scholarly journals 850. Outcomes of Patients Discharged on Parenteral Ceftriaxone Compared with Oxacillin or Cefazolin in Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcal aureus (MSSA) Bloodstream Infections

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S16-S17
Author(s):  
Lee Erik Connor ◽  
Yasir Hamad ◽  
Ige George
Keyword(s):  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Outcome Data ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Clinical Failure ◽  
Median Length ◽  
Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy ◽  
Group 5 ◽  
Staphylococcal Aureus

Abstract Background MSSA is a leading cause of bloodstream infection (BSI) and its incidence is on the rise. Standard of care (SOC) is prolonged parenteral therapy with nafcillin, oxacillin, or cefazolin. Ceftriaxone is active against MSSA and can be given conveniently as a daily infusion. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of hospitalized adults with MSSA BSI from December 2014 to May 2018, defined as ≥1 blood cultures positive for MSSA and discharged on outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) on either ceftriaxone, cefazolin, or oxacillin. We excluded patients with ESRD and polymicrobial infections. We collected demographics, comorbidities, outcome data, and treatment-related adverse events. The primary outcome was 90-day mortality with secondary outcomes of clinical failure and microbiologic failure. Clinical failure was defined as readmission for any infection within 90 days of discharge or a change in antibiotics from the planned course of therapy after discharge. Microbiologic failure was defined as reinfection with MSSA within 90 days of discharge from any site. Results In total, 167 patients had a BSI with MSSA. Of those patients, 66 (39.5%) were discharged on SOC and 101 (60.5%) on ceftriaxone. The two groups were similar in terms of their demographics (Table 1). The SOC group had more cases of endocarditis with 34 (51.5%) than ceftriaxone with 25 (24.8%) (P = 0.001). LOS for the SOC group had a median of 14.05 days whereas the ceftriaxone group had a median length of stay of 7.88 (P = 0.004). In the SOC group, 5 (7.6%) patients died compared with 8 (7.9%) patients in the ceftriaxone group within 90 days of the onset of bacteremia which was not statistically significant (P = 0.94) (Figure 1). There were 4 (6.1%) cases of microbiologic failure in SOC and 7 (6.9%) cases in the ceftriaxone group (P = 0.83). For clinical failures, the SOC had 6 (9.1%) cases compared with the 19 (18.8%) cases in the ceftriaxone group (P = 0.13). Conclusion Ceftriaxone was not statistically different when compared with SOC in terms of mortality, microbiologic failure, or clinical failure. Though clinical failures numerically were more frequent in the ceftriaxone group. Ceftriaxone maybe a reasonable and convenient option to SOC for patients with uncomplicated MSSA BSI discharged on OPAT, but further studies are needed. Disclosures All Authors: No reported Disclosures.

scholarly journals Clinical Outcomes of Antipseudomonal vs. Non-Antipseudomonal Therapy in Patients with Osteomyelitis

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S97-S97
Author(s):  
Jeffrey W Jansen ◽  
Ryan P Moenster
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Cohort Analysis ◽  
Anatomical Site ◽  
Clinical Failure ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Exclusion Criteria ◽  
Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Analysis ◽  
Culture Negative

Abstract Background Osteomyelitis (OM) in diabetics is frequently a polymicrobial infection that rarely involves Pseudomonas (4–5% of cases). Bone cultures have a low-positive yield of 34–50% and, as a result, many patients receive antimicrobial regimens which include antipseudomonal (AP) therapy. Methods A retrospective cohort analysis of adult Veterans with OM treated with AP compared with non-antipseudomonal (NAP) therapy was conducted. Patients managed by the VA St. Louis outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) service from 1/1/2009 to 7/31/2015 were identified and screened for inclusion. Patients with culture negative (CN) or non-pseudomonal superficial swab cultures (SCx) were included. Figure 1 presents the study profile and exclusion criteria. The primary outcome was clinical failure, defined as a composite of: (1) extension of antibiotics beyond 1 week of the planned duration, (2) recurrence of OM at the same anatomical site within 12 months, or (3) any unplanned surgery or amputation at the anatomical site within 12 months of ABx completion. Results Overall, 104 patients with 109 OM encounters were included; there were 29 CN encounters and 80 SCx encounters. Table 1 presents baseline demographics. The overall failure rate was 55/109 (50.5%). The results of the analysis are shown in Table 2. While not included in the primary analysis, Pseudomonas was isolated from 8/88 (9.1%) swab cultures and 5/33 (15%) deep cultures. Conclusion Empiric AP therapy did not improve clinical outcomes in patients with either CN or SCx OM. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals Use of the Accelerate Pheno System for Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Pathogens in Positive Blood Cultures and Impact on Time to Results and Workflow

