scholarly journals Screening for coronary artery disease in early surgical treatment of acute aortic valve infective endocarditis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wiebe G Knol ◽  
Ali R Wahadat ◽  
Jolien W Roos-Hesselink ◽  
Nicolas M Van Mieghem ◽  
Wilco Tanis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Infective Endocarditis ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
Invasive Coronary Angiography ◽  
Perioperative Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Estimated Risk ◽  
Artery Disease

Abstract OBJECTIVES In patients with unknown coronary status undergoing surgery for acute infective endocarditis (IE), the need to screen for coronary artery disease (CAD) and the risk of embolization during invasive coronary angiography (ICA) are debated. Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is a non-invasive alternative in these patients. We aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of ICA and CCTA to diagnose CAD, and the necessity to treat CAD to prevent CAD-related postoperative complications. METHODS In this single-centre retrospective cohort study, all patients with acute aortic IE between 2009 and 2019 undergoing surgery were selected. Outcomes were any clinically evident embolization after preoperative ICA, in-hospital mortality, perioperative myocardial infarction or unplanned revascularization and postoperative renal function. RESULTS Of the 159 included patients, CAD status was already known in 14. No preoperative diagnostics for CAD was done in 46/145, a CCTA was performed in 54/145 patients and an ICA in 52/145 patients. Significant CAD was found after CCTA in 22% and after ICA in 21% of patients. In 1 of the 52 (2%) patients undergoing preoperative ICA, a cerebral embolism occurred. The rate of perioperative myocardial infarction or unplanned revascularization in patients not screened for CAD was 2% (1 out of 46 patients). CONCLUSIONS Although the risk of embolism after preoperative ICA is low, it should be carefully weighed against the estimated risk of CAD-related perioperative complications. CCTA can serve as a gatekeeper for ICA in most patients with acute aortic IE.

scholarly journals Diagnosis and management of coronary artery disease in early surgical treatment of acute infective endocarditis of the aortic valve

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
W.G Knol ◽  
A.W Wahadat ◽  
J.W Roos-Hesselink ◽  
W Tanis ◽  
A Hirsch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Infective Endocarditis ◽  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
Invasive Coronary Angiography ◽  
Perioperative Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Asymptomatic Patients ◽  
Artery Disease

Abstract Background The need to routinely screen for coronary artery disease (CAD) in asymptomatic patients undergoing surgery for acute aortic valve infective endocarditis (IE) is debated. There is concern about the risk of embolization during invasive coronary angiography (ICA), especially in patients with vegetations. Coronary computed tomography angiography (cCTA) is a non-invasive alternative. Purpose To evaluate the prevalence of CAD in patients with acute aortic valve IE, the safety and feasibility of ICA and cCTA for diagnosis of CAD, and CAD related postoperative outcomes. Methods In this single center retrospective cohort study, all patients with acute infective aortic valve endocarditis between 2009–2019 undergoing surgery were selected. Outcomes were embolization after preoperative ICA, in-hospital mortality, perioperative myocardial infarction or unplanned revascularization. Results 159 patients (mean age 58±15, 81% male) underwent surgery. No CAD screening was done in 46/145, a cCTA was performed in 54/145 patients and an ICA in 52/145 patients. In 1 of the 52 patients undergoing preoperative ICA a cerebral embolism occurred. cCTA was not assessable on a patient level in 2 patients and 7 patients underwent both cCTA and ICA. Significant CAD was found in about 20% of patients both after cCTA and ICA. Even though just a minority of patients with CAD was treated with concomitant CABG, only 1 patient with known but untreated CAD needed unplanned revascularization postoperatively. The rate of perioperative myocardial infarction or unplanned revascularization in patients not screened for CAD was 5% (3 patients). Conclusion In patients with acute aortic valve IE the prevalence of CAD is low (14%). The risk of embolism after preoperative ICA is not negligible and should be carefully weighed against the estimated risk of CAD-related perioperative complications. cCTA might serve as a gatekeeper for ICA in many patients with acute aortic IE. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals Diagnostic and prognostic value of coronary artery calcium score of zero: is it time for guidelines to change?

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Arbas Redondo ◽  
D Tebar Marquez ◽  
I.D Poveda Pinedo ◽  
R Dalmau Gonzalez-Gallarza ◽  
S.C Valbuena Lopez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Coronary Angiography ◽  
Coronary Artery Calcium ◽  
Cardiac Ct ◽  
Invasive Coronary Angiography ◽  
Agatston Score ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Artery Disease

