scholarly journals Perspectives on perioperative management of children’s surgical conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic in low-income and middle-income countries: a global survey

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. e000187
Author(s):  
Paul Truche ◽  
Alexis Bowder ◽  
Amber Trujillo Lalla ◽  
Robert Crum ◽  
Fabio Botelho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Low Income ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Surgical Care ◽  
Local Context ◽  
International Consensus ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Global Pandemic ◽  
Surgical Conditions ◽  
Context Specific

BackgroundMany organizations have issued recommendations to limit elective surgery during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. We surveyed providers of children’s surgical care working in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) to understand their perspectives on surgical management in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and how they were subsequently modifying their surgical care practices.MethodsA survey of children’s surgery providers in LMICs was performed. Respondents reported how their perioperative practice had changed in response to COVID-19. They were also presented with 26 specific procedures and asked which of these procedures they were allowed to perform and which they felt they should be allowed to perform. Changes in surgical practice reported by respondents were analyzed thematically.ResultsA total of 132 responses were obtained from 120 unique institutions across 30 LMICs. 117/120 institutions (97.5%) had issued formal guidance on delaying or limiting elective children’s surgical procedures. Facilities in LICs were less likely to have issued guidance on elective surgery compared with middle-income facilities (82% in LICs vs 99% in lower middle-income countries and 100% in upper middle-income countries, p=0.036). Although 122 (97%) providers believed cases should be limited during a global pandemic, there was no procedure where more than 61% of providers agreed cases should be delayed or canceled.ConclusionsThere is little consensus on which procedures should be limited or delayed among LMIC providers. Expansion of testing capacity and local, context-specific guidelines may be a better strategy than international consensus, given the disparities in availability of preoperative testing and the lack of consensus towards which procedures should be delayed.

scholarly journals Lessons from developing, implementing and sustaining a participatory partnership for children’s surgical care in Tanzania

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. e002118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Godfrey Sama Philipo ◽  
Shobhana Nagraj ◽  
Zaitun M Bokhary ◽  
Kokila Lakhoo
Keyword(s):  
Low Income ◽  
Surgical Care ◽  
Health Coverage ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Hospital Capacity ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Global Partnerships ◽  
Poor Access ◽  
Surgical Conditions ◽  
Global Population

Global surgery is an essential component of Universal Health Coverage. Surgical conditions account for almost one-third of the global burden of disease, with the majority of patients living in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). Children account for more than half of the global population; however, in many LMIC settings they have poor access to surgical care due to a lack of workforce and health system infrastructure to match the need for children’s surgery. Surgical providers from high-income countries volunteer to visit LMICs and partner with the local providers to deliver surgical care and trainings to improve outcomes. However, some of these altruistic efforts fail. We aim to share our experience on developing, implementing and sustaining a partnership in global children’s surgery in Tanzania. The use of participatory methods facilitated a successful 17-yearlong partnership, ensured a non-hierarchical environment and encouraged an understanding of the context, local needs, available resources and hospital capacity, including budget constraints, when codesigning solutions. We believe that participatory approaches are feasible and valuable in developing, implementing and sustaining global partnerships for children’s surgery in LMICs.

scholarly journals Artificial Intelligence and its role in surgical care in low-income and middle-income countries

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (8) ◽  
pp. e384-e386 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ché L Reddy ◽  
Shivani Mitra ◽  
John G Meara ◽  
Rifat Atun ◽  
Salim Afshar
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Surgical Care ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries

scholarly journals Job morale of physicians in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic literature review of qualitative studies

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. e028657 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alina Sabitova ◽  
Sana Zehra Sajun ◽  
Sandra Nicholson ◽  
Franziska Mosler ◽  
Stefan Priebe
Keyword(s):  
Low Income ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Analytical Framework ◽  
Working Environment ◽  
Reference List ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Staff Shortage ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Context Specific

ObjectivesTo systematically review the available literature on physicians’ and dentists’ experiences influencing job motivation, job satisfaction, burnout, well-being and symptoms of depression as indicators of job morale in low-income and middle-income countries.DesignThe review was reported following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for studies evaluating outcomes of interest using qualitative methods. The framework method was used to analyse and integrate review findings.Data sourcesA primary search of electronic databases was performed by using a combination of search terms related to the following areas of interest: ‘morale’, ‘physicians and dentists’ and ‘low-income and middle-income countries’. A secondary search of the grey literature was conducted in addition to checking the reference list of included studies and review papers.ResultsTen papers representing 10 different studies and involving 581 participants across seven low-income and middle-income countries met the inclusion criteria for the review. However, none of the studies focused on dentists’ experiences was included. An analytical framework including four main categories was developed: work environment (physical and social), rewards (financial, non-financial and social respect), work content (workload, nature of work, job security/stability and safety), managerial context (staffing levels, protocols and guidelines consistency and political interference). The job morale of physicians working in low-income and middle-income countries was mainly influenced by negative experiences. Increasing salaries, offering opportunities for career and professional development, improving the physical and social working environment, implementing clear professional guidelines and protocols and tackling healthcare staff shortage may influence physicians’ job morale positively.ConclusionsThere were a limited number of studies and a great degree of heterogeneity of evidence. Further research is recommended to assist in scrutinising context-specific issues and ways of addressing them to maximise their utility.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42017082579.

