scholarly journals High Sensitivity and NPV for BinaxNOW Rapid Antigen Test in Children at a Mass Testing Site During Prevalent Delta Variant

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristie J Sun ◽  
Mary Jane E Vaeth ◽  
Matthew L Robinson ◽  
Maryam Elhabashy ◽  
Ishaan Gupta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Predictive Value ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Educational Opportunities ◽  
Antigen Test ◽  
Sample Collection ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Polymerase Chain ◽  
Testing Site ◽  
Antigen Tests

SARS-CoV-2 continues to develop new, increasingly infectious variants, such as delta and omicron. Here, we evaluate the efficacy of the Abbott BinaxNOW Rapid Antigen Test against the gold standard of Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) in 1054 pediatric participants presenting to a state-owned high-volume Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) testing site. During the testing period, the delta variant was predominant. Prior to sample collection, symptomatic and exposure status was collected for all participants based on Centers for Disease Control (CDC) criteria. RT-PCR results demonstrated an overall prevalence rate of 5.2%. For all participants, the sensitivity of the rapid antigen tests was 92.7% (95% CI 82.4% - 98.0%) and specificity was 98.0% (95% CI 97.0%-98.8%). For symptomatic participants, the sensitivity was 92.3% (95% CI 74.9% - 99.1%), specificity was 96.6% (95% CI 93.6%- 98.4%), positive predictive value (PPV) was 72.7% (95% CI 54.5% - 86.7%) and negative predictive value (NPV) was 99.2% (95% CI 98.2% - 100%). Among asymptomatic participants, the sensitivity was 92.6% (95% CI 75.7% - 99.1%), specificity was 98.6% (95% CI 97.5% - 99.3%) the PPV was 71.4% (95% CI 53.7% - 85.4%) and the NPV was 99.7% (95% CI 99.0% - 100%). Our reported sensitivity and NPV are higher than other pediatric studies, but specificity and PPV are lower. Importance Children are especially impacted by the disease and its ability to disrupt educational opportunities. Although vaccinations have been approved for children 5 years and older, many children remain unvaccinated. Widespread testing may improve the ability for children to remain in in-person activities, minimizing absences from school and extracurriculars. Highly accurate rapid antigen tests may be vital to containing future COVID-19 waves while mitigating detrimental effects.

scholarly journals Characteristics of children and antigen test performance at a SARS-CoV-2 community testing site

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Ford ◽  
Melissa J. Whaley ◽  
Melisa M. Shah ◽  
Phillip P. Salvatore ◽  
Hannah E. Segaloff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Test Performance ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Lower Sensitivity ◽  
Antigen Test ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Culture Methods ◽  
Viral Culture ◽  
Asymptomatic Children ◽  
Testing Site ◽  
Antigen Tests

Background: Performance characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 antigen tests among children are limited despite the need for point-of-care testing in school and childcare settings. We describe children seeking SARS-CoV-2 testing at a community site and compare antigen test performance to real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and viral culture. Methods: Two anterior nasal specimens were self-collected for BinaxNOW antigen and RT-PCR testing, along with demographics, symptoms, and exposure information from individuals ≥5 years at a community testing site. Viral culture was attempted on residual antigen or RT-PCR positive specimens. Demographic and clinical characteristics, and the performance of SARS-CoV-2 antigen tests, were compared among children (<18 years) and adults. Results: About one in ten included specimens were from children (225/2110); 16.4% (37/225) were RT-PCR positive. Cycle threshold values were similar among RT-PCR positive specimens from children and adults (22.5 vs 21.3, p=0.46) and among specimens from symptomatic and asymptomatic children (22.5 vs 23.2, p=0.39). Sensitivity of antigen test compared to RT-PCR was 73.0% (27/37) among specimens from children and 80.8% (240/297) among specimens from adults; among specimens from children, specificity was 100% (188/188), positive and negative predictive value were 100% (27/27) and 94.9% (188/198) respectively. Virus was isolated from 51.4% (19/37) of RT-PCR positive pediatric specimens; all 19 had positive antigen test results. Conclusions : With lower sensitivity relative to RT-PCR, antigen tests may not diagnose all positive COVID-19 cases; however, antigen testing identified children with live SARS-CoV-2 virus.

scholarly journals Diagnostic performance and characteristics of anterior nasal collection for the SARS-CoV-2 antigen test: a prospective study

