scholarly journals Impact of BNT162b2 vaccination and isolation on SARS-CoV-2 transmission in Israeli households: an observational study

Author(s):  
Maylis Layan ◽  
Mayan Gilboa ◽  
Tal Gonen ◽  
Miki Goldenfeld ◽  
Lilac Meltzer ◽  
...  

Background Massive vaccination rollouts against SARS-CoV-2 infections have facilitated the easing of control measures in countries like Israel. While several studies have characterized the effectiveness of vaccines against severe forms of COVID-19 or SARS-CoV-2 infection, estimates of their impact on transmissibility remain limited. Here, we evaluated the role of vaccination and isolation on SARS-CoV-2 transmission within Israeli households. Methods From December 2020 to April 2021, confirmed cases were identified among healthcare workers of the Sheba Medical Centre and their family members. Households were recruited and followed up with repeated PCR for a minimum of ten days after case confirmation. Symptoms and vaccination information were collected at the end of follow-up. We developed a data augmentation Bayesian framework to ascertain how age, isolation and BNT162b2 vaccination with more than 7 days after the 2nd dose impacted household transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Findings 210 households with 215 index cases were enrolled. 269 out of 687 (39%) household contacts developed a SARS-CoV-2 infection. Of those, 170 (63%) developed symptoms. Children below 12 years old were less susceptible than adults/teenagers (Relative Risk RR=0.50, 95% Credible Interval CI 0.32-0.79). Vaccination reduced the risk of infection among adults/teenagers (RR=0.19, 95% CI 0.07-0.40). Isolation reduced the risk of infection of unvaccinated adult/teenager (RR=0.11, 95% CI 0.05-0.19) and child contacts (RR=0.16, 95% CI 0.07-0.31) compared to unvaccinated adults/teenagers that did not isolate. Infectivity was significantly reduced in vaccinated cases (RR=0.22, 95% CI 0.06-0.70). Interpretation Within households, vaccination reduces both the risk of infection and of transmission if infected. When contacts were not vaccinated, isolation also led to important reductions in the risk of transmission. Vaccinated contacts might reduce their risk of infection if they isolate, although this requires confirmation with additional data. Funding Sheba Medical Center.

2003 ◽  
Vol 24 (9) ◽  
pp. 679-685 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hetty E. M. Blok ◽  
Annet Troelstra ◽  
Titia E. M. Kamp-Hopmans ◽  
Ada C. M. Gigengack-Baars ◽  
Christina M. J. E. Vandenbroucke-Grauls ◽  
...  

AbstractBackground and Objective:The benefit of screening healthcare workers (HCWs) at risk for methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA) carriage and furloughing MRSA-positive HCWs to prevent spread to patients is controversial. We evaluated our MRSA program for HCWs between 1992 and 2002.Setting:A university medical center in the Netherlands, where methicillin resistance has been kept below 0.5% of all nosocomial S.aureusinfections using active surveillance cultures and isolation of colonized patients.Design:HCWs caring for MRSA-positive patients or patients in foreign hospitals were screened for MRSA. MRSA-positive HCWs had additional cultures, temporary exclusion from patient-related work, assessment of risk factors for persisting carriage, decolonization therapy with mupirocin intranasally and chlorhexidine baths for skin and hair, and follow-up cultures.Results:Fifty-nine HCWs were colonized with MRSA. Seven of 840 screened employees contracted MRSA in foreign hospitals; 36 acquired MRSA after contact with MRSA-positive patients despite isolation precautions (attack rate per outbreak varied from less than 1% to 15%). Our hospital experienced 17 MRSA outbreaks, including 13 episodes in which HCWs were involved. HCWs were index cases of at least 4 outbreaks. In 8 outbreaks, HCWs acquired MRSA after caring for MRSA-positive patients despite isolation precautions.Conclusion:Postexposure screening of HCWs allowed early detection of MRSA carriage and prevention of subsequent transmission to patients. Where the MRSA prevalence is higher, the role of HCWs may be greater. In such settings, an adapted version of our program could help prevent dissemination.