scholarly journals Decentralization and Regionalization of Surgical Care as a Critical Scale-up Strategy in Low- and Middle-Income Countries Comment on "Decentralization and Regionalization of Surgical Care: A Review of Evidence for the Optimal Distribution of Surgical Services in Low- and Middle-Income Countries"

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaymie A. Henry
Keyword(s):  
Scale Up ◽  
Surgical Care ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Optimal Distribution ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Surgical Services ◽  
Obstetric Services ◽  
Surgical Conditions ◽  
Low And Middle Income

As global attention to improve the quality, safety and access to surgical care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) increases, the need for evidence-based strategies to reliably scale-up the quality and quantity of surgical services becomes ever more pertinent. Iversen et al discuss the optimal distribution of surgical services, whether through decentralization or regionalization, and propose a strategy that utilizes the dimensions of acuity, complexity and prevalence of surgical conditions to inform national priorities. Proposed expansion of this strategy to encompass levels of scale-up prioritization is discussed in this commentary. The decentralization of emergency obstetric services in LMICs shows promising results and should be further explored. The dearth of evidence of regionalization in LMICs, on the other hand, limits extrapolation of lessons learned. Nevertheless, principles from the successful regionalization of certain services such as trauma care in high-income countries (HICs) can be adapted to LMIC settings and can provide the backbone for innovation in service delivery and safety.

scholarly journals Theatres without borders: a systematic review of the use of intraoperative telemedicine in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs)

2021 ◽  
pp. bmjinnov-2021-000837
Author(s):  
Hariharan Subbiah Ponniah ◽  
Viraj Shah ◽  
Arian Arjomandi Rad ◽  
Robert Vardanyan ◽  
George Miller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Surgical Care ◽  
Cochrane Collaboration ◽  
Optimal Care ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Low Middle Income Countries

ObjectiveThis systematic review aims to provide a summary of the use of real-time telementoring, telesurgical consultation and telesurgery in surgical procedures in patients in low/middle-income countries (LMICs).DesignA systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement and the Cochrane Collaboration published guidelines.Data sourcesEMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane, PubMed and Google Scholar were searched for original articles and case reports that discussed telementoring, telesurgery or telesurgical consultation in countries defined as low-income or middle-income (as per the World Banks’s 2021–2022 classifications) from inception to August 2021.Eligibility criteria for selecting studiesAll original articles and case reports were included if they reported the use of telemedicine, telesurgery or telesurgical consultation in procedures conducted on patients in LMICs.ResultsThere were 12 studies which discussed the use of telementoring in 55 patients in LMICs and included a variety of surgical specialities. There was one study that discussed the use of telesurgical consultation in 15 patients in LMICs and one study that discussed the use of telesurgery in one patient.ConclusionThe presence of intraoperative telemedicine in LMICs represents a principal move towards improving access to specialist surgical care for patients in resource-poor settings. Not only do several studies demonstrate that it facilitates training and educational opportunities, but it remains a relatively frugal and efficient method of doing so, through empowering local surgeons in LMICs towards offering optimal care while remaining in their respective communities.

scholarly journals Innovative financing to fund surgical systems and expand surgical care in low-income and middle-income countries

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. e002375 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ché L Reddy ◽  
Alexander W Peters ◽  
Desmond Tanko Jumbam ◽  
Luke Caddell ◽  
Blake C Alkire ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Systems ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Scale Up ◽  
Surgical Care ◽  
Healthcare Intervention ◽  
Strengthen Health System ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Fiscal Space

Strong surgical systems are necessary to prevent premature death and avoidable disability from surgical conditions. The epidemiological transition, which has led to a rising burden of non-communicable diseases and injuries worldwide, will increase the demand for surgical assessment and care as a definitive healthcare intervention. Yet, 5 billion people lack access to timely, affordable and safe surgical and anaesthesia care, with the unmet demand affecting predominantly low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). Rapid surgical care scale-up is required in LMICs to strengthen health system capabilities, but adequate financing for this expansion is lacking. This article explores the critical role of innovative financing in scaling up surgical care in LMICs. We locate surgical system financing by using a modified fiscal space analysis. Through an analysis of published studies and case studies on recent trends in the financing of global health systems, we provide a conceptual framework that could assist policy-makers in health systems to develop innovative financing strategies to mobilise additional investments for scale-up of surgical care in LMICs. This is the first time such an analysis has been applied to the funding of surgical care. Innovative financing in global surgery is an untapped potential funding source for expanding fiscal space for health systems and financing scale-up of surgical care in LMICs.

