AbstractPresently, the semiconductor industry relies almost exclusively on perfluorocompounds (e.g., tetrafluoromethane, hexafluoroethane, nitrogen trifluoride. sulfur hexafluoride, and. more recently, octafluoropropane) for the etching of silicon dioxide and silicon nitride films in wafer patterning and PECVD (plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition) chamber cleaning applications. The use of perfluorocompounds (PFCs) by the industry is considered problematic because of the high global warming potentials (GWPs) associated with these substances. Potential replacements for perfluorocompounds are presently being evaluated at MIT. In an initial stage of the study, intended to screen potential candidates on the basis of etch performance, a large number of compounds is being tested in a commercially available magnetically enhanced reactive ion etch tool. The potential alternatives discussed in this work are trifluoroacetic anhydride (TFAA) and three members of the iodofluorocarbon (IFC) family – iodotrifluoromethane, iodopentafluorocthane, and 2-iodoheptafluoropropane. This paper will present the results of etch rate comparisons between TFAA and octafluoropropane, a perfluorinated dielectric etchant. Designed experiment (DOE) methodology, combined with neural network software, was used to study a broad parameter space of reactor conditions. The effects of pressure, magnetic field, and gas flow rates were studied. Additionally, more limited tests were carried out with the three iodofluorocarbon gases. Etch rate data, as well as Auger electron spectroscopy data from substrates exposed to IFC plasmas will be presented. All gases were evaluated using both silicon dioxide as well as silicon nitride substrates. Results indicate that these compounds may be potentially viable in plasma etching applications.
