Motor threshold, motor evoked potential, central motor conduction time

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sein H. Schmidt ◽  
Stephan A. Brandt
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Evoked Potential ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Motor Evoked Potential ◽  
Conduction Time ◽  
Optical Navigation ◽  
Motor Threshold ◽  
Pathological Conditions ◽  
Latency Variability ◽  
First Time

In this chapter, we survey parameters influencing the assessment of the size and latency of motor evoked potentials (MEP), in normal and pathological conditions, and methods to allow for a meaningful quantification of MEP characteristics. In line with the first edition of this textbook, we extensively discuss three established mechanisms of intrinsic physiological variance and collision techniques that aim to minimize their influence. For the first time, in line with the ever wider use of optical navigation and targeting systems in brain stimulation, we discuss novel methods to capture and minimize the influence of extrinsic biophysical variance. Together, following the rules laid out in this chapter, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can account for spinal and extrinsic biophysical variance to advance investigations of the central origins of MEP size and latency variability.

scholarly journals Peculiarities of motor evoked potential in healthy children of different age

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 228-231
Author(s):  
Vladislav B. Voitenkov ◽  
N. V. Skripchenko ◽  
A. V. Klimkin ◽  
A. I. Aksenova
Keyword(s):  
Normative Data ◽  
Evoked Potential ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Pediatric Population ◽  
Motor Evoked Potential ◽  
Conduction Time ◽  
Healthy Children ◽  
Abductor Hallucis ◽  
Abductor Pollicis Brevis ◽  
Pediatric Disorders

Aim of the work The implementation of the database for reference values of motor evoked potentials (MEP) in healthy children of different ages. Methods 95 healthy children were enrolled. Age ranged from 1 to 204 months. Three subgroups were established: children of 1-12 months (n=31, 18 males, 13 females), 12-144 months (n=27, 14 males, 13 females) and 144-204 (n=37, 20 males, 17 females) months. All children were healthy. Diagnostic transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was performed in all patients. MEP shape, threshold, latency and amplitudes were recorded for hands (m. Abductor pollicis brevis) and legs (m. Abductor Hallucis). Central motor conduction time (CMCT) was calculated. Results. Along with age there was observed the elongation of MEP latency, gain in amplitudes and shape normalization. There were significant differences in the elongation of MEP latency between children aged of 1-12 months and children from two other subgroups (12-144 and 144-204 months). Conclusions. Our normative data can be usedfor comparative studies in the broad spectrum of pediatric disorders. Age restrictions have to be taken in a consideration when performing the TMS in pediatric population.

scholarly journals Measurement of Motor Evoked Potential in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Based on Latency, Amplitude, Central Motoric Conduction Time and Resting Motor Threshold

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tugas Ratmono ◽  
Andi Wijaya ◽  
Cahyono Kaelan ◽  
Andi Asadul Islam ◽  
Ferry Sandra
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Evoked Potential ◽  
Motor Evoked Potential ◽  
Conduction Time ◽  
Size Measurement ◽  
Motor Threshold ◽  
Dynamic Changes ◽  
Resting Motor Threshold ◽  
Function Impairment

BACKGROUND: After stroke, there are dynamic changes of motor evoked potential (MEP), including latency, amplitude, central motoric conduction time (CMCT) and resting motor threshold (RMT) in cerebral. However, latency, CMCT, amplitude and RMT have not been clearly shown in acute ischemic stroke patients with motoric function impairment based on Modified Motoric Research Council Scale (MRCs).METHODS: Patients with motoric function impairment after acute ischemic stroke were recruited, scored based on MRCs and grouped. Latency, amplitude, CMCT and RMT (% intensity) was measured using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Latency, amplitude, CMCT and RMT of subjects based on affected hemisphere (AH) and unaffected hemisphere (UH); stroke onset; and motoric severity; were analyzed and compared statistically.RESULTS: Thirty-seven subjects with complete assessments were selected. Results of MEP size measurement between AH and UH showed that latency, amplitude, CMCT and RMT of AH and UH were significantly different (p<0.05). In accordance to AH and UH results, latency, amplitude, CMCT and RMT of mild, moderate and severe groups based on motoric severity, showed that latency and CMCT were prolonged, RMT was increased, while amplitude was decreased along with severity increment. The amplitude and RMT among the groups were significantly different with p=0.034 and p=0.029, respectively.CONCLUSION: MEP size measurement including latency, amplitude, CMCT and RMT have significant different in AH and UH. In addition, amplitude and RMT were significantly different in MRCs groups, therefore the MEP size measurement could be suggested as prognostic tool.KEYWORDS: MEP, latency, amplitude, CMCT, RMT

scholarly journals The motor evoked potential in aids and HAM/TSP State of the evidence