Abstract Introduction Cardiac computed tomography (CT) use has progressively increased as the preferred initial test to rule out coronary artery disease (CAD) when clinical likelihood is low. Coronary artery calcium (CAC) detected by CT is a well-established marker for cardiovascular risk. However, it is not recommended for diagnosis of obstructive CAD. Absence of CAC, defined as an Agatston score of zero, has been associated to good prognosis despite underestimation of non-calcified plaques. Purpose To evaluate whether zero CAC score could help ruling out obstructive CAD in a safely manner. Methods Observational study based on a prospective database of patients (pts) referred to cardiac CT between 2017 and 2019. Pts with an Agatston score of zero were selected. Results We included 176 pts with zero CAC score and non-invasive coronary angiography performed. The median duration of follow-up was 23.9 months. Baseline characteristics of the population are shown in Table 1. In 117 pts (66.5%), cardiac CT was indicated as part of their chest pain evaluation. Mean age was 57.2 years old, 68.2% were women and only and 9.4% were active smokers. Normal coronary arteries were found in 173 pts (98.3%). Obstructive CAD, defined as ≥50% luminal diameter stenosis of a major vessel, was present in 1/176 (0.6%); while non-obstructive atherosclerotic plaques were found in 2 pts (1.1%). During follow-up, one patient died of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. None either suffered from myocardial infarction or needed coronary revascularization. Conclusions In our cohort, a zero CAC score detected by cardiac CT rules out obstructive coronary artery disease in 98.3%, with only 1.7% of non-calcified atherosclerosis plaques and 0.6% of major adverse events. Although further research on this topic is needed, these results support the fact that non-invasive coronary angiography could be avoided in patients with low clinical likelihood of CAD and zero CAC score, facilitating the management of the increasing demand for coronary CT and reduction of radiation dose. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Abstract 13804: Clinical Profile and Outcomes of Myocardial Infarction With Non-obstructive Coronary Arteries in Older Adults

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ara H Rostomian ◽  
Derek Q Phan ◽  
Mingsum Lee ◽  
Ray X Zadegan
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Los Angeles ◽  
Coronary Arteries ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Invasive Coronary Angiography ◽  
Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Kaiser Permanente ◽  
Artery Disease

Introduction: Myocardial Infarction with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (MINOCA) is found in 5%-6% of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). As such, the diagnosis and management of AMI patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (NOCAD) poses a challenge as compared to patients with MI with coronary artery disease (MICAD). Hypothesis: To evaluate the characteristics and outcomes of MINOCA in older patients as compared with MICAD patients, with and without revascularization. Methods: This was a retrospective observational study of patients ≥80 years old who underwent invasive coronary angiography (ICA) for AMI between 2009-2019 at Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center. MINOCA was defied as <50% stenosis of coronary arteries on angiography with a troponin level ≥0.05 ng/ml. Patients with MINOCA vs MICAD were compared. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of MINOCA and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to analyze all-cause mortality between cohorts. Results: A total of 259 patients with MINOCA (mean ± SD age 83.8±2.7 years, 68% female) and 687 patients with MICAD (84.7±3.4 years, 40% female) were analyzed. Younger age (odds ratio [OR]=1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.05-1.18), female sex (OR=3.14; CI=2.20-4.48), black race (OR=2.53; CI=1.61-3.98), no history of prior stroke (OR=1.56; CI=1.06-2.33), atrial fibrillation or flutter (OR=2.04; CI:1.38-3.02), lower troponin levels (OR=1.08; CI:1.03-1.11), and lower triglyceride levels per 10 mg/dl increments (OR=1.06; CI:1.03-1.11) increased the odds of having MINCOA as compared to MICAD. At median follow-up of 2.4 years, MINOCA was associated with a lower rate of death (44.8% vs 55.2%, p<0.01) compared to un-revascularized MICAD, but no difference (31.3% vs 40.4%, p=0.68) when compared to re-vascularized MICAD. Conclusions: Patients age ≥80 years with MINOCA have fewer traditional risk factors compared to their counterparts with MICAD and fewer deaths compared to un-revascularized MICAD, but similar mortality compared to revascularized MICAD

Coronary artery disease: from atherosclerosis to obstructive disease, inducible ischaemia, and the ischaemic cascade

ESC CardioMed ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 1331-1339
Author(s):  
Jeroen J. Bax
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Coronary Angiography ◽  
Coronary Atherosclerosis ◽  
Imaging Techniques ◽  
Invasive Coronary Angiography ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Anatomical Imaging ◽  
Artery Disease ◽  
Ischaemic Cascade

The inclusion or exclusion of coronary artery disease is important for patient management, both from a diagnostic and prognostic view, as well as from a therapeutic view. Various detection techniques are available, including invasive (coronary angiography) or non-invasive imaging techniques. The techniques can also be divided into anatomical imaging or functional imaging, where anatomical imaging detects coronary atherosclerosis and stenosis (invasive coronary angiography, but also non-invasive coronary angiography—performed with multidetector computed tomography), while functional imaging (nuclear imaging, stress echocardiography, and cardiovascular magnetic resonance) detects ischaemia: the haemodynamic consequences of the atherosclerosis/stenosis. The early phase of atherosclerotic coronary artery disease is often asymptomatic (and anatomical imaging can be used to detect/exclude coronary atherosclerosis), whereas with progression of atherosclerotic disease, symptoms occur related to myocardial ischaemia. Non-invasive imaging can facilitate in the detection of both early (asymptomatic) and more advanced (symptomatic, ischaemic) coronary artery disease. The pathophysiological cascade of cardiac abnormalities that occur once ischaemia is induced is referred to as the ischaemic cascade. The ischaemic cascade consists of chronological development of perfusion abnormalities, followed by diastolic dysfunction, then systolic dysfunction, and finally electrocardiographic abnormalities. In this chapter, the variety of the different non-invasive imaging techniques to assess the different phases of the non-ischaemic part and the ischaemic part (ischaemic cascade) of coronary artery disease are described.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document