THE FOSSIL RECORD OF SQUAT LOBSTERS: FILLING IN THE GAPS

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina M. Robins ◽  
◽  
Adiël A. Klompmaker
Keyword(s):  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adiël A. Klompmaker ◽  
Torrey Nyborg ◽  
Jamie Brezina ◽  
Yusuke Ando

Crustaceans including decapods, copepods, amphipods, cumaceans, tanaidaceans, ostracods, and isopods are major components of modern marine methane seeps, where they play a key role in structuring these hotspots of diversity in relatively deep waters. There is every reason to suspect they were common too in ancient seeps, but relatively few studies have focused on crustaceans from fossil seep deposits thus far. We hypothesize that crustaceans can be commonly found in Meso-Cenozoic seeps when many of the aforementioned groups were present and/or radiated. To this end, we review the global fossil record of crustaceans in seeps for the first time using the primary literature and newly collected specimens from the Late Cretaceous of South Dakota, USA. We find that seep crustaceans are much more common than previously known, are found on each continent, and occur more frequently starting in the Jurassic. Decapod crustaceans are represented by body fossils and traces (coprolites, repair scars in mollusks, and burrows), whereas only body fossils of ostracods and barnacles are known. Other groups are lacking. While modern seep decapods are dominated by galatheoid squat lobsters, alvinocaridid shrimps, king crabs, and true crabs, the fossil record is consisting primarily of callianassid ghost shrimps and true crabs thus far. Preservation and recognition are likely to have influenced this discrepancy. Finally, the relatively unexplored fossil record of seep crustaceans provides many opportunities for systematic and paleoecological research.


2012 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 217-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. David Archibald

Studies of the origin and diversification of major groups of plants and animals are contentious topics in current evolutionary biology. This includes the study of the timing and relationships of the two major clades of extant mammals – marsupials and placentals. Molecular studies concerned with marsupial and placental origin and diversification can be at odds with the fossil record. Such studies are, however, not a recent phenomenon. Over 150 years ago Charles Darwin weighed two alternative views on the origin of marsupials and placentals. Less than a year after the publication of On the origin of species, Darwin outlined these in a letter to Charles Lyell dated 23 September 1860. The letter concluded with two competing phylogenetic diagrams. One showed marsupials as ancestral to both living marsupials and placentals, whereas the other showed a non-marsupial, non-placental as being ancestral to both living marsupials and placentals. These two diagrams are published here for the first time. These are the only such competing phylogenetic diagrams that Darwin is known to have produced. In addition to examining the question of mammalian origins in this letter and in other manuscript notes discussed here, Darwin confronted the broader issue as to whether major groups of animals had a single origin (monophyly) or were the result of “continuous creation” as advocated for some groups by Richard Owen. Charles Lyell had held similar views to those of Owen, but it is clear from correspondence with Darwin that he was beginning to accept the idea of monophyly of major groups.


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phoebe Cohen ◽  
◽  
Justin V. Strauss ◽  
Alan D. Rooney ◽  
Mukul Sharma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Serre ◽  
◽  
Thao Nguyen ◽  
Sven Eberhardt ◽  
Peter Wilf ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document