CdZnTe-Based X-Ray Spectrometer for Absolute Density Determination

2020 ◽  
Vol 67 (10) ◽  
pp. 2273-2277
Author(s):  
Nicola Zambelli ◽  
Silvia Zanettini ◽  
Giacomo Benassi ◽  
Andrea Bettati ◽  
Andrea Zappettini
2011 ◽  
Vol 82 (12) ◽  
pp. 125105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Jimenez-Mendoza ◽  
Diego G. Espinosa-Arbelaez ◽  
Astrid L. Giraldo-Betancur ◽  
Margarita I. Hernandez-Urbiola ◽  
Damian Vargas-Vazquez ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 39 (6Part29) ◽  
pp. 3990-3990
Author(s):  
X Wu ◽  
A Yan ◽  
H Liu

2019 ◽  
Vol 75 (4) ◽  
pp. 600-609 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bjarke Svane ◽  
Kasper Tolborg ◽  
Lasse Rabøl Jørgensen ◽  
Martin Roelsgaard ◽  
Mads Ry Vogel Jørgensen ◽  
...  

Electron density determination based on structure factors obtained through powder X-ray diffraction has so far been limited to high-symmetry inorganic solids. This limit is challenged by determining high-quality structure factors for crystalline urea using a bespoke vacuum diffractometer with imaging plates. This allows the collection of data of sufficient quality to model the electron density of a molecular system using the multipole method. The structure factors, refined parameters as well as chemical bonding features are compared with results from the high-quality synchrotron single-crystal study by Birkedalet al.[Acta Cryst.(2004), A60, 371–381] demonstrating that powder X-ray diffraction potentially provides a viable alternative for electron density determination in simple molecular crystals where high-quality single crystals are not available.


2016 ◽  
Vol 81 ◽  
pp. 641-649 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raul Garcia-Diez ◽  
Aneta Sikora ◽  
Christian Gollwitzer ◽  
Caterina Minelli ◽  
Michael Krumrey

1994 ◽  
Vol 64 (8) ◽  
pp. 971-973 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Jacob ◽  
M. Engelhard ◽  
W. Möller ◽  
A. Koch

1972 ◽  
Vol 50 (5) ◽  
pp. 690-700 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. Stewart ◽  
Osvald Knop ◽  
Conrad Ayasse ◽  
F. W. D. Woodhams

Antimonic acid cannot be dehydrated by heating in air to give products of constant and reproducible weight without simultaneous reduction of some of the SbV to SbIII. Neither anhydrous Sb2O5 nor the hydroxy oxide Sb3O6OH postulated by Dihlström and Westgren can be obtained by this method. Two well-defined products of the dehydration/decomposition are Sb2O4.35(5) = Sb6O13, which forms between 650 and 850°, and β-Sb2O4. The latter, and not Sb2O3, results on heating Sb6O13 to 935°. Sb6O13 has a cubic structure of the defect pyrochlore type, a0 = 10.303(1) Å, x(O2) = 0.4304(14). Combined evidence from X-ray diffractometry, density determination, and Mössbauer spectroscopy leads to Sb3+Sb5+2O6O0.5 as the most probable structural formula.The Mössbauer parameters of β-Sb2O4 are closely similar to those reported for α-Sb2O4, but the isomer shifts (relative to InSb at 77°K) for SbV in antimonic acid and Sb6O13 are significantly larger than those in α- and β-Sb2O4.


1989 ◽  
Vol 72 (7) ◽  
pp. 1170-1174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zwi H. Kalman ◽  
Lois A. Johnson ◽  
John B. Wachtman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document