Timing of Surgery After Multisystem Injury With Traumatic Brain Injury: Effect on Neuropsychological and Functional Outcome

2007 ◽  
Vol 62 (5) ◽  
pp. 1250-1258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marjorie C. Wang ◽  
Nancy R. Temkin ◽  
Richard A. Deyo ◽  
Gregory J. Jurkovich ◽  
Jason Barber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Timing Of Surgery

Early versus late decompressive craniectomy in traumatic brain injury: A retrospective comparative case study

Trauma ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 146040862093576
Author(s):  
Nida Fatima ◽  
Mujeeb-Ur-Rehman ◽  
Samia Shaukat ◽  
Ashfaq Shuaib ◽  
Ali Raza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Decompressive Craniectomy ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Timing Of Surgery ◽  
Comparative Case Study ◽  
Outcome Parameters ◽  
Good Functional Outcome

Objectives Decompressive craniectomy is a last-tier therapy in the treatment of raised intracranial pressure after traumatic brain injury. We report the association of demographic, radiographic, and injury characteristics with outcome parameters in early (<24 h) and late (≥24 h) decompressive craniectomy following traumatic brain injury. Methods We retrospectively identified 204 patients (158 (early decompressive craniectomy) and 46 (late decompressive craniectomy)), with a median age of 34 years (range 2–78 years) between 2015 and 2018. The primary endpoint was Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE) at 60 days, while secondary endpoints included Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) at discharge, mortality at 30 days, and length of hospital stay. Regression analysis was used to assess the independent predictive variables of functional outcome. Results With a clinical follow-up of 60 days, the good functional outcome (GOSE = 5–8) was 73.5% versus 74.1% (p = 0.75) in early and late decompressive craniectomy, respectively. GCS ≥ 9 at discharge was 82.2% versus 91.3% (p = 0.21), mortality at 30 days was 10.8% versus 8.7% (p = 0.39), and length of stay in the hospital was 21 days versus 28 days (p = 0.20), respectively, in early and late decompressive craniectomy groups. Univariate analysis identified that GCS at admission (0.07 (0.32–0.18; < 0.05)) and indication for decompressive craniectomy (3.7 (1.3–11.01; 0.01)) are significantly associated with good functional outcome. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that GCS at admission (<9/≥9) (0.07 (0.03–0.16; <0.05)) and indication for decompressive craniectomy (extradural alone/ other hematoma) (1.75 (1.09–3.25; 0.02)) were significant independent predictors of good functional outcome irrespective of the timing of surgery. Conclusions Our results corroborate that the timing of surgery does not affect the outcome parameters. Furthermore, GCS ≥ 9 and/or extra dural hematoma are associated with relatively good clinical outcome after decompressive craniectomy.

One-year costs of intensive care in pediatric patients with traumatic brain injury

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-86
Author(s):  
Era D. Mikkonen ◽  
Markus B. Skrifvars ◽  
Matti Reinikainen ◽  
Stepani Bendel ◽  
Ruut Laitio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Social Security ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Pediatric Population ◽  
Favorable Outcome ◽  
Index Hospitalization ◽  
Pediatric Tbi

OBJECTIVETraumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause of death and disability in the pediatric population. The authors assessed 1-year costs of intensive care in pediatric TBI patients.METHODSIn this retrospective multicenter cohort study of four academic ICUs in Finland, the authors used the Finnish Intensive Care Consortium database to identify children aged 0–17 years treated for TBI in ICUs between 2003 and 2013. The authors reviewed all patient health records and head CT scans for admission, treatment, and follow-up data. Patient outcomes included functional outcome (favorable outcome defined as a Glasgow Outcome Scale score of 4–5) and death within 6 months. Costs included those for the index hospitalization, rehabilitation, and social security up to 1 year after injury. To assess costs, the authors calculated the effective cost per favorable outcome (ECPFO).RESULTSIn total, 293 patients were included, of whom 61% had moderate to severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score 3–12) and 40% were ≥ 13 years of age. Of all patients, 82% had a favorable outcome and 9% died within 6 months of injury. The mean cost per patient was €48,719 ($54,557) (95% CI €41,326–€56,112). The index hospitalization accounted for 66%, rehabilitation costs for 27%, and social security costs for 7% of total healthcare costs. The ECPFO was €59,727 ($66,884) (95% CI €52,335–€67,120). A higher ECPFO was observed among patients with clinical and treatment-related variables indicative of parenchymal swelling and high intracranial pressure. Lower ECPFO was observed among patients with higher admission GCS scores and those who had epidural hematomas.CONCLUSIONSGreater injury severity increases ECPFO and is associated with higher postdischarge costs in pediatric TBI patients. In this pediatric cohort, over two-thirds of all resources were spent on patients with favorable functional outcome, indicating appropriate resource allocation.

