scholarly journals Contribution of Calanus species to the mesozooplankton biomass in the Barents Sea

2017 ◽  
Vol 75 (7) ◽  
pp. 2342-2354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johanna Myrseth Aarflot ◽  
Hein Rune Skjoldal ◽  
Padmini Dalpadado ◽  
Mette Skern-Mauritzen
Keyword(s):  
Barents Sea ◽  
Zooplankton Community ◽  
Zooplankton Biomass ◽  
Calanus Finmarchicus ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Arctic Water ◽  
Mesozooplankton Biomass ◽  
The Barents Sea ◽  
Main Driver ◽  
Calanus Species

Abstract Copepods from the genus Calanus are crucial prey for fish, seabirds and mammals in the Nordic and Barents Sea ecosystems. The objective of this study is to determine the contribution of Calanus species to the mesozooplankton biomass in the Barents Sea. We analyse an extensive dataset of Calanus finmarchicus, Calanus glacialis, and Calanus hyperboreus, collected at various research surveys over a 30-year period. Our results show that the Calanus species are a main driver of variation in the mesozooplankton biomass in the Barents Sea, and constitutes around 80% of the total. The proportion of Calanus decreases at low zooplankton biomass, possibly due to a combination of advective processes (low C. finmarchicus in winter) and size selective foraging. Though the Calanus species co-occur in most regions, C. glacialis dominates in the Arctic water masses, while C. finmarchicus dominates in Atlantic waters. The larger C. hyperboreus has considerably lower biomass in the Barents Sea than the other Calanus species. Stages CIV and CV have the largest contribution to Calanus species biomass, whereas stages CI-CIII have an overall low impact on the biomass. In the western area of the Barents Sea, we observe indications of an ongoing borealization of the zooplankton community, with a decreasing proportion of the Arctic C. glacialis over the past 20 years. Atlantic C. finmarchicus have increased during the same period.

scholarly journals Interannual dynamics of zooplankton in the Kola Section of the Barents Sea during the recent warming period

2019 ◽  
Vol 76 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. i10-i23
Author(s):  
Irina P Prokopchuk ◽  
Alexander G Trofimov
Keyword(s):  
Barents Sea ◽  
Zooplankton Community ◽  
Zooplankton Biomass ◽  
Calanus Finmarchicus ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Zooplankton Abundance ◽  
Total Zooplankton ◽  
The Barents Sea ◽  
Warming Period ◽  
Total Zooplankton Biomass

Abstract Our research focused on the analysis of interannual variability of zooplankton in the Kola Section (the Barents Sea) in the period of current warming in the Arctic basing on previously unpublished data. The zooplankton community was investigated based on the analysis of 240 plankton samples, collected in late May–early June 2009–2017. A total of 74 zooplankton taxa of nine phyla were identified in the plankton samples, but copepods were the most diverse and numerous taxonomic group. The biodiversity index varied considerably from year to year, but a stable tendency for the index to increase since the beginning of the period studied was observed. Copepods dominated in terms of abundance and biomass, comprising on average 73–96% of the total zooplankton abundance and 81–96% of the total zooplankton biomass. Calanus finmarchicus was the main zooplankton species utterly dominated by abundance and biomass (on average 92 and 97% respectively). Considerable differences in zooplankton abundance and biomass at different stations of the section were observed. Although the investigations were carried out during a warming period, interannual differences in zooplankton abundance and biomass were observed. Zooplankton biomasses were higher in the years with higher temperatures and stronger water inflow.

scholarly journals Distribution and feeding of dominant zooplankton species under autumn coccolithophorid development in the eastern part of the Barents sea

2019 ◽  
Vol 59 (5) ◽  
pp. 734-745
Author(s):  
V. M. Sergeeva ◽  
A. V. Drits ◽  
M. V. Flint
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Distribution ◽  
Barents Sea ◽  
Feeding Activity ◽  
Zooplankton Community ◽  
Zooplankton Biomass ◽  
Calanus Finmarchicus ◽  
Grazing Impact ◽  
The Barents Sea ◽  
Diel Vertical Migrations ◽  
Upper Mixed Layer