scholarly journals Lead Exposure in Low and Middle-Income Countries: Perspectives and Lessons on Patterns, Injustices, Economics, and Politics

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. 2351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katarzyna Kordas ◽  
Julia Ravenscroft ◽  
Ying Cao ◽  
Elena V. McLean
Keyword(s):  
Lead Exposure ◽  
Environmental Control ◽  
National Level ◽  
Local Context ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Public Health Programs ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Context Specific ◽  
Vulnerable Population Groups ◽  
Low And Middle Income

Lead exposure is a legacy issue that continues to affect vulnerable population groups globally, but particularly in low and middle-income countries (LMICS). We take a multi-disciplinary approach to examine the patterns of lead exposure in these countries, discuss the underlying injustices and socio-political causes, and the economic costs that are associated with exposure. We conclude with some lessons we drew from our discussion of lead across the disciplines and advocate for a number of approaches to solving this ongoing issue. These include (i) biomonitoring that could be integrated into existing health surveys or public health programs targeting young children; (ii) greater civic engagement to push for solutions; and, (iii) environmental control policies that represent a continuum of local, context-specific to broad, national-level, and even global approaches.

scholarly journals Perioperative mortality rates in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. e000810 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua S Ng-Kamstra ◽  
Sumedha Arya ◽  
Sarah L M Greenberg ◽  
Meera Kotagal ◽  
Catherine Arsenault ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Surgical Procedures ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Surgical Care ◽  
Low Income Countries ◽  
Perioperative Mortality ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Wide Range

IntroductionThe Lancet Commission on Global Surgery proposed the perioperative mortality rate (POMR) as one of the six key indicators of the strength of a country’s surgical system. Despite its widespread use in high-income settings, few studies have described procedure-specific POMR across low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). We aimed to estimate POMR across a wide range of surgical procedures in LMICs. We also describe how POMR is defined and reported in the LMIC literature to provide recommendations for future monitoring in resource-constrained settings.MethodsWe did a systematic review of studies from LMICs published from 2009 to 2014 reporting POMR for any surgical procedure. We extracted select variables in duplicate from each included study and pooled estimates of POMR by type of procedure using random-effects meta-analysis of proportions and the Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation to stabilise variances.ResultsWe included 985 studies conducted across 83 LMICs, covering 191 types of surgical procedures performed on 1 020 869 patients. Pooled POMR ranged from less than 0.1% for appendectomy, cholecystectomy and caesarean delivery to 20%–27% for typhoid intestinal perforation, intracranial haemorrhage and operative head injury. We found no consistent associations between procedure-specific POMR and Human Development Index (HDI) or income-group apart from emergency peripartum hysterectomy POMR, which appeared higher in low-income countries. Inpatient mortality was the most commonly used definition, though only 46.2% of studies explicitly defined the time frame during which deaths accrued.ConclusionsEfforts to improve access to surgical care in LMICs should be accompanied by investment in improving the quality and safety of care. To improve the usefulness of POMR as a safety benchmark, standard reporting items should be included with any POMR estimate. Choosing a basket of procedures for which POMR is tracked may offer institutions and countries the standardisation required to meaningfully compare surgical outcomes across contexts and improve population health outcomes.

scholarly journals Double standards in healthcare innovations: the case of mosquito net mesh for hernia repair

2020 ◽  
pp. bmjinnov-2020-000535
Author(s):  
Mark Skopec ◽  
Alessandra Grillo ◽  
Alvena Kureshi ◽  
Yasser Bhatti ◽  
Matthew Harris
Keyword(s):  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Surgical Care ◽  
Biomechanical Properties ◽  
Double Standard ◽  
Healthcare Sector ◽  
Mosquito Net ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries

With over two decades of evidence available including from randomised clinical trials, we explore whether the use of low-cost mosquito net mesh for inguinal hernia repair, common practice only in low-income and middle-income countries, represents a double standard in surgical care. We explore the clinical evidence, biomechanical properties and sterilisation requirements for mosquito net mesh for hernia repair and discuss the rationale for its use routinely in all settings, including in high-income settings. Considering that mosquito net mesh is as effective and safe as commercial mesh, and also with features that more closely resemble normal abdominal wall tissue, there is a strong case for its use in all settings, not just low-income and middle-income countries. In the healthcare sector specifically, either innovations should be acceptable for all contexts, or none at all. If such a double standard exists and worse, persists, it raises serious questions about the ethics of promoting healthcare innovations in some but not all contexts in terms of risks to health outcomes, equitable access, and barriers to learning.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document