scholarly journals Primary enucleation for group D retinoblastoma in the era of systemic and targeted chemotherapy: the price of retaining an eye

2017 ◽  
Vol 102 (2) ◽  
pp. 265-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ido D Fabian ◽  
Andrew W Stacey ◽  
Kenneth C Johnson ◽  
Tanzina Chowdhury ◽  
Catriona Duncan ◽  
...  

BackgroundChemotherapy is increasingly used as primary treatment for group D retinoblastoma, whereas primary enucleation is considered to have a diminishing role. This study aimed to compare the management course, including number of examinations under anaesthesia (EUAs), of group D patients treated by enucleation versus chemotherapy.MethodsA retrospective analysis of 92 group D patients, of which 40 (37 unilateral) underwent primary enucleation and 52 (17 unilateral) were treated with intravenous chemotherapy. Number of EUAs was compared between the treatment groups with respect to the whole cohort, using univariate and multivariate analysis, and to unilateral cases only.ResultsPatients were followed up for a median of 61 months (mean: 66, range: 14–156), in which time primary enucleated patients had on average seven EUAs and chemotherapy-treated patients 21 EUAs (p<0.001). Chemotherapy, young age, bilateral disease, multifocal tumours, familial and germline retinoblastoma were found on univariate analysis to correlate with increased number of EUAs (p≤0.019). On multivariate analysis, however, only treatment type and presentation age were found significant (p≤0.001). On subanalysis of the unilateral cases, patients undergoing primary enucleation had in average seven EUAs, as compared with 16 in the chemotherapy group (p<0.001). Of the 55 unilateral-presenting patients, a new tumour developed in the fellow eye only in a single familial case.ConclusionGroup D patients’ families should be counselled regarding the significant difference in number of EUAs following primary enucleation versus chemotherapy when deciding on a treatment strategy. In this regard, primary enucleation would be most beneficial for older patients with unilateral disease.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6019-6019
Author(s):  
Benjamin H. Kann ◽  
Michael Buckstein ◽  
Todd J. Carpenter ◽  
Ava Golchin ◽  
Richard Lorne Bakst ◽  
...  

6019 Background: Pathologic ECE (pECE) of tumor through lymph node (LN) is a poor prognosticator for OPC and typically diagnosed upon surgical LN removal. At our institution, experienced radiologists routinely identify ECE on pretreatment CT. The prognostic value of radiographic ECE (rECE) is less clear and may prove clinically useful. In this study, we evaluate rECE as an independent prognosticator in OPC. Methods: Retrospective review of 185 patients with locally advanced OPC treated in our department from 2006-2012. 109 patients had accessible pretreatment CT reports clearly stating the presence or absence of rECE. Patients were treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) (30%), induction chemo then CCRT (47%), or surgery with adjuvant CCRT (14%) or RT (9%). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis compared these cohorts for locoregional control (LRC), distant control (DC), and progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS); log-rank tests were performed for significance. Multivariate analysis was conducted via cox-regression. Results: Median follow-up of the 109 patients was 31 months (range: 1-80 months). 61 patients had rECE(+) and 48 had rECE(-) scans. There was no significant difference between the cohorts in terms of median age, stage, treatment type, smoking history, or tumor HPV status. There was a difference in nodal stage with 83% of rECE(+) patients having N2-3 disease versus 67% of rECE(-) patients (p=0.02). On univariate analysis, there were differences between the rECE(-) versus rECE(+) cohorts in OS (4yr: 92% vs 72%, p=0.01), PFS (4yr: 92% vs 62%, p=0.002), and DC (4yr: 98% vs 76%, p=0.006), with no difference in LRC (4yr: 95% vs 91%, p=0.35). On multivariate analysis factoring in age, smoking history, stage, and treatment type, rECE presence was a negative predictor of OS (hazard ratio, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.95) and PFS (hazard ratio, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.81), with DC approaching significance (hazard ratio, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.02 to 1.05). Conclusions: While pECE is an established risk factor for locally advanced OPC, this study suggests that rECE may be an independent poor prognosticator of PFS, OS and DC with potential importance in guiding clinical management.


