scholarly journals Domain General Processes for Interactive Touch

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tao Buck ◽  
Courtney DiCocco ◽  
Jennifer L. Cuzzocreo ◽  
J. Adam Noah ◽  
Xian Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
General Model ◽  
Social Functions ◽  
Left Hand ◽  
General Region ◽  
Social Processing ◽  
The Right ◽  
Right And Left Hand

AbstractThe nexus model of social processing proposes that the right temporal parietal junction (rTPJ) serves as a neural hub for cognitive social functions. We test the hypothesis that the rTPJ is a domain general region including somatosensory social functions. Neuroimaging findings and cross-brain coherence for right- and left-hand handclasps with real vs. simulated hands were consistent with the domain general model.

scholarly journals Sacramento Peak Magnetograph

1971 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
pp. 65-70
Author(s):  
Richard B. Dunn
Keyword(s):  
Paper Tape ◽  
Circularly Polarized ◽  
Sacramento Peak ◽  
Left Hand ◽  
Tape Reader ◽  
Raster Scan ◽  
Paper Tape Reader ◽  
Original Scheme ◽  
The Right ◽  
Right And Left Hand

The Sac Peak magnetograph (DZA) has been modified from Evans' original scheme so that it measures the displacement of the right and left hand circularly polarized lines separately. The computer reduction calculates the Zeeman and radial velocity signals. A grating servo system has been added to correct for slow temperature drifts in the spectrograph. A paper-tape reader controls the raster scan and the formatting of data on to magnetic tape.

Purdue Pegboard: Test-Retest Estimates

1988 ◽  
Vol 66 (2) ◽  
pp. 503-506 ◽  
Author(s):  
John R. Reddon ◽  
David M. Gill ◽  
Stephen E. Gauk ◽  
Marita D. Maerz
Keyword(s):  
Temporal Stability ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Left Hand ◽  
Right Hand ◽  
The Right ◽  
Test Retest Reliability ◽  
Right And Left Hand ◽  
Over Time

26 normal, self-reported dextral subjects (12 men, 14 women) were assessed with a Purdue Pegboard 5 times at weekly intervals to evaluate temporal stability and efficacy of lateralization with this test. There was a statistically significant increase in performance over time for men on the right- and left-hand placing subtests and for women on the assemblies subtest. For men/women the test-retest reliability over the 5 sessions averaged .63/.76 for the right-hand, .64/.79 for the left-hand, .67/.81 for both-hands, .81/.83 for assemblies, and .33/.22 for the right/left-hand ratio.

Register of Dupuytren’s Disease (Contracture) in Tatarstan Republic: Efficacy of Surgical Treatment

2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-17
Author(s):  
R. O Magomedov ◽  
G. I Mikusev ◽  
R. F Baykeev ◽  
I. E Mikusev ◽  
A. E Nikitina
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Treatment Efficacy ◽  
Hand Function ◽  
Left Hand ◽  
Complete Restoration ◽  
Palmar Aponeurosis ◽  
The Right ◽  
Common Intervention ◽  
Right And Left Hand

Analysis of Dupuytren’s contracture (DC) surgical treatment efficacy according to the Tatarstan Republic DC Register (258 patients, 343 hands) was performed. Partial wedge-shaped excision of palmar aponeurosis was the most common intervention on both the right and left hand. Late (1 year and over) postoperative complications (POC) — relapse, dissemination, progression were detected in 41.8% of patients at terms up to 15 years. Presence of POC on the operated hand caused disturbance of its function in 11.9% of cases on the right and 16.3% of cases on the left. Curability from DC made up 34.9 — 73.8% depending on the operated hand. Complete restoration of hand function was achieved in 22.2—100% of observations. Surgical treatment of DC enabled to ensure favorable patient’s condition at term 1 year and over in 67.5 and 59.9% of cases on the right and left hand respectively.

scholarly journals Drawing with the Non-dominant Hand: Implications for the Study of Construction

1998 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 306-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sherma Zacharias ◽  
Andrew Kirk
Keyword(s):  
Neurological Disease ◽  
Right Hemisphere ◽  
Normal Subjects ◽  
Elderly Subjects ◽  
Dominant Hand ◽  
Left Hand ◽  
Right Hand ◽  
Left And Right ◽  
The Right ◽  
Right And Left Hand

ABSTRACT:Background:Constructional impairment following left vs. right hemisphere damage has been extensively studied using drawing tasks. A confounding factor in these studies is that right-handed patients with left hemisphere damage (LHD) are often forced by weakness to use their non-dominant (left) hand or hemiparetic dominant hand. Qualitative differences in the drawing characteristics of left and right hand drawings by normal subjects have not previously been characterized. The present study was undertaken to determine the qualitative differences between left and right hand drawings of normal subjects.Methods:Thirty right-handed, elderly subjects without a history of neurological disease were asked to draw, from memory, seven objects using the right and left hand. Half of the subjects were randomly assigned to draw with the left hand first, and half the right hand first. Right and left hand drawings were compared using a standardized scoring system utilized in several previous studies of drawing in focal and diffuse neurological disease. Each drawing was scored on eighteen criteria. Right and left hand drawing scores were then compared using the t-test for paired samples or the Wilcoxon matched-pairs testResults:Drawings made using the left hand were found to be significantly simpler, more tremulous and of poorer overall quality than drawings made by the same subjects using the right hand.Conclusions:The deficits found in left versus right hand drawings of normals are similar to those found in patients with LHD, suggesting that much of the drawing impairment seen following LHD is due to an elementary motor disturbance related to use of the non-dominant hand.