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuto Takeuchi ◽  
Yusaku Akashi ◽  
Daisuke Kato ◽  
Miwa Kuwahara ◽  
Shino Muramatsu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prospective Study ◽  
Clinical Utility ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Antigen Test ◽  
Sample Collection ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Reverse Transcription Pcr ◽  
Moderate Sensitivity ◽  
Testing Site ◽  
A Prospective Study

AbstractThe clinical utility of antigen test using anterior nasal samples has not been well evaluated. We conducted a prospective study in a drive-through testing site located at a PCR center to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the antigen test QuickNavi-COVID19 Ag using anterior nasal samples and to compare the degrees of coughs or sneezes induction and the severity of pain between anterior nasal collection and nasopharyngeal collection. The study included a total of 862 participants, of which 91.6% were symptomatic. The median duration from symptom onset to sample collection was 2.0 days. Fifty-one participants tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 on reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) with nasopharyngeal samples, and all of them were symptomatic. In comparison to the findings of RT-PCR, the antigen test using anterior nasal samples showed 72.5% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI] 58.3–84.1%) and 100% specificity (95% CI 99.3–100%). Anterior nasal collection was associated with a significantly lower degree of coughs or sneezes induction and the severity of pain in comparison to nasopharyngeal collection (p < 0.001). The antigen test using anterior nasal samples showed moderate sensitivity in symptomatic patients who were at the early stages of the disease course but was less painful and induced fewer coughs or sneezes.

scholarly journals The evaluation of a novel digital immunochromatographic assay with silver amplification to detect SARS-CoV-2

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoko Kurihara ◽  
Yoshihiko Kiyasu ◽  
Yusaku Akashi ◽  
Yuto Takeuchi ◽  
Kenji Narahara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Predictive Value ◽  
Limit Of Detection ◽  
The Other ◽  
Nucleic Acid Amplification ◽  
Immunochromatographic Assay ◽  
Clinical Samples ◽  
Antigen Test ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Reverse Transcription Pcr ◽  
Antigen Tests

Introduction Rapid antigen tests are convenient for diagnosing severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); however, they have lower sensitivities than nucleic acid amplification tests. In this study, we evaluated the diagnostic performance of Quick Chaser Auto SARS-CoV-2, a novel digital immunochromatographic assay that is expected to have higher sensitivity than conventional antigen tests. Methods A prospective observational study was conducted between February 8 and March 24, 2021. We simultaneously obtained two nasopharyngeal samples, one for evaluation with the QuickChaser Auto SARS-CoV-2 antigen test and the other for assessment with reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR), considered the gold-standard reference test. The limit of detection (LOD) of the new antigen test was compared with those of four other commercially available rapid antigen tests. Results A total of 1401 samples were analyzed. SARS-CoV-2 was detected by reference RT-PCR in 83 (5.9%) samples, of which 36 (43.4%) were collected from symptomatic patients. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 74.7% (95% confidence interval (CI): 64.0-83.6%), 99.8% (95% CI: 99.5-100%), 96.9% (95% CI: 89.2-99.6%), and 98.4% (95% CI: 97.6-99.0%), respectively. When limited to samples with a cycle threshold (Ct) <30 or those from symptomatic patients, the sensitivity increased to 98.3% and 88.9%, respectively. The QuickChaser Auto SARS-CoV-2 detected 34-120 copies/test, which indicated greater sensitivity than the other rapid antigen tests. Conclusions QuickChaser Auto SARS-CoV-2 showed sufficient sensitivity and specificity in clinical samples of symptomatic patients. The sensitivity was comparable to RT-PCR in samples with Ct<30.

scholarly journals Rapid Antigen Test Combine with Nucleic Acid Detection: A Better Strategy for COVID-19 Screening at Points of Entry

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiqing Zhan ◽  
Jie Li ◽  
Zhangkai J. Cheng
Keyword(s):  
Early Stage ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
High Viral Load ◽  
Nucleic Acid Detection ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
The Face ◽  
Polymerase Chain ◽  
Asymptomatic Infections ◽  
Post Entry ◽  
Antigen Tests

AbstractThe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has imposed an enormous disease burden worldwide, and the Delta variant now has become dominant in 53 countries. Recently published studies have shown that during periods of high viral load, rapid antigen tests (RAT) yield similar results to reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests, and when used in serial screening (e.g., every three days), it has a high sensitivity. In this perspective, we recommend RT-PCR combined with RAT at points of entry: (i) RAT can be added to the detection phase at ports of entry to detect asymptomatic infections as early as possible; (ii) RAT can be added to post-entry quarantine every three days or less to reduce the rate of missed detection in later quarantine; (iii) Adding regular RAT to regular PCR testing for key airport personnel to prevent cross-infection and conduct closed-off management. In the face of sporadic Delta variant outbreaks, the combination of the two could help rapid triage and management of suspected populations at an early stage and thus contain the outbreak more quickly and effectively. We also discuss the issue whether the current antigen detection reagents can cope with various SARS-CoV-2 variants.

