scholarly journals Mendelian randomization does not support serum calcium in prostate cancer risk

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Yarmolinsky ◽  
Katie Berryman ◽  
Ryan Langdon ◽  
Carolina Bonilla ◽  
George Davey Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Causal Inference ◽  
Serum Calcium ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Advanced Prostate Cancer ◽  
Mendelian Randomization ◽  
Prostate Cancer Risk ◽  
A Genome ◽  
Increased Risk

AbstractBackground: Observational studies suggest that dietary and serum calcium are risk factors for prostate cancer. However, such studies suffer from residual confounding (due to unmeasured or imprecisely measured confounders), undermining causal inference. Mendelian randomization uses randomly assigned (hence unconfounded and pre-disease onset) germline genetic variation to proxy for phenotypes and strengthen causal inference in observational studies.Objective: We tested the hypothesis that serum calcium is associated with an increased risk of overall and advanced prostate cancer.Design: A genetic instrument was constructed using 5 single nucleotide polymorphisms robustly associated with serum calcium in a genome-wide association study (N ≤ 61,079). This instrument was then used to test the effect of a 0.5 mg/dL increase (1 standard deviation, SD) in serum calcium on risk of prostate cancer in 72,729 men in the PRACTICAL (Prostate Cancer Association Group to Investigate Cancer Associated Alterations in the Genome) Consortium (44,825 cases, 27,904 controls) and risk of advanced prostate cancer in 33,498 men (6,263 cases, 27,235 controls).Results: We found weak evidence for a protective effect of serum calcium on prostate cancer risk (odds ratio [OR] per 0.5 mg/dL increase in calcium: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.63-1.08; P=0.12). We did not find strong evidence for an effect of serum calcium on advanced prostate cancer (OR per 0.5 mg/dL increase in calcium: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.57-1.70; P=0.93).Conclusions: Our Mendelian randomization analysis does not support the hypothesis that serum calcium increases risk of overall or advanced prostate cancer.

scholarly journals Anthropometric Measures and Risk of Prostate Cancer in the Multiethnic Cohort

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivia Sattayapiwat ◽  
Peggy Wan ◽  
Brenda Y Hernandez ◽  
Loic Le Marchand ◽  
Lynne Wilkens ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Advanced Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prostate Cancer Risk ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Anthropometric Measures ◽  
Multiethnic Cohort ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract Studies of anthropometric measures and prostate cancer risk conducted primarily in White men have reported positive associations with advanced disease. We assessed body size in relation to incident prostate cancer risk in 79,950 men from the Multiethnic Cohort, with 8,819 cases identified over a 22-year period (1993-2015). Height was associated with increased risk of advanced prostate cancer (hazard ratio=1.24, 95% CI: 1.04, 1.48; ≥68 inches versus <66 inches) and high-grade disease (hazard ratio=1.15, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.31). Compared to men of normal weight, men overweight at baseline were at higher risk of high-grade cancer (hazard ratio=1.15, 95% CI: 1.04, 1.26). Greater weight was positively associated with localized and low-grade disease in African Americans and Native Hawaiians (Pheterogeneity by race 0.0002 and 0.008 respectively). Weight change since age 21 was positively associated with high-grade disease (hazard ratio=1.20, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.37; for ≥40 lb vs 10 lb; Ptrend=0.005). Comparing highest versus lowest quartile, waist-to-hip ratio was associated with a 1.78-fold increase (95% CI: 1.28, 2.46) in the risk of advanced prostate cancer. Positive associations with the majority of anthropometric measures were observed in all five racial/ethnic groups, suggesting a general impact of anthropometric measures on risk across populations.

scholarly journals Mendelian randomization does not support serum calcium in prostate cancer risk

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (11) ◽  
pp. 1073-1080
Author(s):  
James Yarmolinsky ◽  
◽  
Katie Berryman ◽  
Ryan Langdon ◽  
Carolina Bonilla ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Serum Calcium ◽  
Mendelian Randomization ◽  
Prostate Cancer Risk

scholarly journals Social Jetlag and Prostate Cancer Incidence in Alberta’s Tomorrow Project: A Prospective Cohort Study

