scholarly journals P–407 Early pregnancy in the Emergency Department; presentation, management, outcome and the effect of COVID–19

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Boyd ◽  
K O’Donoghue ◽  
S Meaney
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Emergency Room ◽  
Early Pregnancy ◽  
Community Services ◽  
Phone Calls ◽  
Accessible Information ◽  
Retrospective Audit ◽  
Difficult Time ◽  
The Way

Abstract Study question Has the COVID–19 pandemic and public health guidance impacted referrals, outcome and management of early pregnancy in the emergency room? Summary answer COVID–19 changed the way in which women sought guidance and accessed services in early pregnancy. What is known already Spontaneous miscarriage is the most common complication of pregnancy1. Experiencing an early pregnancy loss is often an unexpected and difficult time that can be physically traumatising2. A previous study looking at the experience of a miscarriage from both the female and male point of view identified that long waiting times surrounded by other pregnant women in the Emergency Department (ED) was particularly difficult part of the experience2. The COVID–19 pandemic had a significant impact on both hospital and community services. Public health advice also changed the way women accessed healthcare. Study design, size, duration Retrospective audit was performed over two six-month periods – July to December 2019 and March to August 2020. Two groups of data were collected; women who contacted the ED with concerns related to early pregnancy (under thirteen weeks gestation) and those who attended the ED with the same complaints. Information was cross referenced to see how many women contacted the ED prior to arrival and what, if any advice was given. Participants/materials, setting, methods All women under thirteen weeks gestation with a complaint of bleeding per vaginum (PV) or pain related to early pregnancy who presented to the ED in a large tertiary maternity unit were included in the audit. All women meeting the same criteria who contacted the ED by telephone were also included. Main results and the role of chance Over the twelve months of data collection, 1274 women had their first visit to the ED. There were 270 further visits within the early pregnancy period recorded for the same cohort of women. Additionally, 1452 phone calls were recorded. There was a 38% (n = 293) decrease in women attending the emergency room in early pregnancy in 2020 during the first wave of COVID–19. There was a 16% (n = 110) increase in women contacting the ED for advice in early pregnancy in the same period in 2020. Women were more like likely to have been referred to the ED by their General Practitioner (GP) (OR 0.62, 95%CI 0.48–0.80) and to have phoned in advance of arrival (OR 1.55, 95%CI 1.17–2.04) in 2020. They were also more likely to have already had a previous ultrasound scan in the current pregnancy (OR 0.64, 95%CI 0.48–0.93). There was a significantly shorter waiting time for an appointment in the early pregnancy clinic in 2020 compared with 2019 (3.5 days versus 2.4 days, p = 0.002). There was no change in the number of women admitted (OR 1.19, 95%CI 0.81–1.74). Limitations, reasons for caution Single centre audit. Pregnancies only followed to booking visit/dating scan and outcome noted at that stage. Wider implications of the findings: The COVID–19 pandemic highlighted the need for more education around early pregnancy. Easily accessible information about local early pregnancy services gives women autonomy. Phone triage allowing referral of women to appropriate services, reduces ED visits. Standard training in early pregnancy ultrasound could reduce follow up referrals and admission rates. Trial registration number Not applicable

scholarly journals Enhanced Surveillance of Heat-Related Illness in Pinal County

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dylan C. Kent ◽  
Rachel Z. Garcia ◽  
Samuel Packard ◽  
Graham Briggs ◽  
Clancey Hill ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Emergency Room ◽  
Medical Record ◽  
Hospital Discharge ◽  
Syndromic Surveillance ◽  
Extreme Heat ◽  
Discharge Data ◽  
Icd 10