GCS-Pupil Score Has a Stronger Association with Mortality and Poor Functional Outcome than GCS Alone in Pediatric Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Binod Balakrishnan ◽  
Heather VanDongen-Trimmer ◽  
Irene Kim ◽  
Sheila J. Hanson ◽  
Liyun Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Cerebral Performance Category ◽  
Regression Tree ◽  
Classification And Regression Tree ◽  
Continuous Variables ◽  
Poor Functional Outcome ◽  
Severity Scores ◽  
Pupil Reactivity

<b><i>Background:</i></b> The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), used to classify the severity of traumatic brain injury (TBI), is associated with mortality and functional outcomes. However, GCS can be affected by sedation and neuromuscular blockade. GCS-Pupil (GCS-P) score, calculated as GCS minus Pupil Reactivity Score (PRS), was shown to better predict outcomes in a retrospective cohort of adult TBI patients. We evaluated the applicability of GCS-P to a large retrospective pediatric severe TBI (sTBI) cohort. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Admissions to pediatric intensive care units in the Virtual Pediatric Systems (VPS, LLC) database from 2010 to 2015 with sTBI were included. We collected GCS, PRS (number of nonreactive pupils), cardiac arrest, abusive head trauma status, illness severity scores, pediatric cerebral performance category (PCPC) score, and mortality. GCS-P was calculated as GCS minus PRS. χ<sup>2</sup> or Fisher’s exact test and Mann-Whitney U test compared categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Classification and regression tree analysis identified thresholds of GCS-P and GCS along with other independent factors which were further examined using multivariable regression analysis to identify factors independently associated with mortality and unfavorable PCPC at PICU discharge. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Among the 2,682 patients included in the study, mortality was 23%, increasing from 4.7% for PRS = 0 to 80% for PRS = 2. GCS-P identified more severely injured patients with GCS-P scores 1 and 2 who had worse outcomes. GCS-P ≤ 2 had higher odds for mortality, OR = 68.4 (95% CI = 50.6–92.4) and unfavorable PCPC, OR = 17.3 (8.1, 37.0) compared to GCS ≤ 5. GCS-P ≤ 2 also had higher specificity and positive predictive value for both mortality and unfavorable PCPC compared to GCS ≤ 5. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> GCS-P, by incorporating pupil reactivity to GCS scoring, is more strongly associated with mortality and poor functional outcome at PICU discharge in children with sTBI.

scholarly journals Self-Reported Complaints as Prognostic Markers for Outcome After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Elderly: A Machine Learning Approach

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mayra Bittencourt ◽  
Sebastián A. Balart-Sánchez ◽  
Natasha M. Maurits ◽  
Joukje van der Naalt
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Neck Pain ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Mild Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Prognostic Markers ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Post Injury

Self-reported complaints are common after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Particularly in the elderly with mTBI, the pre-injury status might play a relevant role in the recovery process. In most mTBI studies, however, pre-injury complaints are neither analyzed nor are the elderly included. Here, we aimed to identify which individual pre- and post-injury complaints are potential prognostic markers for incomplete recovery (IR) in elderly patients who sustained an mTBI. Since patients report many complaints across several domains that are strongly related, we used an interpretable machine learning (ML) approach to robustly deal with correlated predictors and boost classification performance. Pre- and post-injury levels of 20 individual complaints, as self-reported in the acute phase, were analyzed. We used data from two independent studies separately: UPFRONT study was used for training and validation and ReCONNECT study for independent testing. Functional outcome was assessed with the Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE). We dichotomized functional outcome into complete recovery (CR; GOSE = 8) and IR (GOSE ≤ 7). In total 148 elderly with mTBI (median age: 67 years, interquartile range [IQR]: 9 years; UPFRONT: N = 115; ReCONNECT: N = 33) were included in this study. IR was observed in 74 (50%) patients. The classification model (IR vs. CR) achieved a good performance (the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [ROC-AUC] = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.74–0.86) based on a subset of only 8 out of 40 pre- and post-injury complaints. We identified increased neck pain (p = 0.001) from pre- to post-injury as the strongest predictor of IR, followed by increased irritability (p = 0.011) and increased forgetfulness (p = 0.035) from pre- to post-injury. Our findings indicate that a subset of pre- and post-injury physical, emotional, and cognitive complaints has predictive value for determining long-term functional outcomes in elderly patients with mTBI. Particularly, post-injury neck pain, irritability, and forgetfulness scores were associated with IR and should be assessed early. The application of an ML approach holds promise for application in self-reported questionnaires to predict outcomes after mTBI.

Functional outcome after violence related traumatic brain injury

Brain Injury ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 403-407 ◽  
Author(s):  
ROSS D. ZAFONTE, NANCY R. MANN, SCO
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Functional Outcome

Long-Term Effects of Decompressive Craniectomy on Functional Outcomes after Traumatic Brain Injury: A Multicenter Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 84 (8) ◽  
pp. 1314-1318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eliza Moskowitz ◽  
Claudia I. Melendez ◽  
Julie Dunn ◽  
Abid D. Khan ◽  
Richard Gonzalez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Decompressive Craniectomy ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Structured Interview ◽  
Good Functional Outcome

Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is a surgical modality sometimes used in the management of elevated intracranial pressure. Questions remain as to its long-term benefits in traumatic brain injury patients. The extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (eGOS) is a scoring system based on a structured interview that allows for consistent and reproducible measurement of long-term functional outcomes. The purpose of this study was to determine the eGOS score of post-craniectomy patients after discharge and stratify survivors based on outcome. A multicenter review of patients who underwent DC was performed. Survivors underwent a phone survey at which time the eGOS was calculated. Patients with an eGOS ≥ 5 were considered to have a good functional outcome. Fifty-four patients underwent DC. Age (OR 1.038; confidence interval 1.003–1.074) and Glasgow Coma Scale (OR 0677; confidence interval 0.527–0.870) were predictors of mortality. Patients who were available for follow-up (n = 13) had poor functional outcomes at discharge (eGOS = 3); however, this improved at the time of follow-up survey (eGOS = 5; P = 0.005). DC is a controversial operation with high mortality and uncertain benefit. Among our cohort, the eGOS score was significantly higher at follow-up survey than it was at discharge. Although the mortality was high, if patients survived to discharge, most had a good functional outcome at follow-up survey.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document