scholarly journals Long-Term Costs of Ischemic Stroke and Major Bleeding Events among Medicare Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine J. Mercaldi ◽  
Kimberly Siu ◽  
Stephen D. Sander ◽  
David R. Walker ◽  
You Wu ◽  
...  

Purpose. Acute healthcare utilization of stroke and bleeding has been previously examined among patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). The long-term cost of such outcomes over several years is not well understood.Methods. Using 1999–2009 Medicare medical and enrollment data, we identified incident NVAF patients without history of stroke or bleeding. Patients were followed from the first occurrence of ischemic stroke, major bleeding, or intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) resulting in hospitalization. Those with events were matched with 1–5 NVAF patients without events. Total incremental costs of events were calculated as the difference between costs for patients with events and matched controls for up to 3 years.Results. Among the 25,465 patients who experienced events, 94.5% were successfully matched. In the first year after event, average incremental costs were $32,900 for ischemic stroke, $23,414 for major bleeding, and $47,640 for ICH. At 3 years after these events, costs remained elevated by $3,156–$5,400 per annum.Conclusion. While the costs of stroke and bleeding among patients with NVAF are most dramatic in the first year, utilization remained elevated at 3 years. Cost consequences extend beyond the initial year after these events and should be accounted for when assessing the cost-effectiveness of treatment regimens for stroke prevention.

Author(s):  
Matthew R Weir ◽  
Lloyd Haskell ◽  
Jeffrey S Berger ◽  
Veronica Ashton ◽  
François Laliberté ◽  
...  

Introduction: Renal functional impairment is linked to an increased risk of thromboembolic and bleeding events in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) treated with warfarin and rivaroxaban. Anticoagulants such as warfarin and rivaroxaban are often recommended to reduce the risk of stroke in NVAF patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare thromboembolic and bleeding event rates for warfarin and rivaroxaban patients stratified by presence of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Methods: Claims from the IMS Health Real-World Data Adjudicated Claims database from 05/2011-6/2015 were analyzed. Adult patients with NVAF who had ≥6 months of baseline data prior to the first dispensing of warfarin or rivaroxaban after 11/2011 were included. Patients were followed until the end of index therapy or end of data availability/insurance coverage. Outcomes were stratified by presence of CKD for ischemic stroke, major bleeding, and a composite measure of thromboembolic events (ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction (MI) or venous thromboembolism (VTE)) and analyzed using hazard ratios (HRs). Adjustments for confounding were made with inverse probability of treatment weights (IPTW). Results: The analysis included 39,872 rivaroxaban (9.0% [3,572 of 39,872] with CKD) and 48,637 warfarin patients (16.9% [8,230 of 48,637] with CKD). As expected, thromboembolic and bleeding events were more common in patients with CKD than those without CKD. Rivaroxaban patients had significantly lower risk of ischemic stroke, both in the overall population (HR = 0.79 [0.68-0.90], p=0.0008) and for those with CKD (HR = 0.55 [0.40-0.77], p=0.0004). A composite of thromboembolic events were lower with rivaroxaban irrespective of CKD. Major bleeding rates were comparable across all groups. Table 1 reports incidence rates and HRs stratified by presence of CKD. Conclusions: This study suggests that, in an adult population with NVAF, rivaroxaban-treated patients had fewer ischemic strokes across all patients, including patients with renal impairment. Rivaroxaban-treated patients also had significantly better outcomes for the composite (VTE, MI, or stroke) measure across all groups. Bleeding rates were comparable across all groups.


2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Karl August Brensing ◽  
Peter Raab ◽  
Peter Heidkamp ◽  
Uwe Pöge