scholarly journals Application of a Serial Antigen Based Testing Strategy for SARS-CoV-2 and Student Adherence in a University Setting, Wisconsin — October–November 2020

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Paul Bigouette ◽  
Laura Ford ◽  
Ian Pray ◽  
Kimberly Langolf ◽  
Juliana Kahrs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Male Students ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Antigen Test ◽  
Testing Strategy ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Testing Strategies ◽  
Serial Testing ◽  
Polymerase Chain ◽  
Antigen Tests ◽  
University Setting

Abstract Background Serial SARS-CoV-2 testing has been implemented at institutions of higher education (IHEs) and other settings. Testing strategies can include algorithms specifying confirmatory reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing after an antigen test. It is unknown how testing strategies perform detecting SARS-CoV-2, including individual adherence to serial testing requirements. Methods Student serial testing adherence was defined as completing ≥80% of weekly tests from October 5–November 14, 2020 and evaluated using logistic regression. Medical records were reviewed for all positive antigen test encounters and 10% of daily negative antigen test encounters during October 19–November 30, 2020. Results were used to estimate the proportion of individuals requiring only antigen tests, requiring and completing RT-PCR testing, and associated costs of tests. Results Two-thirds (66.5%; 1,166/1,754) of eligible on-campus students adhered to weekly testing; female students were more adherent (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]:2.07, 95% CI:1.66–2.59) than male students. Of all antigen test encounters, 11.5% (1,409/12,305) reported &gt;1 COVID-19 symptoms. Of non-COVID-19 exposed antigen test encounters, 88% (10,386/11,769) did not require confirmatory RT-PCR testing. Only 28% (390/1,387) of testing encounters had an associated recommended confirmatory RT-PCR test performed. We estimated the testing strategy captured 61% (235/389) of predicted RT-PCR positive specimens. Conclusions At this IHE, most students voluntarily adhered to serial testing. The majority of antigen test results did not require confirmatory RT-PCR testing, but when required, most students did not obtain it. Including strategies to increase the proportion of individuals obtaining indicated confirmatory testing might improve the testing program’s performance.

scholarly journals Comparison of COVID-19 Antigen Test and HRCT Chest with RT- PCR Test for Diagnosis of COVID-19

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 195-202
Author(s):  
Pukar Ghimire ◽  
Isha Bhandari ◽  
Rajan Bhandari ◽  
Bibek Bhandari
Keyword(s):  
Social Sciences ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Analytical Study ◽  
Antigen Test ◽  
Medical Sciences ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Negative Results ◽  
Polymerase Chain ◽  
Ethical Clearance

Introduction: We aim to compare Rapid Antigen Test and HRCT chest with Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for diagnosis of COVID-19. Methods: This was a cross-sectional analytical study that included patients tested with RT-PCR and at least one of Rapid Antigen test or HRCT chest, conducted at College of Medical Sciences, Bharatpur, from June 2020 to Feb 2021 after obtaining the ethical clearance. Data analysis was done using statistical packages for social sciences version 16. Results:  315 of 755(41.7%) patients had positive RT-PCR and 18.4% of 733 patients had positive antigen test. Of 600 patients, 106(14.0%) were found to have CO-RADS 1,152(20.1%) had CO-RADS 2, 77(10.2%) had CO-RADS 3, 18(2.4%) had CO-RADS 4 and 247(32.7%) had CO-RADS 5 score on HRCT. Rapid Antigen Test was found to have 43.6% sensitivity, 98.6% specificity, 95.6% Positive predictive value (PPV) and 72.1% negative predictive value (NPV).CO-RADS scoring system was able to distinguish between RT-PCR positive and RT-PCR negative results with an average Area under curve 0.787. CO-RADS 5 had a sensitivity of 71.6%, specificity of 85.1%, PPV of 80.6% and NPV of 77.6% for a positive RT-PCR result. A combination of CO-RADS 1 in HRCT chest and Negative Antigen test can predict PCR negative result with 23.6% sensitivity, 97.3% specificity, 90.5% PPV and 54.0% NPV. Conclusions: Rapid Antigen Test is a better tool for confirmation rather than screening of COVID-19. HRCT chest with higher CO-RADS can be useful to diagnose COVID-19  in suspected patients, even if RT-PCR is negative.

