Modeling and Clustering Analysis of Broadband Convergence Networks

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vladimir Denchev ◽  
Franz Pernkopf ◽  
Dimitar Radev
Keyword(s):  
Clustering Analysis

2249-PUB: Clustering Analysis as a Tool to Define Endotypes in Type 1 Diabetes (T1D)

Diabetes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 69 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2249-PUB
Author(s):  
ALEJANDRO F. SILLER ◽  
XIANGJUN GU ◽  
MUSTAFA TOSUR ◽  
MARCELA ASTUDILLO ◽  
ASHOK BALASUBRAMANYAM ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 1 Diabetes ◽  
Clustering Analysis

A Level Inference Method for Aggregated Information of Objects Based on Clustering Analysis

2012 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 1432-1437 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li-feng Cao ◽  
Xing-yuan Chen ◽  
Xue-hui Du ◽  
Chun-tao Xia
Keyword(s):  
Clustering Analysis ◽  
Inference Method

Clustering Count-based RNA Methylation Data Using a Nonparametric Generative Model

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lin Zhang ◽  
Yanling He ◽  
Huaizhi Wang ◽  
Hui Liu ◽  
Yufei Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clustering Analysis ◽  
Methylation Level ◽  
Optimal Number ◽  
Generative Model ◽  
Methylation Data ◽  
Sequencing Data ◽  
Number Of Clusters ◽  
Rna Methylation ◽  
Clustering Effect ◽  
Optimal Number Of Clusters

Background: RNA methylome has been discovered as an important layer of gene regulation and can be profiled directly with count-based measurements from high-throughput sequencing data. Although the detailed regulatory circuit of the epitranscriptome remains uncharted, clustering effect in methylation status among different RNA methylation sites can be identified from transcriptome-wide RNA methylation profiles and may reflect the epitranscriptomic regulation. Count-based RNA methylation sequencing data has unique features, such as low reads coverage, which calls for novel clustering approaches. <P><P> Objective: Besides the low reads coverage, it is also necessary to keep the integer property to approach clustering analysis of count-based RNA methylation sequencing data. <P><P> Method: We proposed a nonparametric generative model together with its Gibbs sampling solution for clustering analysis. The proposed approach implements a beta-binomial mixture model to capture the clustering effect in methylation level with the original count-based measurements rather than an estimated continuous methylation level. Besides, it adopts a nonparametric Dirichlet process to automatically determine an optimal number of clusters so as to avoid the common model selection problem in clustering analysis. <P><P> Results: When tested on the simulated system, the method demonstrated improved clustering performance over hierarchical clustering, K-means, MClust, NMF and EMclust. It also revealed on real dataset two novel RNA N6-methyladenosine (m6A) co-methylation patterns that may be induced directly by METTL14 and WTAP, which are two known regulatory components of the RNA m6A methyltransferase complex. <P><P> Conclusion: Our proposed DPBBM method not only properly handles the count-based measurements of RNA methylation data from sites of very low reads coverage, but also learns an optimal number of clusters adaptively from the data analyzed. <P><P> Availability: The source code and documents of DPBBM R package are freely available through the Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN): https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/DPBBM/.

Multi-objective clustering analysis via combinatorial pigeon inspired optimization

2020 ◽  
Vol 63 (7) ◽  
pp. 1302-1313
Author(s):  
Lin Chen ◽  
HaiBin Duan ◽  
YanMing Fan ◽  
Chen Wei
Keyword(s):  
Clustering Analysis ◽  
Multi Objective

scholarly journals OP0038 SPLICEOSOME ALTERATIONS IN LEUCOCYTES FROM APS, SLE AND SLE+APS PATIENTS ARE CLOSELY RELATED TO THEIR MAIN CLINICAL FEATURES

