scholarly journals Effect of systolic dysfunction and elevated left ventricular end diastolic pressure on 3‐year clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
HyeYon Yu ◽  
JiHun Ahn
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Diastolic Pressure ◽  
Systolic Dysfunction ◽  
Left Ventricular

scholarly journals Effect of systolic dysfunction and elevated left ventricular end diastolic pressure on 3-year clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
YU HYEYON ◽  
JIHUN AHN
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Systolic Dysfunction ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Diastolic Filling ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Objectives: Systolic and diastolic dysfunctions are related to adverse clinical outcomes in patients with sinus rhythm. The aim of this study was to clarify the prognostic significance of systolic and diastolic dysfunctions in patients with chronic persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods: We evaluated data for 114 consecutive patients with chronic AF who underwent measurement of LVEDP at our hospital between 1 March 2011 and 31 December 2014. In total, 114 consecutive patients with chronic AF were divided into two groups according to the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF): LVEF < 50 (reduced ejection fraction, REF group) and LVEF ≥50 (preserved EF, PEF group). The PEF group was further divided into two subgroups according to the left ventricular end-diastolic filling pressure (LVEDP): LVEDP >15 mmHg and LVEDP ≤ 15 mmHg. The 3-year clinical outcomes were compared between the PEF and REF groups and the LVEDP ≥15 mmHg and LVEDP <15 mmHg groups. Results: During the 3-year follow-up period, the rate of heart failure (HF) hospitalisation and incidence of AF with rapid ventricular rhythm (RVR) were higher in the REF group than in the PEF group. Multivariate analysis revealed that REF was the only significant predictor of HF hospitalisation (hazard ratio, 4.71; 95% confidence interval, 1.48–15.02; p=0.009). Conclusions: Our observations during a mid-term follow-up period revealed that systolic dysfunction could be an important predictor of HF hospitalisation in patients with AF. However, elevated LVEDP may not be associated with mid-term adverse clinical outcomes in patients without systolic dysfunction.

P1025Clinical predictors for the improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction and prognosis after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with systolic dysfunction

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
K Nagaoka ◽  
Y Mukai ◽  
S Kawai ◽  
S Takase ◽  
K Sakamoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Systolic Dysfunction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Lower Plasma ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Abstract Background Catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) improves left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and clinical outcomes in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD). However, predictors of the improvement of LV function and clinical outcomes by CA were poorly understood. Purpose We examined the efficacy of CA in AF patients with LVSD and predictive factors associated with clinical outcomes. Method Among consecutive 795 patients undergone initial RFCA at our hospital, we studied 51 patients with LVSD (LVEF ≤50%). Improved LVEF more then 5% at 1-year after CA was classified as “responder” to CA. We analyzed clinical variables and echocardiographic parameters before and after the CAs. Results In the responder group, LVEF was significantly improved 1-year after catheter ablation compared with the non-responder group. (ΔLVEF 22±12% vs. −1±4%, p<0.001). The responder group was significantly younger, had more non-paroxysmal AF, smaller LV systolic diameter and lower plasma BNP level before CA (Table). Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE)-positive rate in cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) before CA was higher in the non-responder group than in the responder group (100% [6/6] vs. 38% [5/13], p<0.005). After CAs of AF, event-free survival from hospitalization for heart failure was significantly higher in the responder group (Figure) with less AF recurrence (27% vs. 47%, p=0.04) than in the non-responder group. Baseline characteristics Responder (N=35) Non-Responder (N=16) P value Age, y 62±11 69±8 p<0.01 Male, n (%) 26 (74) 13 (76) NS Non-pAF 26 (74) 4 (24) p<0.01 LAD, mm 48±7 48±8 NS LAVI, ml/m2 54±17 58±20 NS LVDd, mm 54±7 58±10 NS LVDs, mm 43±7 48±10 p=0.05 EF, % 37±8 38±8 NS BNP (pg/ml) 278±225 684±848 p<0.05 Conclusion Younger age, absence of LV dilatation, lower plasma BNP, or absence of LGE may well predict favorable clinical outcomes after CA in patients with LVSD.

scholarly journals P966 Impact of systolic dysfunction and elevated left ventricular end diastolic pressure on three years clinical outcome in patients with atrial fibrillation

