scholarly journals Characterizing unmet medical need and the potential role of new biologic treatment options in patients with ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease

2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (7) ◽  
pp. 804-812 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason P. Gordon ◽  
Phil C. McEwan ◽  
Andy Maguire ◽  
Daniel M. Sugrue ◽  
Jorge Puelles
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-66
Author(s):  
Toumi Ryma ◽  
Arezki Samer ◽  
Imene Soufli ◽  
Hayet Rafa ◽  
Chafia Touil-Boukoffa

Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) is a term used to describe a group of complex disorders of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. IBDs include two main forms: Crohn’s Disease (CD) and Ulcerative Colitis (UC), which share similar clinical symptoms but differ in the anatomical distribution of the inflammatory lesions. The etiology of IBDs is undetermined. Several hypotheses suggest that Crohn’s Disease and Ulcerative Colitis result from an abnormal immune response against endogenous flora and luminal antigens in genetically susceptible individuals. While there is no cure for IBDs, most common treatments (medication and surgery) aim to reduce inflammation and help patients to achieve remission. There is growing evidence and focus on the prophylactic and therapeutic potential of probiotics in IBDs. Probiotics are live microorganisms that regulate the mucosal immune system, the gut microbiota and the production of active metabolites such as Short-Chain Fatty Acids (SCFAs). This review will focus on the role of intestinal dysbiosis in the immunopathogenesis of IBDs and understanding the health-promoting effects of probiotics and their metabolites.


2011 ◽  
Vol 140 (5) ◽  
pp. S-787
Author(s):  
Marta Iglesias-Rey ◽  
Manuel Barreiro-de Acosta ◽  
Isabel Vazquez ◽  
Maria Piñeiro ◽  
Adolfo Figueiras ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 12 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 125-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wouter M. Kooloos ◽  
Dirk J. de Jong ◽  
Tom W.J. Huizinga ◽  
Henk-Jan Guchelaar

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-29
Author(s):  
S. A. Bulgakov ◽  
G. M. Chernakova ◽  
E. A. Kleshcheva ◽  
S. V. Simonova

Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis are chronic inflammatory bowel diseases, which are often accompanied by inflammation of other organs. This article presents modern data on etiology, pathogenesis and clinical course of inflammatory bowel diseases, as well as information on extraintestinal eye manifestations of nonspecific ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. The role of microbiota, genetic factors, immune system defects in pathogenesis of intestinal inflammation and extraintestinal eye manifestations is considered. The possibility the development of ophthalmopathology not only against the background of intestinal inflammation, but also as a consequence of therapeutic and surgical methods of treatment of ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease is noted. The peculiarities of the course of episcleritis/scleritis, keratitis, uveitis, chorioretinitis, optical neuritis for patients with inflammatory bowel diseases are considered. The presence of these complications may reflect the activity of the underlying disease, which in some cases requires correction of therapy. Anterior uveitis and episcleritis/scleritis are the most common extraintestinal manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease. Inflammation of tissues of the posterior segment of the eye and optic nerve against the background of ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease are less common, but are of clinical importance, as they can catastrophically damage the structures of the eye and, as a consequence, lead to complete blindness. Considering the possibility of mild clinical symptoms and asymptomatic course of inflammation in the eye envelopes, the importance of ophthalmological examination of all patients with ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease is emphasized. Aspects of modern therapy of ophthalmopathology and background intestinal inflammation are highlighted. Biological preparations — antagonists of pro-inflammatory cytokines — have been identified as the most promising in the treatment of inflammatory intestinal diseases and extraintestinal manifestations. The important role of proper nutrition and biologically active supplements containing omega-3 fatty acids, vitamin D, microelements, was noted as auxiliary therapy of both intestinal and extraintestinal inflammation.


Nutrients ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 4389
Author(s):  
Sharafaath Shariff ◽  
Gordon Moran ◽  
Caris Grimes ◽  
Rachel Margaret Cooney

Despite the increasing array of medications available for the treatment of Crohn’s disease and a focus on mucosal healing, approximately 35% of patients with Crohn’s disease undergo bowel surgery at some stage. The importance of nutritional optimisation before Crohn’s surgery is well-highlighted by surgical, nutritional, and gastroenterological societies with the aim of reducing complications and enhancing recovery. Surgical procedures are frequently undertaken when other treatment options have been unsuccessful, and, thus, patients may have lost weight and/or required steroids, and are therefore at higher risk of post-operative complications. EEN is used extensively in the paediatric population to induce remission, but is not routinely used in the induction of remission of adult Crohn’s disease or in pre-operative optimisation. Large prospective studies regarding the role of pre-operative EEN are lacking. In this review, we evaluate the current literature on the use of EEN in pre-operative settings and its impact on patient outcomes.