ObjectiveUsing a syndromic surveillance system to understand the magnitude and risk factors related to heat-related illness (HRI) in Pinal County, AZ.IntroductionExtreme heat is a major cause of weather-related morbidity and mortality in the United States (US).1 HRI is the most frequent cause of environmental exposure-related injury treated in US emergency departments.2 More than 65,000 emergency room visits occur for acute HRI each summer nationwide.3 In Arizona, HRI accounts for an estimated 2,000 emergency room patients and 118 deaths each year.4 As heat-related illness becomes increasingly recognized as a public health issue, local health departments are tasked with building capacity to conduct enhanced surveillance of HRI in order to inform public health preparedness and response efforts. In Pinal County, understanding the magnitude and risk factors of HRI is important for informing prevention efforts as well as developing strategies to respond to extreme heat.MethodsTo gain a better understanding of the magnitude of HRI in Pinal County, historical cases were reviewed from hospital discharge data (HDD) from 2010-2016. Cases were included if the discharge record included any ICD codes consistent with HRI (ICD-9 codes 992 or ICD-10 codes T67 or X30) and if the patient’s county of residence was Pinal County. Recent HRI cases during the summer of 2017 were identified using the National Syndromic Surveillance Program BioSense Platform. The ESSENCE syndromic surveillance tool within the BioSense Platform includes data reported by local hospitals. This data can be used to detect abnormal activity for public health investigation. HRI cases were identified in ESSENCE based on ICD-10 codes and chief complaint terms according to a standardized algorithm developed by the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists.1 Both emergency department and admitted patients with a HRI were abstracted from HDD and ESSENCE. To assess HRI risk factors for the summer of 2017, a survey instrument was developed. Survey questions included the nature and location of the HRI incident, potential risk factors, and knowledge and awareness of HRI. Cases were identified in ESSENSE on a weekly basis from May 1, 2017-September 12, 2017, and follow up phone interviews were conducted with eligible cases. For HRI cases eligible for interview, three attempts were made to contact the patient by phone. Cases were excluded if the patient was incarcerated, deceased, or did not have a HRI upon medical record review. An exploratory analysis was performed for the data from HDD, ESSENCE, and interviews.ResultsPinal County Public Health Services District identified 1,321 HRI cases from 2010-2016, an average of 189 per year. Hospital discharge data suggest HRI cases are more likely to occur in males between the ages of 20-44 years old (27%). It is also notable that a sharp increase in HRI cases is observed each year in mid-to-late June, with an estimated 14% of annual cases occurring during the third week of June. Further analysis of HDD showed 31% of cases received medical treatment in Casa Grande in central Pinal County. Between May 1st and September 12th of 2017, 161 HRI cases were detected using ESSENCE. Of which 149 cases were determined to be HRI; 22 cases did not have contact information, and 4 cases were ineligible due to incarceration or death. A total of 31 HRI cases were interviewed out of the eligible 123 ESSENSE cases (25% response rate). Interview data indicated occupational exposure to extreme heat as a major risk factor for HRI. Additional risk factors reported during interviews included exposure to extreme heat while at home or traveling, although interview results are not representative due to a small sample size (n=31).ConclusionsSyndromic surveillance combined with interviews and a review of HDD provides an informative approach for monitoring and responding to HRI. Data suggest Pinal County should expect an increase in HRI cases by mid-June each year, typically coinciding with the first National Weather Service Extreme Heat Warning of the season. Preliminary results suggest that cases occur more frequently in working males ages 20-44 years old in occupations that expose workers to extreme heat conditions. Additional information is needed to assess risk factors for HRI among vulnerable populations in Pinal County who were not represented in this study, including individuals who are homeless, undocumented, elderly, or in correctional facilities. Future areas for improvement include improving the phone interview script to include English and Spanish language versions and performing medical record abstractions on all HRI cases. Enhanced syndromic surveillance is recommended to provide information on risk factors for HRI to inform prevention efforts in Pinal County.References1. Heat-Related Illness Syndrome Query: A Guidance Document For Implementing Heat-Related Illness Syndromic Surveillance in Public Health Practice. In: Epidemiologists CoSaT, ed. Vol 1.02016:1-12.2. Pillai SK, Noe RS, Murphy MW, et al. Heat illness: predictors of hospital admissions among emergency department visits-Georgia, 2002-2008. J Community Health. 2014;39(1):90-98.3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Climate Change and Extreme Heat: What You Can Do to Prepare. 2016; Available from https://www.cdc.gov/climateandhealth/pubs/extreme-heat-guidebook.pdf4. Trends in Morbidity and Mortality from Exposure to Excessive Natural Heat in Arizona, 2012 report. In: Services ADoH, ed2012.

