Comments Regarding the “Effect of Aging on the Stiffness of Bioabsorbable Fixation Plates”

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 345
Author(s):  
William S. Pietrzak
2004 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 389-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allison M. Holzapfel ◽  
Devinder S. Mangat

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (9) ◽  
pp. 1020-1025 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jascha Armin Wendelstein ◽  
Peter Goger ◽  
Peter Bock ◽  
Reinhard Schuh ◽  
Priv Doz ◽  
...  

Background: Although standard fixation of proximal interphalangeal (PIP) arthrodesis by K-wire is relatively inexpensive and well established, it does have some drawbacks, making newer fixation devices interesting. The aim of this study was to clinically and radiologically assess the operative correction of the lesser toe deformation in the form of a PIP arthrodesis using a bioabsorbable 2.7-mm fixation screw. Methods: From January 2011 until October 2013, 34 patients underwent a PIP arthrodesis using the TRIM-IT (Arthrex) 2.7-mm fixation screw and were contacted for this retrospective cohort study. At an average of 3.3 years after the operation, 24 patients and 26 toes were evaluated clinically, radiologically, through pedobarography, and a patient-satisfaction survey. Results: Using the PLLA screw for fixation, 84.6% showed bony union of the arthrodesis, and 84.6% were satisfied. Mean AOFAS score was 82.7 points and thus regarded as good. The mean VAS score was 1.3/10. Overall, 73.1% of the toes showed good alignment, and 7.7% had a painless recurrence of deformity and were still satisfied with the intervention. In addition, 34.6% had floating toes, but only 4.2% without Weil osteotomy or encroachment. Further, 3.8% were advised to undergo a revision because of severe misalignment. Conclusion: The 2.7-mm bioabsorbable fixation screw yielded results that were comparable to other fixation devices for PIP fusion fixation regarding success rate, revisions, and patient acceptance. Level of Evidence: Level IV, retrospective case series.


2010 ◽  
Vol 38 (10) ◽  
pp. 2065-2070 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kendra L. Millington ◽  
Jay P. Shah ◽  
Diane L. Dahm ◽  
Bruce A. Levy ◽  
Michael J. Stuart

1998 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 180-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffry T. Watson ◽  
W. David Hovis ◽  
Robert W. Bucholz

2006 ◽  
Vol 34 ◽  
pp. 20-21
Author(s):  
C. Miera ◽  
E. Vert ◽  
J. Bencosme ◽  
Y. Argüelles

1997 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 92-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
William S. Pietrzak ◽  
Mary L. Verstynen ◽  
David R. Sarver

2004 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 240-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Laine ◽  
R. Kontio ◽  
C. Lindqvist ◽  
R. Suuronen

2009 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 389-398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott T. Lovald ◽  
Tariq Khraishi ◽  
Jon Wagner ◽  
Bret Baack

2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 679-689 ◽  
Author(s):  
Debi P. Mukherjee ◽  
William S. Pietrzak

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document