Author(s):  
Koen B Pouwels ◽  
Thomas House ◽  
Julie V Robotham ◽  
Paul Birrell ◽  
Andrew B Gelman ◽  
...  

Objective: To estimate the percentage of individuals infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) over time in the community in England and to quantify risk factors. Design: Repeated cross-sectional surveys of population-representative households with longitudinal follow-up if consent given. Setting: England. Participants: 34,992 Individuals aged 2 years and over from 16,722 private residential households. Data were collected in a pilot phase of the survey between 26 April and 28 June 2020. Main outcome measures: Percentage of individuals in the community testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA using throat and nose swabs. Individuals were asked about any symptoms and potential risk factors. Results: The percentage of people in private-residential households testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 reduced from 0.32% (95% credible interval (CrI) 0.19% to 0.52%) on 26 April to 0.08% (95% CrI 0.05% to 0.12%) on 28 June, although the prevalence stabilised near the end of the pilot. Factors associated with an increased risk of testing positive included having a job with direct patient contact (relative exposure (RE) 4.06, 95% CrI 2.42 to 6.77)), working outside the home (RE 2.49, 95% CrI 1.39 to 4.45), and having had contact with a hospital (RE 2.20, 95% CrI 1.09 to 4.16 for having been to a hospital individually and RE 1.95, 95% CrI 0.81 to 4.09 for a household member having been to a hospital). In 133 visits where individuals tested positive, 82 (61%, 95% CrI 53% to 69%) reported no symptoms, stably over time. Conclusion: The percentage of SARS-CoV-2 positive individuals declined between 26 April and 28 June 2020. Positive tests commonly occurred without symptoms being reported. Working outside your home was an important risk factor, indicating that continued monitoring for SARS-CoV-2 in the community will be essential for early detection of increases in infections following return to work and other relaxations of control measures.


Author(s):  
Dinh Binh Tran

Protecting healthcare workers (HCWs) is a top priority in COVID-19 pandemic at this time. HCWs who carry the pathogens will increase the risk of infecting their patients, their colleagues as well as the community. Therefore, HCWs must follow the guidance of preventive measures issued by the Ministry of Health to ensure safety, although that means they have to work under uncomfortable condition. That is the reason why the role of surveillance and assessment the risk of infection is extremely critical. Only with regular and continuous supervision, with instructions and reminders, can HCWs effectively prevent the COVID-19 infection, especially while being under intensity - work pressure of the current situation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vasiliki Vlacha ◽  
Gavriela Feketea ◽  
Athanasia Petropoulou ◽  
Sebastian Daniel Trancá