Studies of zooplankton spatial distribution and feeding were conducted in the eastern part of the Barents Sea in early October 2014. The study period was characterized by positive anomalies of the water temperature in the upper mixed layer and by the dominance of coccolithophorids in phytoplankton. The scale of spatial variability of zooplankton biomass (6.143.3 mg DW m-3) over the 30,000 km2 investigated area was comparable to the range of interannual variation of zooplankton biomass in the Barents Sea. Calanus finmarchicus and Metridia longa dominated in the zooplankton community. The spatial distribution of C. finmarchicus was correlated with the depth: at the stations, where the depth exceeded 250 m, the biomass was threefold higher than that at the shallower stations. Both species performed diel vertical migrations ascending to the upper 50 m layer during night and actively consuming there coccolithophorids and tintinnids Acanthostomella norvegica. Taking into account the contribution of tintinnids, the amount of assimilated organic carbon in C. finmarchicus CV, CIV and M. longa CV, CIV was 2.6, 8.3 and 3.5, 4.9% of body carbon content, respectively, and compensated therefore the metabolic costs. Grazing impact on the autotrophic phytoplankton by the populations of C. finmarchicus and M. longa did not exceed 5% of its biomass and was preconditioned by the abundance and the feeding activity of migrating copepods.

scholarly journals Climate effects on Barents Sea ecosystem dynamics

2012 ◽  
Vol 69 (7) ◽  
pp. 1303-1316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Padmini Dalpadado ◽  
Randi B. Ingvaldsen ◽  
Leif Christian Stige ◽  
Bjarte Bogstad ◽  
Tor Knutsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Barents Sea ◽  
Zooplankton Biomass ◽  
Ecosystem Dynamics ◽  
Calanus Finmarchicus ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Polar Cod ◽  
Arctic Water ◽  
Pronounced Increase ◽  
Climate Effects ◽  
Barents Sea Ecosystem

AbstractDalpadado, P., Ingvaldsen, R. B., Stige, L. C., Bogstad, B., Knutsen, T., Ottersen, G., and Ellertsen, B. 2012. Climate effects on Barents Sea ecosystem dynamics. – ICES Journal of Marine Science, 69: . Effects of climate variability and change on sea temperature, currents, and water mass distribution are likely to affect the productivity and structure of high-latitude ecosystems. This paper focuses on the Barents Sea (BS), a productive Arcto–boreal shelf ecosystem sustaining several ecologically and economically important fish species. The water masses in the region are classified as Atlantic, Arctic, and mixed, each having a distinct ecological signature. The pronounced increase in temperature and a reduction in the area covered by Arctic water that has taken place during the past decade have affected the ecology of the region. An increase in biomass of lipid-rich euphausiids in recent years, possibly linked to the temperature increase, has apparently provided good feeding and growth conditions for several species, including capelin and young cod. The observed reduction in Arctic zooplankton may on the other hand have negative implications for polar cod and other zooplankton predators linked to the Arctic foodweb. Despite these changes, the BS at present seems to maintain relatively stable levels of boreal zooplankton biomass and production, with no significant changes in the abundances of Calanus finmarchicus or the episodic immigrant C. helgolandicus.

scholarly journals HEAVY METALS IN ZOOPLANKTON ORGANISMS OF THE BARENTS SEA

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 62-75
Author(s):  
L. L. Demina ◽  
A. S. Solomatina ◽  
G. A. Abyzova
Keyword(s):  
Heavy Metals ◽  
Barents Sea ◽  
Water Mass ◽  
Atlantic Water ◽  
Polar Front ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Phytoplankton Production ◽  
Arctic Water ◽  
The Barents Sea ◽  
Geochemical Parameters

Zooplankton plays a Central role in the transfer of matter and energy from primary producers to high trophic organisms, and zooplankton serves as an essential component of sedimentary material that supplies organic matter to the bottom of marine basins. The paper presents new data on the distribution of a number of heavy metals (Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Mo, Ni, Pb) and As in the Calanus zooplankton collected in July–August 2017 in the North-Eastern, Eastern and Central parts of the Barents Sea. It is shown that the spatial distribution of metals in zooplankton organisms is influenced by both biotic ecosystem factors associated with bioproductivity and hydrological and geochemical parameters of the habitat (North Polar Front). In the zooplankton of the Arctic water mass to the South-East of Franz Josef Land, there was an increased content of essential heavy metals Cu, Zn and Cr in comparison with the coastal and Atlantic water masses. Zooplankton from the Central part of the sea (Atlantic water mass), where phytoplankton production is reduced, is characterized by the lowest concentrations of most elements (Ni, Cu, Zn, As and Pb). The highest concentrations were found for both essential heavy metals (Zn and Cu) and toxic metalloid As, which may indicate non-selective bioaccumulation of trace elements by copepods.

