scholarly journals Impact of valganciclovir therapy on severe IRIS-Kaposi Sarcoma mortality: an open-label, parallel, randomized controlled trial.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Volkow ◽  
Leslie Chavez-Galan ◽  
Lucero Ramon-Luing ◽  
Judith Cruz-Velazquez ◽  
Patricia Cornejo-Juarez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Kaposi Sarcoma ◽  
Pulmonary Involvement ◽  
Skin Lesions ◽  
Attributable Mortality ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Parallel Group ◽  
Pulmonary Lymph Node ◽  
The Difference

High HHV-8 viral load (VL) in Kaposi Sarcoma (KS) has been associated with severe Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (S-IRIS-KS), which can occur after initiating cART, and is linked with high mortality particularly in patients with pulmonary involvement. We investigate if valganciclovir initiated before cART decreases HHV-8 VL and assess if it reduces the incidence of S-IRIS-KS and its attributable mortality. Methods: Open-label parallel-group randomized clinical trial in AIDS cART naive patients with disseminated KS (DKS) as defined by at least two of the following: pulmonary, lymph-node or gastrointestinal involvement, lymphedema, or equal or more 30 skin lesions. In the experimental group (EG), patients were randomized to valganciclovir 900 mg BID four weeks before cART and continued until week-48; in the control group (CG), cART was initiated on week-0. Non-severe-IRIS-KS was defined as: increase in the number of lesions plus equal or more than one log10 HIV-VL decrease or equal or more than 50 cells/mm3 increase or equal or more than 2-fold rise in baseline CD4+ cells. S-IRIS-KS was defined as abrupt clinical worsening of KS lesions and/or fever after ruling out another infection following cART initiation, and at least three of the following: thrombocytopenia, anemia, hyponatremia, or hypoalbuminemia. Results: 40 patients were randomized and 37 completed the study. In the ITT analysis, the overall mortality did not differ between groups. In the per-protocol analyses, the difference showed a trend for higher S-IRIS-KS mortality in the CG 3/19 (15.7%), compared to EG 0/18 (p=0.07). The incidence of S-IRIS KS was significantly lower in the EG; two patients, one each had S-IRIS-KS episode (0.038 per 100 patient-days) compared to CG group, four patients developed 12 S-IRIS-KS episodes (0.21 per 100 patient-days); incidence rate of 0.09 (95% CI 0.02-0.5 p=0.006). Mortality in patients with pulmonary KS was significantly lower in EG, 3/4 in CG vs 0/5 in EG. S-IRIS-KS was associated with higher HHV-8-VL; IL6 and CRP; valganciclovir was protective. Of survivors at week 48, 82% achieved more than 80% remission. No difference was found between groups in the number of non-S-IRIS-KS events. Conclusions: Valganciclovir significantly reduced the episodes of S-IRIS-KS although attributable KS mortality was lower in the EG the difference was not significant (p=0.07). Mortality was significantly lower in EG patients with pulmonary KS.

scholarly journals Retraining for prevention of peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis patients: A randomized controlled trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 141-152
Author(s):  
Susanne Ljungman ◽  
Jørgen E Jensen ◽  
Dag Paulsen ◽  
Aivars Petersons ◽  
Mai Ots-Rosenberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Statistical Error ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Infection Prophylaxis ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Parallel Group ◽  
Targeted Testing

Background: Peritonitis is more common in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients nonadherent to the PD exchange protocol procedures than in compliant patients. We therefore investigated whether regular testing of PD knowledge with focus on infection prophylaxis could increase the time to first peritonitis (primary outcome) and reduce the peritonitis rate in new PD patients. Methods: This physician-initiated, open-label, parallel group trial took place at 57 centers in Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Finland, Estonia, Latvia, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom from 2010 to 2015. New peritonitis-free PD patients were randomized using computer-generated numbers 1 month after the start of PD either to a control group ( n = 331) treated according to center routines or to a retraining group ( n = 340), which underwent testing of PD knowledge and skills at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 months after PD start, followed by retraining if the goals were not achieved. Results: In all, 74% of the controls and 80% of the retraining patients discontinued the study. The groups did not differ significantly regarding cumulative incidence of first peritonitis adjusted for competing risks (kidney transplantation, transfer to hemodialysis and death; hazard ratio 0.84; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65–1.09) nor regarding peritonitis rate per patient year (relative risk 0.93; 95% CI 0.75–1.16). Conclusions: In this randomized controlled trial, we were unable to demonstrate that regular, targeted testing and retraining of new PD patients increased the time to first peritonitis or reduced the rate of peritonitis, as the study comprised patients with a low risk of peritonitis, was underpowered, open to type 1 statistical error, and contamination between groups.