2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zeno Sparchez ◽  
Tudor Mocan ◽  
Nadim All Hajjar ◽  
Adrian Bartos ◽  
Claudia Hagiu ◽  
...  

Aim: Percutaneous radiofrequency (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA) are currently the best treatment options forpatients with liver metastases (LM) who cannot undergo a liver resection procedure. Presently, few studies have evaluated theefficacy of tumor ablation in beginner’s hands but none at all in hepatic metastasis. Our aim was to report the initial experiencewith ultrasound as a tool to guide tumor ablation in a low volume center with no experience in tumor ablation.Material and methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study, on a series of 61 patients who had undergone percutaneous US-guided ablations for 82 LM between 2010 and 2015. Long term outcome predictors were assessed using univariate and multivariate analysis.Results: Complete ablation was achieved in 86.9% of cases (53/61). All MWA sessions (20/20) attained ablation margins >5mm, compared to 79% (49/62) for RFA sessions (p=0.031). Ablation time was significantly shorter for MWA, with a median duration of 10 minutes (range: 6-12) vs. 14 minutes (range: 10-19.5, p=0.003). There was no statistically significant difference in local tumor progression (LTP)-free survival rates between MWA and RFA (p=0.154). On univariate analysis, significant predictors for local recurrence were multiple metastases (p=0.013) and ablation margins <5 mm (p<.001), both retaining significance on multivariate analysis. Significant predictors for distant recurrence on both univariate and multivariate analysis were multiple metastases (p<0.001) and non-colorectal cancer metastases (p<0.05).Conclusion: A larger than 5 mm ablation size is critical for local tumor control. We favor the use of MWA due to its ability to achieve ablation in significantlyshorter times with less incomplete ablations.


2017 ◽  
Vol 102 (4) ◽  
pp. 490-495 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raksha Rao ◽  
Santosh G Honavar ◽  
Vishal Sharma ◽  
Vijay Anand P Reddy

Background/aimTo evaluate the efficacy of intravitreal topotecan for refractory or recurrent vitreous seeds in retinoblastoma.MethodsIntravitreal injection of topotecan hydrochloride (30 µg/0.15 mL) was provided every 3 weeks by the safety enhanced technique.ResultsThe study included 17 consecutive patients with retinoblastoma with refractory or recurrent vitreous seeds. Five eyes (29%) belonged to International Classification of Retinoblastoma group C and 12 eyes (71%) belonged to group D. Primary treatment included triple drug intravenous chemotherapy for a mean of 10 cycles (median, 9 cycles; range, 6–18 cycles). Fifteen patients (88%) had undergone 56 periocular carboplatin injections with a mean of 4 injections (median, 3 injections; range, 1–8 injections), concurrent with intravenous chemotherapy. A total of 53 intravitreal topotecan injections were performed in 17 eyes of 17 consecutive patients with refractory or recurrent vitreous seeds with a mean of 3 injections (median, 3 injections; range, 2–6 injections). Complete regression of vitreous seeds was achieved in 17 of 17 eyes (100%). At a mean follow-up of 23.8 months (median, 24 months; range, 15.1–34.1 months), one eye (6%) with a recurrent retinal tumour needed enucleation, and the rest of the 16 eyes (94%) maintained complete regression. Final visual acuity could be reliably assessed in all 16 eyes (100%), of whom 12 eyes (75%) had visual acuity ≥20/200. None of the patients developed ocular or systemic complications.ConclusionThree-weekly intravitreal topotecan appears effective and safe in controlling focal or diffuse refractory or recurrent vitreous seeds in retinoblastoma.