scholarly journals The Barents Sea frontal zones and water masses variability (1980–2011)

Ocean Science ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 169-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Oziel ◽  
J. Sirven ◽  
J.-C. Gascard
Keyword(s):  
Interannual Variability ◽  
Barents Sea ◽  
Sea Water ◽  
Atlantic Water ◽  
Polar Front ◽  
Water Masses ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Arctic Water ◽  
The Barents Sea ◽  
Frontal Zones

Abstract. The polar front separates the warm and saline Atlantic Water entering the southern Barents Sea from the cold and fresh Arctic Water located in the north. These water masses can mix together (mainly in the center of the Barents Sea), be cooled by the atmosphere and receive salt because of brine release; these processes generate dense water in winter, which then cascades into the Arctic Ocean to form the Arctic Intermediate Water. To study the interannual variability and evolution of the frontal zones and the corresponding variations of the water masses, we have merged data from the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea and the Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute and have built a new database, which covers the 1980–2011 period. The summer data were interpolated on a regular grid. A probability density function is used to show that the polar front splits into two branches east of 32° E where the topographic constraint weakens. Two fronts can then be identified: the Northern Front is associated with strong salinity gradients and the Southern Front with temperature gradients. Both fronts enclose the denser Barents Sea Water. The interannual variability of the water masses is apparent in the observed data and is linked to that of the ice cover. The frontal zones variability is found by using data from a general circulation model. The link with the atmospheric variability, represented here by the Arctic Oscillation, is not clear. However, model results suggest that such a link could be validated if winter data were taken into account. A strong trend appears: the Atlantic Water (Arctic Water) occupies a larger (smaller) volume of the Barents Sea. This trend amplifies during the last decade and the model study suggests that this could be accompanied by a northwards displacement of the Southern Front in the eastern part of the Barents Sea. The results are less clear for the Northern Front. The observations show that the volume of the Barents Sea Water remains nearly unchanged, which suggests a northwards shift of the Northern Front to compensate for the northward shift of the Southern Front. Lastly, we noticed that the seasonal variability of the position of the front is small.

scholarly journals Figure Influence of the Barents Sea Frontal Zones on Chlorophyll Concentration in Spring

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pavel Makarevich ◽  
Veronika Vodopianova ◽  
Aleksandra Bulavina ◽  
Olga Kalinka
Keyword(s):  
Barents Sea ◽  
Chlorophyll Concentration ◽  
Original Data ◽  
Polar Front ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Arctic Water ◽  
Chl A ◽  
The Barents Sea ◽  
Frontal Zones ◽  
The Impact

In spring of 2016, 2018 and 2019, chlorophyll a (Chl a) content was studied in the 0-50 m layer on the vast Barents Sea area - to the north of 75∘ N. Standard sampling was carried out at 11 oceanographic transects, including 52 stations. Due to the negative ice anomalies and the high-latitude position of the ice edge, original data on Chl a concentration for spring period were obtained in hard-to-reach and previously unexplored areas of the Barents Sea. The investigation area covered the Marginal Ice Arctic zone, as well as the area where the Polar Front was located quasi-stationary. The effect of the Marginal Ice Arctic and Polar frontal zones on the distribution of Chl a concentration was revealed. The strongest factor influencing the distribution of chlorophyll was the Polar Front. It divided mainly Arctic and Atlantic waters. The highest pigment concentrations corresponded to the Arctic water mass and exceeded the content of pigment in water of Atlantic origin by an order of magnitude. The impact of the Marginal Ice Arctic Front was not so obvious - the content of Chl a in waters of various genesis differed, but not more than by a factor of 2.

scholarly journals THE STATUS OF SEA BIRD POPULATIONS AND FACTORS DETERMINING THEIR DEVELOPMENT IN THE BARENTS SEA

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 225-245
Author(s):  
Yu.V. Krasnov ◽  
◽  
A.V. Ezhov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Barents Sea ◽  
Water Masses ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Arctic Water ◽  
Novaya Zemlya ◽  
The Barents Sea ◽  
Franz Josef Land ◽  
Food Stock ◽  
Seabird Colonies

