scholarly journals Two-Stage Fuzzy Portfolio Selection Problem with Transaction Costs

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanju Chen ◽  
Ye Wang

This paper studies a two-period portfolio selection problem. The problem is formulated as a two-stage fuzzy portfolio selection model with transaction costs, in which the future returns of risky security are characterized by possibility distributions. The objective of the proposed model is to achieve the maximum utility in terms of the expected value and variance of the final wealth. Given the first-stage decision vector and a realization of fuzzy return, the optimal value expression of the second-stage programming problem is derived. As a result, the proposed two-stage model is equivalent to a single-stage model, and the analytical optimal solution of the two-stage model is obtained, which helps us to discuss the properties of the optimal solution. Finally, some numerical experiments are performed to demonstrate the new modeling idea and the effectiveness. The computational results provided by the proposed model show that the more risk-averse investor will invest more wealth in the risk-free security. They also show that the optimal invested amount in risky security increases as the risk-free return decreases and the optimal utility increases as the risk-free return increases, whereas the optimal utility increases as the transaction costs decrease. In most instances the utilities provided by the proposed two-stage model are larger than those provided by the single-stage model.

Author(s):  
Fusun Kucukbay ◽  
Ceyhun Araz

Investors have limited budget and they try to maximize their return with minimum risk. Therefore this study aims to deal with the portfolio selection problem. In the study two criteria are considered which are expected return, and risk. In this respect, linear physical programming (LPP) technique is applied on Bist 100 stocks to be able to find out the optimum portfolio. The analysis covers the period April 2009- March 2015. This period is divided into two; April 2009-March 2014 and April 2014 – March 2015. April 2009-March 2014 period is used as data to find an optimal solution. April 2014-March 2015 period is used to test the real performance of portfolios. The performance of the obtained portfolio is compared with that obtained from fuzzy goal programming (FGP). Then the performances of both method, LPP and FGP are compared with BIST 100 in terms of their Sharpe Indexes. The findings reveal that LPP for portfolio selection problem is a good alternative to FGP.


2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 428-443 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng Zhang ◽  
Heshan Gong ◽  
Weiting Lan

AbstractThis paper considers a multi-period fuzzy portfolio selection problem maximizing the terminal wealth imposed by risk control, in which the returns of assets are characterized by fuzzy numbers. A fuzzy absolute deviation is originally defined as the risk control of portfolio. Entropy constraints and borrowing constraints are added in the portfolio selection model. Based on the theories of possibility measures, a new multi-period portfolio optimization model with transaction costs is proposed. And then, the proposed model is transformed into a crisp nonlinear programming problem by using fuzzy programming approach. Because of the transaction costs, the multi-period portfolio selection is the dynamic optimization problem with path dependence. Through changing the cost function into a variable, the multi-period portfolio selection is approximately turned into the dynamic programming. Furthermore, the discrete approximate iteration method is designed to obtain the optimal portfolio strategy. Finally, an example is given to illustrate the behavior of the proposed model and the designed algorithm using real data from the Shanghai Stock Exchange.


Algorithms ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (8) ◽  
pp. 252
Author(s):  
Weiping Wu ◽  
Lifen Wu ◽  
Ruobing Xue ◽  
Shan Pang

This paper revisits the dynamic MV portfolio selection problem with cone constraints in continuous-time. We first reformulate our constrained MV portfolio selection model into a special constrained LQ optimal control model and develop the optimal portfolio policy of our model. In addition, we provide an alternative method to resolve this dynamic MV portfolio selection problem with cone constraints. More specifically, instead of solving the correspondent HJB equation directly, we develop the optimal solution for this problem by using the special properties of value function induced from its model structure, such as the monotonicity and convexity of value function. Finally, we provide an example to illustrate how to use our solution in real application. The illustrative example demonstrates that our dynamic MV portfolio policy dominates the static MV portfolio policy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document