2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 874-879 ◽  
Author(s):  
Burkhard H.A. von Rahden ◽  
Hubert J. Stein ◽  
Marcus Feith ◽  
Karen Becker ◽  
J. Rüdiger Siewert

Purpose To evaluate the value of lymphatic vessel invasion (LVI) as a predictor of survival in patients with primary resected adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction (AEG). Patients and Methods We prospectively evaluated 459 patients undergoing primary surgical resection for tumors of the esophagogastric junction at our institution between 1992 and 2000 (180 adenocarcinomas of the distal esophagus, AEG I; 140 carcinomas of the cardia, AEG II; and 139 subcardial gastric cancers, AEG III). Median follow-up was 36.8 months. The prevalence of LVI was evaluated by two independent pathologists. Univariate and multivariate analysis of prognostic factors was performed. Results The total rate of LVI was 49.9%, with a significant difference between AEG I (38.9%) and AEGII/III (57.0%, P = .0002). Univariate analysis showed a significant correlation between LVI and T category (P < .0001), N category (P < .0001), and resection status (R [residual tumor] category; P < .0001). This was shown for the group of all AEG tumors, as well as for the subgroups AEG I and AEG II/III. On multivariate analysis, LVI was identified as a significant and independent prognostic factor (P = .050) in the population of all patients and in patients with AEG II/III, but not in the subgroup with AEG I. Conclusion These data demonstrate the prognostic significance of LVI in patients with AEG tumors, with marked differences between the subgroups AEG I versus AEG II/III. The lower prevalence and lack of prognostic significance of LVI in AEG I might be explained by inflammation involved in the pathogenesis of this entity.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1412-1412
Author(s):  
Pierre Peterlin ◽  
Joelle Gaschet ◽  
Thierry Guillaume ◽  
Alice Garnier ◽  
Marion Eveillard ◽  
...  

