scholarly journals Crystal structure, DFT and Hirshfeld surface analysis of N-acetyl-t-3-methyl-r-2,c-6-diphenylpiperidine

Author(s):  
P. Periyannan ◽  
M. Beemarao ◽  
K . Karthik ◽  
S. Ponnuswamy ◽  
K. Ravichandran

In the title compound [systematic name: 1-(3-methyl-2,6-diphenylpiperidin-1-yl)ethanone], C20H23NO, the piperidine ring adopts a distorted boat conformation, while the phenyl rings subtend a dihedral angle 65.1 (2)°. In the crystal, molecules are linked by C—H...O hydrogen bonds into chains extending along the b-axis direction. The DFT/B3LYP/6–311 G(d,p) method was used to determine the HOMO–LUMO energy levels. A Hirshfeld surface analysis was conducted to verify the contributions of the different intermolecular interactions, indicating that the important contributions to the crystal packing are from H...H (73.2%), C...H (18.4%) and O...H (8.4%) interactions.

Author(s):  
P. Periyannan ◽  
M. Beemarao ◽  
K. Karthik ◽  
S. Ponnuswamy ◽  
K. Ravichandran

In the title compound, C22H27NO, the piperidine ring adopts a chair conformation. The dihedral angles between the mean plane of the piperidine ring and the phenyl rings are 89.78 (7) and 48.30 (8)°. In the crystal, molecules are linked into chains along the b-axis direction by C—H...O hydrogen bonds. The DFT/B3LYP/6–311 G(d,p) method was used to determine the HOMO–LUMO energy levels. The molecular electrostatic potential surfaces were investigated by Hirshfeld surface analysis and two-dimensional fingerprint plots were used to analyse the intermolecular interactions in the molecule.


Author(s):  
Gamal Al Ati ◽  
Karim Chkirate ◽  
Joel T. Mague ◽  
Nadeem Abad ◽  
Redouane Achour ◽  
...  

The title molecule, C13H16N4O, adopts an angular conformation. In the crystal a layer structure is generated by N—H...O and N—H...N hydrogen bonds together with C—H...π(ring) interactions. Hirshfeld surface analysis indicates that the most important contributions to the crystal packing are from H...H (53.8%), H...C/C...H (21.7%), H...N/N...H (13.6%), and H...O/O...H (10.8%) interactions. The optimized structure calculated using density functional theory (DFT) at the B3LYP/ 6–311 G(d,p) level is compared with the experimentally determined structure in the solid state. The calculated HOMO–LUMO energy gap is 5.0452 eV.


Author(s):  
Farid N. Naghiyev ◽  
Maria M. Grishina ◽  
Victor N. Khrustalev ◽  
Ali N. Khalilov ◽  
Mehmet Akkurt ◽  
...  

In the title compound, C28H21N3O, the 1,2-dihydropyridine ring of the 1,2,7,8-tetrahydroisoquinoline ring system is planar as expected, while the cyclohexa-1,3-diene ring has a twist-boat conformation, with Cremer–Pople parameters Q T = 0.367 (2) A, θ = 117.3 (3)° and φ = 327.3 (4)°. The dihedral angles between the best planes through the isoquinoline ring system and the three phenyl rings are 81.69 (12), 82.45 (11) and 47.36 (10)°. In the crystal, molecules are linked via N—H...O and C—H...N hydrogen bonds, forming a three-dimensional network. Furthermore, the crystal packing is dominated by C—H...π bonds with a strong interaction involving the phenyl H atoms. The role of the intermolecular interactions in the crystal packing was clarified using Hirshfeld surface analysis, and two-dimensional fingerprint plots indicate that the most important contributions to the crystal packing are from H...H (46.0%), C...H/H...C (35.1%) and N...H/H...N (10.5%) contacts.


Author(s):  
Dmitriy F. Mertsalov ◽  
Maryana A. Nadirova ◽  
Elena A. Sorokina ◽  
Marina A. Vinokurova ◽  
Sevim Türktekin Çelikesir ◽  
...  

The title compound, C24H24N2O5S, crystallizes with two independent molecules (A and B) in the asymmetric unit. In the central ring systems of both molecules, the tetrahydrofuran rings adopt envelope conformations, the pyrrolidine rings adopt a twisted-envelope conformation and the six-membered ring is in a boat conformation. In molecules A and B, the nine-membered groups attached to the central ring system are essentially planar (r.m.s. deviations of 0.002 and 0.003 Å, respectively). They form dihedral angles of 64.97 (9) and 56.06 (10)°, respectively, with the phenyl rings. In the crystal, strong intermolecular O—H...O hydrogen bonds and weak intermolecular C—H...O contacts link the molecules, forming a three-dimensional network. In addition weak π–π stacking interactions [centroid-to centroid distance = 3.7124 (13) Å] between the pyrrolidine rings of the nine-membered groups of A molecules are observed. Hirshfeld surface analysis and two-dimensional fingerprint plots were used to quantify the intermolecular interactions present in the crystal, indicating that the environments of the two molecules are very similar. The most important contributions for the crystal packing are from H...H (55.8% for molecule A and 53.5% for molecule B), O...H/H...O (24.5% for molecule A and 26.3% for molecule B) and C...H/H...C (12.6% for molecule A and 15.7% for molecule B) interactions.


Author(s):  
Younos Bouzian ◽  
Karim Chkirate ◽  
Joel T. Mague ◽  
Fares Hezam Al-Ostoot ◽  
Noureddine Hammou Ahabchane ◽  
...  

