Team dynamics, clinical work satisfaction, and patient care coordination between primary care providers

2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hummy Song ◽  
Molly Ryan ◽  
Shalini Tendulkar ◽  
Josephine Fisher ◽  
Julia Martin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Care Coordination ◽  
Work Satisfaction ◽  
Clinical Work ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Team Dynamics ◽  
Care Providers

"Team Dynamics, Clinical Work Satisfaction, and Care Coordination Between Primary Care Providers"

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 (1) ◽  
pp. 13538
Author(s):  
Hummy Song ◽  
Molly Ryan ◽  
Shalini A Tendulkar ◽  
Alyna T Chien ◽  
Josephine Fisher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Care Coordination ◽  
Work Satisfaction ◽  
Clinical Work ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Team Dynamics ◽  
Care Providers

scholarly journals Meaningful use care coordination criteria: Perceived barriers and benefits among primary care providers

2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (e1) ◽  
pp. e146-e151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Genna R Cohen ◽  
Julia Adler-Milstein
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Care Coordination ◽  
Care Transitions ◽  
Meaningful Use ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Organizational Strategies ◽  
Primary Care Practices ◽  
Stage 1

Abstract Background Stage 2 and proposed Stage 3 meaningful use criteria ask providers to support patient care coordination by electronically generating, exchanging, and reconciling key information during patient care transitions. Methods A stratified random sample of primary care practices in Michigan ( n  = 328) that had already met Stage 1 meaningful use criteria was surveyed, in order to identify the anticipated barriers to meeting these criteria as well as the expected impact on patient care coordination from doing so. Results The top three barriers, as identified by >65% of the primary care providers surveyed, were difficulty sending and receiving patient information electronically, a lack of provider and practice staff time, and the complex workflow changes required. Despite these barriers, primary care providers expressed strong agreement that meeting the proposed Stage 3 care coordination criteria would improve their patients’ treatment and ensure they know about their patients’ visits to other providers. Conclusion The survey results suggest the need to enhance policy approaches and organizational strategies to address the key barriers identified by providers and practices in order to realize important care coordination benefits.

scholarly journals Palliative Care in a Death-Denying Culture: Exploring Barriers to Timely Palliative Efforts for Heart Failure Patients in the Primary Care Setting

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca M. Crimmins ◽  
Lydia Elliott ◽  
Darren T. Absher
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Care Setting ◽  
Primary Care Setting ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Communication Time

Context: Heart failure (HF) is a complex, life-limiting disease that is prevalent and burdensome. All major cardiology societies and international clinical practice guidelines recommend the integration of palliative care (PC) interventions alongside usual HF management. Objectives: The purpose of this review of the literature was to evaluate the various barriers to the early initiation of PC for HF patients in the primary care setting. Methods: An integrative literature review was conducted in order to assess and incorporate the diverse sources of literature available. An EBSCO search identified relevant articles in the following databases: Medline complete, Academic Search Premier, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, and SocINDEX. The search was limited to full text, peer reviewed, English only, and published between 2010 and 2019. Results: Barriers to the integration of PC for HF patients include poor communication between provider/patient and interdisciplinary providers, the misperception and miseducation of what PC is and how it can be incorporated into patient care, the unpredictable disease trajectory of HF, and the limited time allowed for patient care in the primary care setting. Conclusion: The results of this review highlight a lack of communication, time, and knowledge as barriers to delivering PC. Primary care providers caring for patients with HF need to establish an Annual Heart Failure Review to meticulously evaluate symptoms and allow the time for communication involving prognosis, utilize a PC referral screening tool such as the Needs Assessment Tool: Progressive Disease-Heart Failure, and thoroughly understand the benefits and appropriate integration of PC.

scholarly journals Exploring primary care providers’ understandings of body image in patient care

Body Image ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 35 ◽  
pp. 161-170
Author(s):  
Larkin Lamarche ◽  
K. Alysse Bailey ◽  
Amen Awan ◽  
Cathy Risdon ◽  
Glenda Pauw ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Body Image ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Care Providers