2017 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Angella Charnot-Katsikas ◽  
Vera Tesic ◽  
Nedra Love ◽  
Brandy Hill ◽  
Cindy Bethel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Clinical Microbiology Laboratory ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Cellular Analysis ◽  
Hands On

ABSTRACT The Accelerate Pheno system uses automated fluorescence in situ hybridization technology with morphokinetic cellular analysis to provide rapid species identification (ID) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) results for the most commonly identified organisms in bloodstream infections. The objective was to evaluate the accuracy and workflow of bacterial and yeast ID and bacterial AST using the Accelerate Pheno system in the clinical microbiology laboratory. The consecutive fresh blood cultures received in the laboratory were analyzed by the Accelerate Pheno system within 0 to 8 h of growth detection. ID/AST performance, the average times to results, and workflow were compared to those of the routine standard of care. Of the 232 blood cultures evaluated (223 monomicrobial and 9 polymicrobial) comprising 241 organisms, the overall sensitivity and specificity for the identification of organisms were 95.6% and 99.5%, respectively. For antimicrobial susceptibility, the overall essential agreement was 95.1% and categorical agreement was 95.5% compared to routine methods. There was one very major error and 3 major errors. The time to identification and the time to susceptibility using the Accelerate Pheno system were decreased by 23.47 and 41.86 h, respectively, compared to those for the standard of care. The reduction in hands on time was 25.5 min per culture. The Accelerate Pheno system provides rapid and accurate ID/AST results for most of the organisms found routinely in blood cultures. It is easy to use, reduces hands on time for ID/AST of common blood pathogens, and enables clinically actionable results to be released much earlier than with the current standard of care.

scholarly journals 185. Does an Infectious Diseases Consultation Improve Clinical Outcomes and Treatment Bundle Adherence for Enterococcal Bacteremia in a Multicenter Healthcare System?

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S201-S201
Author(s):  
Emily A Shephard ◽  
Kristin E Mondy ◽  
Kelly R Reveles ◽  
Theresa Jaso ◽  
Dusten T Rose
Keyword(s):  
Infectious Diseases ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Clinical Failure ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Composite Failure ◽  
Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia ◽  
Joint Infections ◽  
Infectious Diseases Consultation ◽  
Enterococcal Bacteremia

Abstract Background Infectious diseases consultation (IDC) for Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia has a known mortality benefit, but for other gram positive bacteremias the benefit is not known. This study examined differences in outcomes for enterococcal bacteremia when management includes IDC. Methods This retrospective multicenter observational cohort study included adults with at least 1 positive blood culture with Enterococcus species. Patients who died or transferred to palliative care within 2 days of positive blood cultures were excluded. The primary outcome was a composite of clinical failure, including persistent blood cultures or fever for 5 days and in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included adherence to a treatment bundle (appropriate empiric/definitive antibiotics, echocardiography (ECHO), duration of treatment, and repeat blood cultures). Results A total of 250 patients were included. IDC was obtained in 62.0% of patients. More patients in the IDC group had endocarditis (20% vs 0%, p < 0.0001) and bone and joint infections (13.5% vs 1.1%, p = 0.001), compared to more UTI (16.8% vs 39.0%, p < 0.0001) in the non-IDC group. Patients in the IDC group had more murmurs on initial exam (21.3% vs 6.3%, p = 0.002), prosthetic device (49.7% vs 27.4%, p = 0.001), and NOVA scores of ≥ 4 (40.6% vs 18.9%, p < 0.0001). Most infections were due to E. faecalis (78.4%) and most were susceptible to vancomycin and ampicillin at 90.4% and 92.4%, respectively. The composite of clinical failure occurred in 22.6% of patients with IDC and 16.8% in the non-IDC group (p=0.274). There was higher adherence to the treatment bundle in the IDC group (Figure 1). More patients in the IDC group were treated with ampicillin (47.1% vs 22.1%, p < 0.0001), and numerically more patients received treatment with vancomycin in the non-IDC group (17.4% vs 24.2%, p = 0.068). In the multivariate analysis, vasopressors were the only independent predictor of the primary outcome (OR 9.3, 95% CI 3.5-24.8, p < 0.0001). Figure 1. Adherence to treatment bundle. IDC = infectious diseases consultation, Echo = echocardiogram, * = p < 0.05 Conclusion There was no difference in rates of composite failure in patients with or without IDC; however, adherence to a treatment bundle was higher in the IDC group. IDC demonstrated stewardship benefits with regards to vancomycin usage. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals Fluoroquinolone Versus Nonfluoroquinolone Treatment of Bloodstream Infections Caused by Chromosomally Mediated AmpC-Producing Enterobacteriaceae