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Ahn ◽  
H Y Yu
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Diastolic Dysfunction ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Systolic Dysfunction ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Diastolic Filling ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Abstract Background Systolic and diastolic dysfunction is related with adverse clinical outcomes in the patients with sinus rhythm. Purpose: The aim of this study is to clarify the prognostic significance of both systolic and diastolic dysfunction in the patients with chronic persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods: A total of 114 consecutive patients who have chronic persistent AF. Whole patients were divided into 2 groups according to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF): those with an LVEF &lt; 50 (n = 24) (REF) and those with an LVEF ≥ 50 (n = 90) (PEF). And PEF group was also divided into two groups according to left ventricular end diastolic filling pressure (LVEDP): patients with LVEDP ≥ 15 mmHg (n = 38) and those with &lt; 15 mmHg (n = 52). Results: 3-year clinical outcomes were compared between each groups (PEF groups vs. REF groups and LVEDP ≥ 15 mmHg vs LVEDP &lt; 15 mmHg). The incidence of death, hospitalization, stroke, bleeding, AF with rapid ventricular rhythm (RVR) and heart failure (HF) hospitalization were similar PEF and REF group. However, during 3-year follow up period, the incidence of HF hospitalization (29.2% vs 8.9%, p &lt; 0.02) and AF with RVR (20.8% vs 3.3%, p &lt; 0.01) were frequent in REF group compared with PEF group. In multivariate analysis, REF is an only predictor of HF hospitalization (Table 1). Conclusion: During 3-year follow up period, systolic dysfunction is an important predictor of HF hospitalization in AF patients. However, elevated LVEDP is not related with 3-year adverse clinical outcomes in AF patients without systolic dysfunction. Table 1 variable Odd Ratio (HR) 95% Confidence Interval (CI) P Age .973 .925-1.023 .286 Diabetes mellitus .487 .138-1.721 .264 BNP 1.000 1.000-1.000 .908 Hypertension 1.061 .330-3.413 .921 LVEDP &gt; 15 mmHg 1.302 .396-4.285 .664 EF &lt; 50 4.712 1.478-15.016 .009 Predictors of 3-year follow-up clinical outcomes of all participants

RELATIVE CONTRIBUTIONS OF FIBROSIS AND CONNEXIN CHANGES TOTHE ATRIAL FIBRILLATION SUBSTRATE DURING THE DEVELOPMENT AND REVERSAL OF CONGESTIVEHEART FAILURE

2008 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 5
Author(s):  
Brett Burstein ◽  
Kunihiro Nishida ◽  
Philippe Comtois ◽  
Louis Villenuve ◽  
Yung-Hsin Yeh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Potential Model ◽  
Diastolic Pressure ◽  
Recovery Period ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Muscle Bundle ◽  
Protein Ratio ◽  
Conduction Disturbances ◽  
Conduction Abnormalities ◽  
Mrna And Protein Expression

Background: Connexin alterations occur in various atrial fibrillation (AF) paradigms, but their functional significance remains unclear. No data are available regarding the effects of CHF on atrial connexin expression and phosphorylation. We therefore analyzed connexin changes and their contribution to the AF substrate during the development and reversal ofCHF. Methods and Results: Dogs were allocated to three groups: CHF induced by 2-week ventricular tachypacing (CHF, n=15); CHF dogs allowed to recover for 4 weeks after 2-week tachypacing (REC, n=15) and non-paced shams (CTL, n=11). Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure increased with CHF (14.5±1.0*** vs.3.7±0.7, ***P < 0.001 vs. CTL) and normalized upon CHF recovery (5.1±1.0^†††, ^††† P < 0.001 vs. CHF). Real-time PCR and Western-blot analyses revealed connexin43 (Cx43) and connexin40 (Cx40) mRNA and protein expression to be unchanged by CHF and REC. However, CHF caused Cx43 dephosphorylation(by ~73%***) and increased Cx40/Cx43 protein ratio (by ~35%***), with both alterations completely reversing in REC. Immunofluorescent confocal microscopy confirmed connexin protein trends, with a reduction in phosphorylated Cx43 (by ~68%*** in CHF) that returned to control in REC. CHF caused conduction abnormalities (phasedelay-range and heterogeneity index, both P < 0.01) and burst pacing-induced AF prolongation (CTL 22±7s, CHF 1100±171s***, REC 884±220s***) which persisted in the recovery period, along with residual fibrosis (CTL 3.6±0.7%, CHF 14.7±1.5%***, REC13.3±2.3%***). Fibrosis physically interrupted muscle bundle continuity and anionically-based action potential model of canine atrium showed that fibrosiswas able to account for the observed conduction abnormalities. Conclusions: CHF causes connexin-dephosphorylation and Cx40/Cx43ratio increases. With CHF reversal, atrial connexin alterations recover completely, but tissue fibrosis, conduction abnormalities and a substrate forAF remain with fibrosis accounting for conduction abnormalities. Thus, althougha trial connexin changes occur with CHF, they are not essential for conduction disturbances and AF promotion, which appear rather to be related primarily tofibrotic interruption of muscle-bundle continuity.

HEART COMPLICATIONS IN HYPERTHYROIDISM

2011 ◽  
pp. 7-17
Author(s):  
Hai Thuy Nguyen ◽  
Anh Vu Nguyen
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Heart Diseases ◽  
Systolic Dysfunction ◽  
Oxygen Demand ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Cardiac Contraction ◽  
Cardiac Complications ◽  
Cardiac Symptoms