2009 ◽  
Vol 67 (4) ◽  
pp. 1157-1163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fidias E. Leon-Sarmiento ◽  
Mohamed Elfakhani ◽  
Nash N. Boutros
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Evoked Potential ◽  
Corticospinal Tract ◽  
Spastic Paraparesis ◽  
Motor Evoked Potential ◽  
Conduction Time ◽  
Central Motor Conduction Time ◽  
Medline Search ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Asymptomatic Patients

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to better understand the involvement of the corticospinal tract, assessed by non-invasive transcranial stimulation, in order to determine the actual involvement of the motor system in patients with HAM/TSP and AIDS. METHOD: An exhaustive MEDLINE search for the period of 1985 to 2008 for all articles cross-referenced for "HTLV-I, HTLV-II, HTLV-III and HIV, HIV1, HIV2, evoked potential, motor evoked potential, high voltage electrical stimulation, transcranial magnetic stimulation, magnetic stimulation, corticomotor physiology, motor pathways, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, AIDS, SIDA, tropical spastic paraparesis, HTLV-I-associated myelopathy, HAM, TSP, and HAM/TSP" were selected and analysed. RESULTS: Eighteen papers published in English, Spanish, Portuguese, French and Japanese were identified. Only the central motor conduction time has been analyzed in seropositive patients to human retroviruses. The investigations done on HAM/TSP support the involvement of the pyramidal tract mainly at lower levels, following a centripetal pattern; in AIDS, such an involvement seems to be more prominent at brain levels following a centrifugal pattern. CONCLUSION: The central motor conduction time abnormalities and involvement differences of the corticospinal tract of patients with AIDS and HAM/TSP dissected here would allow to re-orient early neurorehabilitation measures in these retroviruses-associated neurodegenerative disorders. Besides this, more sophisticated and sensitive non-invasive corticospinal stimulation measures that detect early changes in thalamocortical-basal ganglia circuitry will be needed in both clinically established as well as asymptomatic patients at times when the fastest corticospinal fibers remain uninvolved.

Validation of surface recordings of the diaphragm response to transcranial magnetic stimulation in humans

2003 ◽  
Vol 94 (2) ◽  
pp. 453-461 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandre Demoule ◽  
Eric Verin ◽  
Chrystèle Locher ◽  
Jean-Philippe Derenne ◽  
Thomas Similowski
Keyword(s):  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Evoked Potential ◽  
Potential Problem ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Motor Evoked Potential ◽  
Abdominal Muscles ◽  
Serratus Anterior ◽  
Motor Pathways ◽  
Surface Electrodes

The integrity of the central efferent motor pathways to the diaphragm can be assessed by using transcranial magnetic stimulation to measure the latency of the corresponding motor evoked potentials with surface electrodes. Because transcranial magnetic stimulation does not activate the diaphragm alone, signal contamination is a potential problem. To evaluate this issue, surface diaphragmatic motor-evoked potential latencies were compared with latencies recorded from diaphragm needle in 9 healthy volunteers. Surface latencies of muscles likely to contaminate the diaphragm signals (serratus anterior, pectoralis major, and tranversus abdominis) were also recorded. The latencies in response to nonfocal transcranial stimulation from surface electrodes were not significantly different from the needle ones (17 ± 1.3 vs. 17.2 ± 1.1 ms, respectively) but were significantly different from the latencies of the other muscles. In two cases, signal contamination appeared likely (serratus anterior in 1 case, abdominal muscles in 1 case). It is possible to reliably measure the latency of the diaphragm response to transcranial magnetic stimulation with adequately positioned surface electrodes.