Abstract Background and Aims Hemodialysis (HD) patients (Pts) with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) on anti-vitamin-K oral anticoagulation (VK-OAC) are at high risk for cardio-vascular events, major bleeding and rapid vascular/valvular calcification. Thus, current VK-OAC is debated since prospective studies are missing, but all direct oral anticoagulation drugs (DOACs) are not labeled for ESRD. We studied the clinical feasibility of long-term DOAC treatment in HD-pts using individual dosing by regular anticoagulant drug-effect monitoring. Method We analysed 9 HD-patients with AF (median age 77 yrs; range=R: 59-86; 7 Male) on DOAC therapy for at least 6 months (n=1 rivaroxaban=Riva, n=8 apixaban=Apix) initiated by cardiologist with patients informed consent with lower dose as in CKD-4 under regular (weekly) anti-Xa drug-effect monitoring (prior HD) using available routine laboratory test validated for low-molecular heparin: Target trough range (12-24h after drug) was 0.1-1.0 U/ml (=prophylactic to therapeutic anti-Xa levels; test range <0.1, >1.6 U/ml). Bleeding caused drug stop/reduction until anti-Xa control. Results Median study time was 14 months (R: 6-24). We analysed 310 anti-Xa levels on Apix and 83 levels on Riva. After dose adjustment finally 2 Apix-Pts (22%) received full CKD-4 dose (35 mg/week=wk) and 7 patients (78%) had median dose of 10 mg/wk (10-27 mg; 6x Apix) or 40 mg/wk Riva, i.e. 29% and 38% of usual CKD-4 dose. Two Pts with higher dose had clinical reasons: short-bowl-syndrome (less resorption) or high grade (3-4) left atrial sludge (therapeutic goal). Overall, median anti-Xa level was 0.47 U/ml (R: <0.1->1.6) and 80% were in center-accepted targets: 0.1-1.2 U/ml. Lower dose Pts had higher in-target-rate (83%) than the 2 high dose Pts (70%) by more exceeding the upper limit. During our study we saw no cerebral/systemic thrombo-embolic event or major bleeding, but 2 pts had epistaxis (need out-patient intervention), 1x persistent macrohematuria (need catheterization) and 3 pts. had multiple subcutaneous hematoma, none needed event-related transfusion. We saw two non-cardiovascular deaths (22%; 2/9): 1x pneumonic sepsis, 1x advanced cancer. Conclusion We provide new clinical feasibility data on long-term DOACs therapy in HD-patients. Since DOACs are not labelled for ESRD we recommend strict indication plus regular anti-Xa drug-effect monitoring for adequate individual dosing. Our data support initial doses as for CKD-4 but applied only on HD-free days (4x/wk; =57% of usual) and adjustment in steady-state (1-2 wks): final individual doses were increased up to 100% in some patients, but mostly were reduced to 30-40% of usual CKD-4 doses. Overall, this individual dosing approach for DOACs provided adequate anti-Xa levels to prevent thrombo-embolic as well as major bleeding events. This initial data need to be confirmed in larger studies to improve evidence-based management of HD-patients with nonvalvular AF.


2004 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 265-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Konstantinos N. Vemmos ◽  
Georgios Tsivgoulis ◽  
Konstantinos Spengos ◽  
Efstathios Manios ◽  
Savas Toumanidis ◽  
...  

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 883-891 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tadataka Mizoguchi ◽  
Kanta Tanaka ◽  
Kazunori Toyoda ◽  
Sohei Yoshimura ◽  
Ryo Itabashi ◽  
...  

Background and Purpose— We aimed to compare outcomes of ischemic stroke patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation between earlier and later initiation of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) after stroke onset. Methods— From data for 1192 nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack in a prospective, multicenter, observational study, patients who started DOACs during acute hospitalization were included and divided into 2 groups according to a median day of DOAC initiation after onset. Outcomes included stroke or systemic embolism, major bleeding, and death at 3 months, as well as those at 2 years. Results— DOACs were initiated during acute hospitalization in 499 patients in median 4 (interquartile range, 2–7) days after onset. Thus, 223 patients (median age, 74 [interquartile range, 68–81] years; 78 women) were assigned to the early group (≤3 days) and 276 patients (median age, 75 [interquartile range, 69–82] years; 101 women) to the late (≥4 days) group. The early group had lower baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score and smaller infarcts than the late group. The rate at which DOAC administration persisted at 2 years was 85.2% overall, excluding patients who died or were lost to follow-up. Multivariable Cox shared frailty models showed comparable hazards between the groups at 2 years for stroke or systemic embolism (hazard ratio, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.47–1.57]), major bleeding (hazard ratio, 1.39 [95% CI, 0.42–4.60]), and death (hazard ratio, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.28–1.33]). Outcome risks at 3 months also did not significantly differ between the groups. Conclusions— Risks for events including stroke or systemic embolism, major bleeding, and death were comparable whether DOACs were started within 3 days or from 4 days or more after the onset of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation–associated ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. Registration— URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01581502.