Background: The true risk of infection after exposure to SARS-CoV-2 of healthcare workers (HCWs) in the workplace has not yet been established. This descriptive study analyzes the exposure characteristics of HCWs to SARS-CoV-2.Methods: In March 2020, at the beginning of the pandemic, a total of 58 HCWs in a regional hospital in Greece were exposed to three patients with symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. These three index cases had taken part in an 8-day religious tour, during which 52 travelers spent 10 h every day in a tour bus. A study was made of the circumstances of the hospital exposure.Results: Of the 52 travelers in the bus, 48 contracted SARS-CoV2. None of the 58 HCW contacts developed symptoms related to COVID-19, although, 43% were exposed to a SARS-CoV-2 infected patient for more than 15 min, and 74% were within a distance of <1 m, and half of the contacts were not wearing a surgical mask. Additional information was that 63% of the contacts were exposed in a room sized more than 15 m2, and in more than 80% of cases, the window or the door to the room was open during their exposure. In about one-third of the exposure events, the HCW contacts were not wearing a mask and were at a distance of <1 m, and just under half of them were exposed for more than 15 min. One-fourth of the contacts underwent RT-PCR testing, and 11% IgG/IgM antibody testing for SARS-CoV-2, all of which were negative. All observed quarantine at home for 14 days.Conclusion: This observational study was made before the extent of the SARS-CoV-2 became apparent, and before routine preventive measures were observed by all HCWs. Comparing the conditions of exposure in the two different settings (bus vs. regional health facility), it is apparent that the duration of exposure and the small, enclosed nature of the bus are the distinguishing factors. In the healthcare setting, the elimination of both factors and the implementation of additional measures protected the exposed HCWs from contracting SARS-CoV-2 infection.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S289-S290
Author(s):  
Matthew Westercamp ◽  
Giselle Soto ◽  
Rachel Smith ◽  
Eduardo Azziz-Baumgartner ◽  
Susan Bollinger ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Peru has one of the highest per capita SARS-CoV-2 death rates in Latin America. Healthcare workers (HCW) are a critical workforce during the COVID-19 pandemic but are themselves often at increased risk of infection. We evaluated SARS-CoV-2 attack rate and risk factors among frontline HCWs. Methods We performed a prospective cohort study of HCW serving two acute care hospitals in Lima, Peru from Aug 2020 to Mar 2021. Participants had baseline SARS-CoV-2 serology using the CDC ELISA, active symptom monitoring, and weekly respiratory specimen collection with COVID-19 exposure/risk assessment for 16-weeks regardless of symptoms. Respiratory specimens were tested by real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (rRT-PCR). Results Of 783 eligible, 667 (85%) HCW were enrolled (33% nurse assistants, 29% non-clinical staff, 26% nurses, 7% physicians, and 6% other). At baseline and prior to COVID-19 vaccine introduction, 214 (32.1%; 214/667) were reactive for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. In total, 72 (10.8%; 72/667) HCWs were found to be rRT-PCR positive during weekly follow-up. Of the rRT-PCR positive HCWs, 37.5% (27/72) did not report symptoms within 1-week of specimen collection. During follow up, HCW without detectable SARS-CoV-2 antibodies at baseline were significantly more likely to be rRT-PCR positive (65/453, 14.3%) compared to those with SARS-CoV-2 antibodies at baseline (4/214, 1.9%) (p-value: < 0.001). Three HCW were both serologically reactive and rRT-PCR positive at baseline. Looking only at HCW without SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, nurse assistants (rRT-PCR positive: 18.6%; 27/141) and non-clinical healthcare workers (16.5%; 21/127) were at greater risk of infection compared to nurses (8.5%; 10/118), physicians (7.9%; 3/38), and other staff (10.3%; 4/29) (RR 1.95;95%CI 1.2,3.3; p-value: 0.01). Conclusion Baseline SARS-CoV-2 prevalence and 16-week cumulative incidence were substantial in this pre-vaccination Peruvian HCW cohort. Almost 40% of new infections occurred in HCW without complaint of symptoms illustrating a limitation of symptom-based HCW screening for COVID-19 prevention. Nurse assistants and non-clinical healthcare workers were at greater risk of infection indicating a role for focused infection prevention and risk reduction strategies for some groups of HCW. Disclosures Fernanda C. Lessa, MD, MPH, Nothing to disclose


Author(s):  
Antoni Soriano-Arandes ◽  
Berta Ferran ◽  
Magda Campins ◽  
Juliana Esperalba-Esquerra ◽  
Juliana Reyes-Urueña ◽  
...  

We analyzed the characteristics of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infected children during lock-down period in Catalonia (Spain), and their transmission role within the households. Among 295 traced household contacts of 89 pediatric patients, children were classified as final index cases in only 3.4% of the traced homes.