Introduction: Recently, a significant impact of the kinetics of Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 ligand concentration (FLc) during induction (day[D]1 to D22) has been reported on survivals in first-line acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients (pts) (Peterlin et al, 2019). Three different FLc profiles were disclosed i) sustained increase of FLc (FLI group, good-risk), ii) increase from D1 to D15, then decrease at D22 (FLD group, intermediate-risk) and iii) stagnation of low levels (&lt;1000 pg/mL, FLL group, high-risk). An update of this prospective monocentric study (www.ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02693899) is presented here evaluating also retrospectively the impact on outcomes of 6 other cytokine level profiles during induction. Methods: Between 05/2016 and 01/2018, 62 AML pts at diagnosis (median age 59 yo [29-71], &lt;60 yo n=33) eligible for first intensive induction were included and provided informed consent. They received standard of care first-line chemotherapy. Serum samples collected on D1, 8, 15 & 22 of induction were frozen-stored until performing ELISA for FL, TNFa, SCF, IL-1b, IL-6, IL-10, GM-CSF. Normal values were assessed in 5 healthy controls. Pts outcomes considered were relapse/leukemia-free (LFS) and overall (OS) survivals. Results: FLI, FLD and FLL profiles were observed for 26, 22 and 14 pts respectively. A total of 372 samples were assayed for the 6 other cytokines. Median concentrations at D1, D8, D15, D22 for these 6 cytokines were as follows, considering the whole cohort (and healthy donors): TNFa: 0.53, 0, 0, 0 (0); SCF: 5.91, 0, 0, 0 (3); IL-1b : 0, 0, 0, 0 (0); IL-6: 4.85, 16.28, 10.11, 7.1 (0), IL-10: 0, 0, 0, 0 (0) and GM-CSF:1.63, 1.8, 0.67, 1.34 (9.98). Median IL-6 and GM-CSF levels, compared to healthy controls, were respectively higher and lower during induction. No significant difference was observed in terms of median cytokine concentrations at any time when comparing the three FL sub-groups or FLI vs FLD pts. With a median follow-up of 28 months (range: 17-37), FLI and FLD pts show now similar 2-y LFS (62.9% vs 59%, p=0.63) and OS (69.2% vs 63.6%, p=0.70). FLL pts have a significantly higher rate of relapse (85,7% vs FLI 19,2% vs FLD 32%, p=0,0001). Comparing FLL vs FLI+FLD pts disclosed significantly different LFS (7.1% vs 61.1%, p&lt;0.001) but not OS (36.7% vs 66.6%, p=0.11). In univariate analysis, 2y LFS and OS were not affected by the concentration (&lt; or &gt; median) of the 7 cytokines studied except for LFS and GM-CSFc at D8 (p=0,04) and D15 (p=0,08), for LFS and FLc at D1 (p=0.06), D8 (p=0,03), D15 (p=0,04) and D22 (p=0,03) and for OS and GM-CSF at D15 (p=0.08). A significant association between LFS was observed with ELN 2017 risk stratification (2-y LFS: favorable: 68,1% vs intermediate: 48,1% vs unfavorable: 30,7%, p=0.03) but not OS (2 y: 77% vs 55,5% vs 46,1%, p=0.09). Multivariate analysis showed that no factor was independently associated with OS while LFS remained significantly associated with the FLc profile (FLL vs others, HR: 5.79. 95%CI: 2.48-13.53, p&lt;0.0001) and GM-CSF at D15 (HR: 0.45; 95%CI: 0.20-0.98, p=0.04) but not with ELN 2017 risk stratification (p=0.06). Cytokine levels were then assessed to try to better discriminate FLI and FLD pts. A significant higher IL-6 level at D22 was found in relapsed or deceased FLI/FLD pts (median:15,34 vs 5,42 pg/mL, p=0,04). FLI/FLD pts with low IL-6 at D22 (&lt; median, 15.5 pg/mL, n=35 vs n=14 with high level) had significant better 2y LFS and OS (74,2% vs 38,4%, p=0,005 and 77,1% vs 38,4%, p=0,009, respectively). A new prognostic risk-stratification could thus be proposed, i.e. FLI/FLD with IL-6 &lt;15.5 pg/mL (favorable), FLI/FLD with IL-6 &gt;15.5 pg/mL (intermediate) and FLL (unfavorable). This new classification was considered for a second multivariate analysis, showing that it is the strongest factor associated with OS (p=0.006, ELN p=0.03, FL profile p=0.04) and LFS (p&lt;0.0001, ELN p=0.005, GM-CSFc D15 p=0.03) (figure 1). Conclusion: This study confirms stagnation of low FLc during AML induction as a strong poor prognosis factor. Moreover, IL-6 levels at D22 further discriminate FLI/FLD pts. Thus, a new cytokine-based risk-stratification integrating FL kinetics and IL-6 levels during induction may help to better predict outcomes in first-line AML patients. These results need to be validated on a larger cohort of AML patients while anti-IL-6 therapy should be tested in combination with standard 3+7 chemotherapy. Figure 1 Disclosures Peterlin: AbbVie Inc: Consultancy; Jazz Pharma: Consultancy; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy. Moreau:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Chevallier:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria.