Impact of a store-and-forward teledermatology intervention versus usual care on delay before beginning treatment: A pragmatic cluster-randomized trial in ambulatory care

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (8) ◽  
pp. 725-732 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edouard Piette ◽  
Michel Nougairède ◽  
Valerie Vuong ◽  
Beatrice Crickx ◽  
Viet-Thi Tran
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Cluster Randomized Trial ◽  
Skin Lesions ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Referral Letter ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Clinical Images ◽  
Store And Forward ◽  
Cluster Randomized

Introduction In France, 66% of patients forego getting specialized care by dermatologists because of difficulty obtaining appointments. Store-and-forward teledermatology could improve how promptly treatment begins by reducing the delay in obtaining a specialist’s opinion. In this study, we compared the delay before care between general practitioners (GPs) using a store-and-forward teledermatology intervention and GPs addressing their patients with a standard referral letter. Methods We performed an open-label, pragmatic cluster-randomized controlled trial with two parallel arms. GP clinics in Paris (France) were randomly assigned to use either teledermatology referral (use of electronics to send clinical images taken using a mobile phone) or conventional referral (using standard letters) to care for patients for whom a dermatologist’s advice was needed for the diagnosis or treatment of skin lesions. Dermatologists integrated responses to teledermatology requests in their usual schedule. Patients were followed up for three months. Primary outcome was the delay, in days, between the GP’s consultation and a reply by the specialist allowing treatment to begin. Analyses were adjusted for clustering of GPs and identities of dermatologists. Results Between February and June 2014, 103 patients were included in the study (53 patients of 20 GPs in the intervention group). The median delay between the initial GP’s consultation and the reply allowing for treatment to begin was four days in the intervention group and 40 days in the control group (adjusted hazard ratio = 2.55; p < 0.011). Discussion We showed that a simple store-and-forward teledermatology intervention significantly reduced the delay before beginning care (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02122432).

scholarly journals Endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) to change quality of life for adults with recurrent rhinosinusitis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Trials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Heidi M. Kaski ◽  
Antti Alakärppä ◽  
Ulla Lantto ◽  
Aleksi Laajala ◽  
Paulus Tokola ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Life Questionnaire ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Parallel Group ◽  
The Difference

Abstract Background Endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) has been used for decades to treat recurrent acute rhinosinusitis episodes (RARS) in adults. RARS results in infectious symptoms, antibiotic courses, sick leaves, and impaired quality of life. Theoretically, the ESS procedure, through improving the drainage of the paranasal sinuses, decreases the symptoms and enhances the quality of life of the RARS patients. Whether this is true has not been reported in a randomized trial yet. Methods We conduct a single-center, non-blinded, randomized, 6-month, parallel group superiority clinical study including 80 adult participants referred to surgical treatment for RARS. The participants will either have ESS or conservative medical treatment (control group). The primary outcome will be the difference between the mean disease-specific Sinonasal Outcome Test 22 (quality of life questionnaire) change scores (from baseline to 6 months) of ESS and control group. Discussion This study will add significant new information to the effect and harms of ESS procedure in the treatment of adults with RARS. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.govNCT04241016. Registered on 17 January 2020

Investigating the Impact of Cognitive Training for Individuals With Bothersome Tinnitus: A Randomized Controlled Trial

2021 ◽  
pp. 019459982199474
Author(s):  
Maggie Xing ◽  
Dorina Kallogjeri ◽  
Jay F. Piccirillo
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Cognitive Training ◽  
Mixed Model ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Functional Index ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
The Impact

Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of cognitive training in improving tinnitus bother and to identify predictors of patient response. Study Design Prospective open-label randomized controlled trial. Setting Online. Methods Participants were adults with subjective idiopathic nonpulsatile tinnitus causing significant tinnitus-related distress. The intervention group trained by using auditory-intensive exercises for 20 minutes per day, 5 days per week, for 8 weeks. The active control group trained on the same schedule with non–auditory intensive games. Surveys were completed at baseline, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks. Results A total of 64 participants completed the study. The median age was 63 years (range, 25-69) in the intervention group and 61 years (34-68) in the control group. Mixed model analysis revealed that within-subject change in Tinnitus Functional Index in the intervention group was not different than the control group, with marginal mean differences (95% CI): 0.24 (–11.20 to 10.7) and 2.17 (–8.50 to 12.83) at 8 weeks and 2.33 (–8.6 to 13.3) and 3.36 (–7.91 to 14.6) at 12 weeks, respectively. When the 2 study groups were compared, the control group had higher Tinnitus Functional Index scores than the intervention group by 10.5 points at baseline (95% CI, –0.92 to 29.89), 8.1 at 8 weeks (95% CI, –3.27 to 19.42), and 9.4 at 12 weeks (95% CI, –2.45 to 21.34). Conclusion Auditory-intensive cognitive training was not associated with changes in self-reported tinnitus bother. Given the potential for neuroplasticity to affect tinnitus, we believe that future studies on cognitive training for tinnitus remain relevant.

scholarly journals How well do doctors understand a scientific article in English when it is not their first language? A randomised controlled trial

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. e043444
Author(s):  
Martine Rostadmo ◽  
Siri Lunde Strømme ◽  
Magne Nylenna ◽  
Pal Gulbrandsen ◽  
Erlend Hem ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
First Language ◽  
Review Article ◽  
Scientific Article ◽  
Potential Range ◽  
Parallel Group ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Primary Care Medicine

IntroductionEnglish is the lingua franca of science. How well doctors understand English is therefore crucial for their understanding of scientific articles. However, only 5% of the world’s population have English as their first language.MethodsObjectives: To compare doctors’ comprehension of a scientific article when read in their first language (Norwegian) versus their second language (English). Our hypothesis was that doctors reading the article in Norwegian would comprehend the content better than those reading it in English.Design: Parallel group randomised controlled trial. We randomised doctors to read the same clinical review article in either Norwegian or English, before completing a questionnaire about the content of the article.Setting: Conference in primary care medicine in Norway, 2018.Participants: 130 native Norwegian-speaking doctors, 71 women and 59 men. One participant withdrew before responding to the questionnaire and was excluded from the analyses.Interventions: Participants were randomly assigned to read a review article in either Norwegian (n=64) or English (n=66). Reading time was limited to 7 min followed by 7 min to answer a questionnaire.Main outcome measures: Total score on questions related to the article content (potential range −9 to 20).ResultsDoctors who read the article in Norwegian had a mean total score of 10.40 (SD 3.96) compared with 9.08 (SD 3.47) among doctors who read the article in English, giving a mean difference of 1.32 (95% CI 0.03 to 2.62; p=0.046). Age was independently associated with total score, with decreased comprehension with increasing age.ConclusionThe difference in comprehension between the group who read in Norwegian and the group who read in English was statistically significant but modest, suggesting that the language gap in academia is possible to overcome.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of Measures to Eradicate Staphylococcus aureus Carriage in Patients with Community-Associated Skin and Soft-Tissue Infections: A Randomized Trial

2011 ◽  
Vol 32 (9) ◽  
pp. 872-880 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie A. Fritz ◽  
Bernard C. Camins ◽  
Kimberly A. Eisenstein ◽  
Joseph M. Fritz ◽  
Emma K. Epplin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Intention To Treat ◽  
Intranasal Mupirocin ◽  
Mupirocin Ointment ◽  
Hygiene Education ◽  
To Receive

