scholarly journals Initial Immunotherapy Tops Targeted Therapy for Advanced Melanoma

2022 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-19
Author(s):  
Mark L. Fuerst
2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 1143-1153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joao Paulo da Silveira Nogueira Lima ◽  
Mina Georgieva ◽  
Benjamin Haaland ◽  
Gilberto de Lima Lopes

2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anabela Andrade ◽  
Jorge Balteiro

Abstract Background Cutaneous melanoma is an aggressive cancer that occurs in melanocytes, located in the epidermis. Historically it has a high rate of morbidity and mortality, due to the resistance and toxicity of traditional therapies. Its incidence has increased annually by 4% to 8%. Until 2011 it was still considered a devastating and almost always fatal disease in a few months. Advances in therapies have significantly improved the results of most patients with advanced melanoma, especially those with a BRAFV600 mutation, which account for almost 50% of tumors. Before the recent evolution in treatment, the prognosis and overall survival were considered very bad. The introduction of new drugs has improved progression-free survival and overall survival, as well as producing faster clinical responses. Methods Comparison of endpoints such as progression-free survival and overall melanoma survival from the Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) studies of each drug in the therapeutic groups under assessment used in the disease. The variables used were the Endpoints Global Survival at various times (12 months, 24 months, 36 months and the median) and Progression-Free Survival. Results Combined immunotherapy (Nivolumab and Ipilimumab) improves overall survival and progression-free survival, achieving better results than targeted therapy. In this, the combination of a BRAF inhibitor and a MEK inhibitor, presents better results with the combination of Encorafenib and Binimetinib. Conclusions Both targeted therapy and immunotherapy transform melanoma with a dismal prognosis into a life-threatening illness.


Neoplasia ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 218-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lukas Krähenbühl ◽  
Simone M Goldinger ◽  
Joanna Mangana ◽  
Katrin Kerl ◽  
Ines Chevolet ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol Volume 11 ◽  
pp. 7095-7107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunilkumar Kakadia ◽  
Naveen Yarlagadda ◽  
Ramez Awad ◽  
Madappa Kundranda ◽  
Jiaxin Niu ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Magdalena Olbryt ◽  
Wojciech Pigłowski ◽  
Marcin Rajczykowski ◽  
Aleksandra Pfeifer ◽  
Sebastian Student ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pier Francesco Ferrucci ◽  
Marko Lens ◽  
Emilia Cocorocchio

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louay Samir Abdulkarim

UNSTRUCTURED Cutaneous melanoma has always been a dreaded diagnosis due to its high mortality rate and its proclivity for invasiveness and metastasis. Historically, advanced melanoma treatment was limited to chemotherapy and nonspecific immunotherapy agents that displayed poor curative potential and high toxicity. However, during the last decade, the evolving understanding of the mutational burden of melanoma and the immune system evasion mechanisms has led to the development of targeted therapy and specific immunotherapy agents that have transformed the landscape of advanced melanoma treatment. Targeted therapy comprises of agents that directly inhibit mutated kinases, namely BRAF and MEK, which have been implicated in the growth and survival of cancerous melanocytes. However, the efficacy of BRAF and MEK inhibitor monotherapies was limited by early resistance and an upsurge in treatment-associated skin tumours. Consequently, a combined BRAF/MEK inhibitor approach was trialled, which resulted in superior survival rates while minimising the aforementioned limitations. On the other hand, specific immunotherapy agents were developed on the heels of Nobel Prize-winning discoveries that outlined the pivotal role of certain immune downregulatory signals that facilitate tumour growth. Despite the considerable strides in understanding the clinical implication of these agents, there is a scarcity in randomised clinical trials that directly compare the efficacy of the aforementioned agents, hence there are no clear-cut preferences among the available first-line options. This paper attempts to summarise the current understanding of first-line treatments. Additionally, it describes the indirect comparative evidence that aids in bridging the gap in the literature.


Author(s):  
Paolo A. Ascierto ◽  
Keith Flaherty ◽  
Stephanie Goff

Recent years have seen major improvements in survival of patients with advanced melanoma with the advent of various novel systemic immunotherapies and targeted therapies. As our understanding of these agents and their various mechanisms of action improves, even more impressive outcomes are being achieved through use of various combination strategies, including the combining of different immunotherapies with one another as well as with other modalities. However, despite the improved outcomes that have been achieved in advanced melanoma, responses to treatment are heterogeneous and may not always be durable. Additional advances in therapy are required, and several emerging strategies are a focus of interest. These include the investigation of several new immunotherapy and/or targeted therapy combinations, such as checkpoint inhibitors (anti–PD-1/anti–CTLA-4) with other immunotherapies (e.g., indoleamine 2,3 dioxygenase [IDO] inhibitors, antilymphocyte activation 3 [anti–LAG-3], histone deacetylase [HDAC] inhibitors, Toll-like receptor 9 [TLR-9] agonists, antiglucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor [anti-GITR], pegylated interleukin-2 [IL-2]), combined targeted therapies (e.g., MEK and CDK4/6 coinhibition), and combined immunotherapy and targeted therapy (e.g., the triplet combination of BRAF/MEK inhibition with anti–PD-1s). The identification of novel therapeutic targets in the MAP kinase pathway also offers opportunities to improve outcomes by overcoming de novo and acquired resistance to BRAF/MEK inhibition (e.g., the development of ERK inhibitors). In addition, adoptive cell transfer, the infusion of large numbers of activated autologous lymphocytes, may have a potential role in patients whose disease has progressed after immunotherapy. Taken together, these new approaches offer further potential to increase systemic treatment options and improve long-term outcomes for patients with advanced melanoma.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document