scholarly journals Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation-induced motor cortex activity influences visual awareness judgments

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justyna Hobot ◽  
Marcin Koculak ◽  
Borysław Paulewicz ◽  
Kristian Sandberg ◽  
Michał Wierzchoń
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Evoked Potential ◽  
Response Times ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Visual Awareness ◽  
Motor Evoked Potential ◽  
Perceptual Awareness ◽  
Identification Task ◽  
Scale Response ◽  
Stimulus Perception

AbstractThe influence of non-visual information on visual awareness judgments has recently gained substantial interest. Using single-pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS), we investigate the potential contribution of evidence from the motor system to judgment of visual awareness. We hypothesized that TMS-induced activity in the primary motor cortex (M1) would increase reported visual awareness as compared to the control condition. Additionally, we investigated whether TMS-induced motor-evoked potential could measure accumulated evidence for stimulus perception. Following stimulus presentation and TMS, participants first rated their visual awareness verbally using the Perceptual Awareness Scale, after which they responded manually to a Gabor orientation identification task. Delivering TMS to M1 resulted in higher average awareness ratings as compared to the control condition, in both correct and incorrect identification task response trials, when the hand with which participants responded was contralateral to the stimulated hemisphere (TMS-response-congruent trials). This effect was accompanied by longer Perceptual Awareness Scale response times, irrespective of the congruence between TMS and identification response. Moreover, longer identification response times were observed in TMS-response-congruent trials in the M1 condition as compared to the control condition. Additionally, the amplitudes of motor-evoked potentials were related to the awareness ratings when response congruence was taken into account. We argue that motor-evoked potential can serve as an indirect measure of evidence accumulated for stimulus perception and that longer Perceptual Awareness Scale response times and higher amplitudes of motor-evoked potentials in the M1 condition reflect integration of additional evidence with visual awareness judgment. In conclusion, we advocate that motor activity influences perceptual awareness judgments.

scholarly journals Diaphragmatic Central Motor Conduction Changes In Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rehab Abdelaal El-Nemr ◽  
Rania Ahmad Sweed ◽  
Hanaa Shafiek
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Function ◽  
Healthy Subjects ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Motor System ◽  
Evoked Potential ◽  
Group Versus ◽  
Motor Evoked Potential ◽  
Conduction Time ◽  
Copd Patients ◽  
Resting Motor Threshold

AbstractBackground and objectivesRespiratory muscles dysfunction has been reported in COPD. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is easy non-invasive that has been used for assessing the respiratory corticospinal pathways particularly of diaphragm. We aimed to study the cortico-diaphragmatic motor system changes in COPD using TMS and to correlate the findings with the pulmonary function.MethodsA case control study recruited 30 stable COPD from the out-patient respiratory clinic of Main Alexandria University hospital-Egypt and 17 healthy control subjects who were subjected to spirometry. Cortical conduction of the diaphragm was performed by TMS to all participants followed by cervical magnetic stimulation of the phrenic nerve roots. Diaphragmatic resting motor threshold (DRMT), cortical motor evoked potential latency (CMEPL), CMEP amplitude (CMEPA), peripheral motor evoked potential latency (PMEPL), PMEP amplitude (PMEPA) and central motor conduction time (CMCT) were measured.Results66.7% of COPD patients had severe and very severe COPD with median age of 59 (55-63) years. There was statistically significant bilateral decrease in DRMT, CMEPA and PMEPA in COPD group versus healthy subjects and significant increase in CMEPL and PMEPL (p <0.01). Left CMCT was significantly prolonged in COPD group versus healthy subjects (p <0.0001) but not right CMCT. Further, there was significant increase in CMEPL and CMCT of left versus right diaphragm in COPD group (p= 0.003 and 0.001 respectively) that inversely correlated with FEV1% and FVC% predicted.ConclusionCentral cortico-diaphragmatic motor system is affected in COPD patients with heterogeneity of both sides that is correlated with pulmonary function.SignificanceCoticospinal pathway affection could be a factor for development of diaphragmatic dysfunction in COPD patients accordingly its evaluation could help in personalization of COPD management especially pulmonary rehabilitation programs

scholarly journals Long-term motor deficit in brain tumour surgery with preserved intra-operative motor-evoked potentials