scholarly journals Evaluation of the Abbott BinaxNOW rapid antigen test for SARS-CoV-2 infection in children: Implications for screening in a school setting

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. e0249710
Author(s):  
Neeraj Sood ◽  
Rashmi Shetgiri ◽  
Anna Rodriguez ◽  
Dianna Jimenez ◽  
Sonia Treminino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Los Angeles ◽  
School Environment ◽  
School Setting ◽  
Clinical Settings ◽  
Antigen Test ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Logistic Regression Models ◽  
Asymptomatic Children ◽  
Testing Site ◽  
Antigen Tests

Background Rapid antigen tests hold much promise for use in the school environment. However, the performance of these tests in non-clinical settings and among one of the main target populations in schools—asymptomatic children—is unclear. To address this gap, we examined the positive and negative concordance between the BinaxNOW™ rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay and an RT-PCR test among children at a community-based Covid-19 testing site. Methods We conducted rapid antigen (BinaxNOW™) and oral fluid RT-PCR (Curative Labs) tests on children presenting at a walk-up testing site in Los Angeles County from November 25, 2020 to December 9, 2020. Positive concordance was determined as the fraction of RT-PCR positive participants that were also antigen positive. Negative concordance was determined as the fraction of RT-PCR negative participants that were also antigen negative. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to examine the association between positive or negative concordance and participant age, race-ethnicity, sex at birth, symptoms and Ct values. Results 226 children tested positive on RT-PCR; 127 children or 56.2% (95% CI: 49.5% to 62.8%) of these also tested positive on the rapid antigen test. Positive concordance was higher among symptomatic children (64.4%; 95% CI: 53.4% to 74.4%) compared to asymptomatic children (51.1%; 95% CI: 42.5% to 59.7%). Positive concordance was negatively associated with Ct values and was 93.8% (95% CI: 69.8% to 99.8%) for children with Ct values less than or equal to 25. 548 children tested negative on RT-PCR; 539 or 98.4% (95% CI: 96.9% to 99.2%) of these also tested negative on the rapid antigen test. Negative concordance was higher among asymptomatic children. Conclusions Rapid antigen testing can successfully identify most COVID infections in children with viral load levels likely to be infectious. Serial rapid testing may help compensate for limited sensitivity in early infection.

scholarly journals Performance and Operational Evaluation of the Access Bio CareStart Rapid Antigen Test in a High-throughput Drive-through Community Testing Site in Massachusetts

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nira R. Pollock ◽  
Kristine Tran ◽  
Jesica R. Jacobs ◽  
Amber E. Cranston ◽  
Sita Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Throughput ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Antigen Test ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Asymptomatic Children ◽  
Adults And Children ◽  
Moderate Sensitivity ◽  
Testing Site ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

AbstractBackgroundTo facilitate deployment of point-of-care testing for SARS-CoV-2, we evaluated the Access Bio CareStart COVID-19 Antigen test in a high-throughput, drive-through, free community testing site using anterior nasal (AN) swab RT-PCR for clinical testing.MethodsConsenting symptomatic and asymptomatic children (≤18 years) and adults received dual AN swabs. CareStart testing was performed with temperature/humidity monitoring. All tests had two independent reads to assess inter-operator agreement. Patients with positive CareStart results were called and instructed to isolate pending RT-PCR results. The paired RT-PCR result was the reference for sensitivity and specificity calculations.ResultsOf 1603 participants, 1245 adults and 253 children had paired RT-PCR/CareStart results and complete symptom data. 83% of adults and 87% of children were asymptomatic. CareStart sensitivity/specificity were 84.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 71.1-93.7)/97.2% (92.0-99.4) and 85.7% (42.1-99.6)/89.5% (66.9-98.7) in adults and children, respectively, within 5 days of symptoms. Sensitivity/specificity were 50.0% (41.0-59.0)/99.1% (98.3-99.6) in asymptomatic adults and 51.4% (34.4-68.1)/97.8% (94.5-99.4) in asymptomatic children. Sensitivity in all 234 RT-PCR-positive people was 96.3% with cycle threshold (Ct) ≤25, 79.6% with Ct ≤30, and 61.4% with Ct ≤35. All 21 false positive CareStart tests had faint but normal bands. Inter-operator agreement was 99.5%. Operational challenges included identification of faint test bands and inconsistent swab elution volumes.ConclusionsCareStart had high sensitivity in people with Ct ≤25 and moderate sensitivity in symptomatic people overall. Specificity was unexpectedly lower in symptomatic versus asymptomatic people. Excellent inter-operator agreement was observed, but operational challenges indicate that operator training is warranted.