Antibiotics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 331
Author(s):  
Sarah Grace Gunter ◽  
Katie E. Barber ◽  
Jamie L. Wagner ◽  
Kayla R. Stover
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Clinical Failure ◽  
Beta Lactam ◽  
Definitive Therapy ◽  
Effective Option ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Microbiological Cure

Objectives: Chromosomally mediated AmpC-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CAE) display high susceptibility to fluoroquinolones; minimal clinical data exist supporting comparative clinical outcomes. The objective of this study was to compare treatment outcomes between fluoroquinolone and nonfluoroquinolone definitive therapy of bloodstream infections caused by CAE. Methods: This retrospective cohort assessed adult patients with positive blood cultures for CAE that received inpatient treatment for ≥48 h. The primary outcome was difference in clinical failure between patients who received fluoroquinolone (FQ) versus non-FQ treatment. Secondary endpoints included microbiological cure, infection-related length of stay, 90-day readmission, and all-cause inpatient mortality. Results: 56 patients were included in the study (31 (55%) received a FQ as definitive therapy; 25 (45%) received non-FQ). All non-FQ patients received a beta-lactam (BL). Clinical failure occurred in 10 (18%) patients, with 4 (13%) in the FQ group and 6 (24%) in the BL group (p = 0.315). Microbiological cure occurred in 55 (98%) patients. Median infection-related length of stay was 10 (6–20) days, with a significantly longer stay occurring in the BL group (p = 0.002). There was no statistical difference in 90-day readmissions between groups (7% FQ vs. 17% BL; p = 0.387); one patient expired. Conclusion: These results suggest that fluoroquinolones do not adversely impact clinical outcomes in patients with CAE. When alternatives to beta-lactam therapy are needed, fluoroquinolones may provide an effective option.

scholarly journals Comparison of Outcomes in Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy (OPAT) Patients Receiving Vancomycin vs. Non-Vancomycin Anti-MRSA Therapy

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S330-S330
Author(s):  
Carolyn Stoneking ◽  
Ryan P Moenster ◽  
Travis W Linneman
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Therapy ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Adverse Drug Events ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Multivariate Model ◽  
Clinical Failure ◽  
Vancomycin Therapy ◽  
Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Secondary Outcomes

Abstract Background This evaluation set out to determine whether vancomycin therapy was associated with higher rates of clinical failure compared with non-vancomycin anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus therapy (NVAMT) in outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT). Methods This was a retrospective, single center cohort study including patients who received ≥7 days of OPAT with vancomycin, ceftaroline, or daptomycin from January 1, 2009 through March 31, 2016 at the VA Saint Louis Healthcare System. The primary outcome was clinical failure, defined as a composite of acute kidney injury (AKI), creatinine phosphokinase elevations ≥ 500 units/L, adverse drug events necessitating a change in therapy, readmission due to recurrence of infection, or reinitiation of antibiotics after discontinuation. Secondary outcomes were the individual components of the composite primary outcome. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate independent risk factors for clinical failure. Factors evaluated for inclusion in the multivariate model were age >65 at initiation, creatinine clearance >50 mL/minute, length of therapy >28 days, concomitant antibiotic therapy, comorbid disease states, and vancomycin therapy. Results A total of 125 patients were included in the analysis – 72 receiving vancomycin and 53 receiving NVAMT. Baseline characteristics between groups were similar, except patients in the NVAMT group had a greater mean serum creatinine and a higher rate of CKD at baseline; 1.53 vs 1.23 (P = 0.032) and 35.9% vs. 19.4% (P = 0.04) respectively. Forty-three percent (31/72) of patients receiving vancomycin achieved clinical failure compared with 54.7% (29/53) of NVAMT patients (P = 0.197). Of the secondary outcomes analyzed, only readmission due to recurrence was significant between groups (vancomycin vs. NVAMT) – 13.8% vs. 30.2% (P = 0.026). In the univariate model only the choice of vancomycin met pre-defined criteria (P < 0.2) for inclusion in the multivariate model. In the multivariate analysis the choice of vancomycin was not found to be significant (0.71 (95% CI 0.33–1.52), P = 0.37). Conclusion Vancomycin was not associated with an increased risk of clinical failure when compared with NVAMT in patients receiving OPAT. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals Chemical, Mechanical, and Heat Cleaning to Decontaminate Hospital Drains Harboring Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriales

