A Note on the Measurement of Bias in Stated Willingness to Pay for Public Goods

Kyklos ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 145-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felix Schlapfer ◽  
Robert T. Deacon ◽  
Nick Hanley
2021 ◽  
Vol 39 ◽  
pp. 100271
Author(s):  
Habtamu Tilahun Kassahun ◽  
Joffre Swait ◽  
Jette Bredahl Jacobsen

2015 ◽  
Vol 112 ◽  
pp. 53-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margrethe Aanesen ◽  
Claire Armstrong ◽  
Mikołaj Czajkowski ◽  
Jannike Falk-Petersen ◽  
Nick Hanley ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 1227-1250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolai V. Kuminoff ◽  
Jaren C. Pope

1994 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 411-415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory A Guagnano ◽  
Thomas Dietz ◽  
Paul C Stern

This article reports a test of the hypothesis that stated willingness to pay (WTP) for environmental quality follows a contribution model rather than the purchase model that is more congenial to economic thinking In particular, we examine the ability of the Schwartz norm-activation model of altruism to explain six different WTP assessments The Schwartz model explains stated WTP for environmental quality, except when payments are framed as taxes We suggest that models should presume that both altruistic and egoistic considerations may affect stated WTP and that framing may affect their relative contributions


2017 ◽  
Vol 85 ◽  
pp. 35-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Baumgärtner ◽  
Moritz A. Drupp ◽  
Jasper N. Meya ◽  
Jan M. Munz ◽  
Martin F. Quaas

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document