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 3110-3110
Author(s):  
Tarunpreet Bains ◽  
Andy I Chen ◽  
Andrew Lemieux ◽  
Brandon Hayes-Lattin ◽  
Jose F. Leis ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3110 High-dose therapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is standard therapy for patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL), although the optimal conditioning regimen remains uncertain. The three drug alkylating agent regimen, BuMelTt, has been established as our institutional regimen. We performed a retrospective review of outcomes obtained with BuMelTt compared to those achieved with other standard conditioning regimens. 133 patients with relapsed/refractory HL who underwent ASCT between January 1990 and December 2009 were analyzed. 62 patients received BuMelTt and 71 patients received other standard preparative regimens (Standard) consisting of CBV (44), CyVp16TBI (20), BEAM (4), CyTBI (2), and Mel (1). The median follow-up (range) was 4.3 years (0.01–14.24) in BuMelTt and 3.9 years (0.07–20.21) in Standard. The two groups (BuMelTt vs Standard) were balanced for gender (65% male vs 65% male), median age (29 vs 33), median number of prior regimens (2 vs 2), and pre-transplant disease status. Disease status was categorized as PR2/CR2 (48% vs 42%), primary induction failure sensitive (16% vs 17%), and Other which included PIF-refractory, 1st relapse refractory, and greater than 1st relapse (35% vs 41%). The 5 year overall survival (OS) was superior for patient who received BuMelTt conditioning (74% vs 54%, p = 0.03). There was also a trend for improved 5 year event free survival (EFS) for BuMelTt at 56% vs 39% for Standard (p=0.07). Other risk factors for outcome after ASCT were also analyzed and included disease status, more than 2 chemotherapy regimens before ASCT, Karnofsky score < 90% at ASCT, time from diagnosis to ASCT < 12 months, prior extranodal involvement, and age > 40 years. By univariate analysis, >2 chemotherapy regimens before ASCT (HR 1.7, p=0.05) and disease status of Other (HR 2.8, p<0.01) were predictive for lower OS. There was a trend for influence on OS for BuMelTt (HR 0.6, p=0.07) and PIF-sensitive (HR 1.9, p=0.09). By multivariate analysis, disease status of PIF-sensitive or Other predicted worse outcomes for OS (HR 2.4 & 2.9, p 0.03 & <0.01, respectively), and there was still a trend for benefit with BuMelTt (HR 0.6, p=0.09), although >2 chemotherapy regimens lost significance (p=0.22). For EFS, disease status of PIF-sensitive or Other were prognostic in univariate analysis (HR 2.1 or 2.3, p=0.02 or <0.01, respectively), and there was a trend for improved EFS with BuMelTt (HR 0.66, p=0.08). In multivariate analysis, disease status of PIF-sensitive or Other remained prognostic (p=0.03 & 0.004, respectively), while BuMelTt was not significant (p=0.27). There was no significant difference in 100 day non-relapse related mortality for BuMelTt vs Standard conditioning (5% vs 3%, p=0.88). More patients developed NCI CTCAE grade 3/4 mucositis with BuMelTt than Standard (89% vs 61%, p<0.01), but fewer patients had bacteremia with BuMelTt than Standard (7% vs 23%, p=0.02). There was no difference in duration of hospitalization, episodes of febrile neutropenia, incidence of veno-occlusive disease, time to neutrophil engraftment, or time to platelet engraftment. Our results suggest that BuMelTt may improve OS and EFS compared to standard conditioning regimens with increased but manageable toxicity. A case matched control study is planned. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3946-3946 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antony Ceraulo ◽  
Aminetou Mint-Mohamed ◽  
Delphine Maucort-Boulch ◽  
Etienne Paubelle ◽  
Xavier Thomas ◽  
...  

