scholarly journals How effective is cryoablation in the treatment of atrial fibrillation?

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_E) ◽  
pp. E51-E54
Author(s):  
Diego Penela ◽  
Riccardo Cappato

Abstract Pulmonary vein isolation is the standard for atrial fibrillation ablation. Although the most commonly applied energy source is radiofrequency (RF), cryoablation has rapidly evolved as a powerful one-shot tool, particularly after the introduction of the second-generation catheter, gaining widespread use in recent years. The efficacy in maintaining sinus rhythm after a first ablative procedure is ∼70–80%, and the randomization studies comparing cryoablation to RF have not been able to reveal significant differences up to now. Although different baseline characteristics may influence the efficacy of cryoablation, we are not yet able to distinguish which patients may benefit from a personalized choice of ablative source. Regarding safety, cryoballoon ablation appears to be associated with a lower rate of pericardial effusion and cardiac tamponade, mainly due to the lack of risk of overheating. The other side of the coin is a higher incidence of phrenic nerve damage, which occurs in 1–2% of procedures. In conclusion, we do not yet have definitive data to affirm the superiority of the RF technique over that of cryoablation. The choice of energy source currently depends on the availability of the centre and on the experience of the operator.

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Michaelsen ◽  
U Parade ◽  
H Bauerle ◽  
K.-D Winter ◽  
U Rauschenbach ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using cryoballoon ablation (CBA) has become an established and widespread procedure for the treatment of symptomatic paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). The safety and efficacy of PVI at low and medium volume hospitals is unknown. Aim To determine safety and acute efficacy of PVI using CBA performed at community hospitals with limited annual case numbers. Methods This registry study prospectively included 1004 consecutive patients who underwent PVI with CBA for symptomatic paroxysmal (n=563) or persistent AF (n=441) between 01/2019 and 09/2020 at 20 community hospitals (each performing <100 PVI/year). Qualifying criteria for participating hospitals were an experience of performing CBA for at least 1 year and a minimum of 50 CBA performed up to the start of the registry. All CBA procedures were performed according to the individual local standards of each hospital. Procedural data, acute efficacy and complications were determined. Results The mean annual number of CBA procedures performed was 59±26/hospital, the mean annual number of PVI performed regardless of the method used was 70±26/center. 8/20 hospitals performed CBA only. There were 22 operators (1,1/center), in 12/20 hospitals CBA was performed by an operator being board certified in invasive electrophysiology. 10/20 hospitals included <60 patients/center (n=381), the centers enrolling >60 patients/hospital included a total of 623 pts (62%). Mean procedure time was 90.1±31.6 min, mean fluoroscopy time was 19.2±11.4 min. Isolation of all pulmonary veins could be achieved in 97.9% of patients. Not achieving the goal of “all veins isolated” in a respective patient was mainly due to early termination of CBA procedure due to phrenic nerve palsy. Major complications occurred in 1,2% of patients: no in-hospital death (0%), clinical stroke in 2 patients (0.2%), pericardial effusion requiring pericardial drainage in 2 patients (0,2%), vascular complications needing vascular surgery and/or blood transfusion in 2 patients (0,2%), phrenic nerve palsy persisting up to hospital discharge in 6 patients (0,6%). Minor complications occurred in 7,5% of patients: pericardial effusion with no need of intervention in 0,4%, access site complications with no need for therapeutic intervention or prolonged in-hospital stay in 2,1% (mainly superficial hematoma) and phrenic nerve palsy resolving before discharge in 4,2%. No significant difference in the number of complications could be found when testing for numbers of enrolled patients (> or < than 60/hospital) or regarding the board certification status of the operator. Conclusions PVI for paroxysmal or persistent AF using CBA can be performed at community hospitals with high acute efficacy and low complication rates despite low and moderate annual procedure numbers. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.


2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (8) ◽  
pp. 1200-1206
Author(s):  
Makoto Sano ◽  
Tsuyoshi Urushida ◽  
Gaku Matsukura ◽  
Tomoaki Sakakibara ◽  
Kenichiro Suwa ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 230-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nirav Patel ◽  
Krunalkumar Patel ◽  
Abhishek Shenoy ◽  
William L. Baker ◽  
Amgad N. Makaryus ◽  
...  