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s466-s467
Author(s):  
Alainna Juliette Jamal ◽  
Rajni Pantelidis ◽  
Rachael Sawicki ◽  
Angel Li ◽  
Wayne Chiu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Group Versus ◽  
Brain Heart Infusion ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Comparator Group ◽  
Carbapenemase Gene ◽  
Cleaning Intervention

Background: Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriales (CPE) outbreaks have been linked to contaminated wastewater drainage systems in hospitals. The optimal strategy for CPE decontamination of drains is unknown. In this randomized controlled trial, we aimed to determine whether combining chemical, mechanical, and heat cleaning was superior to routine cleaning for drain decontamination. Methods: We enrolled CPE-contaminated hospital drains at 2 geographic locations. Eligible drains were those initially found to be culture positive in a 2017 study and that remained positive (by RT-PCR) when retested twice in August 2018. Drains were stratified by type (sink versus shower) and randomized with a 1:1 allocation ratio (as per computer-generated randomization) to standard-of-care cleaning (comparator) or combined chemical, mechanical, and heat cleaning (intervention) on day 0. Drain tail pieces were swabbed on days 0 (before administration of the intervention), 1, 2, 3, 7, and 14, and at months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. Swabs were placed into brain heart infusion with 10% Dey-Engley neutralizing broth and incubated overnight. Direct RT-PCR was performed to detect KPC, VIM, NDM, OXA-48–like, IMP, GES, and SME genes. The primary outcome was drain decontamination, defined as no detectable carbapenemase gene in the drain from day 1 to 7 (inclusive). Results: Overall, 33 CPE-contaminated drains were enrolled (7 sink and 26 shower); 17 and 16 drains were randomized to the intervention and comparator, respectively. Moreover, 12 (36%) drains met the primary outcome of decontamination, 18 (55%) remained contaminated, and 3 (9%) could not be assessed. Among drains that could be assessed, 11 of 15 (74%) in the intervention group met the primary outcome of decontamination compared to 1 of 15 (7%) in the comparator group (P = .0005). Of the 11 drains in the intervention group that were decontaminated, the carbapenemase gene present at enrollment was subsequently detected in 10 (91%): 1 (10%) at day 14, 3 (30%) at month 1, 4 (40%) at month 3, 1 (10%) at month 4, and 1 (10%) at month 6. The median time to a swab yielding CPE was 1 day in the comparator group versus 14 days in the intervention group (Fig. 1). Overall, 24 drains (73%) had a carbapenemase gene (that was not detectable at enrollment) appear in the follow-up. Of patients identified as CPE colonized or infected during this study, none occupied rooms with these drains. Conclusions: Chemical, mechanical, and heat cleaning were superior to standard cleaning for CPE decontamination of hospital drains at 7 days, but these trends were not sustained. Such cleaning may be useful if applied repeatedly.Funding: NoneDisclosures: Allison McGeer reports funds to her institution for studies for which she is the principal investigator from Pfizer and Merck as well as consulting fees from Sanofi-Pasteur, Sunovion, GSK, Pfizer, and Cidara.

scholarly journals 270. Clinical Outcomes of Ceftriaxone versus Penicillin G for Complicated Viridans Group Streptococci Bacteremia

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S137-S137
Author(s):  
Stephanie Wo ◽  
Yanina Dubrovskaya ◽  
Justin Siegfried ◽  
John Papadopoulos ◽  
Shin-Pung Jen
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Hospital Readmission ◽  
Protective Factor ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Penicillin G ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Extended Spectrum Beta Lactamase ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Viridans Group Streptococci

