Clinical Correlates of Maternal Suicidal Ideation Detected by Perinatal Depression Screening

2014 ◽  
Vol 123 ◽  
pp. 60S ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Jo Kim ◽  
Richard K. Silver ◽  
Laura M. La Porte ◽  
Ying Zhou ◽  
Samantha B. Allweiss ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Molly M. Long ◽  
Robert J. Cramer ◽  
Linda Bennington ◽  
Frank G. Morgan ◽  
Charles A. Wilkes ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 107 (2, Part 1) ◽  
pp. 342-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Trent E. J. Gordon ◽  
Ida A. Cardone ◽  
Jennifer J. Kim ◽  
Scott M. Gordon ◽  
Richard K. Silver

Author(s):  
WQ Xue ◽  
KK Cheng ◽  
D Xu ◽  
X Jin ◽  
WJ Gong

Abstract Aims Perinatal depression threatens the health of maternal women and their offspring. Although screening programs for perinatal depression exist, non-uptake of referral to further mental health care after screening reduces the utility of these programs. Uptake rates among women with positive screening varied widely across studies and little is known about how to improve the uptake rate. This study aimed to systematically review the available evidence on uptake rates, estimate the pooled rate, identify interventions to improve uptake of referral and explore the effectiveness of those interventions. Methods This systematic review has been registered in PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42019138095). We searched Pubmed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Ovid, Embase, CNKI, Wanfang Database and VIP Databases from database inception to January 13, 2019 and scanned reference lists of relevant researches for studies published in English or Chinese. Studies providing information on uptake rate and/or effectiveness of interventions on uptake of referral were eligible for inclusion. Studies were excluded if they did not report the details of the referral process or did not provide exact uptake rate. Data provided by observational studies and quasi-experimental studies were used to estimate the pooled uptake rate through meta-analysis. We also performed meta-regression and subgroup analyses to explore the potential source of heterogeneity. To evaluate the effectiveness of interventions, we conducted descriptive analyses instead of meta-analyses since there was only one randomised controlled trial (RCT). Results Of 2302 records identified, 41 studies were eligible for inclusion, including 39 observational studies (n = 9337), one quasi-experimental study (n = 43) and one RCT (n = 555). All but two studies were conducted in high-income countries. The uptake rates reported by included studies varied widely and the pooled uptake rate of referral was 43% (95% confidence intervals [CI] 35–50%) by a random-effect model. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses both showed that referral to on-site assessment or treatment (60%, 95% CI 51–69%) had a significantly higher uptake rate than referral to mental health service (32%, 95% CI 23–41%) (odds ratio 1.31, 95% CI 1.13–1.52). The included RCT showed that the referral intervention significantly improved the uptake rate (p < 0.01). Conclusions Almost three-fifths of women with positive screening results do not take up the referral offers after perinatal depression screening. Referral to on-site assessment and treatment may improve uptake of referral, but the quality of evidence on interventions to increase uptake was weak. More robust studies are needed, especially in low-and middle-income countries.


2015 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 305-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen M. Tabb ◽  
Shinwoo Choi ◽  
Maria Pineros-Leano ◽  
Brandon Meline ◽  
Hellen G. McDonald ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole Reilly ◽  
Dawn Kingston ◽  
Deborah Loxton ◽  
Kristina Talcevska ◽  
Marie-Paule Austin

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 523 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katja Beer ◽  
Nina Rieckmann ◽  
Mira Ertl ◽  
Laura Grosse ◽  
Thorsten Zeidler ◽  
...  

Rationale, aims and objectives: Depression is common in coronary heart disease (CHD) patients and routine depression screening is often performed in research settings and recommended for clinical practice. Many depression screening instruments contain an item assessing suicidal ideation. A positive answer for suicidal ideation requires timely follow-up evaluation by trained clinicians; however, the process of transferal of this information is not without its problems. We aimed to develop and implement a step-by-step action protocol for the timely follow-up evaluation of positive screenings for suicidal ideation in hospitalized CHD patients who complete a depression screening in a research study.Method: The protocol was developed by a team of psychiatrists and psychologists as part of a two-site prospective cohort study which includes 1265 hospitalized CHD patients with and without co-morbid depression. Patients were presented with two depression screening instruments as part of the baseline assessment, the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). All participants underwent a standardized computer based evaluation for clinical depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). The protocol was adapted continuously with the aims to optimize information transfer between study team and clinic staff and to initiate potentially required care.Results: The protocol was adapted to site-specific exigencies, resulting in a stepped approach of handling suicidal ideation, starting with suicidality assessment in a depression screening questionnaire. In case of positive screening, a detailed procedure for following-up on suicidal ideation was developed, including guidelines for various eventualities. In case of insufficient or doubtful distance from suicidal intent as assessed by clinical psychologists in training, psychiatric consultation was initiated. Conclusions:Implementation of a protocol to follow-up on a positive suicidality screening in a research setting at two coronary care hospital sites was a logistical challenge, but proved feasible and acceptable to patients and staff.


2010 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 814-821 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa S. Segre ◽  
Rebecca L. Brock ◽  
Michael W. O’Hara ◽  
Laura L. Gorman ◽  
Jane Engeldinger

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document