Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Cortical Bone Trajectory and Conventional Pedicle Screw Trajectory for Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis (systematic review of literature)

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Fawzy Khattab ◽  
Mostafa Atef Kamal ◽  
Mbbch Naser Hussein Zaher
Keyword(s):  
Cortical Bone ◽  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Degenerative Spondylolisthesis ◽  
Leg Pain ◽  
Fixation Strength ◽  
Cortical Bone Trajectory ◽  
Non Union ◽  
Spine Stabilization

Abstract Background Pedicle screw fixation the gold standard for lumbar spine stabilization. Pedicle screw has fixation offers multiple advantages, allowing superior correction of spinal deformities, and reduced rates of loss of non-union. Cortical Bone Trajectory (CBT) is a new technique in which screws follow a caudal-to-cephalad path in the sagittal plane and a medial-to-lateral directed path in the transverse plane. CBT is reducing operative and post-operative complications and has high fixation strength. Purpose To Compare the clinical outcomes between CBT and traditional trajectory (TT) in surgical management of degenerative spondylolisthesis. Materials and Methods A comprehensive electronic search in Pubmed, MEDLINE and Chocrane library databases, Google scholar and Research gate for articles that published between 2009 to 2020 using these keywords: Cortical bone trajectory, Cortical bone trajectory-pedicle screw, Pedicle screw. Results The majority of literature suggests that the CBT technique results in similar or decreased postoperative back and leg pain compared to TT. Regarding the disability ODI and the operative time showed no significant differences between the CBT and TT. Radiographic outcomes between both studies show no statistical difference in fusion rates and vertebral slippage. Intraoperative blood loss was significantly less with CBT compared to TT. Conclusion there is no widely accepted consensus regarding comparison of clinical outcomes and complications between the CBT and TT procedures. Generally, indications for CBT and TT are similar between most studies, especially for common pathologies resulting in spondylolisthesis.

scholarly journals Clinical and Radiological Results of Treating Lumbar Spondylosis With Cortical Bone Trajectory Screws

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mateusz Bielecki ◽  
Przemyslaw Kunert ◽  
Artur Balasa ◽  
Sławomir Kujawski ◽  
Andrzej Marchel
Keyword(s):  
Cortical Bone ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Numerical Rating Scale ◽  
Leg Pain ◽  
Lumbar Degenerative Disease ◽  
Cortical Bone Trajectory ◽  
Non Union ◽  
Clinical And Radiological Results

Abstract Background: The cortical bone trajectory (CBT) technique is a popular minimally invasive spine surgery. Few studies have reported long-term outcomes. Here, we evaluated the complication profile and long-term follow-up of patients with lumbar degenerative disease treated with the CBT technique. Methods: This retrospective analysis included the first 40 consecutive patients that underwent the CBT technique. The indication for surgery was critical stenosis of the intervertebral foramen, which required removal of the entire intervertebral joint, on at least one side, during decompression. Results: The CBT technique was performed on one spine level, in 29 cases, and on two levels, in 11 cases. The last follow-up showed minimal clinically important differences in the numerical rating scale (NRS) of leg pain, the NRS of back pain, and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), in 97%, 95%, and 95% of patients, respectively. Thirty-nine patients completed long-term radiological follow-ups. Computed tomography demonstrated solid bone unions on 47 (92%) operated levels, collapsed unions on 2 (4%) levels, non-union on 1 (2%) level, and 1 (2%) lost to follow-up. Seven patients experienced complications (4 hardware-related). Three patients required four revision surgeries.Conclusions: The CBT technique effectively achieved spinal fusion; over 90% of patients achieved clinical improvement at a mean follow-up of 4.4 years (minimum 3 years in all cases).