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S060-S061
Author(s):  
M Høivik ◽  
M Lördal ◽  
J Burisch ◽  
E Langholz ◽  
T Knudsen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Real-world data on time from diagnosis to first biologic treatment is limited for ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD) patient populations. Methods This retrospective observational study collected data from the National Patient Registries and National Prescription Registries in Sweden (data on biologic use was only available for Stockholm [STK], Norway [NOR], Denmark [DEN]) and one university hospital database (Turku, Finland [FIN]) during 2010–2017 to investigate time from diagnosis to first biologic treatment for UC and CD. Patients with ≥2 ICD-10 diagnosis codes for UC (K51) or CD (K50) from 2010 or later were included; patients were classified according to their last code. The look-back period for SWE was until 2000, for NOR until 2008, for DEN until 1995, and for FIN until 2004. Time to first biologic was defined as the period from the first UC or CD code to first biologic record. In FIN, it was only possible to investigate infliximab (IFX). Results A total of 47,568 patients were included (STK n = 5594, NOR n = 20,761, FIN n = 2118, DEN n = 19,095). Of them, 30 397 patients had UC and 17 171 CD diagnosed during 2010–2017. Time to first biologic following diagnosis of UC or CD was decreased over time. For patients diagnosed with CD in 2015, in STK, NOR, FIN, and DEN, 30%, 35%, 25%, and 26%, respectively, received a biologic within 2 years; in 2010, the proportions were less than 10%, 20%, 5%, and 22%, respectively. FIN results may be attributed to only IFX use captured in the data sources. NOR had in most cohorts the shortest time between diagnosis and first treatment with a biologic agent, e.g. 33%, 35%, 36%, 34% and 33% of patients diagnosed with CD in 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively, received a biologic already one month after diagnosis compared with 2%, 1%, 3%, 4% and 6%, respectively, in STK, 7%, 5%, 9%, 4% and 5%, respectively, in FIN and 3%, 10%, 28%, 12% and 23%, respectively, in DEN. Fewer UC than CD patients received biologics, but the time to first biologic was shortened to the same extent (Figure 1 and 2, respectively). In NOR, FIN and DEN, the most common biologic used was IFX for UC and CD, e.g. 18%, 14% and 15%, respectively, of UC and 35%, 17% and 35%, respectively, of CD patients diagnosed in 2015 had received IFX; in STK it was IFX for UC (8% of patients diagnosed in 2015) and adalimumab for CD (20% of patients diagnosed in 2015). Conclusion This retrospective observational study of >45 000 patients with inflammatory bowel disease in four Nordic countries showed reduced time between diagnosis and first biologic from 2010 to 2017, with the shortest time between diagnosis and first biologic in Norway. IFX was most commonly used.


Author(s):  
Céline Gregoire ◽  
Chantal Lechanteur ◽  
Alexandra Briquet ◽  
Etienne Baudoux ◽  
Olivier Giet ◽  
...  

1990 ◽  
Vol 4 (7) ◽  
pp. 404-406 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Grant Gall

As no curative therapy exists, supportive measures play an important role in the management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBO). Aminosalicylic acid (ASA) compounds and corticosteroids remain the mainstay of medical therapy. Aminosalicylates are recommended for therapy of mild to moderate active ulcerative colitis and for the maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis. The role of 5-ASA preparations in Crohn's disease is less clear. In granulomatous colitis, 5-ASA therapy is recommended. With the development of new delivery systems, the role for 5-ASA in the treatment of small bowel Crohn's disease is under investigation. Prednisone remains the drug of choice in severe ulcerative colitis and active Crohn's disease. The role of immunosuppressive drugs in pediatric patients is unclear. Nutritional therapy has been an important advance in the treatment of children with Crohn's disease, especially those with growth failure. Nutritional therapy can consist of combined total parenteral and enteral nutrition or enteral nutrition alone. An initial period of total parenteral nutrition followed by a six to eight week course of enteral therapy with a semisynthetic diet has been shown to be effective in the management of patients with severe active disease and growth failure.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document