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 3873
Author(s):  
Liang Hu ◽  
Andrew Harper ◽  
Emily Heer ◽  
Jessica McNeil ◽  
Chao Cao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Cancer Incidence ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
Prostate Cancer Risk ◽  
Absolute Difference ◽  
Prostate Cancer Incidence ◽  
Social Jetlag ◽  
Increased Risk

We investigated the association of social jetlag (misalignment between the internal clock and socially required timing of activities) and prostate cancer incidence in a prospective cohort in Alberta, Canada. Data were collected from 7455 cancer-free men aged 35–69 years enrolled in Alberta’s Tomorrow Project (ATP) from 2001–2007. In the 2008 survey, participants reported usual bed- and wake-times on weekdays and weekend days. Social jetlag was defined as the absolute difference in waking time between weekday and weekend days, and was categorized into three groups: 0–<1 h (from 0 to anything smaller than 1), 1–<2 h (from 1 to anything smaller than 2), and 2+ h. ATP facilitated data linkage with the Alberta Cancer Registry in June 2018 to determine incident prostate cancer cases (n = 250). Hazard ratios (HR) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regressions, adjusting for a range of covariates. Median follow-up was 9.57 years, yielding 68,499 person-years. Baseline presence of social jetlag of 1–<2 h (HR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.10 to 2.01), and 2+ hours (HR = 1.69, 95% CI: 1.15 to 2.46) were associated with increased prostate cancer risk vs. those reporting no social jetlag (p for trend = 0.004). These associations remained after adjusting for sleep duration (p for trend = 0.006). With respect to chronotype, the association between social jetlag and prostate cancer risk remained significant in men with early chronotypes (p for trend = 0.003) but attenuated to null in men with intermediate (p for trend = 0.150) or late chronotype (p for trend = 0.381). Our findings suggest that greater than one hour of habitual social jetlag is associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer. Longitudinal studies with repeated measures of social jetlag and large samples with sufficient advanced prostate cancer cases are needed to confirm these findings.

scholarly journals Depression and prostate cancer risk: A Mendelian randomization study

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (23) ◽  
pp. 9160-9167
Author(s):  
Xiong Chen ◽  
Jianqiu Kong ◽  
Xiayao Diao ◽  
Jiahao Cai ◽  
Junjiong Zheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Mendelian Randomization ◽  
Prostate Cancer Risk

scholarly journals Circulating Selenium and Prostate Cancer Risk: A Mendelian Randomization Analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 110 (9) ◽  
pp. 1035-1038 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Yarmolinsky ◽  
Carolina Bonilla ◽  
Philip C Haycock ◽  
Ryan J Q Langdon ◽  
Luca A Lotta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Mendelian Randomization ◽  
Prostate Cancer Risk ◽  
Mendelian Randomization Analysis ◽  
Randomization Analysis

scholarly journals O8A.4 Asbestos exposure and prostate cancer, really?

2019 ◽  
Vol 76 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A71.1-A71
Author(s):  
Marie-Elise Parent ◽  
M Hugues Richard
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Asbestos Exposure ◽  
Large Population ◽  
Prostate Cancer Risk ◽  
Cumulative Exposure ◽  
Population Exposure ◽  
Specific Information ◽  
Chrysotile Asbestos ◽  
Increased Risk