81 Integrating A Front Door Frailty Service in the Emergency Department: Results of A Pilot Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. i12-i42
Author(s):  
L Dunnell ◽  
A Shrestha ◽  
E Li ◽  
Z Khan ◽  
N Hashemi
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Admission Rate ◽  
Community Services ◽  
Service Improvement ◽  
Specialist Nurse ◽  
Front Door ◽  
Medication Changes ◽  
Health Service Improvement

Abstract Introduction Increasing old age and frailty is putting pressure on health services with 5–10% of patients attending the emergency department (ED) and 30% of patients in acute medical units classified as older and frail. National Health Service improvement mandates that by 2020 hospital trusts with type one EDs provide at least 70 hours of acute frailty service each week. Methodology A two-week pilot (Monday–Friday 8 am-5 pm) was undertaken, with a “Front Door Frailty Team” comprising a consultant, junior doctor, specialist nurse and pharmacist, with therapy input from the existing ED team. They were based in the ED seeing patients on arrival, referrals from the ED team and patients in the ED observation ward—opposed to the usual pathway of referral from the ED team to medical team. Data was captured using “Cerner” electronic healthcare records. A plan, do, study, act methodology was used throughout with daily debrief and huddle sessions. Results 95 patients were seen over two weeks. In the over 65 s, average time to be seen was 50 minutes quicker than the ED team over the same period, with reduced admission rate (25.7% vs 46.5%). The wait between decision to admit and departure was shortened by 119 minutes. Overall, this led to patients spending on average 133 minutes less in the ED. 64 patients were discharged, of which 44 had community follow-up (including 37.5% of 64 referred to acute elderly clinic and 25% to rapid response). 47 medications were stopped across 25 patients. Conclusion The pilot shows that introduction of an early comprehensive geriatric assessment in the ED can lead to patients being seen sooner, with more timely decisions over their care and reduction in hospital admissions. It allowed for greater provision of acute clinics and community services as well as prompt medication review and real time medication changes.

scholarly journals Development of a Remote Public Health Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experience in Response to COVID-19

2021 ◽  
pp. 089719002110048
Author(s):  
Tyler Marie Kiles ◽  
Tracy Hagemann ◽  
Brianna Felts ◽  
Catherine Crill
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Disaster Response ◽  
Pharmacy Practice ◽  
Health Department ◽  
Health Science ◽  
Science Center ◽  
Health Crisis ◽  
University Of Tennessee ◽  
Practice Experience ◽  
Phone Calls

Objectives: In order to meet the needs of the COVID-19 public health crisis and to actively engage students in patient care opportunities, the University of Tennessee Health Science Center College of Pharmacy in partnership with the Tennessee Health Department, developed a remote Public Health Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experience (APPE) Elective. The objectives of this paper are to describe the development of and students’ experiences and learning outcomes during the elective. Faculty preceptor and experiential administrator’s perspectives are also described. Methods: This month-long APPE was developed in mid-March and delivered in April and May of 2020. The students volunteered in-person with the State of Tennessee COVID-19 Hotline call centers and conducted topic discussions and assignments virtually with a remote preceptor. Results: A total of 16 students completed this rotation experience. Student ratings of the experience were positive, and their knowledge improved in all topic areas. Students collectively completed approximately 700 hours manning the COVID-19 hotline and logged over 1,000 phone calls. Conclusions: In a time of unprecedented disruption to experiential learning, the development of this unique public health APPE directly benefited the college, the students, and the citizens of our state. The APPE described in this paper could be replicated in additional waves of the pandemic or adapted for similar disaster response.

scholarly journals POS1189 THE IMPACT OF TELEMEDICINE AND COVID-19 ON A TERTIARY RHEUMATOLOGY SERVICE: A RETROSPECTIVE AUDIT

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 876-877
Author(s):  
W. Zhu ◽  
T. De Silva ◽  
L. Eades ◽  
S. Morton ◽  
S. Ayoub ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immunosuppressive Therapy ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Diagnostic Delay ◽  
Cohort Differences ◽  
Phone Calls ◽  
Retrospective Audit ◽  
Common Diagnosis ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact

Background:Telemedicine was widely utilised to complement face-to-face (F2F) care in 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic, but the impact of this on patient care is poorly understood.Objectives:To investigate the impact of telemedicine during COVID-19 on outpatient rheumatology services.Methods:We retrospectively audited patient electronic medical records from rheumatology outpatient clinics in an urban tertiary rheumatology centre between April-May 2020 (telemedicine cohort) and April-May 2019 (comparator cohort). Differences in age, sex, primary diagnosis, medications, and proportion of new/review appointments were assessed using Mann-Whitney U and Chi-square tests. Univariate analysis was used to estimate associations between telemedicine usage and the ability to assign a diagnosis in patients without a prior rheumatological diagnosis, the frequency of changes to immunosuppression, subsequent F2F review, planned admissions or procedures, follow-up phone calls, and time to next appointment.Results:3,040 outpatient appointments were audited: 1,443 from 2019 and 1,597 from 2020. There was no statistically significant difference in the age, sex, proportion of new/review appointments, or frequency of immunosuppression use between the cohorts. Inflammatory arthritis (IA) was a more common diagnosis in the 2020 cohort (35.1% vs 31%, p=0.024). 96.7% (n=1,444) of patients seen in the 2020 cohort were reviewed via telemedicine. In patients without an existing rheumatological diagnosis, the odds of making a diagnosis at the appointment were significantly lower in 2020 (28.6% vs 57.4%; OR 0.30 [95% CI 0.16-0.53]; p<0.001). Clinicians were also less likely to change immunosuppressive therapy in 2020 (22.6% vs 27.4%; OR 0.78 [95% CI 0.65-0.92]; p=0.004). This was mostly driven by less de-escalation in therapy (10% vs 12.6%; OR 0.75 [95% CI 0.59-0.95]; p=0.019) as there was no statistically significant difference in the escalation or switching of immunosuppressive therapies. There was no significant difference in frequency of follow-up phone calls, however, patients seen in 2020 required earlier follow-up appointments (p<0.001). There was also no difference in unplanned rheumatological presentations but significantly fewer planned admissions and procedures in 2020 (1% vs 2.6%, p=0.002). Appointment non-attendance reduced in 2020 to 6.5% from 10.9% in 2019 (OR 0.57 [95% CI 0.44-0.74]; p<0.001), however the odds of discharging a patient from care were significantly lower in 2020 (3.9% vs 6%; OR 0.64 [95% CI 0.46-0.89]; p=0.008), although there was no significance when patients who failed to attend were excluded. Amongst patients seen via telemedicine in 2020, a subsequent F2F appointment was required in 9.4%. The predictors of needing a F2F review were being a new patient (OR 6.28 [95% CI 4.10-9.64]; p<0.001), not having a prior rheumatological diagnosis (OR 18.43 [95% CI: 2.35-144.63]; p=0.006), or having a diagnosis of IA (OR 2.85 [95% CI: 1.40-5.80]; p=0.004) or connective tissue disease (OR 3.22 [95% CI: 1.11-9.32]; p=0.031).Conclusion:Most patients in the 2020 cohort were seen via telemedicine. Telemedicine use during the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with reduced clinic non-attendance, but with diagnostic delay, reduced likelihood of changing existing immunosuppressive therapy, earlier requirement for review, and lower likelihood of discharge. While the effects of telemedicine cannot be differentiated from changes in practice related to other aspects of the pandemic, they suggest that telemedicine may have a negative impact on the timeliness of management of rheumatology patients.Disclosure of Interests:None declared.

Current Models for Inpatient and Emergency Room Ophthalmology Consultation in U.S. Residency Programs

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (02) ◽  
pp. e171-e174
Author(s):  
Donna H. Kim ◽  
Dongseok Choi ◽  
Thomas S. Hwang
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Medical Education ◽  
Emergency Room ◽  
Program Directors ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Direct Supervision ◽  
Residency Programs ◽  
Residency Program Directors ◽  
Competency Assessments

Abstract Objective This article examines models of patient care and supervision for hospital-based ophthalmology consultation in teaching institutions. Design This is a cross-sectional survey. Methods An anonymous survey was distributed to residency program directors at 119 Accreditation Council for Graduated Medical Education accredited U.S. ophthalmology programs in the spring of 2018. Survey questions covered consult volume, rotational schedules of staffing providers, methods of supervision (direct vs. indirect), and utilization of consult-dedicated didactics and resident competency assessments. Results Of the 119 program directors, 48 (41%) completed the survey. Programs most frequently reported receiving 4 to 6 consults per day from the emergency department (27, 55.1%) and 4 to 6 consults per day from inpatient services (26, 53.1%). Forty-seven percent of programs reported that postgraduate year one (PGY-1) or PGY-2 residents on a dedicated consult rotation initially evaluate patients. Supervising faculty backgrounds included neuro-ophthalmology, cornea, comprehensive, or a designated chief of service. Staffing responsibility is typically shared by multiple faculty on a daily or weekly rotation. Direct supervision was provided for fewer of emergency room consults (1–30%) than for inpatient consults (71–99%). The majority of programs reported no dedicated didactics for consultation activities (27, 55.1%) or formal assessment for proficiency (33, 67.4%) prior to the initiation of call-related activities without direct supervision. Billing submission for consults was inconsistent and many consults may go financially uncompensated (18, 36.7%). Conclusion The majority of hospital-based ophthalmic consultation at academic centers is provided by a rotating pool of physicians supervising a lower level resident. Few programs validate increased levels of graduated independence using specific assessments.