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Davide Giampiccolo ◽  
Cristiano Parisi ◽  
Pietro Meneghelli ◽  
Vincenzo Tramontano ◽  
Federica Basaldella ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Evoked Potentials ◽  
Brain Tumour ◽  
Evoked Potential ◽  
Corticospinal Tract ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Motor Evoked Potential ◽  
Motor Deficit ◽  
Motor Deficits ◽  
Brain Tumour Surgery

Abstract Muscle motor-evoked potentials are commonly monitored during brain tumour surgery in motor areas, as these are assumed to reflect the integrity of descending motor pathways, including the corticospinal tract. However, while the loss of muscle motor-evoked potentials at the end of surgery is associated with long-term motor deficits (muscle motor-evoked potential-related deficits), there is increasing evidence that motor deficit can occur despite no change in muscle motor-evoked potentials (muscle motor-evoked potential-unrelated deficits), particularly after surgery of non-primary regions involved in motor control. In this study, we aimed to investigate the incidence of muscle motor-evoked potential-unrelated deficits and to identify the associated brain regions. We retrospectively reviewed 125 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for peri-Rolandic lesions using intra-operative neurophysiological monitoring. Intraoperative changes in muscle motor-evoked potentials were correlated with motor outcome, assessed by the Medical Research Council scale. We performed voxel–lesion–symptom mapping to identify which resected regions were associated with short- and long-term muscle motor-evoked potential-associated motor deficits. Muscle motor-evoked potentials reductions significantly predicted long-term motor deficits. However, in more than half of the patients who experienced long-term deficits (12/22 patients), no muscle motor-evoked potential reduction was reported during surgery. Lesion analysis showed that muscle motor-evoked potential-related long-term motor deficits were associated with direct or ischaemic damage to the corticospinal tract, whereas muscle motor-evoked potential-unrelated deficits occurred when supplementary motor areas were resected in conjunction with dorsal premotor regions and the anterior cingulate. Our results indicate that long-term motor deficits unrelated to the corticospinal tract can occur more often than currently reported. As these deficits cannot be predicted by muscle motor-evoked potentials, a combination of awake and/or novel asleep techniques other than muscle motor-evoked potentials monitoring should be implemented.

scholarly journals Motor disability in patients with multiple sclerosis: transcranial magnetic stimulation study

2020 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anssam Bassem Mohy ◽  
Aqeel Kareem Hatem ◽  
Hussein Ghani Kadoori ◽  
Farqad Bader Hamdan
Keyword(s):  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Motor Evoked Potential ◽  
Invasive Procedure ◽  
Single Pulse ◽  
Lower Limbs ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Conduction Time ◽  
Motor Disability

Abstract Background Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive procedure used in a small targeted region of the brain via electromagnetic induction and used diagnostically to measure the connection between the central nervous system (CNS) and skeletal muscle to evaluate the damage that occurs in MS. Objectives The study aims to investigate whether single-pulse TMS measures differ between patients with MS and healthy controls and to consider if these measures are associated with clinical disability. Patients and methods Single-pulse TMS was performed in 26 patients with MS who hand an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score between 0 and 9.5 and in 26 normal subjects. Different TMS parameters from upper and lower limbs were investigated. Results TMS disclosed no difference in all MEP parameters between the right and left side of the upper and lower limbs in patients with MS and controls. In all patients, TMS parameters were different from the control group. Upper limb central motor conduction time (CMCT) was prolonged in MS patients with pyramidal signs. Upper and lower limb CMCT and CMCT-f wave (CMCT-f) were prolonged in patients with ataxia. Moreover, CMCT and CMCT-f were prolonged in MS patients with EDSS of 5–9.5 as compared to those with a score of 0–4.5. EDSS correlated with upper and lower limb cortical latency (CL), CMCT, and CMCT-f whereas motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude not. Conclusion TMS yields objective data to evaluate clinical disability and its parameters correlated well with EDSS.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document