Abstract Background Viridans group streptococci (VGS) is an infrequent yet significant cause of bloodstream infections, and complicated cases may require prolonged antibiotic therapy. Ceftriaxone (CTX) and penicillin G (PCN G) are both considered first line options for VGS infections, but comparisons between these agents are limited. We evaluated the clinical outcomes amongst patients treated with CTX and PCN G for complicated VGS bacteremia. Methods This was a single-center, retrospective study of adult patients with ≥1 positive VGS blood culture who were treated with either CTX or PCN G/ampicillin (both included in PCN G arm) between January 2013 and June 2019. The primary outcome was a composite of safety endpoints, including hospital readmission due to VGS or an adverse event (AE) from therapy, Clostridioides difficile infections, treatment modification or discontinuation due to an antibiotic-related AE, and development of extended-spectrum beta lactamase resistance. Secondary outcomes included the individual safety endpoints, VGS bacteremia recurrence, hospital readmission, and all-cause mortality. Results Of 328 patients screened for inclusion, 94 patients met eligibility criteria (CTX n= 64, PCN G n=34). Median age was 68 years (IQR 56–81) and 68% were male. Study patients did not present with critical illness, as reflected by a median Pitt bacteremia score of 0 in the CTX and 1 in the PCN G arms, P=0.764. Streptococcus mitis was the most common VGS isolate and infective endocarditis (IE) was the predominant source of infection. CTX was not significantly associated with increased risk of the primary outcome (14% vs. 27%; P= 0.139). The driver of the composite outcome was hospital readmission due to VGS bacteremia or therapy complications. Results were similar in the subgroup of patients with IE (12.5% vs. 23.5%). No secondary endpoints differed significantly between groups. On multivariate analysis, source removal was a protective factor of the primary outcome (OR 0.1; 95% CI 0.020–0.6771; P= 0.017). Conclusion Despite potential safety concerns with the prolonged use of CTX in complicated VGS bacteremia, this study did not demonstrate a higher rate of treatment failure, adverse events, or resistance. These findings warrant further exploration. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals 1341. Blood Volume Collected for Blood Cultures in Infants with Suspected Neonatal Sepsis in the NICU

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S682-S682
Author(s):  
Maria S Rueda Altez ◽  
Lamia Soghier ◽  
Joseph M Campos ◽  
James Bost ◽  
Jiaxiang Gai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bloodstream Infection ◽  
Blood Volume ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Continuous Variables ◽  
Volume Calculation ◽  
Culture Negative ◽  
Time Of Collection ◽  
Rule Out

Abstract Background Blood cultures have high sensitivity to detect bacteremia in septic neonates when >=1 ml of blood is collected. Neonatologists often cite low confidence in microbiologic sampling as rationale for continuing antibiotics without a focus of infection despite negative blood cultures, resulting in prolonged antimicrobial therapy. We aim to describe the blood culture sample volumes in NICU patients, to identify factors associated with sample volumes < 1ml, and to compare the sample volumes of patients treated for culture-negative sepsis with those with bloodstream infections and those treated for a ≤72-hour sepsis rule-out Methods Data from this observational cohort study were collected retrospectively and prospectively from NICU patients with blood cultures obtained from September 2018 to February 2019. Clinical data were collected through chart review. All inoculated culture bottles were weighed for volume calculation. We determined the association of age, weight, sample source, and time of collection with volume < 1mL. Continuous variables were analyzed using Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney, and categorical variables using chi-squared test. For aim 3, the volumes of the groups were compared using analysis of variance. Results A total of 310 blood cultures were identified, corresponding to 159 patients. Of these, 49 (16%) were positive. Among the negative blood cultures, 86% were collected in patients who subsequently received antibiotics (Figure 1). Median inoculated volume was 0.6 ml (IQR: 0.1-2.4). Weight and age at time of culture collection, source of sample, and time of collection were not significantly associated with the inoculation of < 1ml of blood. Median volume of blood was 0.6ml (0.3-0.6) for sepsis rule-out, 0.6ml (0.2-0.6) for bloodstream infection, and 0.6ml (0.6-1.4) for culture-negative sepsis. No difference was found among the three groups (p=0.54) Figure 1. Classification of blood cultures identified during study period Conclusion The blood volume collected for cultures in the NICU is lower than recommended. Clinical and environmental characteristics are not significantly associated with the inoculated volume. The volume of blood sampled does not differ in patients with culture-negative sepsis, bloodstream infection and sepsis rule-out, and should not be a justification for longer duration of antibiotic therapy Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Comparison of Inpatient Standard-of-Care to Outpatient Oritavancin Therapy for Patients With Acute Uncomplicated Cellulitis

