User evaluation of a domain-oriented end-user design environment for building 3D virtual chemistry experiments

Author(s):  
Ying Zhong ◽  
Chang Liu
1997 ◽  
pp. 537-541
Author(s):  
Richard B. Beeby ◽  
John G. Gammack ◽  
Malcolm K. Crowe

2013 ◽  
Vol 70 (2) ◽  
pp. 206-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Satterly ◽  
Daniel Nelson ◽  
Nathan Zwintscher ◽  
Morohunranti Oguntoye ◽  
Wayne Causey ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 185 (9-10) ◽  
pp. e1787-e1793 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Krauss ◽  
Sarah Sanjakdar ◽  
Andrew Wilson ◽  
Brian Dacanay ◽  
Louis Jasper ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Gathering end-user feedback about candidate technologies in the operational environment prior to fielding helps to ensure that far-forward medical teams receive the most suitable technology. It is therefore a crucial step in the defense medical acquisition process. The current article reviews the methodology and provides an illustrative example of how end-user feedback was collected to evaluate the current suitability and future promise of two FDA-approved devices, the BrainScope One and Infrascanner 2000, that could potentially aid in the field evaluation of head injuries by far-forward medical teams. Materials and Method The BrainScope One and Infrascanner 2000 end-user evaluation is used as an example to illustrate how to collect end-user feedback from the field in order to rapidly assess the candidate technology. In this evaluation of whether and how to implement FDA-approved technology candidates for head injury assessment by far-forward medical teams, end-user feedback was collected from 158 medical personnel at 8 bases in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Kuwait using focus groups and interviews. Results The end users reported consistent concerns about the operational efficacy and suitability of the current versions of the devices as well as the areas where the devices showed promise for the Department of Defense (DoD). End-user feedback is shown in detail to demonstrate the depth and richness of feedback that can be gathered using this methodology. Conclusion Overall, the BrainScope One and Infrascanner 2000 end-user evaluation shows the necessity and value of gathering end-user field efficacy and suitability feedback during the medical acquisition process. Limitations and best practices for this approach are discussed.


2020 ◽  
pp. 030936462096394
Author(s):  
Quinn A Boser ◽  
Michael R Dawson ◽  
Jonathon S Schofield ◽  
Gwen Y Dziwenko ◽  
Jacqueline S Hebert

Background: Powered hand exoskeletons are an emerging technology that have shown promise in assisting individuals with impaired hand function. A number of hand exoskeleton designs have been described in the literature; however, the majority have not been supported by patient-oriented criteria. Objective: The aim of this study was to define preliminary end-user needs and expectations for an assistive hand exoskeleton. Study design: Explorative interview and case series. Methods: Six clinicians and eight individuals with impaired hand function were interviewed in small groups or individually. A standardized list of questions was used to elicit feedback on specific design criteria or promote the discovery of new criteria. In addition, three participants with impaired hand function returned for a second session where hand characteristics, such as range of motion and force required to flex/extend fingers, were recorded to further quantify design requirements. Results: Interview responses indicated that there was general consensus among participants on criteria relating to important grasp patterns, grip strength, wear time, and acceptable bulk/weight. However, interview responses and hand characteristics also revealed important differences between individuals with impaired hand function. Conclusion: Qualitative and quantitative data were collected to develop an understanding of end-user design requirements for assistive hand exoskeletons. Although the data collected were helpful in identifying some preliminary criteria, differences between participants exist and identifying a universal set of criteria applicable across individuals with impaired hand function is challenging. This work reinforces the importance of involving users of rehabilitation technology in the device development process.


Author(s):  
Xiaoling Dai ◽  
Kaylash Chaudhary ◽  
John Grundy

Micro-payment systems are becoming an important part of peer-to-peer (P2P) networks. The main reason for this is to address the “free-rider” problem in most existing content sharing systems. The authors of this chapter have developed a new micro-payment system for content sharing in P2P networks called P2P-Netpay. This is an offline, debit based protocol that provides a secure, flexible, usable, and reliable credit service in peer-to-peer networks ensuring equitable participation by all parties. The authors have carried out an assessment of micro-payment against non-micro-payment credit systems for file sharing applications. The chapter reports on the design of our experiment and results of an end user evaluation. The chapter then discusses the performance of the credit model, comparing it to a non-micro-payment credit model. Through evaluation of the proposed system and comparison with other existing systems, the authors find that the new approach eliminates the “free-rider” problem. The chapter analyses a heuristic evaluation performed by a set of evaluators and presents directions for research aiming to improve the overall satisfaction and efficiency of this model for peers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document