BackgroundGeneral population exposure to asbestos from residential insulation and from environmental sources during childhood have recently been associated with prostate cancer. While asbestos fibers can be found in the prostate of workplace-exposed men at autopsy, few occupational studies have reported on asbestos exposure and prostate cancer incidence. We examined the association between lifetime occupational exposure to chrysotile asbestos and prostate cancer risk in a large population-based case-control study.MethodsCases were 1933 men with histologically-confirmed incident prostate cancer, aged ≤75 years, diagnosed in 2005–2009 in Montreal. Concurrently, 1994 population controls from the same residential area and age distribution were randomly selected from electoral lists. In-person interviews elicited detailed socio-demographics, lifestyle and work histories. Industrial hygienists used job-specific information to provide semi-quantitative evaluations of intensity and frequency of exposure to 345 chemical agents, including asbestos, and a measure of confidence in the evaluation. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for prostate cancer risk associated with exposure to chrysotile asbestos.ResultsAfter restriction to probable and definite exposure, and application of a 5 year lag, 12.5% of cases and 11.8% of controls were ever exposed to asbestos (OR=1.1, 95% CI 0.9–1.3). For duration of exposure, there was no increase in risk of overall prostate cancer in the lower tertiles of exposure but risk was elevated in the upper tertile (OR=1.6, 95% CI 1.2–2.2). Similarly, for cumulative exposure, risk was elevated in the upper tertile only (OR=1.5, 95% CI 1.1–2.1). Analyses considering tumor grades also showed a higher risk in the upper tertile of cumulative exposure for non-aggressive (OR=1.5, 95% CI 1.1–2.2) and especially aggressive (OR=1.9, 95% CI 1.2–3.0) cancers.ConclusionOur findings are consistent with an increased risk of prostate cancer with prolonged and high cumulative exposure to chrysotile asbestos, and particularly for the aggressive form of the disease.

scholarly journals Appraising causal relationships of dietary, nutritional and physical-activity exposures with overall and aggressive prostate cancer: two-sample Mendelian-randomization study based on 79 148 prostate-cancer cases and 61 106 controls

2019 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 587-596 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nabila Kazmi ◽  
Philip Haycock ◽  
Konstantinos Tsilidis ◽  
Brigid M Lynch ◽  
Therese Truong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Serum Iron ◽  
Mendelian Randomization ◽  
Prostate Cancer Risk ◽  
Uk Biobank ◽  
Monounsaturated Fat ◽  
Aggressive Prostate Cancer

Abstract Background Prostate cancer is the second most common male cancer worldwide, but there is substantial geographical variation, suggesting a potential role for modifiable risk factors in prostate carcinogenesis. Methods We identified previously reported prostate cancer risk factors from the World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF)’s systematic appraisal of the global evidence (2018). We assessed whether each identified risk factor was causally associated with risk of overall (79 148 cases and 61 106 controls) or aggressive (15 167 cases and 58 308 controls) prostate cancer using Mendelian randomization (MR) based on genome-wide association-study summary statistics from the PRACTICAL and GAME-ON/ELLIPSE consortia. We assessed evidence for replication in UK Biobank (7844 prostate-cancer cases and 204 001 controls). Results WCRF identified 57 potential risk factors, of which 22 could be instrumented for MR analyses using single nucleotide polymorphisms. For overall prostate cancer, we identified evidence compatible with causality for the following risk factors (odds ratio [OR] per standard deviation increase; 95% confidence interval): accelerometer-measured physical activity, OR = 0.49 (0.33–0.72; P = 0.0003); serum iron, OR = 0.92 (0.86–0.98; P = 0.007); body mass index (BMI), OR = 0.90 (0.84–0.97; P = 0.003); and monounsaturated fat, OR = 1.11 (1.02–1.20; P = 0.02). Findings in our replication analyses in UK Biobank were compatible with our main analyses (albeit with wide confidence intervals). In MR analysis, height was positively associated with aggressive-prostate-cancer risk: OR = 1.07 (1.01–1.15; P = 0.03). Conclusions The results for physical activity, serum iron, BMI, monounsaturated fat and height are compatible with causality for prostate cancer. The results suggest that interventions aimed at increasing physical activity may reduce prostate-cancer risk, although interventions to change other risk factors may have negative consequences on other diseases.

scholarly journals Meta-Analysis of the Relationship between XRCC1-Arg399Gln and Arg280His Polymorphisms and the Risk of Prostate Cancer

