Mesh erosion after robotic ventral mesh rectopexy, a minimally invasive solution – a video vignette

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (12) ◽  
pp. 2357-2357
Author(s):  
T. Allaeys ◽  
A. Beunis ◽  
M. Ruppert ◽  
S. Van den Broeck ◽  
G. Hubens ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Mesh Erosion ◽  
Ventral Mesh Rectopexy ◽  
Mesh Rectopexy ◽  
Video Vignette

Minimally invasive organ‐preserving approaches in the management of mesh erosion after laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (11) ◽  
pp. 1642-1648 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Ratnatunga ◽  
S. Singh ◽  
R. Bolckmans ◽  
S. Goodbrand ◽  
K. Gorissen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Mesh Erosion ◽  
Laparoscopic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy ◽  
Ventral Mesh Rectopexy ◽  
Mesh Rectopexy

Minimally invasive ventral mesh rectopexy for complex rectocoele: impact on anorectal and sexual function

2011 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. e320-e326 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. T. C. Wong ◽  
E. Abet ◽  
J. Rigaud ◽  
E. Frampas ◽  
P. A. Lehur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Sexual Function ◽  
Ventral Mesh Rectopexy ◽  
Mesh Rectopexy

Robotic ventral mesh rectopexy technique for rectal intussusception with rectocele - a video vignette

2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (10) ◽  
pp. 947-947
Author(s):  
D. Atasoy ◽  
A. Aghayeva ◽  
O. Bayraktar ◽  
N. Pirinc ◽  
E. Aytac ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Intussusception ◽  
Ventral Mesh Rectopexy ◽  
Mesh Rectopexy ◽  
Video Vignette

Robotic ventral mesh rectopexy - a video vignette

2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (7) ◽  
pp. 695-695
Author(s):  
A. M. Al-Mazrou ◽  
R. P. Kiran ◽  
E. P. Pappou ◽  
D. Feingold ◽  
S. Lee-Kong
Keyword(s):  
Ventral Mesh Rectopexy ◽  
Mesh Rectopexy ◽  
Video Vignette

Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy after hysteropexy - a video vignette

2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 401-402
Author(s):  
F. Arabaci ◽  
M. P. Gosselink ◽  
K. J. Gorissen ◽  
C. Cunningham ◽  
O. M. Jones ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy ◽  
Ventral Mesh Rectopexy ◽  
Mesh Rectopexy ◽  
Video Vignette

Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy performed with ArtiSential®: a video vignette

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Darwich ◽  
R. Aliyev ◽  
Y. Koliesnikov ◽  
F. Willeke
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy ◽  
Ventral Mesh Rectopexy ◽  
Mesh Rectopexy ◽  
Video Vignette

scholarly journals Redo ventral rectopexy: is it worthwhile?

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. E. Laitakari ◽  
J. K. Mäkelä-Kaikkonen ◽  
M. Kairaluoma ◽  
A. Junttila ◽  
J. Kössi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Rectal Prolapse ◽  
Revisional Surgery ◽  
Pelvic Floor Dysfunction ◽  
Pelvic Organ ◽  
Ventral Rectopexy ◽  
Included Patient ◽  
External Rectal Prolapse ◽  
Ventral Mesh Rectopexy ◽  
Mesh Rectopexy

Abstract Background Minimally invasive ventral mesh rectopexy (VMR) is a widely used surgical treatment for posterior pelvic organ prolapse; however, evidence of the utility of revisional surgery is lacking. Our aim was to assess the technical details, safety and outcomes of redo minimally invasive VMR for patients with external rectal prolapse (ERP) recurrence or relapsed symptoms of internal rectal prolapse (IRP). Methods This is a retrospective cohort study of patients with recurrent ERP or symptomatic IRP who underwent redo minimally invasive VMR between 2011 and 2016. The study was conducted at three hospitals in Finland. Data collected retrospectively included patient demographics, in addition to perioperative and short-term postoperative findings. At follow-up, all living patients were sent a questionnaire concerning postoperative disease-related symptoms and quality of life. Results A total of 43 redo minimally invasive VMR were performed during the study period. The indication for reoperation was recurrent ERP in 22 patients and relapsed symptoms of IRP in 21 patients. In most operations (62.8%), the previously used mesh was left in situ and a new one was placed. Ten (23.3%) patients experienced complications, including 2 (4.7%) mesh-related complications. The recurrence rate was 4.5% for ERP. Three patients out of 43 were reoperated on for various reasons. One patient required postoperative laparoscopic hematoma evacuation. Patients operated on for recurrent ERP seemed to benefit more from the reoperation. Conclusions Minimally invasive redo VMR appears to be a safe and effective procedure for treating posterior pelvic floor dysfunction with acceptable recurrence and reoperation rates.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document