Background.Despite a paucity of evidence, decolonization measures are prescribed for outpatients with recurrent Staphylococcus aureus skin and soft-tissue infection (SSTI).Objective.Compare the effectiveness of 4 regimens for eradicating S. aureus carriage.Design.Open-label, randomized controlled trial. Colonization status and recurrent SSTI were ascertained at 1 and 4 months.Setting.Barnes-Jewish and St. Louis Children's Hospitals, St. Louis, Missouri, 2007–2009.Participants.Three hundred patients with community-onset SSTI and S. aureus colonization in the nares, axilla, or inguinal folds.Interventions.Participants were randomized to receive no therapeutic intervention (control subjects) or one of three 5-day regimens: 2% mupirocin ointment applied to the nares twice daily, intranasal mupirocin plus daily 4% chlorhexidine body washes, or intranasal mupirocin plus daily dilute bleach water baths.Results.Among 244 participants with 1-month colonization data, modified intention-to-treat analysis revealed S. aureus eradication in 38% of participants in the education only (control) group, 56% of those in the mupirocin group (P = .03 vs controls), 55% of those in the mupirocin and chlorhexidine group (P = .05), and 63% off those in the mupirocin and bleach group (P = .006). Of 229 participants with 4-month colonization data, eradication rates were 48% in the control group, 56% in the mupirocin only group (P = .40 vs controls), 54% in the mupirocin and chlorhexidine group (P = .51), and 71% in the mupirocin and bleach group (P = .02). At 1 and 4 months, recurrent SSTIs were reported by 20% and 36% of participants, respectively.Conclusions.An inexpensive regimen of dilute bleach baths, intranasal mupirocin, and hygiene education effectively eradicated S. aureus over a 4-month period. High rates of recurrent SSTI suggest that factors other than endogenous colonization are important determinants of infection.Trial Registration.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00513799.

scholarly journals Development and evaluation of an online medication safety module for medical students at a rural teaching hospital: the Winchester District Memorial Hospital

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. e001385
Author(s):  
Ali Elbeddini ◽  
Yasamin Tayefehchamani
Keyword(s):  
Online Learning ◽  
Medical Students ◽  
Medication Safety ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Effective Means ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Online Module ◽  
Learning Module

ObjectiveTo design, implement and assess an online learning module for third-year and fourth-year medical students addressing medication safety.DesignThis study was a prospective, parallel, open-label, randomised controlled trial with two arms: (1) a control arm in which students were given five articles to read about medication safety, and (2) an intervention arm in which students were given access to an interactive web-based learning module on medication safety. Pretesting and post-testing were done online to evaluate change in medication safety knowledge.ResultsTen students completed the study in the intervention group (online module) and six students completed the study in the control group. The increase in score obtained on the post-test, relative to the pretest, was 15.4% in the group who completed the online module and 2.0% in the control group (difference=13.4%, 95% CI 0.5% to 26.2%, p=0.04).ConclusionStudents who completed an online educational tool about medication safety demonstrated a significantly greater increase in knowledge than those who completed a few readings. Online learning modules can be a convenient and effective means of teaching safe prescribing concepts to medical trainees.

An Open-Label, Analgesic Efficacy and Safety of Pituitary Radiosurgery for Patients With Opioid-Refractory Pain: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Neurosurgery ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 83 (1) ◽  
pp. 146-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre-Yves Borius ◽  
Stéphanie Ranque Garnier ◽  
Karine Baumstarck ◽  
Frédéric Castinetti ◽  
Anne Donnet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Cancer Pain ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Analgesic Efficacy ◽  
Standards Of Care ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Open Label