Author(s):  
Thomas Bénet ◽  
Sélilah Amour ◽  
Martine Valette ◽  
Mitra Saadatian-Elahi ◽  
Ludwig Serge Aho-Glélé ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Influenza is an important cause of viral hospital-acquired infection involving patients, healthcare workers (HCW), and visitors. The frequency of asymptomatic influenza among HCW with possible subsequent transmission is poorly described. The objective is to determine the cumulative incidence of asymptomatic, paucisymptomatic, and symptomatic influenza among HCW. Method A multicenter prospective cohort study was done in 5 French university hospitals, including 289 HCW during the 2016–2017 influenza season. HCW had 3 physical examinations (time [T] 0, before epidemic onset; T.1, before epidemic peak; T.2, T.3, after epidemic peak). A blood sample was taken each time for influenza serology and a nasal swab was collected at T1 and T2 for influenza detection by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Positive influenza was defined as either a positive influenza PCR, and/or virus-specific seroconversion against influenza A, the only circulating virus, with no vaccination record during follow-up. Symptoms were self-reported daily between T1 and T2. Cumulative incidence of influenza was stratified by clinical presentation per 100 HCW. Results Of the 289 HCW included, 278 (96%) completed the entire follow-up. Overall, 62 HCW had evidence of influenza of whom 46.8% were asymptomatic, 41.9% were paucisymptomatic, and 11.3% were symptomatic. Cumulative influenza incidence was 22.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 17.4%–27.2%). Cumulative incidence of asymptomatic influenza was 5.8% (95% CI: 3.3%–9.2%), 13.7% (95% CI: 9.9%–18.2%) for paucisymptomatic influenza, and 2.9% (95% CI: 1.3%–5.5%) for symptomatic influenza. Conclusions Asymptomatic and paucisymptomatic influenza were frequent among HCW, representing 47% and 42% of the influenza burden, respectively. These findings highlight the importance of systematic implementation of infection control measures among HCW regardless of respiratory symptoms from preventing nosocomial transmission of influenza. Clinical Trials Registration NCT02868658.


2020 ◽  
pp. archdischild-2020-319910 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jieun Kim ◽  
Young June Choe ◽  
Jin Lee ◽  
Young Joon Park ◽  
Ok Park ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTransmissibility of COVID-19 by children in the household is not clear. Herein, we describe children’s role in household transmission of COVID-19.Design and settingAll paediatric COVID-19 index cases and their household members reported from 20 January to 6 April 2020 in South Korea were reviewed. The secondary attack rate (SAR) from child index case to household secondary case was calculated. Epidemiological and clinical findings of child index case-household secondary case pair was assessed.ResultsA total of 107 paediatric COVID-19 index cases and 248 of their household members were identified. One pair of paediatric index-secondary household case was identified, giving a household SAR of 0.5% (95% CI 0.0% to 2.6%). The index case was self-quarantined at home after international travel, stayed in her room, but shared a meal table with the secondary case.ConclusionThe SAR from children to household members was low in the setting of social distancing, underscoring the importance of rigorous contact tracing and early isolation in limiting transmission within households.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 425-425
Author(s):  
Jihoon Kang ◽  
Bumjun Kim ◽  
Changhoon Yoo ◽  
Jaewon Hyung ◽  
Kyu-Pyo Kim ◽  
...  

425 Background: In advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC), the role of 2nd line chemotherapy after failure of 1st line gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GEMCIS) has not been established. Fluoropyrimidine(FP)-based regimens are widely used as 2nd line treatment in clinical practice. We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy of 2nd line FP-based chemotherapy in patients(pts) with advanced BTC after failure of GEMCIS. Methods: Histologically confirmed advanced BTC pts who received 1st line GEMCIS at Asan Medical Center between December 2010 and June 2016 were identified. Among 748 pts treated with GEMCIS, 331 patients (44%) subsequently received 2nd line chemotherapy and FP-based regimens were used in 321 pts (97%). Results: The median age was 60 years (range, 27-82) and 57% of pts were male. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma(IH-CCC) (44%) was the most common type, and followed by extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (32%). Most pts (n = 289, 89%) had metastatic/recurrent disease at the time of 1st line treatment. FP alone and FP plus platinum combination were used in 255 pts (79%) and 66 pts (21%), respectively. In pts with measurable disease, response rate (RR) was 3% (8/301) and disease control rate was 47% (142/301). After a median follow-up of 27.6 months (0.9-70.4 months), the median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 1.9 months (95% CI, 1.6-2.2) and 6.5 months (95% CI, 5.9-7.0). RR was significantly higher in pts with combination of FP and platinum compared to FP alone (8% vs 1%, p = 0.009). However, there were no statistically significant differences in terms of PFS (p = 0.43) or OS (p = 0.88) between two groups. In the multivariate analysis for OS, IH-CCC, initially metastatic disease and elevated CA 19-9 level at the time of 1st line treatment, and time-to-progression at 1st line GEMCIS > 4 months were independent poor prognostic factors. Conclusions: In this analysis, FP-based regimen showed modest efficacy as 2nd line chemotherapy for advanced BTC patients after failure of 1st line GEMCIS. Combination of FP and platinum was not associated with improved survival outcomes compared to FP monotherapy, despite of higher RR.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4888-4888
Author(s):  
Evelyne Shabad ◽  
Eitan Mangoubi ◽  
Olga Valkovsky ◽  
Salim Habib Alla ◽  
Miriam Quitt

