PROXIMAL INTERPHALANGEAL JOINT FLEXION CONTRACTURE SECONDARY TO INJURY OF AN ANOMALOUS ULNAR LUMBRICAL MUSCLE INSERTION

1975 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 226-228
Author(s):  
WILLIAM B. WEBBER
Keyword(s):  
Flexion Contracture ◽  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Muscle Insertion ◽  
Lumbrical Muscle ◽  
Joint Flexion

scholarly journals Outcome review on the percutaneous release of the proximal interphalangeal joint accessory collateral ligaments

2009 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonja Cerovac ◽  
John Stanley
Keyword(s):  
Intraoperative Complications ◽  
Flexion Contracture ◽  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Collateral Ligaments ◽  
Postoperative Rehabilitation ◽  
Percutaneous Release ◽  
Joint Flexion

The percutaneous release of accessory collateral ligaments was introduced in 1986 as a safe and quick procedure to be attempted before open, more extensive joint release in the treatment of proximal interphalangeal joint flexion contracture. Our study analyzed the long-term results and patient satisfaction following a percutaneous release in 30 joints after a mean follow-up period of 34 months. In one half of cases the preoperative joint flexion deformity was reduced from 78° to 34°. The best results were observed in patients with osteoarthritis and stiff, immobilized joints. In patients with inflammatory arthritides, marked intraoperative correction was maintained rarely, joint contractures recurred early, and patients were unsatisfied. There were no intraoperative complications. Percutaneous release of the accessory collateral ligaments can produce a long lasting correction of the joint contracture, but careful patient selection and strict postoperative rehabilitation are essential for favorable outcome.

scholarly journals Predictors of Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Flexion Contracture After Homodigital Island Flap

2015 ◽  
Vol 40 (11) ◽  
pp. 2155-2159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akito Nakanishi ◽  
Shohei Omokawa ◽  
Akio Iida ◽  
Daisuke Kaji ◽  
Yasuhito Tanaka
Keyword(s):  
Flexion Contracture ◽  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Island Flap ◽  
Joint Flexion

Comparative study on the effectiveness of corticosteroid injections between trigger fingers with and without proximal interphalangeal joint flexion contracture

2015 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 198-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Shinomiya ◽  
T. Sunagawa ◽  
Y. Nakashima ◽  
Y. Kawanishi ◽  
T. Masuda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Corticosteroid Injection ◽  
Flexion Contracture ◽  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Joint Contracture ◽  
Flexor Digitorum Superficialis ◽  
Joint Flexion ◽  
Hypoechoic Lesion ◽  
Flexor Digitorum ◽  
A1 Pulley

Trigger fingers with proximal interphalangeal joint flexion contracture are suggested to have a poorer response to corticosteroid injection than those without contracture, though this has not been proven scientifically. We compared the clinical response to corticosteroid injection between trigger fingers with and without proximal interphalangeal joint contracture, and investigated the influence of the injection on the A1 pulley and flexor digitorum tendons using ultrasonography. One month after injection, pain was significantly reduced in the no contracture group, and 56% of trigger fingers with proximal interphalangeal joint contracture resolved. Before injection, relative thickening of the A1 pulley and flexor digitorum tendons, and a partial hypoechoic lesion of the flexor digitorum superficialis tendon were observed in the contracture group. One month after injection, the thickening of the tendons and the A1 pulley was reduced, but the partial hypoechoic lesion was still observed in significant numbers. We have demonstrated that the presence of a proximal interphalangeal joint contracture was associated with a reduced clinical response to corticosteroid injection, and we suggest that the pathologic change in the flexor digitorum superficialis tendon, represented by the partial hypoechoic lesion, contributed to corticosteroid injection resistance. Level of evidence: IV

Percutaneous Accessory Collateral Ligament Release in the of Treatment Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Flexion Contracture

1986 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 360-363
Author(s):  
J. K. STANLEY ◽  
W. A. JONES ◽  
M. C. LYNCH
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Flexion Contracture ◽  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Joint Contracture ◽  
Collateral Ligament ◽  
Small Pilot Study ◽  
Operative Correction ◽  
Percutaneous Release ◽  
Joint Flexion

A percutaneous release or capsulo-ligamentous proximal interphalangeal joint contracture is described, the indications are outlined and the advantage over open releases are discussed. The results of a small pilot study are reported which we feel are comparable to the results of open techniques. The procedure in itself, however, merely allows operative correction to be achieved. Its maintenance depends upon a stringent post-operative rehabilitation regime.

Percutaneous A1 Pulley Release Combined with Finger Splint for Trigger Finger with Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Flexion Contracture

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (03) ◽  
pp. 270-275
Author(s):  
Tzu-Cheng Yang ◽  
Duretti Fufa ◽  
Hui-Kuang Huang ◽  
Yi-Chao Huang ◽  
Ming-Chau Chang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Flexion Contracture ◽  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Trigger Finger ◽  
Group I ◽  
Percutaneous Release ◽  
Pip Joint ◽  
Joint Flexion ◽  
Group Ii ◽  
A1 Pulley

Background: Long-standing trigger finger can lead to proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint flexion contracture. In the present study, we present the clinical outcome of percutaneous release with finger splinting for trigger finger with PIP joint flexion contracture prospectively. Methods: We compared outcomes in patients with trigger fingers combined with proximal interphalangeal joint flexion contracture treated by percutaneous release therapy regimen alone (group I) or percutaneous trigger finger release combined with finger splint (group II) during January 2011 and May 2016 with 6 months follow up. Results: Sixty-five patients were randomly allocated to group I (35 patients) or group II (30 patients). Symptoms of locking sensation and pain over the A1 pulley were improved in all patients. The patients in group II showed significantly greater improvements in the flexion contracture angles of proximal interphalangeal joint at post-operative 3 months later (group I, 9.4° ± 4.1°; group II, 27.8° ± 4.6°) and at 6 months later (group I, 15.1° ± 5.2°; group II, 35.7° ± 5.3°) relative to group I. In group II, 25 fingers achieved near full extension (< 10° contracture) after 6 months. Conclusions: Percutaneous release combined with finger splint is regarded as a useful therapy to speed recovery of trigger finger with proximal interphalangeal joint flexion contracture.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document