scholarly journals Artificial intelligence for diagnosis of inherited retinal disease: an exciting opportunity and one step forward

2021 ◽  
pp. bjophthalmol-2021-319365
Author(s):  
Tien-En Tan ◽  
Hwei Wuen Chan ◽  
Mandeep Singh ◽  
Tien Yin Wong ◽  
Jose S Pulido ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan Szymanski ◽  
Yan Zeng ◽  
Haoyan Huo ◽  
Chris Bartel ◽  
Haegyum Kim ◽  
...  

Autonomous experimentation driven by artificial intelligence (AI) provides an exciting opportunity to revolutionize inorganic materials discovery and development. Herein, we review recent progress in the design of self-driving laboratories, including...


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (15) ◽  
pp. 7842
Author(s):  
Susanne Kohl ◽  
Britta Baumann ◽  
Francesca Dassie ◽  
Anja K. Mayer ◽  
Maria Solaki ◽  
...  

Achromatopsia (ACHM) is a rare autosomal recessively inherited retinal disease characterized by congenital photophobia, nystagmus, low visual acuity, and absence of color vision. ACHM is genetically heterogeneous and can be caused by biallelic mutations in the genes CNGA3, CNGB3, GNAT2, PDE6C, PDE6H, or ATF6. We undertook molecular genetic analysis in a single female patient with a clinical diagnosis of ACHM and identified the homozygous variant c.778G>C;p.(D260H) in the CNGA3 gene. While segregation analysis in the father, as expected, identified the CNGA3 variant in a heterozygous state, it could not be displayed in the mother. Microsatellite marker analysis provided evidence that the homozygosity of the CNGA3 variant is due to partial or complete paternal uniparental isodisomy (UPD) of chromosome 2 in the patient. Apart from the ACHM phenotype, the patient was clinically unsuspicious and healthy. This is one of few examples proving UPD as the underlying mechanism for the clinical manifestation of a recessive mutation in a patient with inherited retinal disease. It also highlights the importance of segregation analysis in both parents of a given patient or especially in cases of homozygous recessive mutations, as UPD has significant implications for genetic counseling with a very low recurrence risk assessment in such families.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marlies Saelaert ◽  
Heidi Mertes ◽  
Tania Moerenhout ◽  
Caroline Van Cauwenbergh ◽  
Bart P. Leroy ◽  
...  

AbstractExome-based testing for genetic diseases can reveal unsolicited findings (UFs), i.e. predispositions for diseases that exceed the diagnostic question. Knowledge of patients’ interpretation of possible UFs and of motives for (not) wanting to know UFs is still limited. This lacking knowledge may impede effective counselling that meets patients’ needs. Therefore, this article examines the meaning of UFs from a patient perspective. A qualitative study was conducted and an interpretative phenomenological analysis was made of 14 interviews with patients with an inherited retinal disease. Patients assign a complex meaning to UFs, including three main components. The first component focuses on result-specific qualities, i.e. the characteristics of an UF (inclusive of actionability, penetrance, severity and age of onset) and the consequences of disclosure; the second component applies to a patient’s lived illness experiences and to the way these contrast with reflections on presymptomatic UFs; the third component addresses a patient’s family embedding and its effect on concerns about disease prognosis and genetic information’s family relevance. The complex meaning structure of UFs suggests the need for counselling procedures that transcend a strictly clinical approach. Counselling should be personalised and consider patients’ lived illness experiences and family context.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 383-397
Author(s):  
Simone A. Huygens ◽  
Matthijs M. Versteegh ◽  
Stefan Vegter ◽  
L. Jan Schouten ◽  
Tim A. Kanters

2021 ◽  
Vol 61 (4) ◽  
pp. 63-78
Author(s):  
Daniel C. Chung ◽  
David G. Birch ◽  
Robert E. MacLaren

2021 ◽  
Vol 61 (4) ◽  
pp. 133-142
Author(s):  
Séverine Marconi ◽  
John T. Stout

2021 ◽  
Vol 61 (4) ◽  
pp. 3-45
Author(s):  
Aumer Shughoury ◽  
Thomas A. Ciulla ◽  
Benjamin Bakall ◽  
Mark E. Pennesi ◽  
Szilárd Kiss ◽  
...  

Genes ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 557 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siebren Faber ◽  
Ronald Roepman

The light sensing outer segments of photoreceptors (PRs) are renewed every ten days due to their high photoactivity, especially of the cones during daytime vision. This demands a tremendous amount of energy, as well as a high turnover of their main biosynthetic compounds, membranes, and proteins. Therefore, a refined proteostasis network (PN), regulating the protein balance, is crucial for PR viability. In many inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) this balance is disrupted leading to protein accumulation in the inner segment and eventually the death of PRs. Various studies have been focusing on therapeutically targeting the different branches of the PR PN to restore the protein balance and ultimately to treat inherited blindness. This review first describes the different branches of the PN in detail. Subsequently, insights are provided on how therapeutic compounds directed against the different PN branches might slow down or even arrest the appalling, progressive blinding conditions. These insights are supported by findings of PN modulators in other research disciplines.


2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 576-586 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omamah A. Jiman ◽  
◽  
Rachel L. Taylor ◽  
Eva Lenassi ◽  
Jill Clayton Smith ◽  
...  

AbstractThirty percent of all inherited retinal disease (IRD) is accounted for by conditions with extra-ocular features. This study aimed to establish the genetic diagnostic pick-up rate for IRD patients with one or more extra-ocular features undergoing panel-based screening in a clinical setting. One hundred and six participants, tested on a gene panel which contained both isolated and syndromic IRD genes, were retrospectively ascertained from the Manchester Genomic Diagnostics Laboratory database spanning 6 years (2012–2017). Phenotypic features were extracted from the clinical notes and classified according to Human Phenotype Ontology; all identified genetic variants were interpreted in accordance to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines. Overall, 49% (n = 52) of patients received a probable genetic diagnosis. A further 6% (n = 6) had a single disease-associated variant in an autosomal recessive disease-relevant gene. Fifty-two percent (n = 55) of patients had a clinical diagnosis at the time of testing. Of these, 71% (n = 39) received a probable genetic diagnosis. By contrast, for those without a provisional clinical diagnosis (n = 51), only 25% (n = 13) received a probable genetic diagnosis. The clinical diagnosis of Usher (n = 33) and Bardet–Biedl syndrome (n = 10) was confirmed in 67% (n = 22) and 80% (n = 8), respectively. The testing diagnostic rate in patients with clinically diagnosed multisystemic IRD conditions was significantly higher than those without one (71% versus 25%; p value < 0.001). The lower pick-up rate in patients without a clinical diagnosis suggests that panel-based approaches are unlikely to be the most effective means of achieving a molecular diagnosis for this group. Here, we suggest that genome-wide approaches (whole exome or genome) are more appropriate.


2013 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 215-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Potrata ◽  
Martin McKibbin ◽  
Jennifer NW Lim ◽  
Jenny Hewison

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document