Percutaneous coronary intervention for left main coronary artery stenosis

Author(s):  
Michael Mahmoudi ◽  
Nick Curzen ◽  
Christine Hughes ◽  
Bruno Farah ◽  
Jean Fajadet

Significant left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD) occurs in 5–7% of patients undergoing coronary angiography. Patients with LMCAD have a 50% 3-year mortality despite optimal medical therapy. As such, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) emerged as the gold standard therapy for the treatment of patients with LMCAD either in isolation or in association with disease elsewhere in the coronary circulation. Advances in stent and adjunctive intracoronary imaging as well as pharmacotherapy has enabled percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to challenge CABG in such patients, with a host of randomized and observational studies comparing the safety and efficacy of PCI with CABG. This chapter covers historical data on CABG in LMCAD, compares various PCI techniques with CABG, and finally evaluates the differences in efficacy and safety.

Author(s):  
Christine Hughes ◽  
Bruno Farah ◽  
Jean Fajadet

Significant unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease occurs in 5–7% of patients undergoing coronary angiography (and patients with ULMCA disease treated medically have a 3-year mortality rate of 50%. Several studies have shown a significant benefit following treatment of left main (LM) stenosis with coronary bypass grafting compared with medical treatment. Until recently coronary bypass grafting has been the gold standard therapy for LM disease. However, advances in percutaneous intervention techniques and stent technology have allowed re-evaluation of the role of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for LM disease. Recent studies have focused on the safety and efficacy of stenting the left main coronary artery (LMCA) to determine if it does provide a true alternative to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). So should we stent the LM?


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document