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 20.2-20
Author(s):  
A. M. Patiño-Trives ◽  
C. Perez-Sanchez ◽  
A. Ibañez-Costa ◽  
P. S. Laura ◽  
M. Luque-Tévar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Autoimmune Diseases ◽  
Clinical Features ◽  
Antiphospholipid Syndrome ◽  
Immune Cells ◽  
Inflammatory Mediators ◽  
Clustering Analysis ◽  
Renal Involvement ◽  
Molecular Clustering ◽  
Cluster 2 ◽  
Splicing Machinery

Background:To date, although multiple molecular approaches have illustrated the various aspects of Primary Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and antiphospholipid syndrome plus lupus (APS plus SLE), no study has so far fully characterized the potential role of posttranscriptional regulatory mechanisms such as the alternative splicing.Objectives:To identify shared and differential changes in the splicing machinery of immune cells from APS, SLE and APS plus SLE patients, and their involvement in the activity and clinical profile of these autoimmune disorders.Methods:Monocytes, lymphocytes and neutrophils from 80 patients (22 APS, 35 SLE and 23 APS plus SLE) and 50 healthy donors (HD) were purified by immunomagnetic selection. Then, selected elements of the splicing machinery were evaluated using a microfluidic qPCR array (Fluidigm). In parallel, extensive clinical/serological evaluation was performed, comprising disease activity, thrombosis and renal involvement, along with autoantibodies, acute phase reactants, complement and inflammatory molecules. Molecular clustering analyses and correlation/association studies were developed.Results:Patients with primary APS, SLE and APS plus SLE displayed significant and specific alterations in the splicing machinery components in comparison with HD, that were further specific for each leukocyte subset. Besides, these alterations were associated with distinctive clinical features.Hence, in APS, clustering analysis allowed to identify two sets of patients representing different molecular profile groups with respect to the expression levels of splicing machinery components. Principal component analyses confirmed a clear separation between patients. Clinically, cluster 1 characterized patients with higher thrombotic episodes and recurrences than cluster 2 and displayed a higher adjusted global APS score (aGAPSS). Accordingly, these patients showed higher levels of inflammatory mediators than cluster 2.Similarly, in patients with APS plus SLE, clustering analysis allowed to identify two sets of patients showing differential expression of splicing machinery components. Clinical and laboratory profiles showed that cluster 2 characterized patients that had suffered more thrombotic recurrences, most of them displaying an aGAPSS over 12 points and expressing higher levels of inflammatory mediators than cluster 1. The incidence of lupus nephropathy was similarly represented in both clusters.Lastly, in SLE patients, molecular clustering analysis identified two sets of patients showing distinctive clinical features. One cluster characterized most of the patients positive for anti-dsDNA antibodies, further suffering lupus nephropathy, and a high proportion of them also presenting atheroma plaques and high levels of inflammatory mediators.Correlation studies further demonstrated that several deranged splicing machinery components in immune cells (i.e. SF3B1tv1, PTBP1, PRP8 and RBM17) were linked to the autoimmune profile of the three autoimmune diseases, albeit in a specific way on each disorder. Accordingly, in vitro treatment of HD lymphocytes with aPL-IgG or anti-dsDNA-IgG changed the expression of spliceosome components also found altered in vivo in the three autoimmune diseases. Finally, the induced over/downregulated expression of selected spliceosome components in leukocytes modulated the expression of inflammatory cytokines, changed the procoagulant/adhesion activities of monocytes and regulated NETosis in neutrophils.Conclusion:1) The splicing machinery, profoundly altered in leukocytes from APS, APS plus SLE and SLE patients, is closely related to the activity of these diseases, their autoimmune and inflammatory profiles. 2) The analysis of the splicing machinery allows the segregation of APS, APS plus SLE and SLE, with specific components explaining the CV risk and renal involvement in these highly related autoimmune disorders.Acknowledgements:Funded by ISCIII, PI18/00837 and RIER RD16/0012/0015 co-funded with FEDERDisclosure of Interests:None declared

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document