In 2013–2019, observations on Arctic archipelagoes Novaya Zemlya and Franz-Josef Land were made. A series of multiannual monitoring of seabird colonies on the Murman coast (Kola Peninsula) were continued. The results show that large-scale negative effects on seabird populations mostly occur in areas of Atlantic water masses in the southwestern Barents Sea. On the coasts and islands ofMurman, considerable fluctuations of the number of kittiwakes and guillemots imposed on the general decreasing trend were noted. Within the Arctic water masses at Franz-Josef Land and Novaya Zemlya, the conditions of the colonies were more favorable. Geolocation data loggers helped to establish wintering and pre-breeding areas of kittiwakes and guillemots in the Barents Sea. Degradation of the seabird colonies is explained by oceanographic changes in the southern Barents Sea, along with the influence of integrative drivers such as food stock, i. e., presence and availability of capelin, and thermal conditions of the water masses determining its distribution in coastal waters.

scholarly journals Phylogeography of the Brittle Star Ophiura sarsii Lütken, 1855 (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea) from the Barents Sea and East Atlantic

Diversity ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 40
Author(s):  
Evgeny Genelt-Yanovskiy ◽  
Yixuan Li ◽  
Ekaterina Stratanenko ◽  
Natalia Zhuravleva ◽  
Natalia Strelkova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Diversity ◽  
Barents Sea ◽  
Haplotype Diversity ◽  
Brittle Star ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Coi Gene ◽  
High Genetic Diversity ◽  
Svalbard Archipelago ◽  
Mitochondrial Coi ◽  
The Barents Sea

Ophiura sarsii is a common brittle star species across the Arctic and Sub-Arctic regions of the Atlantic and the Pacific oceans. Ophiurasarsii is among the dominant echinoderms in the Barents Sea. We studied the genetic diversity of O.sarsii by sequencing the 548 bp fragment of the mitochondrial COI gene. Ophiurasarsii demonstrated high genetic diversity in the Barents Sea. Both major Atlantic mtDNA lineages were present in the Barents Sea and were evenly distributed between the northern waters around Svalbard archipelago and the southern part near Murmansk coast of Kola Peninsula. Both regions, and other parts of the O.sarsii range, were characterized by high haplotype diversity with a significant number of private haplotypes being mostly satellites to the two dominant haplotypes, each belonging to a different mtDNA clade. Demographic analyses indicated that the demographic and spatial expansion of O.sarsii in the Barents Sea most plausibly has started in the Bølling–Allerød interstadial during the deglaciation of the western margin of the Barents Sea.

Arctic Freshwater in CMIP6: Declining Sea Ice, Increasing Ocean Storage and Export

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannah Zanowski ◽  
Alexandra Jahn ◽  
Marika Holland
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
21St Century ◽  
Barents Sea ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Historical Period ◽  
Freshwater Flux ◽  
Bering Strait ◽  
The Barents Sea ◽  
Late 21St Century ◽  
Freshwater Export

<p>Recently, the Arctic has undergone substantial changes in sea ice cover and the hydrologic cycle, both of which strongly impact the freshwater storage in, and export from, the Arctic Ocean. Here we analyze Arctic freshwater storage and fluxes in 7 climate models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 6 (CMIP6) and assess their agreement over the historical period (1980-2000) and in two future emissions scenarios, SSP1-2.6 and SSP5-8.5. In the historical simulation, few models agree closely with observations over 1980-2000. In both future scenarios the models show an increase in liquid (ocean) freshwater storage in conjunction with a reduction in solid storage and fluxes through the major Arctic gateways (Bering Strait, Fram Strait, Davis Strait, and the Barents Sea Opening) that is typically larger for SSP5-8.5 than SSP1-2.6. The liquid fluxes through the gateways exhibit a more complex pattern, with models exhibiting a change in sign of the freshwater flux through the Barents Sea Opening and little change in the flux through the Bering Strait in addition to increased export from the remaining straits by the end of the 21st century. A decomposition of the liquid fluxes into their salinity and volume contributions shows that the Barents Sea flux changes are driven by salinity changes, while the Bering Strait flux changes are driven by compensating salinity and volume changes. In the straits west of Greenland (Nares, Barrow, and Davis straits), the models disagree on whether there will be a decrease, increase, or steady liquid freshwater export in the early to mid 21st century, although they mostly show increased liquid freshwater export in the late 21st century. The underlying cause of this is a difference in the magnitude and timing of a simulated decrease in the volume flux through these straits. Although the models broadly agree on the sign of late 21st century storage and flux changes, substantial differences exist between the magnitude of these changes and the models’ Arctic mean states, which shows no fundamental improvement in the models compared to CMIP5.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document