scholarly journals 4CPS-048 Quality of the empiric antibiotic treatment in community-acquired pneumonia

Author(s):  
S Conde ◽  
MD Belles ◽  
C Raga ◽  
M Tripiana ◽  
T Cebolla ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S751-S751
Author(s):  
Saeed Shoar ◽  
Daniel Musher

Abstract Background Background: Recent guidelines recommend immediate empiric antibiotic treatment for patients (pts) with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Concerns about treatment recommendations and antibiotic stewardship motivated a systematic literature review of the etiology of CAP. Methods We reviewed English-language literature using PRISMA guidelines. Data were stratified into diagnostic categories according to the microbiologic studies that were done (Table1). Fig.1. Flowchart of systematic literature review and study selection Table 1. Characteristics of studies reporting the etiology of community-acquired pneumonia Results 146 articles with 82,674 CAP pts met criteria for inclusion; 63,938 (77.3%) were inpatients, 16,532 (20.0%) were in- or outpatients, and 2,204 (2.7%) were outpatients. Pneumococcus was the most common cause of CAP without regard to which microbiological techniques were used (33-50% of all cases). The proportion due to this organism declined with time, much more strikingly in the US than in Europe. Haemophilus influenzae was the second most common cause (7-16% of cases), followed by Staphylococcus aureus and Enterobacteriaceae each in 4–10%. Pseudomonas (0.8-4.5%) and Moraxella (1.2-3.5%) were less common; all other bacteria were isolated far less frequently. Mycoplasma caused 4-11% of CAP, Legionella 3-8%, Chlamydophila 2-7%, and Coxiella < 2%; some studies showed a much higher frequency of Mycoplasma. With routine use of viral PCR, a virus was identified in 30-40% of pts; bacterial/viral coinfection was found in 25-35% of these cases. In a separate study of CAP pts in whom viral PCR was positive, 40% had bacterial coinfection. Influenza viruses were identified in 6.2-13.7% of cases and rhinoviruses in 4.1-11.5%. RSV and human metapneumovirus were less common (0.4-4.7%), followed more distantly by other viruses. Even with the use of the most sophisticated diagnostic techniques, no etiologic agent for CAP was identified in > 50% of cases. Trends of identification of S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae as the etiology of CAP (above); and the proportion of S. pneumoniae as the causes of CAP in different geographic regions (below). Conclusion Our results justify current guidelines for initial empiric antibiotic treatment of all pts with CAP. With pneumococcus and Haemophilus continuing to predominate, efforts at antibiotic stewardship might be enhanced by greater attention to routine use of sputum Gram stain and culture. Because viral/bacterial coinfection is relatively common, the identification of a virus by PCR does not, by itself, permit the non-use of an antibiotic. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures


2014 ◽  
Vol 42 (8) ◽  
pp. 1749-1755 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricard Ferrer ◽  
Ignacio Martin-Loeches ◽  
Gary Phillips ◽  
Tiffany M. Osborn ◽  
Sean Townsend ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Antonio Rodríguez-Cervera ◽  
Paulo Francisco Castañeda-Mendez ◽  
Luis Soto-Ramírez ◽  
Lorena Cabrera-Ruiz

Pneumonia ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Saeed Shoar ◽  
Daniel M. Musher

Abstract Background The etiology of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) has evolved since the beginning of the antibiotic era. Recent guidelines encourage immediate empiric antibiotic treatment once a diagnosis of CAP is made. Concerns about treatment recommendations, on the one hand, and antibiotic stewardship, on the other, motivated this review of the medical literature on the etiology of CAP. Methods We conducted a systematic review of English-language literature on the etiology of CAP using methods defined by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched PubMed using a combination of the keywords ‘pneumonia’, ‘CAP’, ‘etiology’, ‘microbiology’, ‘bacteriology’, and ‘pathogen’. We examined articles on antibiotics that were develop to treat pneumonia. We reviewed all ‘related articles’ as well as studies referenced by those that came up in the search. After we excluded articles that did not give sufficient microbiological data or failed to meet other predetermined criteria, 146 studies remained. Data were stratified into diagnostic categories according to the microbiologic studies that were done; results are presented as the percentage in each category of all cases in which an etiology was established. Results Streptococcus pneumoniae remains the most common cause of CAP although declining in incidence; this decline has been greater in the US than elsewhere. Haemophilus influenzae is the second most common cause of CAP, followed by Staphylococcus aureus and Gram negative bacilli. The incidence of all bacteria as causes of CAP has declined because, with routine use of PCR for viruses, the denominator, cases with an established etiology, has increased. Viruses were reported on average in about 10% of cases, but recent PCR-based studies identified a respiratory virus in about 30% of cases of CAP, with substantial rates of viral/bacterial coinfection. Conclusion The results of this study justify current guidelines for initial empiric treatment of CAP. With pneumococcus and Haemophilus continuing to predominate, efforts at antibiotic stewardship might be enhanced by greater attention to the routine use of sputum Gram stain and culture. Because viral/bacterial coinfection is relatively common, the identification of a virus by PCR does not, by itself, allow for discontinuation of the antibiotic therapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document