Abstract Background. The ATP binding cassette transporter 3 (ABCA3) has been recently found to induce a significant reduction in cytotoxicity following exposure to anthracyclines, mitoxantrone, etoposide, Ara-C, vincristine, and rituximab. ABCA3 acts through the modulation of multivesicular bodies (MVB) and contributes to drug sequestration in late endosomal organelles, i.e. MVB and lysosomes. Studies having investigated the prognostic impact of ABCA3 expression in AML have yielded conflicting results as ABCA3 expression has both been reported to exert unfavorable or neutral effects on patient outcomes. In addition, the small sample size of these studies precluded the use of multivariate analyses. Methods. Our goal was to investigate the prognostic impact of ABCA3 expression in adult patients with AML treated with IC with or without gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO). To this end we investigated the relationship between ABCA3 expression and EFS in a representative series of 221 AML homogeneously treated in the ALFA-0701 trial. qRTPCR amplification of conserved ABCA3 mRNA sequences, as identified with FasterDB database, was performed with GUS and ABL as reference genes. Primer sets were complementary to conserved ABCA3 exons 6-7 and exon 19-20 junctions. Patients were given a 3+7 induction course without (control group, n=110) or with fractionated intravenous GO (n=111) (Castaigne S, Lancet 2012; 379:1508-1516). Results. Among the 278 randomized patients, 221 had available bone-marrow diagnostic samples with high-quality RNA. The same benefits associated with GO were observed in the 221 patients from the present study as in the entire trial population. Overall, median age, CR rate, relapse rate, median follow-up, 3-years EFS were 62.1 years, 76.5%, 66%, 47.45 months, 28±3%, respectively. There was no significant difference in the level of ABCA3 expression between responders and non-responders. In the 169 responders, ABCA3 expression at diagnosis was more than 3-fold higher in the 111 remitters who subsequently relapsed than in the 58 patients who remained in persistent CR (p=0.033). The level of ABCA3 expression was significantly lower in ELN favorable group than in intermediate and adverse risk AML (p= 0.004) and negatively correlated with CD33 expression (R=-0.272, p<10-4). Through univariate analysis, higher ABCA3 expression was associated with shorter EFS (3-years: 22±3 vs 45±7 % p=0.002). Multivariate analysis identified age, treatment arm, and ELN risk group as independent prognostic factors for EFS. In the control group, there was no significant association between ABCA3 expression and CR rate, relapse rate, and EFS. In the 111 patients within the GO arm, there was no significant difference in the level of ABCA3 expression between responders and non-responder whereas in the 89 responders, ABCA3 expression at diagnosis was more than 7-fold higher in the 53 remitters who subsequently relapsed than in the 36 patients who remained in persistent CR (p=0.006). Through univariate analysis, higher ABCA3 expression was associated with shorter EFS (3-years: 22±5 vs 64±9 % p=0.0002). Multivariate analysis identified ABCA3 expression, cytogenetics, CD33 expression, and ECOG as independent prognostic factors for EFS (Figure 1). Conclusion. WhileABCB1 has been previously found to attenuate GO-induced cytotoxicity in AML cells (Walter RB, Blood 2003; 102:1466-1473), present results indicate that higher ABCA3 expression independently predicts poor outcome in AML patients treated with fractionated GO and intensive chemotherapy (IC). GO is an anti-CD33 antibody carrying a toxic calicheamicin derivative that, after hydrolytic release within lysosomal vesicles, induces DNA strand breaks, apoptosis, and cell death. Whether the clinical effect of ABCA3 expression relies on the modulation of CD33 internalization, calicheamicin release or combination thereof is under investigation. Finally our results encourage inhibiting ABCA3, such as with indomethacin, in order to overcome drug resistance in AML treated with GO-IC. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Thomas: Pfizer: Consultancy.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20076-e20076
Author(s):  
Shruti Bhandari ◽  
Danh Pham ◽  
Rohit Kumar ◽  
Jeremy T Gaskins ◽  
Goetz H. Kloecker

e20076 Background: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive disease currently treated as soon as possible given its rapid doubling time. Evidence for appropriate timing of chemotherapy from diagnosis (TCD) for SCLC is lacking. This study evaluates TCD in SCLC on a national level. Methods: National Cancer Database identified SCLC patients treated with chemotherapy from 2010 - 2014. Factors associated with TCD were identified with multiple linear regression analyses. TCD was categorized into four groups using cutoff points of 7, 14, and 28 days. Using these categories, median overall survival (MOS) and log-rank test was used for univariate analysis of the survival outcome and the Cox model for multivariate analysis. Results: Among the 64491 SCLC, 42% received chemotherapy alone, 38% chemotherapy followed by radiation and 20% radiation followed by chemotherapy. Median TCD is 14 days with 21% treated within 7d, 21% 8-14d, 30% 15-28d and 28% > 28d from diagnosis. Age, race, insurance, comorbidities and stage were associated with TCD (Table). Significant difference in survival was found by TCD categories (P < .001). MOS for TCD within 7d was 8.2m, 8-14d was 9.2m, 15-28d was 10.3m, and > 28d was 10.8m. In the multivariate analysis, increased TCD was associated with better survival across all stages. Among stage IV patients, compared to those treated within 1 week, the HR is 0.92 (P < .001) for 1-2 weeks, HR 0.82 (P < .001) for 2-4 weeks, and HR 0.77 (P < .001) for > 4 weeks. Results are similar for Stage III and for Stage I/II. Conclusions: These results show a trend towards poor survival with early treatment. While we do not suggest delaying treatment for SCLC patients, our results provide new evidence to inform a discussion about appropriate treatment timing and individualizing treatment. Optimization of patients' clinical baseline before hasty cytotoxic treatment may lead to better outcomes. [Table: see text]