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie Yan ◽  
Xiantao Wang ◽  
Hui Tao ◽  
Zengfu Deng ◽  
Wang Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Prostate Cancer Risk ◽  
Recessive Model ◽  
Dominant Model ◽  
Xrcc1 Arg399gln ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Arg399gln Polymorphism ◽  
The Relationship

Abstract Prostate cancer is one of the most common noncutaneous malignancies in Western countries. Because there has been a debate regarding the relationship between the XRCC1-Arg399Gln and Arg280His polymorphisms and prostate cancer risk, we therefore performed this meta-analysis. The electronic databases PubMed, EMBASE and Medline were searched prior to October 1, 2014. An odds ratio and 95% confidence interval were used to calculate association. Heterogeneity was tested by both a chi-square test and I2statistic. Funnel plots and Egger’s test were used to assess publication bias. All statistical analyses were performed using STATA 12.0 software. A significant association between the XRCC1-Arg399Gln polymorphism and prostate cancer risk was found under a homozygote model and a recessive model. A significant association between XRCC1-Arg280His and prostate cancer risk was found under a heterozygote model and a dominant model. Overall, the results of this meta-analysis show that the XRCC1-Arg399Gln polymorphism may be associated with an increased risk for prostate cancer under the homozygote model and the recessive model. And XRCC1-Arg280His polymorphism is likely to be related with prostate cancer risk under the heterozygote model and the dominant model. Additional larger well-designed studies are needed to validate our results.

scholarly journals Appraising causal relationships of dietary, nutritional and physical-activity exposures with overall and aggressive prostate cancer: two-sample Mendelian randomization study based on 79,148 prostate cancer cases and 61,106 controls

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nabila Kazmi ◽  
Philip Haycock ◽  
Konstantinos Tsilidis ◽  
Brigid M. Lynch ◽  
Therese Truong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cancer Research ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Serum Iron ◽  
Mendelian Randomization ◽  
Prostate Cancer Risk ◽  
Uk Biobank ◽  
Unsaturated Fat

SummaryBackgroundProstate cancer is the second most common male cancer worldwide, but there is substantial geographical variation suggesting a potential role for modifiable risk factors in prostate carcinogenesis.MethodsWe identified previously reported prostate cancer risk factors from the World Cancer Research Fund’s (WCRF) systematic appraisal of the global evidence (2018). We assessed whether each identified risk factor was causally associated with risk of overall (79,148 cases and 61,106 controls) or aggressive (15,167 cases and 58,308 controls) prostate cancer using Mendelian randomization (MR) based on genome wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics from the PRACTICAL and GAME-ON/ELLIPSE consortia. We assessed evidence for replication in UK Biobank (7,844 prostate cancer cases and 204,001 controls).FindingsWCRF identified 57 potential risk factors, of which 22 could be instrumented for MR analyses using single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). In MR analyses for overall prostate cancer, we identified evidence compatible with causality for the following risk factors (odds ratio [OR] per standard deviation increase; 95% confidence interval): accelerometer-measured physical-activity, OR=0.49 (0.33-0.72; p=0.0003); serum iron, OR=0.92 (0.86-0.98; p=0.007); body mass index (BMI), OR=0.90 (0.84-0.97; p=0.003); and mono-unsaturated fat, OR=1.11 (1.02-1.20; p=0.02). Findings in our replication analyses in UK Biobank were compatible with our main analyses (albeit with wide confidence intervals). In MR analysis, height was positively associated with aggressive prostate cancer risk: OR=1.07 (1.01-1.15; p=0.03).InterpretationThe results for physical-activity, serum iron, BMI, mono-unsaturated fat and height are compatible with causality for prostate cancer but more research is needed to rule out violations of MR assumptions for some risk factors. The results suggest that interventions aimed at increasing physical activity may reduce prostate cancer risk, but the direction of effects of BMI, and iron are at odds with their effects on other diseases, so the overall public health impact of intervening on these need to be considered.FundingWorld Cancer Research Fund International (2015/1421), Cancer Research UK program grant (C18281/A19169), National Institute for Health Research, Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, and Victorian Cancer Agency (MCRF18005).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document