scholarly journals Performance and Operational Evaluation of the Access Bio CareStart Rapid Antigen Test in a High-throughput Drive-through Community Testing Site in Massachusetts

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nira R Pollock ◽  
Kristine Tran ◽  
Jesica R Jacobs ◽  
Amber E Cranston ◽  
Sita Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Throughput ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Antigen Test ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Asymptomatic Children ◽  
Adults And Children ◽  
Moderate Sensitivity ◽  
Testing Site ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Abstract Background To facilitate deployment of point-of-care testing for SARS-CoV-2, we evaluated the Access Bio CareStart COVID-19 Antigen test in a high-throughput, drive-through, free community testing site using anterior nasal (AN) swab RT-PCR for clinical testing. Methods Consenting symptomatic and asymptomatic children (≤18 years) and adults received dual AN swabs. CareStart testing was performed with temperature/humidity monitoring. All tests had two independent reads to assess inter-operator agreement. Patients with positive CareStart results were called and instructed to isolate pending RT-PCR results. The paired RT-PCR result was the reference for sensitivity and specificity calculations. Results Of 1603 participants, 1245 adults and 253 children had paired RT-PCR/CareStart results and complete symptom data. 83% of adults and 87% of children were asymptomatic. CareStart sensitivity/specificity were 84.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 71.1-93.7)/97.2% (92.0-99.4) and 85.7% (42.1-99.6)/89.5% (66.9-98.7) in adults and children, respectively, within 5 days of symptoms. Sensitivity/specificity were 50.0% (41.0-59.0)/99.1% (98.3-99.6) in asymptomatic adults and 51.4% (34.4-68.1)/97.8% (94.5-99.4) in asymptomatic children. Sensitivity in all 234 RT-PCR-positive people was 96.3% with cycle threshold (Ct) ≤25, 79.6% with Ct ≤30, and 61.4% with Ct ≤35. All 21 false positive CareStart tests had faint but normal bands. Inter-operator agreement was 99.5%. Operational challenges included identification of faint test bands and inconsistent swab elution volumes. Conclusions CareStart had high sensitivity in people with Ct ≤25 and moderate sensitivity in symptomatic people overall. Specificity was unexpectedly lower in symptomatic versus asymptomatic people. Excellent inter-operator agreement was observed, but operational challenges indicate that operator training is warranted.

scholarly journals A meta-analysis of accuracy and sensitivity of chest CT and RT-PCR in COVID-19 diagnosis

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatemeh Khatami ◽  
Mohammad Saatchi ◽  
Seyed Saeed Tamehri Zadeh ◽  
Zahra Sadat Aghamir ◽  
Alireza Namazi Shabestari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Reverse Transcriptase ◽  
Ct Scan ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Chest Ct ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Polymerase Chain ◽  
Chest Ct Scan

AbstractNowadays there is an ongoing acute respiratory outbreak caused by the novel highly contagious coronavirus (COVID-19). The diagnostic protocol is based on quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and chests CT scan, with uncertain accuracy. This meta-analysis study determines the diagnostic value of an initial chest CT scan in patients with COVID-19 infection in comparison with RT-PCR. Three main databases; PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, and EMBASE were systematically searched for all published literature from January 1st, 2019, to the 21st May 2020 with the keywords "COVID19 virus", "2019 novel coronavirus", "Wuhan coronavirus", "2019-nCoV", "X-Ray Computed Tomography", "Polymerase Chain Reaction", "Reverse Transcriptase PCR", and "PCR Reverse Transcriptase". All relevant case-series, cross-sectional, and cohort studies were selected. Data extraction and analysis were performed using STATA v.14.0SE (College Station, TX, USA) and RevMan 5. Among 1022 articles, 60 studies were eligible for totalizing 5744 patients. The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of chest CT scan compared to RT-PCR were 87% (95% CI 85–90%), 46% (95% CI 29–63%), 69% (95% CI 56–72%), and 89% (95% CI 82–96%), respectively. It is important to rely on the repeated RT-PCR three times to give 99% accuracy, especially in negative samples. Regarding the overall diagnostic sensitivity of 87% for chest CT, the RT-PCR testing is essential and should be repeated to escape misdiagnosis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document