Comparison of Three Different Screw Trajectories in Osteoporotic Vertebrae: A Biomechanical Investigation

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan-Sven Jarvers ◽  
Stefan Schleifenbaum ◽  
Christian Pfeifle ◽  
Christoph Oefner ◽  
Melanie Edel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cortical Bone ◽  
Fatigue Behavior ◽  
Fixation Strength ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Promising Alternative ◽  
Cortical Bone Trajectory ◽  
Pull Out ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

Abstract Background: Pedicle screw insertion in osteoporotic patients is challenging. Achieving more screw-cortical bone purchase and invasiveness minimization, the cortical bone trajectory and the midline cortical techniques represent alternatives to traditional pedicle screws. This study compares the fatigue behavior and fixation strength of the cement-augmented traditional trajectory (TT), the cortical bone trajectory (CBT) and the midline cortical (MC). Methods: Ten human cadaveric spine specimens (L1 - L5) were examined. The average age was 86.3 ± 7.2 years. CT scans were provided for preoperative planning. CBT and MC were implanted by using the patient-specific 3D-printed placement guide (MySpine®, Medacta International), TT were implanted freehand. All 10 cadaveric specimens were randomized to group A (CBT vs. MC) or group B (MC vs. TT). Each screw was loaded for 10,000 cycles. The failure criterion was doubling of the initial screw displacement resulting from the compressive force (60 N) at the first cycle, the stop criterion as a doubling of the initial screw displacement. After dynamic testing, screws were pulled out axially at 5 mm/min to determine their remaining fixation strength. Results: The mean pull-out forces did not differ significantly. Concerning the fatigue performance, only one out of ten MC of group A failed prematurely due to loosening after 1,500 cycles (L3). Five CBT already loosened during the first 500 cycles. The mean displacement was always lower in the MC. In group B, all TT showed no signs of failure or loosening. Three MC failed already after 26 cycles, 1,510 cycles, and 2,144 cycles, respectively. The TT showed always a lower mean displacement. In the subsequent pull-out tests, the remaining mean fixation strength of the MC (449.6 ± 298.9 N) was slightly higher compared to the mean pull-out force of the CBT (401.2 ± 261.4 N). However, MC (714.5 ± 488.0 N) were inferior to TT (990.2 ± 451.9 N).Conclusion: The current study demonstrated that cement-augmented TT have best fatigue and pull-out characteristics in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae, followed by the MC and CBT. MC represent a promising alternative in osteoporotic bone if cement augmentation should be avoided. Using the patient-specific guide contributes to improve screws’ biomechanical properties.

scholarly journals Comparison of facet joint violation in lumbar posterior spinal instrumentation using different techniques including cortical bone trajectory

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-62
Author(s):  
CY To ◽  
P Cheung ◽  
W Ng ◽  
WY Mok
Keyword(s):  
Cortical Bone ◽  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Facet Joint ◽  
Spinal Instrumentation ◽  
Entry Site ◽  
Cortical Bone Trajectory ◽  
Percutaneous Pedicle Screw ◽  
Iatrogenic Damage ◽  
Percutaneous Screws ◽  
Facet Joint Violation

Study background: A retrospective study to compare the rate of facet joint violation (FJV) in lumbar posterior spinal instrumentation using open pedicle screw, percutaneous pedicle screw, and cortical bone trajectory (CBT) technique. CBT is a new posterior spinal instrumentation technique in which a more caudal entry point can minimize iatrogenic damage to the cranial facet joint. Only one recent study reports incidence of FJV of 11%; however, no previous reports comment on radiological outcomes comparing to traditional open and percutaneous screws. Methods: We reviewed 90 patients who underwent lumbar posterior spinal instrumentation from January 2016 to June 2017. Postoperative computer tomography scans were performed to evaluate FJV. Incidence of FJV was graded by three reviewers according to Seo classification. Results: Totally, 446 screws (open 43.4%, percutaneous 37.8%, CBT 18.9%) were inserted. Among these, 6.3% (28/446) had screw head or rod in contact with facet joint and 0.9% (4/446) had screws directly invaded the facet joint. Overall, FJV was 7.2% (CTB = 3.4%, open = 10.4%, and percutaneous = 4.5%, p = 0.075). Conclusion: CBT technique has potential advantage in reducing FJV. It has a unique entry site at lateral aspect of pars interarticular with a caudomedial to craniolateral pathway. It is a reasonable alternative to open or percutaneous techniques in lumbar posterior spinal instrumentation.