scholarly journals Interrupted time series design to evaluate ICD-9-CM to ICD-10-CM coding changes on trends in Colorado emergency department visits related to traumatic brain injury

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren Alexis De Crescenzo ◽  
Barbara Alison Gabella ◽  
Jewell Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Interrupted Time Series ◽  
Emergency Department Visits ◽  
Control And Prevention ◽  
Icd 10 ◽  
Ed Visits ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background The transition in 2015 to the Tenth Revision of the International Classification of Disease, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) in the US led the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to propose a surveillance definition of traumatic brain injury (TBI) utilizing ICD-10-CM codes. The CDC’s proposed surveillance definition excludes “unspecified injury of the head,” previously included in the ICD-9-CM TBI surveillance definition. The study purpose was to evaluate the impact of the TBI surveillance definition change on monthly rates of TBI-related emergency department (ED) visits in Colorado from 2012 to 2017. Results The monthly rate of TBI-related ED visits was 55.6 visits per 100,000 persons in January 2012. This rate in the transition month to ICD-10-CM (October 2015) decreased by 41 visits per 100,000 persons (p-value < 0.0001), compared to September 2015, and remained low through December 2017, due to the exclusion of “unspecified injury of head” (ICD-10-CM code S09.90) in the proposed TBI definition. The average increase in the rate was 0.33 visits per month (p < 0.01) prior to October 2015, and 0.04 visits after. When S09.90 was included in the model, the monthly TBI rate in Colorado remained smooth from ICD-9-CM to ICD-10-CM and the transition was no longer significant (p = 0.97). Conclusion The reduction in the monthly TBI-related ED visit rate resulted from the CDC TBI surveillance definition excluding unspecified head injury, not necessarily the coding transition itself. Public health practitioners should be aware that the definition change could lead to a drastic reduction in the magnitude and trend of TBI-related ED visits, which could affect decisions regarding the allocation of TBI resources. This study highlights a challenge in creating a standardized set of TBI ICD-10-CM codes for public health surveillance that provides comparable yet clinically relevant estimates that span the ICD transition.

Transitions in “Privatized” Prison Health Systems: Emergency Department Visits and Hospitalizations Among Incarcerated People in Florida, 2011–2018

2021 ◽  
pp. e1-e4
Author(s):  
Jessica L. Adler ◽  
Weiwei Chen ◽  
Timothy F. Page
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Hospital Discharge ◽  
Emergency Department Visits ◽  
Care Utilization ◽  
Discharge Data ◽  
Prison Health ◽  
Discharge Rates ◽  
Care Problems

Objectives. To examine rates of emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations among incarcerated people in Florida during a period when health care management in the state’s prisons underwent transitions. Methods. We used Florida ED visit and hospital discharge data (2011–2018) to depict the trend in ED visit and hospital discharge rates among incarcerated people. We proxied incarcerated people using individuals admitted from and discharged or transferred to a court or law enforcement agency. We fitted a regression with year indicators to examine the significance of yearly changes. Results. Among incarcerated people in Florida, ED visit rates quadrupled, and hospitalization rates doubled, between 2015 and 2018, a period when no similar trends were evident in the nonincarcerated population. Public Health Implications. Increasing the amount and flexibility of payments to contractors overseeing prison health services may foster higher rates of hospital utilization among incarcerated people and higher costs, without addressing major quality of care problems. Hospitals and government agencies should transparently report on health care utilization and outcomes among incarcerated people to ensure better oversight of services for a highly vulnerable population. (Am J Public Health. Published online ahead of print March 18, 2021: e1–e4. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2020.305988 )

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document