scholarly journals Is there any difference between right hepatectomy and left lateral sectionectomy for living donors? As much you cut, as much you hurt?

HPB ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. 684-687 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaus Steinbrück ◽  
Reinaldo Fernandes ◽  
Marcelo Enne ◽  
Jose Manoel Martinho ◽  
Jefferson Alves ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 261 (3) ◽  
pp. 506-512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivier Scatton ◽  
Georgios Katsanos ◽  
Olivier Boillot ◽  
Claire Goumard ◽  
Denis Bernard ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
S. V. Gautier ◽  
E. A. Gallyamov ◽  
A. R. Monakhov ◽  
E. V. Zagainov

Introduction.Living donor liver transplantation has proved to be an effective, safe and radical treatment modality for patients with end-stage liver diseases. Left lateral section (LLS) of donor’s liver is used in pediatric recipients. Laparoscopic LLS procurement was fi rst described by D. Cherqui in 2002. At present, this technique is routinely used only by 5 hospitals in the world. However, up to date, some authors consider it to be a new standard to perform such a surgery in living donors.Aim.To analyze the fi rst Russian experience in laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy (LapLLS) in living related donor.Materials and methods.From May to September 2016 fi ve LapLLS were performed in living donors. In all cases donors were women (mothers in 4 cases and aunt in 1 case). Recipients were children aged from 6 months through 3 years with body mass from 5.6 to 12.5 kg. Liver transection was carried out under conditions of maintained blood supply. Parenchymal transection was performed using a harmonic scalpel, bipolar coagulation and ultrasound dissection.Results. Average donor age was 32 ± 5 years. Average operation time was 287 ± 16 min. Average LLS graft weight was 220 ± 16 g. Intraoperative blood loss did not exceed 100 ml (95 ± 5 ml). Donors were discharged on the 3rd–4th post-op day. There were no postoperative complications in donors. Recipients were also characterized by a standard course of the postoperative period.Conclusion.LapLLS is an effective and safe method with several advantages. Primarily, these are early rehabilitation of the donors and shortening of the hospital stay, which are important for the quick return to normal way of live. Excellent visualization of anatomical structures, including vascular and biliary ones, allows performing precise selection. In addition, good cosmetic effect is also an important aspect.


2006 ◽  
Vol 244 (5) ◽  
pp. 815-820 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivier Soubrane ◽  
Daniel Cherqui ◽  
Olivier Scatton ◽  
Fabien Stenard ◽  
Denis Bernard ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 73 (5) ◽  
pp. 1100-1108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Hobeika ◽  
David Fuks ◽  
François Cauchy ◽  
Claire Goumard ◽  
Brice Gayet ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Marcel J. van der Poel ◽  
Pieter J. Tanis ◽  
Dennis A. Wicherts ◽  
Marc G. H. Besselink

HPB ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. S333
Author(s):  
A. Chan ◽  
S. Jamdar ◽  
A. Sheen ◽  
A. Siriwardena

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document