Abstract Abstract 4888 Introduction. Rituximab (RTX), a chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, has now become a cornerstone in the treatment of many CD20 positive B cell lymphomas. RTX induces a rapid depletion of normal CD20 expressing B-cells in the peripheral blood, and their level remains low for 2–6 months before returning to pretreatment levels, generally within 12 months. Some patients develop late side effects such as neutropenia and hypogammaglobulinemia regardless of the level of B cells; these patients are more vulnerable to life-threatening infections. In addition, treatment with RTX is a risk factor for HBV and HCV reactivation in occult and chronic carriers. Aims. The goal of the study was to identify the clinical and laboratory indices that serve as predictors of risk for developing late side effects in patients with non- Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) treated with RTX in a single medical center. Statistical correlation between these variables and occurrence of infectious complications secondary to late hematologic adverse effects such as neutropenia and hypogammaglobulinemia was performed. Clinical outcome of patients with infectious complications was evaluated. Methods. We conducted a retrospective study of 120 patients who were diagnosed with B cell NHL and were followed in the Institute of Hematology of Carmel Medical Center in Haifa between 2000–2008. Each patient received RTX as a monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy. All the patients in the study were RTX naive. The study was approved by the local Helsinki committee. For the purpose of the study, the follow-up period was defined from the time of termination until a period of 24 months from the last therapeutic dose of RTX. Late side effects were defined as side effects that appeared 6 months after the last therapeutic dose of RTX or continued beyond the 6 month period. For each variable we evaluated retrospectively the proportion of patients who developed late side effects. In an attempt to characterize the risk factors such as age, sex, status of lymphoma, type of chemotherapy, number of treatments and the interval between the treatments, comparison was made between the patients who developed side effects and those who did not. Results. Twenty two of the 120 surveyed patients (18.3%) developed infections. Hematologic side effects observed were anemia (28.3%), thrombocytopenia (7.5%) and neutropenia (3.28%). We found that age ≥70 years and recurrence of the disease were significant risk factors for developing side effects. Laboratory indexes that were found to be significant predicting factors for the risk of infection were: PMN<2.0×109/mm3, LDH≥480u/l, SGOT≥44u/l. An active disease and grade 3–4 neutropenia were both variables that contributed to the risk of infection. There was no correlation between gender of patients, the histological type and stage of lymphoma, type of chemotherapy, or number of therapeutic courses with RTX and increased risk of infection. We did not find any association between hypogammaglobulinemia and the risk of infection. Regarding viral infections, only 2 HCV carriers were detected in the study; none of them had reactivation during the follow up. Reactivation of HBV occurred in 1 of the 6 occult carriers (16.7%). Conclusions. In recent years RTX has become an essential component in the therapy of B cell NHL. Late side effects of this drug are now beginning to emerge and require new risk assessment for safety. Twenty two patients (18.33%) in our study developed infectious complications. This rate is lower than the one reported in the literature (30%). In contrast, mortality following infection was 7% as compared to 2% reported in the literature. These data can be explained by the fact that our study examined hospitalized patients who had more severe infections. Our study supports the previous observation that hypogammaglobulinemia does not present a risk factor for infection. In contrary to the reports in literature, we found no correlation between the number of therapeutic courses with RTX and the risk of infection. In conclusion, we suggest that RTX should be used with caution in patients over age 70 and in patients with recurrent disease. In order to confirm our findings, further assessment of late adverse effects on the larger population of patients treated with rituximab is warranted. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document