.8%), representing a significant shift in practice. An increasing number of patients were initially investigated by CT(40.2%) instead of endoscopy (37.8%). 51(15.5%) patients were not investigated, with COVID-19 being the commonest reason. 25 patients were diagnosed with colorectal cancer, of which 8(32.0%) breached the investigation and 13(52.0%) the treatment date, both usually postponed due to the pandemic. There was a 66.7% reduction in surgical management compared to 2019. Conclusions Two-week wait pathways are strained in the era of Covid-19. As the fight against the global pandemic continues, patients are mostly seen virtually and receive non-gold standard investigation. With fewer patient presentations and elective surgeries, it is important to continue colorectal cancer surveillance and timely treatment, considering possible alternative pathways.

2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. A602-A602
Author(s):  
S RAWL ◽  
S BLACKBURN ◽  
L HACKWARD ◽  
N FINEBERG ◽  
T IMPERIALE ◽  
...  

1994 ◽  
Vol 81 (5) ◽  
pp. 689-691 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Jonsson ◽  
L. Åhsgren ◽  
L. O. Andersson ◽  
R. Stenling ◽  
J. Rutegåd

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (7) ◽  
pp. 3108-3113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamie M. Tjaden ◽  
Jessica A. Hause ◽  
Daniel Berger ◽  
Samantha K. Duveneck ◽  
Shriram M. Jakate ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 270-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nabiha Shamsi ◽  
Aasma Shaukat ◽  
Sofia Halperin-Goldstein ◽  
Joshua Colton

Colorectal cancer surveillance intervals by colonoscopy are based on the size and number of polyps removed. Evidence suggests endoscopists’ estimation of polyp size is often inaccurate, but the differences by endoscopists’ characteristics have not been reported. This study assesses endoscopists’ accuracy of measuring polyp illustrations, the effect of endoscopists’ characteristics, and the impact of having a measurement reference. Endoscopists in a community-based, gastroenterology practice estimated the size of several illustrations in a booklet. One month later, they estimated the size of illustrations with a provided measurement reference. Accuracy was defined as no difference between estimated and actual value. Endoscopists were accurate in sizing only 15% of the time, with a tendency toward undersizing. Female endoscopists, those with less than 10 years in practice and those with lower adenoma detection rates, were more likely to undersize polyps. Accuracy of measuring the polyp illustrations increased to 50% ( p < .01) with the measurement reference. The improvement in accuracy was seen across endoscopists’ demographic groups. Endoscopists had poor accuracy of measuring polyp illustrations. Almost universally, endoscopists tended to undersize the polyp illustrations. Accuracy improved significantly with the use of a polyp-measuring guide, particularly when considering important surveillance thresholds of 5 and 10 mm.


2019 ◽  
Vol 89 (6) ◽  
pp. AB161
Author(s):  
Ahmad Abu-Heija ◽  
Bashar Mohamad ◽  
Pradeep R. Kathi ◽  
Mohammed Mustafa Nayeem ◽  
Mowyad Khalid ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document