Stroke ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shoji Arihiro ◽  
Kenichi Todo ◽  
Masatoshi Koga ◽  
Hiroshi Yamagami ◽  
Tadashi Terasaki ◽  
...  

Backgound and Purpose: Recently, three non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) became available for patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in Japan. We aimed to determine 3-month outcomes in ischemic stroke/TIA patients receiving NOACs or warfarin from a multicenter prospective registry (SAMURAI-NVAF registry, NCT01581502). Methods: Among 1,191 acute ischemic stroke /TIA patients enrolled between September 2011 and March 2014, we studied 916 patients (389 women, 77±10 y) who took oral anticoagulants (OACs) after index stroke and completed 3-month follow-up survey. Primary outcome measures were ischemic events, including recurrent stroke/TIA and thromboembolism, and major bleedings events, such as fatal bleeding and/or symptomatic bleeding in a critical area or organ according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis statement. We assessed the incidence and clinical factors associated with primary outcomes within 90 days after initiating OACs. Results: NOACs were given for 370 patients (126 women, 74±9 y; dabigatran 168, rivaroxaban 183 and apixaban 19) and warfarin for 546 (263 women, 79±10 y). NOAC users had lower scores of CHADS2 (median 3 in NOAC, 4 in warfarin, p<0.001) and HAS-BLED (3, 3, p<0.001) than warfarin users. Ischemic events occurred in 14 NOAC users (3.8%; 2 women, 76±6 y, including 8 lower dose users between two approved dose for each NOAC) and 25 warfarin users (4.6%; 13 women, 81±9 y). Of these, 13 NOAC users (3.5%) and 16 warfarin users (2.9%) developed ischemic stroke/TIA. Among NOAC users, patients with ischemic events had lower body weights (53±11 vs 60±11kg, p= 0.017), more frequently had congestive heart failure (36 vs 10%, p = 0.003) and intracardiac thrombus (27 vs 4%, p < 0.001) than those without. Major bleeding events occurred in 5 NOAC users (1.4%, all using lower dose), and 14 warfarin users (2.6%). Of these, one NOAC user (0.3%) and 4 warfarin users (0.7%) developed intracranial hemorrhage. Conclusion: The 3-month incidence of ischemic events in stroke/TIA patients with NVAF was approximately 4% in both NOAC and warfarin users. Intracranial hemorrhage was relatively infrequent in NOAC users.


2015 ◽  
Vol 114 (12) ◽  
pp. 1290-1298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janet Schnee ◽  
Kathy Fraeman ◽  
Kimberly Siu ◽  
Matthew W. Reynolds ◽  
Jenna Collins ◽  
...  

SummaryDabigatran is approved for stroke risk reduction in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Data from diverse clinical practice settings will help establish whether the risk:benefit ratio seen in clinical trials is comparable with routine clinical care. This study aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness of dabigatran and warfarin in clinical practice. We undertook a propensity score-matched (PSM) cohort study (N=12,793 per group; mean age 74) comparing treatment with dabigatran or warfarin in the US Department of Defense claims database, October 2009 to July 2013. Treatment-naïve patients with first prescription claim for dabigatran (either FDA-approved dose) or warfarin between October 2010 and July 2012 (index) and a diagnosis of NVAF during the 12 months before index date were included. Primary outcomes were stroke and major bleeding. Secondary outcomes included ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke, major gastrointestinal (GI), urogenital or other bleeding, myocardial infarction (MI) and death. Time-to-event was investigated using Kaplan-Meier survival analyses. Outcomes comparisons were made utilising Cox-proportional hazards models of PSM groups. Dabigatran users experienced fewer strokes (adjusted hazard ratio [95 % confidence intervals] 0.73 [0.55–0.97]), major intracranial (0.49 [0.30–0.79]), urogenital (0.36 [0.18–0.74]) and other (0.38 [0.22–0.66]) bleeding, MI (0.65 [0.45–0.95]) and deaths (0.64 [0.55–0.74]) than the warfarin group. Major bleeding (0.87 [0.74–1.03]) and major GI bleeding (1.13 [0.94–1.37]) was similar between groups and major lower GI bleeding events were more frequent (1.30 [1.04–1.62]) with dabigatran. In conclusion, compared with warfarin, dabigatran treatment was associated with a lower risk of stroke and most outcomes measured, but increased incidence of major lower GI bleeding.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document