Incidence and Risk Factors of Adjacent Cranial Facet Joint Violation Following Pedicle Screw Insertion Using Cortical Bone Trajectory Technique

Spine ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (14) ◽  
pp. E851-E856 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keitaro Matsukawa ◽  
Takashi Kato ◽  
Yoshiyuki Yato ◽  
Hiroshi Sasao ◽  
Hideaki Imabayashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cortical Bone ◽  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Facet Joint ◽  
Cortical Bone Trajectory ◽  
Screw Insertion ◽  
Pedicle Screw Insertion ◽  
Facet Joint Violation

scholarly journals The Effect of Lumbar Lordosis on Screw Loosening in Dynesys Dynamic Stabilization: Four-Year Follow-Up with Computed Tomography

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chao-Hung Kuo ◽  
Peng-Yuan Chang ◽  
Tsung-Hsi Tu ◽  
Li-Yu Fay ◽  
Hsuan-Kan Chang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Lumbar Lordosis ◽  
Degenerative Spondylolisthesis ◽  
Dynamic Stabilization ◽  
Leg Pain ◽  
Screw Loosening ◽  
Disc Disease ◽  
Radiographic Outcomes

Introduction. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of Dynesys dynamic stabilization (DDS) on clinical and radiographic outcomes, including spinal pelvic alignment.Method. Consecutive patients who underwent 1- or 2-level DDS for lumbar spondylosis, mild degenerative spondylolisthesis, or degenerative disc disease were included. Clinical outcomes were evaluated by Visual Analogue Scale for back and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index, and the Japanese Orthopedic Association scores. Radiographic outcomes were assessed by radiographs and computed tomography. Pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis (LL) were also compared.Results. In 206 patients with an average follow-up of 51.1 ± 20.8 months, there were 87 screws (8.2%) in 42 patients (20.4%) that were loose. All clinical outcomes improved at each time point after operation. Patients with loosened screws were 45 years older. Furthermore, there was a higher risk of screw loosening in DDS involving S1, and these patients were more likely to have loosened screws if the LL failed to increase after the operation.Conclusions. The DDS screw loosening rate was overall 8.2% per screw and 20.4% per patient at more than 4 years of follow-up. Older patients, S1 involvement, and those patients who failed to gain LL postoperatively were at higher risk of screw loosening.

scholarly journals Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with cortical bone trajectory screw fixation versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion using traditional pedicle screw fixation for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a comparative study

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 591-595 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hironobu Sakaura ◽  
Toshitada Miwa ◽  
Tomoya Yamashita ◽  
Yusuke Kuroda ◽  
Tetsuo Ohwada
Keyword(s):  
Cortical Bone ◽  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Surgical Outcomes ◽  
Recovery Rate ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Cortical Bone Trajectory

OBJECTIVE Several biomechanical studies have demonstrated the favorable mechanical properties of the cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screw. However, no reports have examined surgical outcomes of posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with CBT screw fixation for degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) compared with those after PLIF using traditional pedicle screw (PS) fixation. The purposes of this study were thus to elucidate surgical outcomes after PLIF with CBT screw fixation for DS and to compare these results with those after PLIF using traditional PS fixation. METHODS Ninety-five consecutive patients underwent PLIF with CBT screw fixation for DS (CBT group; mean followup 35 months). A historical control group consisted of 82 consecutive patients who underwent PLIF with traditional PS fixation (PS group; mean follow-up 40 months). Clinical status was assessed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scale score. Fusion status was assessed by dynamic plain radiographs and CT. The need for additional surgery and surgery-related complications was also evaluated. RESULTS The mean JOA score improved significantly from 13.7 points before surgery to 23.3 points at the latest follow-up in the CBT group (mean recovery rate 64.4%), compared with 14.4 points preoperatively to 22.7 points at final follow-up in the PS group (mean recovery rate 55.8%; p < 0.05). Solid spinal fusion was achieved in 84 patients from the CBT group (88.4%) and in 79 patients from the PS group (96.3%, p > 0.05). Symptomatic adjacent-segment disease developed in 3 patients from the CBT group (3.2%) compared with 9 patients from the PS group (11.0%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS PLIF with CBT screw fixation for DS provided comparable improvement of clinical symptoms with PLIF using traditional PS fixation. However, the successful fusion rate tended to be lower in the CBT group than in the PS group, although the difference was not statistically significant between the 2 groups.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document