Midline and Off-Midline Tongue and Right- and Left-Hand Vibrotactile Thresholds of Stutterers and Normal-Speaking Individuals

1987 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 253-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda Petrosino ◽  
Peter Gorman ◽  
Donald Fucci ◽  
Daniel Harris
Keyword(s):  
Preliminary Data ◽  
Left Hand ◽  
Vibrotactile Thresholds ◽  
The Right ◽  
Age Range ◽  
Peripheral Sensory ◽  
Right And Left Hand ◽  
Normal Speaking

Vibrotactile thresholds for 7 male stutterers and 7 normal-speaking men (age range for both groups = 19 to 32 yr.) were obtained from the right, midline, and left sides of the lingual dorsum, and the thenar eminences of both hands. The stutterers showed slightly higher (less sensitive) mean thresholds than the normal speakers for all three lingual test sites. This was not the case for the thresholds obtained from both hands. The preliminary data suggest that oral peripheral sensory integrity might be somewhat different for stutterers than for normal-speaking individuals.

Über die Vererbung der Fingerlängenproportion

1958 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 361-382 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans-Dieter Rösler
Keyword(s):  
Left Hand ◽  
Finger Length ◽  
Parents And Children ◽  
Mothers And Children ◽  
Different Ages ◽  
Longitudinal Variations ◽  
The Right ◽  
Right And Left Hand ◽  
Brothers And Sisters

SUMMARYThe evaluation of the sketches of the hands of 746 consanguineous persons of different ages and sexes as well as the examinations of 120 radiograms of the hands of non-related adults have shown the following results:1) Relatives (Brothers and sisters, mothers and children, parents and children) resemble each other with regard to the respective finger-lengths and the proportions of these between right and left hand more than non-relatives do.2) The respective finger-length is organized anatomically by the longitudinal variations of all elements of the second and forth rays and modified by the Carpalia and the longitudinal proportion of Radius and Ulna. We can regard the most extensive variations of growth at the second ray in men and at the forth ray in women. In the same manner the lateral differences between the right and the left hand can be explained for both sexes mainly by the longitudinal differences of the second rays.3) In reference to these anatomical conditions a genetical hypothesis about a transmission of the relative finger-length is developped and its usefulnes for the diagnosis of paternity comes to discussion.

Determination of Resistance to Abrasive Wear. VII. Uniformity of Results Obtained with the Du Pont Machine

1948 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 257-261
Author(s):  
J. F. Morley ◽  
J. R. Scott
Keyword(s):  
Abrasive Wear ◽  
Left Hand ◽  
Emery Paper ◽  
Solid Disc ◽  
The Right ◽  
Right And Left Hand

Abstract (1) Tests have been made to investigate the variability of the abrasive papers used on the du Pont abrasion machine; the data obtained have also been examined to detect any variation in rate of abrasion during one test, and differences between the right- and left-hand specimens. (2) Differences in abrasiveness of 13 per cent were found between the different sheets of emery paper, even when compared with the differences between the rubber specimens, and it is considered that a solid disc of bonded abrasive, as used on the Akron machine, would be preferable to emery papers. (3) As there is no evidence of variation in rate of abrasion during a 20-minute run, there seems to be no objection to using different test-periods for different rubbers if circumstances render this desirable. (4) There are small, but not consistent, differences between the abrasion losses on the right- and left-hand specimens, which may arise from the 8-lb. load not being equally distributed between them. It is considered that the machine could be improved by making the arm that carries the specimens free to oscillate in a plane perpendicular to the abrasive, so that the loads on the specimens would be automatically equalized. The practice of rigidly fixing the arm parallel to the plane of the abrasive seems unsound because, if the parallelism were really rigid, the rates of wear on the two specimens would of necessity be equal, even if the rubbers had different abrasion resistances. Moreover, any suggestion to test the sample under examination and a standard rubber simultaneously is clearly unsound unless a freely oscillating arm is provided.

Is there any relationship between right and left hand dominance and right and left nasal airflow dominance?

2017 ◽  
Vol 131 (10) ◽  
pp. 846-852 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Price ◽  
R Eccles
Keyword(s):  
Nasal Passage ◽  
Hand Dominance ◽  
Nasal Airflow ◽  
Left Hand ◽  
Human Trait ◽  
The Right ◽  
Healthy Participants ◽  
Right And Left Hand

AbstractBackground:Left- or right-handedness is a common human trait, and it has been previously reported that human nasal airflow dominance correlates with hand dominance. Any relationship between hand dominance and nasal airflow dominance would be unusual. This study aimed to measure nasal airflow and look for any relationship to handedness.Methods:The modified Glatzel mirror was used to record the dominant nasal passage at 15-minute intervals over a 6-hour period in 29 healthy participants consisting of 15 left-handers and 14 right-handers.Results:In left-handers, the percentage of time that the left nasal passage was dominant ranged from 0 to 100 per cent. In right-handers, the percentage of time that the right nasal passage was dominant ranged from 4.2 to 95.8 per cent. No correlation between nasal airflow dominance and hand dominance was identified.Conclusion:The results do not support the hypothesis that nasal airflow and handedness are related.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document