Evaluation of Round Block Oncoplastic breast surgery in early Juxta-areolar breast cancer in comparison to conventional breast conservation surgery

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashraf Abd El Moghny ◽  
Karim Fahmy ◽  
Ahmed Khalil Mohamed

Abstract Background Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women all over the world representing 18% of all women reported cases of cancer. It represents the leading cause of women mortality as representing 23% of all women cancer deaths. The decision in any breast cancer patient is taken by MDT that includes breast surgery consultant, pathology consultant, plastic surgery consultant, radiology consultant and medical oncology consultant. Breast conserving surgeries are now the standard technique for management of breast cancer patient. Oncoplastic techniques are replacing SWLE for their better cosmetic outcomes and better exposure of the tumor. Objective The aim of this work was to assess the round block technique as regard oncological safety, surgical outcomes and patients' satisfaction comparing results with standard wide local excision. Methods This is a retrospective study to assess the round block technique as an oncological procedure for management of early breast cancer near to nipple-areola complex as regard oncological safety, surgical outcomes and patients' satisfaction comparing results with standard wide local excision. It was conducted at general surgery department, Ain Shams university hospitals. Approval of the Ethical Committee and written informed consent from all participants were obtained. In our study 40 breast cancer patients are subdivided into group (A) 20 females which underwent round block technique and group (B) 20 femaleswhich underwent standard wide local excision. Patient and tumor criteria including age, co morbidities, tumor size and distance between tumor and nipple-areola complex were considered to be nonsignificant between 2 groups so the only difference is the surgical technique. Results The study shows that the round block technique and SWLE have the same results regarding hospital stay, post operative complications and oncological recurrence with the advantage to RBT because of its better cosmetic outcomes. So, the round block technique is superior to SWLE in selected cases. Conclusion The round block technique has comparable post operative parameters with better cosmoses as it is scarless operation without nipple and areola shift suggesting that the round block technique is superior to SWLE in selected cases.

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amr Abd El-Raouf Ali Abd El-Naser ◽  
Dina Hany Ahmed ◽  
Mohamed Shawky Mohamed

Abstract Background The goal of optimizing the cosmetic and oncologic outcomes of BCS has been addressed in recent years by the emergence of the field of oncoplastic surgery, that originally defined as an assortment of volume replacement techniques performed by plastic surgeons to replace all or part of the resected breast volume with myocutaneous tissue flaps. The definition of oncoplastic surgery has more recently been expanded to include a wide range of volume displacement or volume redistribution procedures performed by breast surgeons and general surgeons to optimize breast shape and breast volume following breast cancer surgery. Aim of the Work To assess the round block technique as regard oncological safety, surgical outcomes and patients' satisfaction comparing results with standard wide local excision. Patients and Methods This is a prospective randomized study to assess the round block technique as an oncological procedure for management of early breast cancer near to nipple-areola complex as regard oncological safety, surgical outcomes and patients' satisfaction comparing results with standard wide local excision. Twenty breast cancer patients are subdivided into group (A) 10 females which underwent round block technique and group (B) 10 femaleswhich underwent standard wide local excision. Patient and tumor criteria including age, co morbidities, tumor size and distance between tumor and nipple-areola complex were considered to be non-significant between 2 groups so the only difference is the surgical technique. Results The round block technique and SWLE have the same results regarding operative time, intra-operative blood loss and post operative complications with the advantage to RBT because of its better cosmetic outcomes and lower re-excision rates. So, the round block technique is superior to SWLE in selected cases. Conclusion The round block technique has comparable operative parameters to SWLE with no evidence of increased surgical complications. With a lower re-excision rates and better cosmoses were observed in the round block patients as it is scarless operation without nipple and areola shift suggesting that the round block technique is superior to SWLE in selected cases.


Breast Care ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 385-390 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabian Riedel ◽  
André Hennigs ◽  
Sarah Hug ◽  
Benedikt Schaefgen ◽  
Christof Sohn ◽  
...  

Aim: To describe and discuss the evidence for oncological safety of different procedures in oncological breast surgery, i.e. breast-conserving treatment versus mastectomy. Methods: Literature review and discussion. Results: Oncological safety in breast cancer surgery has many dimensions. Breast-conserving treatment has been established as the standard surgical procedure for primary breast cancer and fits to the preferences of most breast cancer patients concerning oncological safety and aesthetic outcome. Conclusions: Breast-conserving treatment is safe. Nonetheless, the preferences of the individual patients in their consideration of breast conservation versus mastectomy should be integrated into routine treatment decisions.


2020 ◽  
Vol 06 (02) ◽  
pp. e135-e138
Author(s):  
T. M. Aherne ◽  
M. R. Boland ◽  
D. Catargiu ◽  
K. Bashar ◽  
T. P. McVeigh ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Routine utilization of multigene assays to inform operative decision-making in early breast cancer (EBC) treatment is yet to be established. In this pilot study, we sought to establish the potential benefits of surgical intervention in EBC based on recurrence risk quantification using the Oncotype DX (ODX) assay. Materials and Methods Consecutive ODX tests performed over a 9-year period from October 2007 to May 2016 were evaluated. Oncotype scores were classified into high (≥31), medium (18–30), or low-risk (0–17) groups. The primary outcome was breast cancer recurrence. Subgroup analysis offered assessment of the recurrence effect of mode of surgical intervention for patient groups as defined by the oncotype score. Results In total 361 patients underwent ODX testing. The mean age and follow-up were 55.25 (± 10.58) years and 38.59 (± 29.1) months, respectively. The majority of patients underwent wide local excision (86.7%) with 8.9 and 4.4% patients having a mastectomy or wide local excision with completion mastectomy, respectively. Fifty-one percent of patients fell into the low risk ODX category with a further 40.2 and 8.5% deemed to be of intermediate and high risk. Five patients (1.38%) had disease recurrence. Comparative analysis of operative groups in each oncotype group revealed no difference in recurrence scores in the low- (p = 0.84) and high-risk groups (p = 0.92) with a statistically significant difference identified in the intermediate risk group (p = 0.002). Conclusion To date we have been unable to definitively identify a role for ODX in guiding surgical approach in EBC. There is, however, a need for larger studies to examine this hypothesis.


2012 ◽  
Vol 38 (11) ◽  
pp. 1113
Author(s):  
M. Asad Parvaiz ◽  
Aphrodite Iacovidou ◽  
Ali Ismail ◽  
Ehsan Rehman ◽  
Brian Isgar

2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. e54
Author(s):  
Francois Malherbe ◽  
Liana Roodt ◽  
Fazlin Noor ◽  
Rufkah Gamieldien ◽  
Dharshnee Chetty ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document