2014 ◽  
Vol 120 (2) ◽  
pp. 300-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam M. Sonabend ◽  
Brad E. Zacharia ◽  
Hannah Goldstein ◽  
Samuel S. Bruce ◽  
Dawn Hershman ◽  
...  

Object Central nervous system (CNS) hemangiopericytomas are relatively uncommon and unique among CNS tumors as they can originate from or develop metastases outside of the CNS. Significant difference of opinion exists in the management of these lesions, as current treatment paradigms are based on limited clinical experience and single-institution series. Given these limitations and the absence of prospective clinical trials within the literature, nationwide registries have the potential to provide unique insight into the efficacy of various therapies. Methods The authors queried the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database to investigate the clinical behavior and prognostic factors for hemangiopericytomas originating within the CNS during the years 2000–2009. The SEER survival data were adjusted for demographic factors including age, sex, and race. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify characteristics associated with overall survival. Results The authors identified 227 patients with a diagnosis of CNS hemangiopericytoma. The median length of follow-up was 34 months (interquartile range 11–63 months). Median survival was not reached, but the 5-year survival rate was 83%. Univariate analysis showed that age and radiation therapy were significantly associated with survival. Moreover, young age and supratentorial location were significantly associated with survival on multivariate analysis. Most importantly, multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model showed a statistically significant survival benefit for patients treated with gross-total resection (GTR) in combination with adjuvant radiation treatment (HR 0.31 [95% CI 0.01–0.95], p = 0.04), an effect not appreciated with GTR alone. Conclusions The authors describe the epidemiology of CNS hemangiopericytomas in a large, national cancer database, evaluating the effectiveness of various treatment paradigms used in clinical practice. In this study, an overall survival benefit was found when GTR was accomplished and combined with radiation therapy. This finding has not been appreciated in previous series of patients with CNS hemangiopericytoma and warrants future investigations into the role of upfront adjuvant radiation therapy.


2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Lanciotti ◽  
L. Masieri ◽  
M. R. Raspollini ◽  
A. Minervini ◽  
A. Mari ◽  
...  

Introduction. The aim of our work was to investigate the causal connection between M1 and M2 macrophage phenotypes occurrence and prostate cancer, their correlation with tumor extension (ECE), and biochemical recurrence (BR).Patient and Methods. Clinical and pathological data were prospectively gathered from 93 patients treated with radical prostatectomy. Correlations of commonly used variables were evaluated with uni- and multivariate analysis. The relationship between M1 and M2 occurrence and BR was also assessed with Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.Results. Above all in 63.4% there was a M2 prevalence. M1 occurred more frequently in OC disease, while M2 was more represented in ECE. At univariate analysis biopsy and pathologic GS and M2 were statistically correlated with ECE. Only pathologic GS and M2 confirmed to be correlated with ECE. According to macrophage density BCR free survival curves presented a statistically significant difference. When we stratified our population for M1 and M2,we did not find any statistical difference among curves. At univariate analysis GS, pTNM, and positive margins resulted to be significant predictors of BCR, while M1 and M2 did not achieve the statistical significance. At multivariate analysis, only GS and pathologic stage were independent predictors of BR.Conclusion. In our study patients with higher density of M count were associated with poor prognosis; M2 phenotype was significantly associated with ECE.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document