2021 ◽  
pp. 089719002110212
Author(s):  
Brandy Williams ◽  
Justin Muklewicz ◽  
Taylor D. Steuber ◽  
April Williams ◽  
Jonathan Edwards
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Readmission ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Hospital Readmissions ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Economic Outcomes ◽  
Day Hospital ◽  
Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy ◽  
Average Length Of Stay ◽  
Observational Cohort ◽  
The Difference

Background: Shifting inpatient antibiotic treatment to outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy may minimize treatment for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, including cellulitis. The purpose of this evaluation was to compare 30-day hospital readmission or admission due to cellulitis and economic outcomes of inpatient standard-of-care (SoC) management of acute uncomplicated cellulitis to outpatient oritavancin therapy. Methods: This retrospective, observational cohort study was conducted at a 941-bed community teaching hospital. Adult patients 18 years and older treated for acute uncomplicated cellulitis between February 2015 to December 2018 were eligible for inclusion. Information was obtained from hospital and billing department records. Patients were assigned to either inpatient SoC or outpatient oritavancin cohorts for comparison. Results: 1,549 patients were included in the study (1,348 in the inpatient SoC cohort and 201 in the outpatient oritavancin cohort). The average length of stay for patients admitted was 3.6 ± 1.5 days. The primary outcome of 30-day hospital readmission or admission due to cellulitis occurred in 49/1348 (3.6%) patients in the inpatient SoC cohort versus 1/201 (0.5%) in the outpatient oritavancin cohort (p = 0.02). The difference between costs and reimbursement was improved in the outpatient oritavancin group (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Outpatient oritavancin for acute uncomplicated cellulitis was associated with reduction in 30-day hospital readmissions or admissions compared to inpatient SoC. Beneficial economic outcomes for the outpatient oritavancin cohort were observed. Additional studies are required to confirm these findings.

scholarly journals Early Treatment Outcomes for Bloodstream Infections Caused by Potential AmpC Beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales with Focus on Piperacillin/Tazobactam: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Antibiotics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 665
Author(s):  
Lena Herrmann ◽  
Aurelia Kimmig ◽  
Jürgen Rödel ◽  
Stefan Hagel ◽  
Norman Rose ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Treatment Outcomes ◽  
Treatment Response ◽  
Sofa Score ◽  
Early Treatment ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Beta Lactamase ◽  
Early Treatment Response

The Gram-negative bacilli Serratia spp., Providencia spp., Morganella morganii, Citrobacter freundii complex, Enterobacter spp. and Klebsiella aerogenes are common Enterobacterales that may harbor inducible chromosomal AmpC beta-lactamase genes. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate treatment outcomes and identify predictors of early treatment response in patients with bloodstream infection caused by potential AmpC beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (SPICE-BSI). This cohort study included adult patients with SPICE-BSI hospitalized between 01/2011 and 02/2019. The primary outcome was early treatment response 72 h after the start of active treatment, defined as survival, hemodynamic stability, improved or stable SOFA score, resolution of fever and leukocytosis and microbiologic resolution. Among 295 included patients, the most common focus was the lower respiratory tract (27.8%), and Enterobacter spp. (n = 155) was the main pathogen. The early treatment response rate was significantly lower (p = 0.006) in the piperacillin/tazobactam group (17/81 patients, 21.0%) than in the carbapenem group (40/82 patients, 48.8%). Independent negative predictors of early treatment response (p < 0.02) included initial SOFA score, liver comorbidity and empiric piperacillin/tazobactam treatment. In vitro piperacillin/tazobactam resistance was detected in three patients with relapsed Enterobacter-BSI and initial treatment with piperacillin/tazobactam. In conclusion, our findings show that piperacillin/tazobactam might be associated with early treatment failure in patients with SPICE-BSI.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document