Background: Ablation therapy is the treatment of choice in antiarrhythmic drugrefractory atrial fibrillation (AF). It is performed by either cryoballoon ablation (CBA) or radiofrequency ablation. CBA is gaining popularity due to simplicity with similar efficacy and complication rate compared with RFA. In this meta-analysis, we compare the recurrence rate of AF and the complications from CBA versus RFA for the treatment of AF. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed for the articles that compared the outcome of interest. The primary outcome was to compare the recurrence rate of AF between CBA and RFA. We also included subgroup analysis with complications of pericardial effusion, phrenic nerve palsy and cerebral microemboli following ablation therapy. Results: A total of 24 studies with 3527 patients met our predefined inclusion criteria. Recurrence of AF after CBA or RFA was similar in both groups (RR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.65, 1.07; I2=48%, Cochrane p=0.16). In subgroup analysis, heterogeneity was less in paroxysmal AF (I2=0%, Cochrane p=0.46) compared to mixed AF (I2=72%, Cochrane p=0.003). Procedure and fluoroscopy time was less by 26.37 and 5.94 minutes respectively in CBA compared to RFA. Complications, pericardial effusion, and silent cerebral microemboli, were not different between the two groups, however, phrenic nerve palsy was exclusively present only in CBA group. Conclusion: This study confirms that the effectiveness of CBA is similar to RFA in the treatment of AF with the added advantages of shorter procedure and fluoroscopy times.


2013 ◽  
Vol 106 (10) ◽  
pp. 501-510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederic A. Sebag ◽  
Najia Chaachoui ◽  
Nick W. Linton ◽  
Sana Amraoui ◽  
James Harrison ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (4S) ◽  
pp. 6-14
Author(s):  
T. Y. Chichkova ◽  
S. E. Mamchur ◽  
E. A. Khomenko

Aim. To estimate the clinical success of cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation (PVI).Methods.230 patients (males: 49.6%, mean age 57 (53; 62) with symptomatic paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) resistant to antiarrhythmic therapy were included in a single-center prospective study. The patients were randomized into 2 groups to undergo either cryoballoon ablation (n = 122) or radiofrequency (RF) (n = 108) ablation. Both groups were comparable in baseline parameters. The follow-up period was 12 months. Clinical outcomes were estimated with the use of a three-stage scale. The rates of cardiovascular rehospitalizations, direct-current cardioversions and repeated ablations during were estimated within the follow-up. The quality of life (QoL) in the cryoablation group was measured using the AFEQT scale.Results.77% (n = 94) of patients in the cryoballoon ablation group and 71.3% (n = 77) of patients in the RF group (р = 0.71) demonstrated reported the optimal clinical effects. Both groups, cryo ablation and RF ablation, had similar rates of cardiovascular hospitalizations (23.8 vs 28.7%, OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.4–1.4; р = 0.39), direct-current cardioversions (12.3 vs 17.6%, OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.3–1.4; р = 0.26) and repeated ablations (9.8–11.1%, OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.4–2.0; р = 0.75). The patients treated with cryoballoon as opposed to RF ablation had significantly more successful usage of “pill-in-pocket” strategy – 14.8 vs 6.5% (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.01–6.2; р = 0.04). Significant improvements of the QoL parameters with strong size effect have been found in the cryoablation group, i.e. global score (GS) increased by 8.9±6.9 (95% CI 6.6–10.1; dCohen 1.2; р<0.001), symptoms (S) – by 8.3±7.9 (95% CI 4.2–8.8; dCohen 1.5; р<0.001), daily activities (DA) – by 10.0±6.9 (95% CI = 6.4–10.6; dCohen 0.9; р<0.001), treatment concerns (TC) – by 5.5±6.0 (95% CI 6.3–9.2; dCohen 1.2; р<0.001) and treatment satisfaction (TS) – by 5.5±6.0 (95% CI 5.4–9.8; dCohen 0.9; р<0.001).Conclusion.The both catheter-based technologies had comparable clinical success. Cryoablation was characterized by improvement in all QoL parameters based on the AFEQT score.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document