Thyroid hormone increases the force of the contraction and the amount of the heart muscle oxygen demand. It also increases the heart rate. Due to these reasons, the work of the heart is greatly increased in hyperthyroidism. Hyperthyroidism increases the amount of nitric oxide in the intima, lead them to be dilated and become less stiff. Cardiac symptoms can be seen in anybody with hyperthyroidism, but can be particularly dangerous in whom have underlying heart diseases. Common symptoms include: tachycardia and palpitations. Occult hyperthyroidism is a common cause of an increased heart rate at rest and with mild exertion. Hyperthyroidism can also produce a host of other arrhythmias such as PVCs, ventricular tachycardia and especially atrial fibrillation. Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and systolic dysfunction, Mitral regurgitation and mitral valve prolapsed are heart complications of hyperthyroism could be detected by echocardiography. The forceful cardiac contraction increases the systolic blood pressure despite the increased relaxation in the blood vessels reduces the diastolic blood pressure. Atrial fibrillation, atrial enlargement and congestive heart failure are important cardiac complications of hyperthyroidism. An increased risks of stroke is common in patients with atrial fibrillation. Graves disease is linked to autoimmune complications, such as cardiac valve involvement, pulmonary arterial hypertension and specific cardiomyopathy. Worsening angina: Patients with coronary artery disease often experience a marked worsening in symptoms with hyperthyroidism. These can include an increase in chest pain (angina) or even a heart attack.

scholarly journals Three Vessel Coronary Cameral Fistulae Associated with New Onset Atrial Fibrillation and Angina Pectoris

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Murat Yuksel ◽  
Abdulkadir Yildiz ◽  
Mustafa Oylumlu ◽  
Nihat Polat ◽  
Halit Acet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Coronary Angiography ◽  
Left Ventricle ◽  
Coronary Arteries ◽  
Diastolic Pressure ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Rate ◽  
Fistula Formation ◽  
New Onset

Coronary cameral fistulas are abnormal communications between a coronary artery and a heart chamber or a great vessel which are reported in less than 0.1% of patients undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography. All three major coronary arteries are even less frequently involved in fistula formation as it is the case in our patient. A 68-year-old woman was admitted to cardiology clinic with complaints of exertional dyspnea and angina for two years and a new onset palpitation. Standard 12-lead electrocardiogram revealed atrial fibrillation (AF) with a ventricular rate of 114 beat/minute and accompanying T wave abnormalities and minimal ST-depression on lateral derivations. Transthoracic echocardiographic examination was normal except for diastolic dysfunction, minimally mitral regurgitation, and mild to moderate enlargement of the left atrium. Sinus rhythm was achieved by medical cardioversion with amiodarone infusion. Coronary angiography revealed diffuse and multiple coronary-left ventricle fistulas originating from the distal segments of both left and right coronary arterial systems without any stenosis in epicardial coronary arteries. The patient’s symptoms resolved almost completely with medical therapy. High volume shunts via coronary artery to left ventricular microfistulas may lead to increased volume overload and subsequent increase in end-diastolic pressure of the left ventricle and may cause left atrial enlargement.

scholarly journals P1441 Predictors of systemic embolisms in a large cohort of left ventricular noncompaction patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
G Casas ◽  
G Oristrell ◽  
J Limeres ◽  
R Barriales ◽  
J R Gimeno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Oral Anticoagulation ◽  
Systolic Dysfunction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Noncompaction ◽  
Severe Phenotype ◽  
Ventricular Noncompaction ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract BACKGROUND Left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC) is associated with an increased risk of systemic embolisms (SE). However, incidence and risk factors are not well established. PURPOSE To evaluate the rate of SE in LVNC and describe risk factors. METHODS LNVC patients were included in a multicentric registry. Those with SE were considered for the analysis. RESULTS 514 patients with LVNC from 10 Spanish centres were recruited from 2000 to 2018. During a median follow-up of 4.2 years (IQR 1.9-7.1), 23 patients (4.5%) had a SE. Patients with SE (Table 1) were older at diagnosis, with no differences in gender and had similar cardiovascular risk factors. They were more frequently under oral anticoagulation (OAC). Besides, they had a more reduced LVEF, and more dilated LV and left atrium (LA). Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) was more frequent, altogether suggesting a more severe phenotype. Patients with SE had non-significantly higher rates of hospitalization for heart failure (33% Vs 24%, p = 0.31) and atrial fibrillation (35% Vs 19%, p = 0.10). In multivariate analysis, only LA diameter was an independent predictor of SE (OR 1.04, p = 0.04). A LA diameter &gt; 45 mm had an independent 3 fold increased risk of SE (OR 3.04, p = 0.02) (Image 1). CONCLUSIONS LVNC carries a moderate mid-term risk of SE, which appears to be irrespective of atrial fibrillation and associated with age, LV dilatation and systolic dysfunction and mainly LA dilatation. This subgroup of patients should be considered for oral anticoagulation in primary prevention. Table 1 Systemic embolisms (n = 23) No systemic embolisms (n = 491) p Men, n (%) 15 (65) 289 (56) 0.52 Median age at diagnosis (IQR) - yr 60 (48-76) 48 (30-64) 0.02 Median follow up (IQR) - yr 5.9 (3.1-7.8) 4.2 (1.8-7.1) 0.18 OAC, n (%) 19 (83) 118 (24) 0.01 LVEF (SD) - % 37 (15) 48 (17) 0.01 LVEDD (SD) - mm 58 (11) 54 (10) 0.04 LA diameter (SD) - mm 46 (9) 39 (9) 0.01 Characteristics of patients with and without systemic embolisms Abstract P1441 Figure. Image 1

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document