The title molecule, C20H15NO3, adopts a Z-shaped conformation with the carboxyl group nearly coplanar with the dihydroquinoline unit. In the crystal, corrugated layers are formed by C—H...O hydrogen bonds and are stacked by C—H...π(ring) interactions. Hirshfeld surface analysis indicates that the most important contributions to the crystal packing are from H...H (43.3%), H...C/C...H (26.6%) and H...O/O...H (16.3%) interactions. The optimized structure calculated using density functional theory at the B3LYP/ 6–311 G(d,p) level is compared with the experimentally determined structure in the solid state. The calculated HOMO–LUMO energy gap is 4.0319 eV.


Author(s):  
Mohamed El Hafi ◽  
Sanae Lahmidi ◽  
Lhoussaine El Ghayati ◽  
Tuncer Hökelek ◽  
Joel T. Mague ◽  
...  

The title compound {systematic name: (S,E)-3-[4-(furan-2-yl)-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-benzo[b][1,4]diazepin-2-ylidene]-6-methyl-2H-pyran-2,4(3H)-dione}, C19H16N2O4, is constructed from a benzodiazepine ring system linked to furan and pendant dihydropyran rings, where the benzene and furan rings are oriented at a dihedral angle of 48.7 (2)°. The pyran ring is modestly non-planar [largest deviation of 0.029 (4) Å from the least-squares plane] while the tetrahydrodiazepine ring adopts a boat conformation. The rotational orientation of the pendant dihydropyran ring is partially determined by an intramolecular N—HDiazp...ODhydp (Diazp = diazepine and Dhydp = dihydropyran) hydrogen bond. In the crystal, layers of molecules parallel to the bc plane are formed by N—HDiazp...ODhydp hydrogen bonds and slipped π–π stacking interactions. The layers are connected by additional slipped π–π stacking interactions. A Hirshfeld surface analysis of the crystal structure indicates that the most important contributions for the crystal packing are from H...H (46.8%), H...O/O...H (23.5%) and H...C/C...H (15.8%) interactions, indicating that van der Waals interactions are the dominant forces in the crystal packing. Computational chemistry indicates that in the crystal the N—H...O hydrogen-bond energy is 57.5 kJ mol−1.


2019 ◽  
Vol 75 (11) ◽  
pp. 1638-1642
Author(s):  
M. Beemarao ◽  
S. Silambarasan ◽  
A. Jamal Abdul Nasser ◽  
M. Purushothaman ◽  
K. Ravichandran

The benzopyran ring of the title compound, C16H11ClN2O2, is planar [maximum deviation = 0.079 (2) Å] and is almost perpendicular to the chlorophenyl ring [dihedral angle = 86.85 (6)°]. In the crystal, N—H...O, O—H...N, C—H...O and C—H...Cl hydrogen bonds form inter- and intramolecular interactions. The DFT/B3LYP/6-311G(d,p) method was used to determine the HOMO–LUMO energy levels. The molecular electrostatic potential surfaces were investigated by Hirshfeld surface analysis and two-dimensional fingerprint plots were used to analyse the intermolecular interactions in the molecule.


Author(s):  
Mohammed Boulhaoua ◽  
Sevgi Kansiz ◽  
Mohamed El Hafi ◽  
Sanae Lahmidi ◽  
Necmi Dege ◽  
...  

In the title compound, C17H14N4O3, the indazole unit is planar to within 0.0171 (10) Å and makes dihedral angles of 6.50 (6) and 6.79 (4)°, respectively, with the nitro and pendant phenyl groups. The conformation of the oxazole ring is best described as an envelope. In the crystal, oblique stacks along the a-axis direction are formed by π–π stacking interactions between the indazole unit and the pendant phenyl rings of adjacent molecules. The stacks are linked into pairs through C—H...O hydrogen bonds. Hirshfeld surface analysis and two-dimensional fingerprint plots indicate that the most important contributions to the crystal packing are from H...H (36.3%), O...H/H...O (23.4%), C...H/H...C (13.4%) and N...H/H...N (11.4%) interactions.


Author(s):  
Nada Kheira Sebbar ◽  
Brahim Hni ◽  
Tuncer Hökelek ◽  
Abdelhakim Jaouhar ◽  
Mohamed Labd Taha ◽  
...  

The title compound, C18H12Cl2N2OS, consists of a dihydrobenzothiazine unit linked by a –CH group to a 2,4-dichlorophenyl substituent, and to a propanenitrile unit is folded along the S...N axis and adopts a flattened-boat conformation. The propanenitrile moiety is nearly perpendicular to the mean plane of the dihydrobenzothiazine unit. In the crystal, C—HBnz...NPrpnit and C—HPrpnit...OThz (Bnz = benzene, Prpnit = propanenitrile and Thz = thiazine) hydrogen bonds link the molecules into inversion dimers, enclosing R 2 2(16) and R 2 2(12) ring motifs, which are linked into stepped ribbons extending along [110]. The ribbons are linked in pairs by complementary C=O...Cl interactions. π–π contacts between the benzene and phenyl rings, [centroid–centroid distance = 3.974 (1) Å] may further stabilize the structure. The Hirshfeld surface analysis of the crystal structure indicates that the most important contributions for the crystal packing are from H...H (23.4%), H...Cl/Cl...H (19.5%), H...C/C...H (13.5%), H...N/N...H (13.3%), C...C (10.4%) and H...O/O...H (5.1%) interactions. Hydrogen bonding and van der Waals interactions are the dominant interactions in the crystal packing. Computational chemistry calculations indicate that the two independent C—HBnz...NPrpnit and C—HPrpnit...OThz hydrogen bonds in the crystal impart about the same energy (ca 43 kJ mol−1). Density functional theory (DFT) optimized structures at the B3LYP/6–311 G(d,p) level are compared with the experimentally determined molecular structure in the solid state. The HOMO–LUMO behaviour was elucidated to determine the energy gap.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document