Evaluation of coordination of cancer care between designated cancer hospitals and primary care providers: Results from a nationwide survey in Japan.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 84-84
Author(s):  
Taro Tomizuka ◽  
Tomone Watanabe ◽  
Satoru Kamitani ◽  
Takahiro Higashi
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Care Coordination ◽  
Cancer Care ◽  
Critical Path ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Follow Up Care ◽  
Cancer Specialist

84 Background: To improve coordination of cancer care between cancer specialist hospitals and primary care providers (PCPs), the Japanese government accredited cancer specialist hospitals, so called “designated cancer care hospitals (DCCHs)” and introduced “Cancer care coordination instruction fee” which PCPs can receive if they share a cancer critical path (Japanese version of Survivorship Care Plans) of each cancer patient with DCCHs. We sought to assess the current status of coordination of cancer care in Japan and communication between DCCHs and PCPs from PCPs’ point of view. Methods: A cross-sectional mail survey was administered to randomly selected clinic-based PCPs (4,000 clinics) from a nation-wide database of medical institutions authorized by Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Japan to treat patients with health insurance (87,869 clinics). The survey evaluated how much PCPs provided cancer follow-up care and how well DCCHs coordinated care and communicated with PCPs in cancer survivorship. Results: 1,873 PCPs returned the questionnaire (response rate: 46.8%). 1,223 (65.3%) answered to provide cancer follow-up care in outpatient setting. Most of the PCPs which provided cancer follow-up care evaluated the care coordination and support by DCCHs were satisfactory (946, 77.4%) but the degree of good evaluation varied by region (highest: 91.3%, lowest: 45.8%). In regression analysis, provision of palliative care by PCPs (OR 1.52 95%CI 1.05-2.17) and use of cancer critical path (OR 2.10 95%CI 1.63-2.71) were significantly correlated with better evaluation of communication and care coordination. Conclusions: DCCHs communicated well with PCPs and PCPs were satisfied with the communication and care coordination by DCCHs. Provision of palliative care by PCPs and use of cancer critical path are likely to lead good care coordination in cancer care.

scholarly journals An Epigenetics-Based, Lifestyle Medicine–Driven Approach to Stress Management for Primary Patient Care: Implications for Medical Education

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 294-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenny Lee ◽  
Frank Papa ◽  
Paresh Atu Jaini ◽  
Sarah Alpini ◽  
Tim Kenny
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Stress Management ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Therapeutic Interventions ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Lifestyle Medicine ◽  
Lifestyle Choices

Over 75% of patients in the primary care setting present with stress-related complaints. Curiously, patients and health care providers all too often see stress as a relatively benign sequela of many common illnesses such as heart disease, cancer, lung disease, dementia, diabetes, and mental illness. Unfortunately, various day-to-day lifestyle choices and environmental factors, unrelated to the presence of any disease, can cause stress sufficient to contribute to the development of various diseases/disorders and suboptimal health. There is evidence suggesting that counseling in stress management–oriented therapeutic interventions (as offered by lifestyle medicine–oriented practitioners) may prevent or reduce the onset, severity, duration, and/or overall burden of stress-related illnesses. Such counseling often involves considerations such as the patient’s nutrition, physical activity, interest in/capacity to meditate, drug abuse/cessation, and so on. Unfortunately, lifestyle medicine–oriented approaches to stress management are rarely offered in primary care—the patient care arena wherein such counseling would likely be best received by patients. Would health care outcomes improve if primary care providers offered counseling in both stress management and positive lifestyle choices? The purpose of this article is to provide both primary care practitioners and educators in health care training programs with an introductory overview of epigenetics. An emerging field of science offering insights into how factors such as stress and lifestyle choices interact with our genes in ways that can both positively and negatively impact the various micro (eg, cellular) through macro (eg, physiologic, pathophysiologic) processes that determine our tendencies toward illness or wellness. A deeper understanding of epigenetics, as provided herein, should enable primary care providers and medical educators to more confidently advocate for the primary benefits associated with counseling in both stress reduction and the pursuit of healthy lifestyle choices.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document