Abstract BACKGROUND Hypophysectomy performed by craniotomy or percutaneous techniques leads to complete pain relief in more than 70% to 80% of cases for opioid refractory cancer pain. Radiosurgery could be an interesting alternative approach to reduce complications. OBJECTIVE To assess the analgesic efficacy compared with standard of care is the primary goal. The secondary objectives are to assess ophthalmic and endocrine tolerance, drug consumption, quality of life, and mechanisms of analgesic action. METHODS The trial is multicenter, randomized, prospective, and open-label with 2 parallel groups. This concerns patients in palliative care suffering from nociceptive or mixed cancer pain, refractory to standard opioid therapy. Participants will be randomly assigned to the control group receiving standards of care for pain according to recommendations, or to the experimental group receiving a pituitary GammaKnife (Elekta, Stockholm, Sweden) radiosurgery (160 Gy delivered in pituitary gland) associated with standards of care. Evaluation assessments will be taken at baseline, day0, day4, day7, day14, day28, day45, month3, and month6. EXPECTED OUTCOMES We could expect pain improvement in 70% to 90% of cases at day4. In addition we will assess the safety of pituitary radiosurgery in a vulnerable population. The secondary endpoints could show decay of opioid consumption, good patient satisfaction, and improvement of the quality of life. DISCUSSION The design of this study is potentially the most appropriate to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of radiosurgery for this new indication. New recommendations could be obtained in order to improve pain relief and quality of life.

scholarly journals Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial

BMJ ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 328 (7441) ◽  
pp. 673 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Schroter ◽  
Nick Black ◽  
Stephen Evans ◽  
James Carpenter ◽  
Fiona Godlee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Peer Review ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Group Score ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Quality Instrument

AbstractObjective To determine the effects of training on the quality of peer review.Design Single blind randomised controlled trial with two intervention groups receiving different types of training plus a control group.Setting and participants Reviewers at a general medical journal.Interventions Attendance at a training workshop or reception of a self taught training package focusing on what editors want from reviewers and how to critically appraise randomised controlled trials.Main outcome measures Quality of reviews of three manuscripts sent to reviewers at four to six monthly intervals, evaluated using the validated review quality instrument; number of deliberate major errors identified; time taken to review the manuscripts; proportion recommending rejection of the manuscripts.Results Reviewers in the self taught group scored higher in review quality after training than did the control group (score 2.85 v 2.56; difference 0.29, 95% confidence interval 0.14 to 0.44; P = 0.001), but the difference was not of editorial significance and was not maintained in the long term. Both intervention groups identified significantly more major errors after training than did the control group (3.14 and 2.96 v 2.13; P < 0.001), and this remained significant after the reviewers' performance at baseline assessment was taken into account. The evidence for benefit of training was no longer apparent on further testing six months after the interventions. Training had no impact on the time taken to review the papers but was associated with an increased likelihood of recommending rejection (92% and 84% v 76%; P = 0.002).Conclusions Short training packages have only a slight impact on the quality of peer review. The value of longer interventions needs to be assessed.

scholarly journals Effect of conversion from calcineurin inhibitors to everolimus on hepatitis C viremia in adult kidney transplant recipients

2018 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larissa Sgaria Pacheco ◽  
Valter Duro Garcia ◽  
Ronivan Luis Dal Prá ◽  
Bruna Doleys Cardoso ◽  
Mariana Ferras Rodrigues ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatitis C ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Calcineurin Inhibitors ◽  
Control Group ◽  
P Value ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients ◽  
Positive Serology ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Adult Kidney ◽  
Group 1

ABSTRACT Introduction: Currently, there is no specific immunosuppressive protocol for hepatitis C (HCV)-positive renal transplants recipients. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the conversion effect to everolimus (EVR) on HCV in adult kidney recipients. Method: This is an exploratory single-center, prospective, randomized, open label controlled trial with renal allograft recipients with HCV-positive serology. Participants were randomized for conversion to EVR or maintenance of calcineurin inhibitors. Results: Thirty patients were randomized and 28 were followed-up for 12 months (conversion group, Group 1 =15 and control group, Group 2 =13). RT-PCR HCV levels reported in log values were comparable in both groups and among patients in the same group. The statistical analysis showed no interaction effect between time and group (p value G*M= 0.852), overtime intra-groups (p-value M=0.889) and between group (p-value G=0.286). Group 1 showed a higher incidence of dyslipidemia (p=0.03) and proteinuria events (p=0.01), while no difference was observed in the incidence of anemia (p=0.17), new onset of post-transplant diabetes mellitus (p=1.00) or urinary tract infection (p=0.60). The mean eGFR was similar in both groups. Conclusion: Our study did not show viral load decrease after conversion to EVR with maintenance of antiproliferative therapy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document